MP Diane Abbott suspended from Labour Party for second time over comments about racism
|
1 hr ago
LONG-STANDING MP Diane Abbott has been suspended from the Labour Party for a second time after she doubled down on comments about racism for which she had previously apologised.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: 'Diane Abbott has been administratively suspended from the Labour Party, pending an investigation. We cannot comment further while this investigation is ongoing.'
The move means the whip is automatically suspended in the House of Commons for the Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP, it is understood.
Abbott was suspended by the Labour Party in 2023 after
writing a letter to the Observer comparing racism experienced by people of colour with that seen by other groups.
She apologised for any anguish caused by the remarks, which drew criticism from Jewish and Traveller groups, and was readmitted to the party before the 2024 general election.
But in a new interview with
BBC Radio 4's Reflections programme, she said she did not look back on the incident with regret.
'No, not at all,' she told the BBC.
'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know.
'You don't know unless you stop to speak to them or you're in a meeting with them.
Advertisement
'But if you see a black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're black. They are different types of racism.'
She added: 'I just think that it's silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.'
Deputy British Prime Minister Angela Rayner was asked if she was disappointed by the comments.
'I was. There's no place for antisemitism in the Labour party, and obviously the Labour party has processes for that,' she told The Guardian.
'Diane had reflected on how she'd put that article together, and said that 'was not supposed to be the version', and now to double down and say 'Well, actually I didn't mean that. I actually meant what I originally said', I think is a real challenge.'
Abbott is the longest-serving female MP in the Commons, having entered Parliament in 1987, and holds the honorary title of Mother of the House.
Her letter to the Observer in 2023 sparked a long-running process during which she sat as an Independent MP for about a year while an internal investigation took place.
She was readmitted as a Labour MP shortly before the 2024 election.
Abbott suggested in the letter that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism.
She withdrew the remarks the same day and apologised 'for any anguish caused'.
In the newly released BBC interview, she said she was 'grateful' to be a Labour MP, but that she was sure the party leadership had been 'trying to get me out'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘Labour wants me out' – Diane Abbott suspended for second time for repeating racism claim on Jewish, Irish and Traveller communities
The Hackney North and Stoke Newington MP said the Labour leadership 'wants me out' and that her comments in a BBC interview released this week were 'factually correct'. It comes a day after Keir Starmer stripped the whip from four Labour MPs for persistent breaches of discipline. Ms Abbott, the longest-serving female MP in the Commons, lost the whip and had a lengthy stint sitting as an independent after she suggested in 2023 that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. She apologised for those remarks at the time and was eventually readmitted to the party just in time to stand as a Labour candidate in the 2024 general election. But in a BBC interview released this week, she said she did not regret the incident. 'Diane Abbott has been administratively suspended from the Labour Party, pending an investigation. We cannot comment further while this investigation is ongoing,' a Labour spokesperson said. Ms Abbott posted a clip of her BBC interview after news of her suspension emerged. She did not respond to a request for comment, but gave a statement to BBC Newsnight. 'It is obvious this Labour leadership wants me out. 'My comments in the interview with James Naughtie were factually correct, as any fair-minded person would accept,' she said. The original comments in 2023 were in a letter to The Observer newspaper, and she withdrew the remarks the same day and apologised 'for any anguish caused'. In the interview with BBC Radio 4's Reflections programme, she was asked whether she looked back on the incident with regret. 'No, not at all,' she said. 'Clearly, there must be a difference between racism which is about colour and other types of racism, because you can see a Traveller or a Jewish person walking down the street, you don't know. 'You don't know unless you stop to speak to them or you're in a meeting with them. 'But if you see a black person walking down the street, you see straight away that they're black. There are different types of racism.' She added: 'I just think that it's silly to try and claim that racism which is about skin colour is the same as other types of racism.' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner was asked if she was disappointed by the comments. 'I was. There's no place for antisemitism in the Labour Party, and obviously the Labour Party has processes for that,' she told The Guardian newspaper. 'Diane had reflected on how she'd put that article together, and said that 'was not supposed to be the version', and now to double down and say 'Well, actually I didn't mean that. I actually meant what I originally said', I think is a real challenge.' Ms Abbott entered Parliament in 1987 and holds the honorary title of Mother of the House. Her suspension comes in the same week that Keir Starmer carried out a purge of troublesome backbenchers in a bid to assert authority over the party. Rachael Maskell, who spearheaded plans to halt the Government's welfare reforms, had the whip suspended alongside Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff. Party sources said the decision to suspend the whip was taken as a result of persistent breaches of discipline rather than a single rebellion.
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Remove statute of limitations to encourage churches and orders to pay sex-abuse redress
In November 2022, when a tsunami of sexual abuse allegations swept into the public domain following the broadcast of the RTÉ radio documentary Blackrock Boys, much of the focus was on abuse in Irish schools run by some of the religious orders. However, allegations soon emerged about similar abuse in primary and secondary schools run by the Catholic and Protestant Churches. On many grounds, not least moral, they would appear to be as obliged as the State and religious orders when it comes to contributing to compensation for people abused in their schools. Traditionally, the Irish education system has been run by the churches. Currently, 88 per cent of primary schools in Ireland are Catholic, with 5.7 per cent linked to the Church of Ireland . READ MORE At second level, of 717 of 722 post-primary schools are run in association with the main churches – 338 have a Catholic ethos, 21 are Church of Ireland, 211 are multi-denominational and 147 are inter-denominational. Of the remaining five, two are Quaker-run, while Presbyterians, Methodists and Jews run one each. All schools come within the remit of the Commission of Investigation into the Handling of Child Sexual Abuse in Schools, announced by Minister for Education Helen McEntee earlier this month. Based on previous inquiries and convictions in the courts, it is known there was sexual abuse in schools other than those run by religious congregations. Yet, recent discussion around redress seems focused entirely on contributions made, or not, by religious orders, which have been found wanting. For instance, all four religious orders involved in running Magdalene laundries refused to contribute to a redress scheme for women who spent time in those institutions. Of the eight religious congregations involved in running the Mother and Baby Homes , just two have agreed to contribute to redress for survivors. Of the approximate €1.5 billion paid to survivors of residential institutions for children, about 16 per cent has come from the 18 religious congregations that ran them. According to Department of Education figures, the total adjusted offers towards redress from those orders amounted to €435.53 million, with €245.24 million realised. Even the controversial 2002 'indemnity deal " entered into by the 18 religious congregation has not been fulfilled. Two properties have yet to be transferred, with €124.94 million of the €128 million pledged under the deal realised so far. Prof Conor O'Mahony, director of the Child Law Clinic at UCC, said one possible way of encouraging the orders and the churches to contribute to a redress scheme would be to remove a statute of limitations on survivors taking legal actions against them. 'Then it would be in their interest to contribute to a redress scheme, as a way of reducing overall costs.' O'Mahony noted, however, that under Article 44 of the Constitution, the orders are entitled to hold on to their property. Where the State is concerned, and repeating what he wrote in this newspaper following publication of the scoping inquiry report last September, he said 'survivors, solicitors, the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission and the Child Law Clinic in UCC have spent a decade battling the Department of Education , seeking the full implementation of the O'Keeffe judgment, but this has yet to happen". Louise O'Keeffe was aged eight when she was abused at Dunderrow National School in Cork in 1973 by principal Leo Hickey. Complaints had been made against him but, in line with Department of Education policy then, these were directed to the local priest. Hickey remained at the school, perpetrating more than 400 counts of abuse against at least 20 victims. Following further allegations, he resigned and moved to another school, where he taught for a further 22 years until his retirement in 1995. In 1998, he pleaded guilty to 21 sample charges relating to the sexual abuse of girls under his care and was sentenced to three years in prison. O'Keeffe took legal action for damages, but the courts ruled the department was not liable because the school was under Catholic Church management, even though the State paid Hickey's salary. She appealed to the European Court of Human Rights , which in 2014 found Ireland had failed to protect O'Keeffe from Hickey while at school. It said the State, when relinquishing control of education, should have been aware of the potential risks and put in place safeguards given its obligation to protect children. By failing to put in place adequate child-protection measures until the early 1990s at primary and second level, O'Mahony said the court found 'the Irish State had a stand-alone culpability for breach of convention rights, independent of any other actor'. 'The Irish government interpreted the ruling as meaning it was only liable for damages in cases where there had been a prior complaint against an abuser,' he said. O'Mahony said that while O'Keeffe was awarded damages, it was unfortunate that the scheme was 'designed from its inception to make it almost impossible to receive compensation'. 'Only one-third of the budget of €31 million allocated to the scheme was paid out. Most of the people abused by the same teacher as Louise O'Keeffe [was] would not have qualified for payments under the scheme – which demonstrates the bizarre logic at work,' he said. 'Very simply, the 2014 O'Keeffe judgment demands that every child who experienced sexual abuse in a defective child protection framework in schools be compensated for that abuse. The Government needs to match words with action for the first time on this matter.'
Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Letters: It's time for Israel to listen to their own Holocaust scholars on what constitutes genocide
As a rebuke, the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, calls on Ireland to apologise to Israel, writing online: 'Did the Irish fall into a vat of Guinness & propose something so stupid that it would be attributed to an act of diplomatic intoxication?' Significantly, Huckabee has also stated that 'there is no such thing as a Palestinian'. In contrast to these political responses, prominent Israeli Holocaust and genocide scholars Amos Goldberg, Omer Bartov, Daniel Blatman, Raz Segal and Shmuel Lederman have all concluded that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. According to Dr Goldberg: 'Other genocide experts who have reached this determination include Martin Shaw, author of the book What is Genocide?; Melanie O'Brien, president of the International Association of Genocide Scholars; and Dirk Moses, senior editor of the Journal of Genocide Research.' When nations ignore the clear assessments of these scholars, they abandon both moral responsibility and international law. The cost of this silence is measured in human lives. Terry Hansen, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Dark times when a US ambassador is so bereft of tact on a nation's affairs The diplomatic service of the US was once renowned and admired globally, mainly staffed by professional, patriotic men and women with enormous pride in representing their nation internationally. Alas, the imbecilic statement by the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee ('Taoiseach hits back after US ambassador to Israel says Irish have 'fallen into a vat of Guinness' over Occupied Territories Bill', Irish Independent, July 17) shows clearly how absolutely bereft of tact he is. His remarks on Irish legislation might suggest he is not a fit person to serve in any capacity representing the US. As the late theologian Professor Barbara Holmes wrote: 'There are many types of darkness. There is the darkness of determined ignorance and hatred, impenetrable and smothering.' ADVERTISEMENT Declan Foley, Melbourne, Australia Catherine Connolly – a fine, honest parliamentarian – would be wasted in the Áras Now that Catherine Connolly TD has launched her bid for the presidency, political commentators are beside themselves with excitement. But given that it has been often said that 'a government is as good as its opposition', we must ask ourselves if it is politically wise to consign this standout parliamentarian to the Park. The presidency is largely a ceremonial role with minimal impact upon public policy, where the most important function is to sign whatever act of parliament is presented to them, and where they cannot address the nation or leave the country without government approval. In the Dáil as an Independent TD free from the constraints of party strategies and agendas, she has held the Government to account on many issues, from the provision of local health centres to the outrages currently being perpetrated upon Palestinians. Almost alone she called out the national antipathy generated by our government towards those who, having assessed the available evidence together with their GP, concluded that taking the Covid jab was not for them. She is admired for admitting in the Dáil that she was wrong in adopting left-wing party policy which insisted on zero-Covid before reopening society and the economy. Incidentally these are the same parties that she now needs to ensure her nomination. Perhaps most memorably before the two failed referendums last year, she was one of very few public figures to call out the absence of legislative scrutiny, disingenuous claims, and the ambiguous language associated with them. We badly need Catherine Connolly's talent and skill set in the Dáil. She is too important to be confined in the Áras enclosure. Gearoid Duffy, Lee Road, Cork Planning pitfalls revealed in report, but can a better turnaround be achieved? I note that recommendations of a report published on Wednesday afternoon last by the new Oireachtas Committee on Infrastructure have called for quicker decision-making as well as a less cumbersome planning process, and more trained construction workers. The committee will also oversee delivery of the revised National Development Plan, which is due to be revealed next week. There have been repeated complaints from industry and from utility companies about the lack of investment in areas – from transport to waste and to water treatment. In last week's report, the committee said projects of national import shouldn't depend on windfall taxes like the Apple billions. If that's the case, it leaves me wondering where they believe this money will be found. John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary Thousands of schoolbooks are dumped each year, so free scheme seems a waste The free schoolbooks scheme needs to be examined. I've just returned from the recycling centre where I deposited a large number of Junior Cert books, most of which were in excellent condition, as pupils do so much work online now. This is such a waste. Thousands of good books are sent to the bin every year. Surely this could be managed better and books could be re-used. Such a waste of taxpayers' money. Donough McGuinness, Bray, Co Wicklow EuroMillions family can toast their win with a very different kind of bread In common with the €250m EuroMillions winners, I enjoy a ham and cheese sandwich. Mind you, the big difference is now is, the 'bread' involved in our different households. Tom Gilsenan, Beaumont, Dublin Kingdom will rule and the 'Donegal boys' will be left sobbing after football final With the greatest respect to Brian McDevitt, ('Donegal boys look to be unstoppable and brought tears to my eyes on Sunday, Irish Independent, Letters, July 16), the only tears he will have at the end of the All-Ireland football final will be tears of sorrow. An Ríocht abú.
