Bill that would punish Americans boycotting Israel pulled from US Congress
An anti-boycott, divestment and sanctions bill scheduled for a vote on Monday has been pulled from the US Congress after severe backlash from several 'America First' Republican lawmakers and social media podcasters.
'I'm told we are no longer voting on this. It's been pulled,' Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X on Monday, in reference to the bill that particularly targets Israel.
Congressman Thomas Massie, a libertarian Republican who is critical of Israel's influence on Capitol Hill, also confirmed the bill "has been pulled from the schedule for this week'.
The bill, dubbed the International Governmental Organization (IGO) Anti-Boycott Act, would effectively criminalise boycotting Israel.
It was drafted by Republican Mike Lawler and Democrat Josh Gottheimer in January, and co-sponsored by 22 other lawmakers from the Republican and Democratic parties.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The legislation was slammed by both free speech activists and pro-Palestinian organisations, uniting various constituencies that would otherwise find themselves on opposite sides of US domestic issues.
'It is my job to defend Americans' rights to buy or boycott whomever they choose without the government harshly fining them or imprisoning them,' Greene wrote on X on Sunday ahead of the vote.
'But what I don't understand is why we are voting on a bill on behalf of other countries and not the President's executive orders that are FOR OUR COUNTRY???' She added.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair) also denounced the bill as a 'threat' to 'First Amendment free speech rights".
Trump allies say 'Mossad agents' and 'warmongers' trying to derail Iran talks Read More »
"The right to boycott is an intrinsic part of the First Amendment and a cornerstone of American democracy - from resisting British colonial rule to supporting civil rights and opposing apartheid in South Africa. That right must not be infringed,' Cair said.
Under the sweeping bill, US citizens, businesses and organisations could face civil penalties, criminal fines of up to $1m, and potentially imprisonment of up to 20 years for aligning with internationally backed calls to boycott Israel.
Progressive Democratic lawmakers opposed the bill, but for political watchers, the more interesting opposition emerged within the Republican Party and among fervent supporters of President Trump.
Charlie Kirk, an influential conservative media personality, on Sunday launched a campaign against the bill on X, saying the 'right to speak freely is the birthright of all Americans'.
Steve Bannon, the former Trump advisor whose podcast War Room has become required listening to those trying to discern Trump's America First world view, also supported Kirk and Green's remarks against the bill.
For decades, Republicans have been stalwart supporters of Israel, maintaining their vocal support even as progressive democrats became more critical.
Although the anti-boycott bill galvanised free speech advocates, the response from conservative personalities reflects a growing trend in the US to view Israel with scepticism, which has intensified since the Hamas-led 7 October 2023 attacks on southern Israel, which sparked the Israeli invasion of Gaza and a simmering Middle East war.
According to a Pew poll published in April, 53 percent of Americans now express an unfavourable opinion of Israel, up from 42 percent in March 2022.
The deep scepticism of Israel among Trump allies has been playing out in the podcast space. Last month, conservative talk show host Tucker Carlson hosted media personality Matt Walsh for a discussion where the two talked briefly about whether Israel should 'exist' as a country if it has to rely on US military support.
The shift in negative sentiment on Israel has been notable among young Republicans under 50, who are more likely to tune into podcasts like Carlson's and be motivated by free speech concerns and the disbursement of foreign aid.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US Secretary of State Rubio terminates all USAID positions abroad: Report
By the end of September, there will be no such thing as the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), The Guardian reported on Monday, because all of its overseas staff will be terminated. Many, if not most, are local hires who have depended on a USAID salary for years and sometimes decades to support their families. The Guardian attributed the revelation to a State Department cable that it had obtained. It said the chiefs of mission at embassies in more than 100 countries have been notified that a significant overhaul is coming. 'The Department of State is streamlining procedures under National Security Decision Directive 38 to abolish all USAID overseas positions,' the cable said. The State Department and Secretary of State Marco Rubio 'will assume responsibility for foreign assistance programming previously undertaken by USAID' from 15 June, it added. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In early March, Rubio said that US President Donald Trump's purge of the six-decade-old USAID was complete and that 5,200 of its 6,200 programmes had been eliminated. The remaining programmes, he said, would now be administered 'more effectively' under the State Department and in consultation with Congress. The axing of the aid agency was an initiative from the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, which aimed to save Washington billions in what it believed was unnecessary spending. Among its earliest finds was what the administration described as $50worth of condoms sent by the US "to Hamas". It was then revealed that it was a programme to prevent sexually transmitted diseases in the rural province of Gaza, Mozambique. Musk departed the administration two weeks ago. Since the Trump administration announced an immediate suspension of all foreign assistance, blocking ongoing aid programmes and freezing new funding, humanitarian workers around the world have been trying to work out exactly what this means for the millions of vulnerable people they are trying to keep alive. Middle East Eye reported on the impact of the initial USAID cuts on 1.8 million Sudanese experiencing famine. Food boxes sent by the US were rotting in warehouses because the agency no longer provided the money needed for the actual distribution. Since 1946, the Middle East and North Africa have been the biggest recipients of US financial assistance. Between April 2023 and April 2024, Congress appropriated around $9bn for the region. While most of the aid went towards military assistance, a fraction was funnelled into democracy programmes via USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy, a quasi-autonomous agency funded largely by the US Congress. MEE reported in May of this year that the Trump cuts to USAID have already impacted human rights defenders in the region who were reliant on the small grants to relocate and resettle abroad. Although modest in scope, the money provided a lifeline for exiled human rights activists.
Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
Blackstone to invest $500bln in Europe over next decade, Bloomberg reports
Blackstone plans to invest up to $500 billion in Europe over the next decade, CEO Steve Schwarzman told Bloomberg Television in an interview on Tuesday, underscoring market confidence in the region's prospects. Schwarzman said Europe represents a "major opportunity" for the world's largest alternative asset manager, which oversees assets worth over $1 trillion. There has been a surge in investor optimism about the region, driven by European governments' push to increase military spending and revive a sluggish private equity market. With U.S. President Donald Trump reshaping global alliances and trade policies, Europe is actively pursuing new avenues for economic growth, potentially creating promising investment opportunities for firms such as Blackstone. The European Union, for example, is ramping up its defense spending to revitalize a sector historically overlooked by private investors. Since 2020, the U.S. and Canada have attracted 83% of all private equity and venture capital-backed aerospace and defense investment, according to S&P. Europe is starting to change its approach, "which we think will result in higher growth rates. So this has worked out amazingly well for us," Schwarzman told Bloomberg. Schwarzman supported Trump in the U.S. presidential election last year, according to a report from Axios. He has long been viewed as an ally of the president. Trump's whiplash tariffs have, however, prompted several businesses to optimize their supply chains to reduce U.S. exposure. "The U.S. administration's tariffs - combined with any retaliatory measures from its trading partners - will deliver a supply shock to the U.S. and a demand shock to the rest of the world, including China and Europe," said Blerina Uruçi, chief U.S. economist at T. Rowe Price. ($1 = 0.8753 euros)
Dubai Eye
5 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US deploys Marines to Los Angeles as police break up fourth day of protests
The US military will temporarily deploy about 700 Marines to Los Angeles until more National Guard troops can arrive on the fourth day of street protests over US President Trump's immigration policies. This follows tensions after the US President activated the National Guard on Saturday following street protests that erupted in response to immigration raids in Southern California. It is the biggest flashpoint yet in the Trump administration's efforts to deport migrants living in the country illegally. Late on Monday police began to disperse hundreds of demonstrators who gathered outside a federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles where immigrants have been held. National Guard forces had formed a human barricade to keep people out of the building, following troops of Los Angeles police starting to push people from the scene and firing "less lethal" munitions such as gas canisters. California sued the Trump administration to block deployment of the National Guard and the Marines on Monday, arguing that it violates federal law and state sovereignty. US Marines have been deployed domestically for major disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and the September 11, 2001, attacks, but it is extremely rare for US military troops to be used for domestic policing. For now, the Trump administration was not invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, according to a US official speaking on condition of anonymity. The Pentagon confirmed on Monday that a contingent of 2,000 National Guard troops would be doubled to 4,000. President Trump also added that he felt he had no choice but to increase the level of force to prevent violence from spiraling out of control. He also supported a suggestion by his US law enforcement officer Tom Homan that California Governor Gavin Newsom should be arrested over possible obstruction of his administration's immigration enforcement measures. Democrats said President Trump's decision to deploy military force to handle the protests amounts to an abuse of presidential power, and California's lawsuit claimed it was illegal. Protests also sprang up in at least nine other US cities on Monday, including New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco, according to local US news outlets. The Trump administration has argued that Democratic President Joe Biden's administration allowed far too many immigrants to enter the country and that Democratic-run cities such as Los Angeles are improperly interfering with efforts to deport them. The US President has pledged to deport record numbers of people who are in the country illegally and to lock down the US-Mexico border, setting a goal of at least 3,000 daily arrests. The last time the military was used for direct police action under the Insurrection Act was in 1992, when the California governor at the time asked President George H.W. Bush to help respond to Los Angeles riots over the acquittal of police officers who beat Black motorist Rodney King. More than 50 people were killed in the 1992 riots, which also caused some $1 billion in damage over six days. Federal allows the president to deploy the National Guard if the nation is invaded, if there is "rebellion or danger of rebellion," or the president is "unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States."
