
Black ribbons and assemblies to pay homage: Delhi's lawyers condemn Pahalgam terror attack
Lawyers across Delhi Wednesday condemned Tuesday's Pahalgam terror attack — the deadliest on civilians in the country since the Mumbai 26/11 shootings — in which 25 tourists and a Valley resident were killed at a meadow in the Jammu and Kashmir area.
Condemning the attack, the Delhi High Court Bar Association requested lawyers to wear black ribbons while appearing in Court.
'The Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) strongly condemns the dastardly and cowardly terrorist attack on the lives of innocent tourists at Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir and such heinous acts challenging the unity, integrity and sovereignty of our Nation,' read a DHCBA circular.
'The members are requested to wear black ribbons while appearing in the court, as a mark of protest against this terrorist attack,' the circular added.
The New Delhi Bar Association (NDBA) in Patiala House Court requested lawyers to assemble in the Central Hall at the Court complex to pay homage to the 'departed souls'. 'It is with profound sorrow that, on behalf of NDBA members, we express our deepest condolence to the families of innocent citizens who lost their lives in the 'Brutal Terrorist Massacre' in Pahalgam, Kashmir on 22.04.2025,' read the NDBA circular.
'We stand in solidarity with the victims and their families and strongly condemn the cowardly act of violence…We request the members to assemble today in the Central Hall at 04:30 pm to pay homage to the departed souls,' it added.
Sources indicated the death toll in the Pahalgam terror attack could go up since several others have sustained serious injuries.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who cut short his two-day visit to Saudi Arabia, promised that 'those behind this heinous act will be brought to justice… they will not be spared'. He was briefed about the terror attack by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who later reached Srinagar to review the situation.
A team of National Investigation Agency (NIA) officers have reached the spot, and one of the four attackers has been identified, said officials.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
PM Modi Plans A Sixer For Bihar: BJP Rallies Across 9 Divisions To Lift State Poll Trophy
Last Updated: Bihar elections: PM Narendra Modi has already addressed massive gatherings in three divisions — Madhubani, Bikramganj and Siwan In the run-up to the crucial Bihar assembly elections, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to intensify the National Democratic Alliance's (NDA) campaign across the state by holding rallies in all nine administrative divisions. The move comes as part of the Bharatiya Janata Party-led alliance's broader strategy to ensure comprehensive outreach and mobilisation in every corner of Bihar. So far, PM Modi has already addressed massive gatherings in three divisions — Madhubani, Bikramganj and Siwan. These rallies have seen an enthusiastic response from the public, with the Prime Minister laying out his government's achievements and future roadmap for Bihar. The campaign timeline is expected to stretch from July 15 to September 15, covering a critical two-month window ahead of the expected election announcement. During this period, the NDA aims to hold public meetings and rallies across all assembly constituencies in Bihar. Party leaders say this will mark the most extensive political outreach programme in the state so far, with not just the Prime Minister but also top NDA leaders from both national and state levels participating in the campaign blitz. PREP IS ON Before launching this division-wise campaign, the NDA has already conducted preparatory meetings at the district and block levels, signalling a bottom-up approach to organisation and voter engagement. By planning one rally in each of the state's nine divisions, the NDA hopes to create a ripple effect across Bihar's political landscape, ensuring that no region feels left out — and that every voter hears the alliance's message loud and clear. Although the seat distribution is yet to happen between all the alliance partners. It is learnt that the JDU will contest the maximum number of seats followed by the BJP and then followed by smaller alliances like LJP, HAM and Upendra Kushwaha's party. A lion's share of the 243 seats in the assembly is expected to go to the big two alliances. Currently, a couple of rounds of meeting have taken place at the state level of the alliance partners with the focus being on winnability as the biggest criteria to award seats to anybody. For now, the BJP has done an assessment and a survey of all the 243 seats in this state. The saffron party, which has led the alliance talks, has narrowed down on the caste combination, which will be appropriate for every seat in this state. On the other hand, Union Home Minister Amit Shah is also expected to hold smaller meetings with the ground workers in groups, the way it was done during the Maharashtra elections using his tried and tested formula of booth empowerment. With the clock ticking toward election season, the BJP-led alliance appears focused, aggressive, and determined to consolidate its position in a politically sensitive state. Top leaders of the BJP, including Modi and Shah, have already indicated that Nitish Kumar will be the face for the upcoming polls. The Election Commission, which is expected to visit the state in the next couple of weeks, has already hinted that this could also be an election which will be held in either two or three phases. The Election Commission is also considering the timing of the election which may be around festival seasons like Diwali or Chhath which is celebrated widely across the state. First Published:


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
As Trump Floats Regime Change In Iran, Lessons From US's Past In Middle East
As President Donald Trump floats the idea of "regime change" in Tehran, previous US attempts to remake the Middle East by force over the decades offer stark warnings about the possibility of a deepening involvement in the Iran-Israeli conflict. "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump posted on his social media site over the weekend. It came after the US bombed Iran's nuclear sites but before that country retaliated by firing its own missiles at a US base in Qatar. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Monday insisted that Trump, who spent years railing against "forever wars" and pushing an "America first" world view, had not committed a political about-face. "The president's posture and our military posture have not changed," she said, suggesting that a more aggressive approach might be necessary if Iran "refuses to give up their nuclear program or engage in talks." Leavitt also suggested that a new government in Iran could come about after its people stage a revolt, not necessarily requiring direct US intervention. "If they refuse to engage in diplomacy moving forward, why shouldn't the Iranian people rise up," she asked. That's a perilous path that other US administrations have taken. And it's a long way from Trump's past dismissal of " stupid, endless wars," and his scoffing at the idea of nation-building championed by his Republican predecessors -- including in Afghanistan and Iraq, where the US helped overthrow governments. Some lessons learned from previous conflicts: Initial Success Is Often Fleeting US special forces and Afghan allies drove the Taliban from power and chased Osama bin Laden into Pakistan within months of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. American tanks rolled into Baghdad weeks after the 2003 invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein in Iraq. But then, both wars went on for years. The Taliban waged a tenacious, two-decade insurgency and swept back into power as the US beat a chaotic retreat in 2021. The overthrow of Saddam plunged Iraq into chaos, with Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias battling each other and US forces. Israel has so far largely succeeded in taking out Iran's air defences and ballistic missiles, and the US strikes on three sites with missiles and 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) bunker-buster bombs have wrecked its nuclear program, Trump says. But that still potentially leaves hundreds of thousands in the military, the Revolutionary Guard and forces known as the Basij, who played a key role in quashing waves of anti-government protests in recent years. Ground Forces Are Key - But Don't Guarantee Success Airstrikes have never been enough on their own. Take, for example, Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi. His forces withstood a seven-month NATO air campaign in 2011 before rebels fighting city by city eventually cornered and killed him. There are currently no insurgent groups in Iran capable of taking on the Revolutionary Guard, and it's hard to imagine Israeli or US forces launching a ground invasion of a mountainous country of some 80 million people that is about four times as big as Iraq. A split in Iran's own security forces would furnish a ready-made insurgency, but it would also likely tip the country into civil war. There's also the question of how ordinary Iranians would respond. Protests in recent years show that many Iranians believe their government is corrupt and repressive, and would welcome its demise. But the last time a foreign power attacked Iran - the Iraqi invasion of 1980 - people rallied around the flag. At the moment, many appear to be lying low or leaving the capital. Be Wary Of Exiled Opposition Groups Some of the biggest cheerleaders for the US invasion of Iraq were exiled opposition figures, many of whom had left the country decades before. When they returned, essentially on the back of US tanks, they were marginalised by local armed groups more loyal to Iran. There are several large Iranian opposition groups based abroad. But they are not united, and it's unclear how much support any of them has inside the country. The closest thing to a unifying opposition figure is Reza Pahlavi, the son of the shah who was overthrown in the 1979 Islamic Revolution that brought theocracy to power. But many Iranians have bitter memories of repression under the shah, and others might reject Pahlavi over his outreach to Israel, especially if he tries to ride to power on the back of a foreign invasion. In Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya - and in Syria and Yemen after their 2011 uprisings - a familiar pattern emerged when governments were overthrown or seriously weakened. Armed groups emerged with competing agendas. Neighbouring countries backed local proxies. Weapons flowed in, and large numbers of civilians fled. The fighting in some places boiled over into full-blown civil war, and ever more violent extremist groups sprouted from the chaos. When it was all over, Saddam had been replaced by a corrupt and often dysfunctional government at least as friendly to Iran as it was to the United States. Gadhafi was replaced by myriad militias, many allied with foreign powers. The Taliban were replaced by the Taliban.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Operation Sindoor Asserts India's Stance Against Terrorism: PM Modi
New Delhi: Asserting that Operation Sindoor has made clear to the world India's stringent policy against terrorism, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Tuesday that his government takes whatever steps are appropriate in national interest. Weapons manufactured in India showed their impact during the conflict with Pakistan, he said, without naming the country, at an event to mark the centenary celebration of the conversation between spiritual figure and social reformer Sree Narayana Guru and Mahatma Gandhi. "We have shown that no hideout is safe for terrorists who spill the blood of Indians," he said, adding that his government has worked on ideals of the revered spiritual figure who wanted a strong India which was free of any discrimination. PM Modi said his government in the past 11 years has worked to make India strong in social, economic and defence sectors. He said India's reliance on foreign countries to meet its defence needs is declining, and it is becoming "aatmanirbhar" in defence sector. Indian military brought the enemy to its knees with made-in-India weapons in 22 minutes, he said of the precision attacks on terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir following the horrific killing of civilians by terrorists in Pahalgam. He said he was confident that made-in-India weapons will be feted across the world in future. The prime minister cited his government's welfare schemes in housing, drinking water and health insurance among other fields to assert that these have empowered the deprived and backward sections of society. More number of IITs, IIMs and AIIMS have been opened in the last 11 years than earlier, he added.