Tories hit out at ‘hypocrite' Miliband as his department hires a photographer
Ed Miliband's department is hiring a taxpayer-funded 'vanity photographer', leading to accusations of hypocrisy from the Tories.
The Energy Secretary's department is recruiting a part-time photographer to cover ministerial visits and shoot official portraits, on a pay and pension package worth around £50,000 a year on a pro-rata basis.
But the Conservatives hit out at 'uber-hypocrite' Mr Miliband, who as Labour leader criticised then-prime minister Lord David Cameron for having a personal photographer in 2010.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) is recruiting for a role to cover the whole of its work, rather than as a personal photographer for Mr Miliband.
The part-time photographer replaces a full-time post, saving on salary costs.
But shadow paymaster general Richard Holden condemned Mr Miliband, claiming he wants the photographer to sharpen his public image.
'It wasn't that long ago that Red Ed was attacking David Cameron for having an official photographer,' he said.
'Now, with photos of him and a bacon sandwich and the 'Ed Stone' seared in the public mind, you can see why uber-hypocrite Ed 'two kitchens' Miliband has hypocritically hired a taxpayer-funded vanity photographer to try and avoid such snaps in the future.'
Mr Miliband's criticism of Lord Cameron focused on his appointment of Andrew Parsons in a Civil Service role, having previously been the then-Tory leader's personal photographer.
Lord Cameron U-turned on the appointment, but the photographer subsequently became a special adviser in No 10 under Boris Johnson.
The DESNZ role advertises a full-time salary of £38,295 along with £11,094 towards a Civil Service pension, although the starting salary could be as high as £41,355 and includes a £5,050 communications allowance.
The job advert suggests photographers might 'accompany a minister to a hydrogen facility, take official portraits at an international event, and refresh our stock imagery with photos from the offshore wind sector'.
A DESNZ spokesman said: 'This is not a personal photographer for Ed Miliband. The department inherited a full-time photographer from the Business department in 2023.
'The person in that role has now left the department, so we are recruiting for a replacement who will cover all of the ministerial team and the department's work, as well as providing photography for our events and campaigns.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision
Plans for a Chinese super-embassy in central London have become a 'walk of shame' for the Government, a former leader of the Conservative Party has said. Sir Iain Duncan Smith said response by the Government to the proposed embassy near the the capital's financial district had become 'Project Kowtow', as he criticised the Government for 'one denial after another (and) one betrayal after another'. Sir Iain referred to the warnings reportedly issued by the White House and Dutch government to Downing Street over the plans, which is set to be scrutinised by ministers. The worries stem from the close proximity of the proposed embassy's Royal Mint Court site to data centres and communication cables. The Sunday Times said the US was 'deeply concerned' about the plans, quoting a senior US official. In response, planning minister Matthew Pennycook said he could not give a full response as the matter was still to come before the department for a decision, and any verdict could be challenged by the courts. Sir Iain said: 'Beijing has a recent history of cutting cables and confirmed infrastructure hacks, including embedding malware capable of disabling all that infrastructure. 'Minister Peter Kyle yesterday on television said surprisingly that this was in the planning process and could be managed. Will the minister correct this record? The planning inquiry has concluded, no changes can be made to the Chinese planning application at all. 'I'll remind him the application contains nothing about cabling. Indeed to the inquiry, the Chinese have rejected only two requests, which he referred to actually, made by the Government in the letter from the foreign and home secretaries, despite ministers regularly saying that this letter, and I quote, should give those concerned, 'comfort'.' The Conservative MP said rerouting the cables would cost millions of pounds, and asked Mr Pennycook why the Government had denied the existence of cables until the White House confirmed it. He asked Mr Pennycook to deny reports by Chinese state media, saying the UK had given the Chinese assurances that it would allow a development 'no matter what'. He added: 'I see this as Project Kowtow, one denial after another, one betrayal after another. No wonder our allies believe that this Chinese mega embassy is now becoming a walk of shame for the Government.' Mr Pennycook replied because of the 'quasi-judicial nature' of his role, he could not comment on details of the application. He also said it would not be 'appropriate' for him to comment on the cabling or national security issues. He said he did not 'recognise the characterisation' by the Sunday Times of the embassy being raised in talks between the UK and China on trade. 'It is important to also emphasise that only material planning considerations can be taken into account in determining this case,' he said. 'But, as I say, I cannot comment in any detail on a case and it is not yet before the department.' Tory shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake said Parliament had been treated with disdain by the Government. Mr Hollinrake said: 'Question after question, letter after letter, the Government has consistently treated Parliament with complete disregard on this matter. Stonewalling legitimate inquiries about national security, about ministerial discussions, and warnings about security bodies.' He added: 'Why won't the Government follow the examples of the US, Australian, and Irish governments which veto similar embassies that threaten their national security? 'The Government is on the verge of making a decision that will lead to huge risk, that will persist for decades. Will they change course before it is too late?' Mr Pennycook replied: 'No decision has been made on this case. No application is yet before the department.' Marie Rimmer, Labour MP for St Helens South and Whiston, said: 'China has a track record of aggressive state-backed espionage, and surely this country cannot afford to make a massive underestimation of what risk if this would go ahead?' She added: 'We cannot not say anything in this House. We must comment on what we see, and please understand that we must do so.' Meanwhile, former security minister, Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat, asked whether the Government believed the Chinese would treat a similar application in the same way. He said: 'Do you honestly believe that thr minister thinks that the Chinese would look at this proposal in the same way? 'Do we actually in this House believe that our economic security being threatened, as highlighted by the Americans and the Dutch, would go through a bureaucratic planning process with no ability to vary it because, frankly, them's the orders? 'I don't think that's the way China would do it, and it's certainly not the way we should.' Mr Pennycook replied: 'I'm very glad that we have a different and more robust planning system than the People's Republic of China.' Later in the session, Conservative MP Lincoln Jopp (Spelthorne) asked if the officer considering the case is 'cleared to receive top secret information'. Mr Pennycook replied: 'A planning inspector is assessing the case as part of a public inquiry. 'And I'm afraid, while I recognise why (Mr Jopp) has asked the question, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on national security matters.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE 'One rule for them and another for us': Ed Miliband is blasted by Brits who are being forced to object to energy plant plans near their homes AGAIN - when minister's wife did the same recently...
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband has been accused of 'sheer hypocrisy' following his wife's objection to a block of flats near their liberal north London home. Householders in Walsall, West Midlands say it is 'one rule for them and another for us' as a potentially explosive energy system is set to come to green belt near them. It comes as prominent academics have raised concerns about the 'eco-friendly' stored energy system saying it could be 'the next Grenfell', with a nearby school also expressing fears. Robert Withers, of the Beacon Action Group, has blamed the rush to Net Zero by 2050 for the development's approval in Great Barr Village at Chapel Lane. He told MailOnline: 'It's an absolute disgrace that Ed Miliband and others in the Labour government are destroying our green belt - it's a tragedy. 'People who live in this conservation area can't even put a shed in the garden. But somebody can come along and say we'll plant this unsightly very, very noisy equipment in the middle of this field - and they'll get away with it. 'These are bombs and this one would be adjacent to a school. If this thing explodes the school children would have to all be evacuated.' The Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) is earmarked for a five-acre field surrounded by ancient buildings, woodland, and rare species of bats. There are fears the UK could see explosions bigger than the one picture above that destroyed the harbour in Beirut in 2020 It would operate using batteries to store electricity which would be released when needed, and has been described as 'crucial technology for integrating renewable energy sources'. The development, set to exist for 40 years, received over 700 objections. It was rejected by the local council but then approved on appeal by the planning inspectors. Householders are now combining their efforts to put a stop to it all together as they challenge the verdict. Last month it emerged Justine Thorton, a High Court judge and wife of Mr Miliband, had written to Camden Council in relation to a five-storey building proposed near their home. She cited concerns the design was 'too tall, too bulky and to dense given the context of the surrounding houses and the wider conservation area'. Among her fellow opponents were actor Benedict Cumberbatch, with many of the campaigners citing concerns around the multiple 'noisy' air source heat pumps due to be attached to the controversial development. Responding to their objections, Jenny Hulme, another opponent to the energy storage system in Walsall said: 'We have to make do and put up with a five-acre field full of Lithium-Ion batteries and the noise, pollution, destruction of biodiversity and wildlife and the ever present thought that the batteries will explode as they have done in many cases across the world. 'Due to the topography of the land, this ticking timebomb would also be built below a 1500+ pupil, plus staff, Secondary School, utter madness and a total disregard for Health and Safety.' She concluded: 'Would the Milibands live next door to that?' Another householder, Miss H B White, said: 'It would be good to think that everyone is treated the same - not one rule for them and another for us! 'The proposed building is next to a Grade II Listed Church, a woodland which has many species of wildlife including foxes, birds, bats (12 varieties) badgers and deer. 'The local school it just above the land which if there is a problem with the BESS will cause issues for the children and staff.' Staff at the school - the Matrix Academy - have come out to speak at recent meetings against the development. It comes as Professors from Oxford University are among those to issue words of warning against the energy storage systems. An article from 2021 authored by Dr Edmund Fordham, Dr Wade Allison and Sir David Melville read: 'The race for renewable energy driven by the 2050 Net Zero target requires energy storage and this is bringing large lithium-ion batteries into our day to day lives, close to our homes and work-places, on an unprecedented scale. 'Government failure to properly understand the dangers of insulating cladding resulted in the Grenfell tragedy. Government needs to get a firm grasp of the hazards of Lithium-ion batteries before there is a another 'green' disaster.' Mr Withers, who has lived in the area for fifty years, said: 'We are expected to live in fear of this potentially explosive device for the next 40 years knowing that any day or night this could blow up, despite scientists telling us they wouldn't live within one mile of it.' The 81-year-old added the article 4 conservation area - 'quality agricultural land - was unsuitable and that the '40 years figure' was 'ridiculous' as 'once you've lost it it's gone forever'. He accused Mr Miliband and his wife of 'sheer hypocrisy'. In Merseyside in 2020, one of three battery cabins on a site caught fire while a shocking eruption also occurred in Beirut, Lebanon that same year. South Korea saw 23 battery farm fires in just two years. Meanwhile a battery fire in Illinois burned for three days and thousands of residents were evacuated. The Labour Party's deputy, Angela Rayner, is currently spearheading the Government's efforts to overhaul planning rules to build 300,000 new homes a year. And the Labour Party said it planned to designate some previously untouched greenbelt land as 'grey belt' so they could get approval for more developments. The flats' developers have relied on Labour's updated planning rules to argue extra homes are needed and that local objections should not stand in the way of houses on brownfield sites Mr Miliband previously vowed to put the 'delayers' in their place as part of his green energy agenda. And Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has also been vehement in his criticism of 'nimbys' and 'blockers' describing himself as a 'yimby' - yes in my backyard. A spokesperson for the Planning Inspectorate said: 'As the appeal is part of a legal challenge we are unable to comment further on the details of the case. 'A key principle of the planning system is that each planning application and any subsequent planning appeal will be treated on its own individual circumstances and merits, in the light of the current local plan for the area, the National Planning Policy Framework and any other specific material considerations.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Anger as 'neutral' mandarin fawns over Sturgeon ahead of £300,000 memoirs
Scotland's top civil servant has been accused of 'fawning over' Nicola Sturgeon after wishing her success with her £300,000 memoirs. Permanent Secretary Joe Griffin cheered on the former First Minister after clearing the 464-page book, titled 'Frankly', for publication. In a letter telling her no changes were required for national security reasons, he gushed: 'I wish you well with publication of the memoirs'. The Scottish Conservatives criticised the remark given Ms Sturgeon's controversies in office and civil service neutrality. Deputy party leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'Scots will wonder why someone duty bound to be neutral was fawning over Nicola Sturgeon in this way. 'There have been repeated concerns that permanent secretaries have ended up being close to their SNP bosses. 'Joe Griffin should have thought twice about using this sort of language especially when the former First Minister's divisive legacy is still being keenly felt.' Other material released by the SNP Government yesterday shows Ms Sturgeon demanded tight security to ensure there were no leaks from her book, for which she is receiving a reported advance of £300,000. The memoirs of former ministers are governed by the 50-year-old Radcliffe Rules. Politicians are free to write about their own work but must not reveal anything which could breach national security, harm the UK's international relations, or damage 'the confidential relationships between ministers or of ministers with their officials'. Ms Sturgeon, who left Bute House in March 2023 after more than eight years as First Minister, announced she was writing her memoirs in August the same year. In December 2024, the Scottish Government's most senior official wrote to her about vetting the contents. Then permanent secretary John-Paul Marks asked the Glasgow MSP to 'share the draft manuscript with my office, if possible three months ahead of publication'. In February, Ms Sturgeon told the Government she expected an 'advanced draft' in late March and demanded to know how officials would guard the contents. 'I'd be grateful for an indication of what the circulation will be with SG [Scottish Government] - I assume very limited - and what steps will be taken to ensure confidentiality,' she wrote. Mr Marks told her 'a small senior group' including the Director of Propriety and Ethics would undertake the review and provide advice. He said: 'In terms of ensuring the manuscript is held and reviewed in a secure manner, we would request that you provide my office with four hard copies. 'These will be securely held and reviewed by a named list of senior officials only. We will not hold the document in electronic format.' Publishers Pan MacMillan sent the four copies to Mr Marks by secure delivery on March 26. Two weeks later, Mr Griffin took over as Permanent Secretary and on April 24, told Ms Sturgeon, based on the advice from the review group, no changes were required. He added: 'At all times strong security arrangements have been observed with only a small number of designated senior officials having recorded access.' He concluded: 'Thank you for engaging with the process proactively, and I wish you well with publications of the memoirs. Best Wishes, Joe Griffin.' A Government spokesman said: 'The Permanent Secretary signed off his letter in a manner that was polite and appropriate.'
