Ghana donates 40-tonne food aid to Palestine
Mahama said the items, mostly Ghana-made cocoa-based food products, are to alleviate the hunger of the people of Palestine.
"This donation emphasizes Ghana's commitment to global peace and compassion," the president said, adding that cocoa, as one of Ghana's most valuable natural resources, represents resilience, generosity, and economic livelihood for millions of Ghanaian farmers.
"Ghana supports a peaceful, negotiated two-state solution between Israel and Palestine, in line with international law and United Nations resolutions," Mahama stressed.
Palestinian Ambassador to Ghana Abdalfatah Ahmed Khalil Alsattari expressed appreciation to the president and people of Ghana for the kind gesture.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sinar Daily
2 hours ago
- Sinar Daily
Gaza's Airdrop Ordeal: Humanitarian Aid or a Squid Game Show?
THINK of the infamous glass bridge scene in Squid Game: a line of desperate contestants, suspended high above the ground, forced to choose between panels of glass - one tempered, the other a death trap. Each step is a gamble. Behind them, time is ticking; ahead, only fear. Below, death awaits. Now shift that image to Gaza. Barefoot children, limping fathers and hollow-eyed mothers race beneath parachuting aid packages in an open-air prison. The skies rain not salvation, but risk - boxes that might fall safely or crash onto a crowd. Each run is a gamble. There is no courage here, only desperation. No winners, only survivors or casualties. The world watches - entertained, horrified or indifferent. But this is no game. Aid packages falling from the sky over Gaza - parachutes drifting in cinematic slow motion, filmed from military aircraft and broadcast with dramatic flair - might seem like a gesture of compassion. But the reality is far darker. This is not humanitarianism - it's a performance. And for Palestinians, it's beginning to feel like a deadly game show. This handout photo taken over Gaza and released on August 1, 2025 by the Spanish Ministry of Defence shows the release of humanitarian aid from a Spanish Air Force Airbus A400M Atlas airplane over Gaza. (Photo by HANDOUT / Spain Defence Ministry / AFP) On July 27 this year, Israeli aircraft began dropping aid into northern Gaza after announcing limited daily pauses in its offensive. But almost immediately, the truth broke through the façade: the airdrops injured several Palestinians, according to Al Jazeera. Crates fell in chaotic fashion, endangering the very people they were supposedly meant to help. The image of people sprinting across bombed-out streets, risking injury or death just to grab a bag of rice, is chilling. It resembles something out of Squid Game, where survival becomes sport, and the powerless must scramble for basic needs under the watchful eye of the powerful. Dangerous, Chaotic, and Deeply Insufficient Each airdrop delivers only a symbolic fraction of what is actually needed. Gaza is home to over two million people. Yet scattered pallets, with no distribution system, are expected to feed entire communities. Worse still, aid packages often land in dangerous zones, the sea or inaccessible areas. Several Palestinians have died trying to retrieve them. This is not aid. This is a deadly lottery. The weakest lose. The desperate suffer. And the powerful film it. Nine-year-old malnourished Palestinian girl Mariam Dawwas is carried by her mother in the Rimal neighbourhood in Gaza City on August 2, 2025. The World Health Organisation warned on July 27 that malnutrition was reaching "alarming levels" in Gaza. (Photo by Omar AL-QATTAA / AFP) Israel Prefers Airdrops - But Why? In a stunning moment of irony, Israel publicly announced that it would allow foreign governments to airdrop aid into Gaza. Think about that: the same state that bombs aid convoys and blocks trucks at land crossings is now saying, 'Go ahead - toss food from the air.' Why approve airlifts but restrict trucks? Because airdropping aid allows Israel to control the narrative. It gets to appear cooperative, while continuing to restrict the kind of aid that actually reaches people effectively. Allowing airdrops is a way to avoid allowing real access. It creates an illusion of generosity, while avoiding pressure to lift the siege, stop the bombing or allow UN convoys through. It's not a humanitarian breakthrough - it's a carefully calculated performance. Airdrops Are Political Theatre As shown in viral social media critiques like this one, airdrops serve more as PR (public relations) tools than real relief efforts. The visuals - parachutes over war-torn neighbourhoods - make headlines. But the deeper truth is hidden: the same governments staging these drops are often the ones supplying weapons, blocking ceasefire resolutions or criminalising pro-Palestinian advocacy. You can't bomb a population and expect applause for dropping them snacks. Airdrops sanitise brutality - making it easier for the global public to consume images of 'help' instead of confronting the real images of occupation, starvation and slaughter. TOPSHOT - French military personnel load an aircraft with humanitarian aid in Jordan, before an airdropping operation over the Gaza Strip on August 2, 2025. (Photo by Ahmad GHARABLI / AFP) Airdrops Dehumanise Palestinians Palestinians are not props in an action film. They are not waiting for Hollywood-style rescues from the sky. They are a people - with agency, rights and dignity, being deliberately starved, bombed and cut off from the world. Reducing them to aerial aid recipients strips them of that humanity. It shifts the narrative from one of occupation, apartheid and genocide to one of vague 'tragedy,' as if this were a natural disaster rather than a deliberate act. These stunts reduce Palestinians to figures in a crisis simulation. They are not contestants in a survival show. They are a people enduring displacement, starvation and bombardment. Their dignity is stripped away when they are forced to chase parachutes for food while the world claps from a distance. Humanitarian aid should empower - not humiliate. But these airdrops do the opposite. They turn survival into spectacle, while world powers refuse to address the root cause: a brutal siege and a military campaign that has devastated Gaza's civilian population. Gaza Needs Ceasefire - Not Cameras If the international community is serious about saving lives, it must demand: An immediate and lasting ceasefire Fully opened land crossings for medical and food aid Unimpeded humanitarian access led by neutral agencies Accountability for war crimes And above all, justice for Palestinians, not photo ops Until that happens, these airdrops remain what they truly are: A PR stunt for the complicit and an insult to the oppressed. In Gaza, aid should fall through borders - not from the sky. And certainly not like it's a scene out of a Squid Game show. Revda Selver is Friends of Palestine Public Relation and Media Executive. The views expressed in this article are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Sinar Daily.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Hiroshima atomic bombing memorial draws record global attendance in 2025
HIROSHIMA: A record 120 countries and regions, including Belarus, Taiwan, and Palestinian representatives, will attend the 80th anniversary commemoration of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima this week. The United States dropped the first nuclear weapon on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, killing approximately 140,000 people, followed by a second bombing in Nagasaki three days later that claimed 74,000 lives. Hiroshima officials confirmed the unprecedented attendance figures, noting the inclusion of Taiwan and Palestine for the first time. This follows a change in protocol where the city notified all nations and regions about the event rather than issuing selective invitations. 'This allowed us to approach economies Japan doesn't officially recognise as countries,' a city representative explained. Notably absent are nuclear powers Russia, China, and Pakistan. In Nagasaki, 101 countries and regions have provisionally registered to attend their August 9 memorial, including Russia for the first time since its 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Last year's Nagasaki ceremony made headlines when Israel's ambassador was excluded, prompting a boycott by the then-US envoy to Japan. City officials maintained the decision was a safety precaution amid Gaza conflict tensions, stating, 'We wanted attendees to witness the catastrophic reality of nuclear weapons.' The dual anniversaries occur days before Japan's August 15 surrender anniversary in World War II. A Nagasaki official emphasized the ceremonies' purpose: 'These events transcend politics to show what humanity must never repeat.' - AFP
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump's tariff, trade deals come under fire from experts at home, abroad
NEW YORK: United States (US) President Donald Trump's latest round of sweeping tariff measures and his handling of recent trade negotiations have drawn strong criticism from experts both domestically and internationally, reported Xinhua. Trump has not only signed an executive order to further revise tariff rates for 69 trading partners, but also announced a few high-profile trade deals that critics dismissed as "exaggerated, wrong, and false." "Whatever progress that's ultimately achieved as part of these new trade deals and duty rates will come at the steep price of significant US tariff increases and the erosion of trust with America's key partners," said Jake Colvin, head of the National Foreign Trade Council. "Institutionalising the highest US duties since the Great Depression, coupled with ongoing uncertainty, is a recipe for making American businesses less competitive globally and consumers worse off while harming relationships with close geopolitical allies and trading partners," Colvin was quoted in a recent Wall Street Journal report. "As of today, US tariff rates are at levels not seen in a century, which will result in hundreds of billions of dollars in new taxes paid mainly by American companies and consumers," said Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics and trade at the Cato Institute. Trade policy remains uncertain, and the US tariff system has gone from simple and transparent to an impenetrable labyrinth of new requirements that will prove particularly costly for smaller American businesses that can't afford either pricey lawyers and accountants or high tariff bills and fines for noncompliance, The Washington Post reported Friday, quoting Lincicome. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said that the effective US tariff rate, which started this year at just over 2 per cent, looks to settle somewhere between 15 per cent and 20 per cent. "The economic damage from the tariffs is mounting... The damage will soon be obvious as inflation ramps up and businesses conclude that the higher tariffs are here to stay," said Zandi in The Washington Post piece. "While economists don't completely agree, they generally do acknowledge that broad-based tariffs, such as those being implemented, are a bad idea," said Zandi. "Uncertainty is coming down with more trade deals, but tariffs may settle higher than expected, posing risks to our forecasts," said a Friday research note by Claudio Irigoyen and Antonio Gabriel, global economists with Bank of America Global Research. The higher-than-expected tariffs pose upside risks to inflation forecasts and downside risks to growth forecasts, according to the research note. "It's a very high tariff wall," said Deborah Elms, head of trade policy of the Hinrich Foundation. "The cost is going to be significantly higher for American companies and American consumers who will surely respond by buying less," Elms was quoted as saying in a Friday Bloomberg report. "While we haven't returned entirely to a 'law of the jungle' system, we have taken several huge strides back in that direction," said Stephen Olson, visiting senior fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute and a former US trade negotiator, in a Friday CNBC report. "We've seen numerous changes in the US tariff regime to date, and there could always be more. Companies will be wary of investing and setting plans while uncertainty remains," said Jonathan Kearns, chief economist with Australian investment management firm Challenger Ltd. Kearns, a former high-ranking official with the Reserve Bank of Australia, expected greater pass-through to the US consumer in the months ahead, according to the Bloomberg report.
