
Protests in 'ghost town' where £400m ferries don't fit the harbour
The new vessels cost quadruple their original price tag, one was delivered seven years late, the other is still being built, and both are too big to fit the main harbour for their daily journeys to and from the Isle of Arran.
But in this latest chapter of the scandal, the unbelievable is very much part of the script. And, as Sky News has been hearing, the consequences are brutal.
"It is completely and utterly nuts," one exasperated campaigner exclaims as we stand overlooking the deserted Ardrossan Harbour on Scotland's mainland.
Ardrossan, on the Ayrshire coast, has been the main port for the ferry service to and from Arran for decades. It is the quickest, most efficient route.
But the 30-year-old ferry serving the islands for generations is failing and two new bespoke-designed ones were ordered, with them due to enter service from 2017.
The original £100m cost ballooned to £400m, the shipyard was bought by taxpayers amid financial crisis, one vessel finally started carrying passengers in January 2025 while the other is still being built.
And to add insult to injury, both are too big for Ardrossan Harbour's jetty to cope with and require an £80m upgrade.
In the meantime, services are being diverted along the coast to Troon.
Protest as tensions rise in 'ghost town'
Ardrossan was promised it would remain the primary port for connectivity to Arran. But now the community is in limbo and is fearing for its future.
Christine Cowie, from Save Ardrossan Harbour, told Sky News: "It is completely and utterly nuts.
"Why anybody would commission a ferry which doesn't fit the harbour for the route it is meant for is crazy. I cannot understand it at all.
"Ardrossan is like an extension of Arran. A lot of people come here to the dentist and use other businesses they don't have on the island which are losing money since the ferries have gone away."
A botched design process, mismanagement and a string of costly blunders have given the project the label of one of the biggest procurement disasters in the history of Scottish devolution.
People from Arran are joining Ardrossan campaigners on the mainland for a protest on Saturday. Hundreds are expected to gather as tensions boil over.
The group's chairwoman Frances Gilmour said Ardrossan has become a "ghost town".
She said: "It is so quiet. It is spooky. It's frankly a disgrace. Businesses are suffering.
"Economically, this is the route. This is the economic route. We have the infrastructure. We just need the berths fixed."
The 33-year-old MV Caledonian Isles, which has been away over the winter for extensive repairs, is expected to return to Ardrossan next month. But locals question how reliable and sustainable that vessel is.
On the edge of the once bustling harbour carpark is the Bute MOT garage.
Manager Scott Revans says they rely on customers from Arran previously hopping off the ferry and leaving their car for repairs at their centre.
He told Sky News: "The harbour is a ghost town. We'd get the passing trade doing whatever customers need from batteries to punctures. It has had an impact on us."
Could taxpayers pick up the bill?
Ardrossan Harbour is owned by private company Peel Ports.
The Scottish government is currently exploring buying the port, but the talks are a secret, with campaigners feeling left in the dark.
No one involved in the discussions would answer questions from Sky News about when they expect to alert communities to the next steps.
A spokesman for the Scottish government agency Transport Scotland said: "We absolutely understand people and communities' views in favour of retaining Ardrossan as the mainland port and remain committed to ensuring the Arran ferry service is fit for the future.
"The Scottish government has instructed officials… to explore options on purchasing Ardrossan Port.
"We will of course update parliament once there is progress and an outcome to report, however, it would be inappropriate to get in the way of these complex and sensitive discussions."
Jim McSporran, port director at Peel Ports Clydeport, said: "Peel Ports Group welcomes the Scottish government's statement that it intends to explore the potential purchase of Ardrossan Harbour.
"Regardless of the outcome of this process, our willingness to invest in the harbour remains steadfast. We take comfort that the port continues to operate this lifeline route and that it remains the port of choice for the people and businesses of Arran and Ardrossan."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Outrageous! Fury at threat to increase rail fares by 5.5%
A potential 5.5 per cent rise in England's train fares next year has been described by public transport groups as 'outrageous'. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6 per cent hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5 per cent, which means fares could jump by 5.5 per cent. Bruce Williamson of pressure group Railfuture said 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He added: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and on to our congested road network, which is in no one's interest.' Mr Williamson said that he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of the lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71 per cent of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper.' Mr Plowden added that Great British Railways – an upcoming public sector body that will oversee the UK's train operations – 'must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable' because 'public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise'. About 45 per cent of fares on the country's railways are regulated by either the Westminster Parliament or the Scottish and Welsh governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. A DfT spokesman said: 'The Transport Secretary [Heidi Alexander] has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Fire chiefs ‘squander' £500,000 on ‘virtue signalling'
Fire chiefs have been accused of 'squandering' public money on 'virtue-signalling exercises' after it emerged that Scottish Fire and Rescue has spent almost £500,000 on salaries for diversity and inclusion roles in the past three years. This outlay comes despite significant operational challenges for the service, including the potential closure of fire stations and crumbling infrastructure. The figures were obtained through a freedom of information request by the Scottish Conservatives. • 'Unsafe' concrete found in fire and police stations across Scotland The audit shows that £458,121 was allocated to salaries for diversity-related roles since 2023. Further expenditures included £8,937 for membership of the Diversity Champion scheme with the charity Stonewall and £6,000 for a celebratory event for Scottish women in the fire service, for a total of £484,888 since 2023. The Scottish fire service has had its annual budget cut by £57 million in real terms over the past decade, and further demands for cost reductions have led to proposals to close up to 13 fire stations across the country. Additionally, a number of fire stations are in disrepair, with almost half of the service's 356 stations categorised as being in 'poor' or 'bad' condition. A recent report revealed that 18 Scottish fire stations do not have running water, forcing firefighters to rely on wet wipes for personal hygiene and to clean equipment. The fleet of fire engines is also deteriorating, with almost three quarters of the vehicles being more than a decade old. Sharon Dowey, the Scottish Conservative MSP and shadow community safety minister, condemned the spending, telling The Mail on Sunday that the service 'can ill-afford to be shelling out on woke DEI [diversity, equity and inclusion] jobs and virtue-signalling exercises'. She urged SNP ministers to 'ensure that crucial resources are being used appropriately rather than being squandered in this vein'. Jon Henderson, the director of prevention at the Scottish fire service, defended the spending, stating that 'commitment to equality, diversity and inclusion is an integral part of our working culture'. He explained that diversity-related spending and capital budgets for infrastructure were funded through different sources and could not be directly compared. Henderson acknowledged the 'insurmountable capital backlog of more than £800 million' needed for repairs but maintained that the service is committed to advancing both its diversity goals and its operational needs simultaneously, saying it was 'not about prioritising one area over the other'.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Now Salmond's widow takes on his legal battle with ministers over sex probe
Alex Salmond 's widow is to pick up her late husband's £3million compensation claim that he raised against SNP ministers. Moira Salmond is pursuing the legal action started almost two years ago over a flawed sexual misconduct investigation by the Scottish Government. The case concerns possible wrongdoing by officials while Nicola Sturgeon was First Minister. Reporting the development, the Sunday Mail said the reclusive 88-year-old had been galvanised by attacks on Mr Salmond in Ms Sturgeon's memoirs, Frankly. A family friend said Mrs Salmond was 'upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book' with 'ridiculous and inaccurate' allegations. 'It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure the full truth comes out and Alex's name is cleared,' they told the paper. Now executor of Mr Salmond's estate, his widow has assembled a legal team including a KC and two junior counsel in readiness for a court battle. The friend added: 'Her case against the government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. 'Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him.' Ms Sturgeon's book includes disputed claims Mr Salmond had 'consensual affairs', opposed gay marriage and failed to read the 650-page independence white paper. The MSP also denied there had been any 'conspiracy' to ruin Mr Salmond's reputation – a claim the former Alba Party leader maintained until his death at the age of 69 last October. Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor 'would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him'. She also claimed he 'impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy – government, police, Crown Office', adding: 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all.' Ms Sturgeon and Mr Salmond fell out spectacularly in 2018 after it emerged her government had investigated misconduct complaints made against him by two female civil servants. Mr Salmond had the probe struck down at the Court of Session within months as unfair, unlawful and 'tainted by apparent bias', and was awarded £512,000 in legal costs. He was later cleared of 13 sexual assault charges at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020. He launched the Alba Party as a rival to the SNP a year later. The former First Minister, who admitted he could have behaved better towards women on occasions, had always denied any criminality. He sued the Scottish Government in November 2023 alleging there had been misfeasance – a knowing abuse of power to harm others – by various civil servants under Ms Sturgeon and sought damages of around £3million. Promising a 'day of reckoning', he said at the time: 'Not one person has been held accountable. With this court action that evasion of responsibility ends.' In a Court of Session hearing last August, Mr Salmond's lawyer said the police were probing whether one senior civil servant 'gave a false statement under oath' to a Holyrood inquiry that was probing how the sexual harassment claims were handled. The action was frozen when Mr Salmond suffered a fatal heart attack in North Macedonia. But Mrs Salmond's legal team is now reactivating proceedings. A Scottish Tory spokesman said: 'It's hardly surprising Moira Salmond is deeply disappointed that her previous calls for privacy to grieve have been ignored by Nicola Sturgeon.' Ms Sturgeon's spokesman declined to comment. The Scottish Government said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on live litigation.'