Vall Iliev charged with smuggling body armor from China, selling it to police as American-made
CLEVELAND (WJW) — Federal authorities have charged a Stow man with smuggling body armor plates made in China, then selling them to law enforcement agencies as American-made goods.
Vall Iliev, 69, of Stow, is accused of importing body armor from the People's Republic of China, then giving it a fake trademarked label to pass it off as a domestic product.
Indiana woman accused of marrying her biological father
The scheme went on from 2017 to October 2023, according to a Wednesday news release from Carol Skutnik, acting U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio.
In May 2023, U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents at the U.S.-Canada border in Washington intercepted a truck carrying more than 200 ballistic body armor plates, concealed in pre-packaged boxes inside a large shipping container — a technique used by smugglers to evade port authorities.
The manufacturer of the plates could not be discerned, but they were marked as originating in China. The hidden boxes were pre-labeled with the address of Iliev's Stow business, Vallmar Studios, according to the release.
Authorities found the site to be a warehouse Iliev was using to process the smuggled body armor before selling it through ShotStop Ballistics, which he also owns.
The shop marketed the body armor as being 'Made in Stow, Ohio,' and as having ballistics testing certifications — of which investigators could find no actual evidence. Testing performed later at a ballistics lab found the plates failed to meet the standard that was advertised, according to the release.
Prosecutors say Iliev spent years working with a Chinese broker to find cheaply made body armor, which was shipped to Vallmar Studios. There, employees were told to put made-in-America and testing certification stickers on the goods.
Some of the stickers designated the goods as being 'Level III+' or 'Level IV+HD' certified, 'which are non-existent designations,' reads the release.
Investigators at Iliev's Stow businesses found no means of making body armor, though they did find a laser printer used to make the marketing stickers, according to the release.
Though Iliev's companies had once held a valid ballistics certification through the National Institute of Justice, the ballistic resistance of the Chinese body armor plates was never tested under the institute's standards, which 'are crucial for buyers to make informed purchases about a product's safety levels,' reads the release.
I-Team: Cleveland schools CEO dodges questions on travel costs
Iliev is charged by information with counts of conspiracy to smuggle goods into the U.S., conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit goods and conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud.
No future court dates have been set.
Anyone who purchased ballistic body armor from ShotStop from 2018 onward is urged to stop using it. They're also encouraged to send a copy of their invoice on the product to faultyarmor@hsi.dhs.gov, with the subject heading 'ShotStop Invoice,' no later than April 7.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump to sign executive order to punish those who burn American flags
President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Thursday that would direct the Justice Department to try and bring charges against people who burn the American flag, a White House official told CNN. The order is not expected to outright criminalize the act of burning the American flag, the official said, but rather directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to review cases where the flag has been set on fire and determine whether charges can be brought under existing laws. A 1989 Supreme Court ruling determined that burning the American flag in political protest is protected under the First Amendment. NewsNation first reported Trump's plans for the executive order. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Trump Demands 'Free Tina Peters,' Threatens 'Harsh Measures'
President Donald Trump repeated his demand for Tina Peters to be released from prison and threatened "harsh measures" if she remains 69, is a Colorado election clerk convicted of tampering with voting machines after the 2020 presidential election. She is serving a nine-year sentence in La Vista Correctional Facility."FREE TINA PETERS, a brave and innocent Patriot who has been tortured by Crooked Colorado politicians, including the big Mail-In Ballot supporting the governor of the State," Trump posted to Truth Social on Thursday morning."Let Tina Peters out of jail, RIGHT NOW."Trump, who said Peters "did nothing wrong" and accused the Democrats of electoral cheating, added: "She is an old woman, and very sick. If she is not released, I am going to take harsh measures!!!"Newsweek reached out to Colorado Governor Jared Polis's office for audits confirmed the accuracy of Colorado's 2020 election, finding no evidence of fraud and verifying that machine vote counts matched the markings on paper Is Tina Peters?Peters has become a symbol for election denial movements that continue to cast doubt on the integrity of U.S. elections, despite a lack of evidence and repeated court rejections of such public push for her release adds political pressure to a legal case involving serious breaches of election security. In March, he directed the Department of Justice to review Peters' case and intervene to secure her former Mesa County clerk was elected to the position in 2018 and initially focused on administrative improvements. But Peters later aligned herself with efforts to challenge the legitimacy of the 2020 election results."Tina Peters is a criminal who compromised her own voting equipment to try to prove Trump's Big Lie," Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold said in a previous statement, responding to an earlier Trump call for Peters' release."Trump is weaponizing the Department of Justice. We cannot allow him to rewrite history or use his lies to create two tiers of justice for the American people."What Did Tina Peters Do?In 2021, Peters facilitated unauthorized access to her county's voting systems, seeking to uncover evidence of alleged election fraud. This breach led to sensitive election data being leaked had allowed a county security card to be misused, granting access to the Mesa County election system to an individual connected to MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, another prominent figure in the election denial was found guilty of seven of 10 charges at a 2024 trial: Three counts of attempting to influence a public official, conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, official misconduct, violation of duty, and failure to comply with an order by the secretary of jury acquitted her on three other charges: Conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, criminal impersonation, and identity was sentenced to nine years in prison, making her the first election official in the U.S. convicted of criminal charges related to efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential 8/21/25, 9:35 a.m. ET: This article was updated with additional information.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Tariffs are a money launderer's best friend
U.S. trade policy is now synonymous with tariff policy. President Trump's latest round of higher taxes on imports went into effect on Aug. 7, and the 40 countries with which the U.S. runs a trade deficit now face a 15 percent rate. Some will be hit with even steeper rates — Brazil, for one, faces a 50 percent total tariff. While trade and tariffs have been a dominant economic policy issue since Trump took office in January, one related domain has been completely overlooked: the connection between high tariffs and trade-based money laundering, which disguises the proceeds of crime through the use of trade transactions in an attempt to legitimize their illicit origins. Some sources estimate that trade-based money laundering could account for as much as $1.6 trillion of the total amount laundered globally each year. In a study cited by the Financial Action Task Force, trade mis-invoicing accounted for roughly 80 percent of illicit financial flows in developing countries. The relationship between tariffs and money laundering represents one of the most complex challenges facing global trade and financial systems today. As tariff rates increase, so too does the incentive for both legitimate businesses and criminal organizations to engage in customs fraud and trade-based money laundering. This symbiotic relationship creates a dual threat: higher tariffs directly incentivize evasion schemes, while these same schemes provide convenient vehicles for laundering illicit proceeds from other criminal activities. Simply stated, the fundamental relationship between tariffs and financial crime is straightforward: High tariffs create greater incentives to cheat. The methods employed to evade tariffs often mirror traditional money laundering techniques, creating overlapping areas of criminal activity. These include over- and under-invoicing, whereby importers systematically misrepresent the value of goods to reduce duty payments. The difference between actual and declared values is often settled through informal channels, facilitating money laundering. Another is country-of-origin fraud, where products manufactured in high-tariff countries are falsely declared as originating from lower-tariff jurisdictions. This frequently involves forged certificates of origin and collusion with overseas suppliers. Transshipment schemes are another technique, as goods are routed through third-country intermediate ports with minor repackaging or processing to disguise their true origin. Chinese steel, aluminum and other products commonly transit through countries such as Oman, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and Vietnam before reaching U.S. markets. Finally, false description schemes are employed as a method whereby high-value items are deliberately misclassified as lower-value goods to reduce scrutiny and tariff liability. For example, electronics might be declared as 'plastic components' to avoid detection. Drug trafficking organizations from Latin America are prone to use a type of money laundering scheme known as the Black Market Peso Exchange to launder funds. Such schemes involve merchants who — wittingly or not — accept payment in illicitly derived funds, often from third parties to a trade transaction, for exports of goods. In carrying out such schemes, criminal and terrorist organizations use various goods, including precious metals and automobiles. As an example of tariff-based money laundering, in May 2023, a federal judge sentenced a co-owner of Woody Toys, Inc. to 14 months in custody for participating in a scheme that laundered approximately $3 million for Mexican and Colombian drug traffickers. The plot involved foreign toy retailers using Colombian and Mexican pesos to purchase discounted U.S. dollars from currency brokers, which were then used to buy merchandise from Woody Toys. In terms of enhanced enforcement, the Department of Justice has significantly elevated tariff evasion and trade-based money laundering as priorities. In May, Justice Department Criminal Division head Matthew Galeotti identified 'trade and customs fraud, including tariff evasion' as among the 'most urgent' threats facing the country. At the same time, the federal government has increased its deployment of technologies such as blockchain and artificial intelligence in its money laundering prevention strategies. Effectively fighting trade-based money laundering and tariff fraud requires three critical elements: ongoing collaboration between nations, adequate funding and staffing for enforcement agencies, and advanced technology that can keep pace with increasingly sophisticated criminal operations. 'The challenge is significant,' David Schwartz, president and CEO of the Financial International Business Association, told me. 'We must safeguard the global financial system's credibility without hampering the legitimate international commerce that drives our interconnected economy.' The nexus between high tariffs and money laundering demands vigilance and action to confront illicit behavior — the sooner, the better.
