logo
‘Crazy-communist white hippies': Chants & boos disrupt JD Vance's national guard lunch; DC pushback grows

‘Crazy-communist white hippies': Chants & boos disrupt JD Vance's national guard lunch; DC pushback grows

Time of India21 hours ago
Stephen Miller (left), Pete Hegseth, JD Vance (AP)
Vice President JD Vance's lunch event with national guard troops at Union Station on Wednesday was disrupted by a wave of protests, as demonstrators voiced opposition to the Trump administration's security deployment in the capital.
Vance, joined by defence secretary Pete Hegseth and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, met National Guard members - many from red states such as South Carolina, Ohio, and Mississippi - at a Shake Shack inside the station. The visit was intended as a gesture of appreciation for troops deployed to patrol Washington, DC, according to CNN.
As Vance entered the venue, he was met with a mix of applause and boos.
Protesters blocked from entering the second floor of the restaurant chanted 'shame,' 'this is our city,' and 'we want the military out of our streets.' In response, others began chanting 'USA.'
When questioned by reporters during a brief press interaction, Vance dismissed the demonstrators as 'crazy' and 'communists.' Miller added, without evidence, that the protesters were 'elderly white hippies' and 'not part of the city,' as quoted by the news outlet.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
Referencing his past visit to Union Station with his children, Vance said, 'They were being screamed at by violent vagrants, and it was scaring the hell out of my kids.'
The visit highlighted ongoing tensions between DC residents and the Trump administration's decision to deploy federal forces in the city. A Washington Post-Schar School poll earlier found that about 80% of DC residents oppose the move and the federal takeover of the city's police department.
Vance pushed back against those numbers, stating: 'I'm highly skeptical that a majority of DC residents don't want their city to have better public safety and more reasonable safety standards.'
A college student at Union Station, who asked not to be named, told CNN, the troop presence felt 'overwhelming.' She added, 'I thought I had read that the crime rate in DC is actually going down?'
While city officials and Democrats have raised similar points, Vance claimed crime is 'massively underreported.'
When asked for supporting data, he responded: 'Just talk to a resident of this city.'
Some media reports suggest that the department of justice is currently investigating whether DC's metropolitan police department manipulated crime data.
As Vance concluded the visit and returned to the main level, more boos followed. 'I heard you buddy,' he responded to one protester. 'This is the guy who thinks people don't deserve law and order in their own community,' he said to Hegseth.
Outside, another group of protesters gathered near parked National Guard vehicles. One sign read: 'Criminals out of DC? Start with the Epstein files.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tech varsity stalemate: Kerala HC junks temporary vice-chancellor's appeal
Tech varsity stalemate: Kerala HC junks temporary vice-chancellor's appeal

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Tech varsity stalemate: Kerala HC junks temporary vice-chancellor's appeal

Kochi: High court on Thursday dismissed the appeal filed by Kerala Technological University (KTU) temporary vice-chancellor K Sivaprasad, challenging a single bench order which had denied his plea for interim relief directing three senior govt officials to attend the varsity's syndicate meeting. The bench of Justices Anil K Narendran and S Muralee Krishna observed that there were no grounds to interfere with the single bench order, as the interim relief sought was identical to the main relief in the writ petition. The division bench, however, clarified that the dismissal was without prejudice to the legal and factual contentions raised by the appellant and the state govt, leaving all issues open for consideration in the pending writ petition. Earlier, Sivaprasad had moved HC seeking a directive to the finance secretary, higher education secretary and director of technical education — who are ex-officio members of the syndicate — to attend its meetings in order to prevent an administrative stalemate. He alleged that these officials, along with nominated legislative members, were deliberately abstaining from meetings at the behest of the state govt, causing repeated adjournments for want of quorum. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Sivaprasad further contended that the university's administration had come to a standstill due to the deliberate and conscious actions of the state govt, which, according to him, had not accepted his appointment as vice-chancellor by the chancellor. In his petition filed on Aug 11, Sivaprasad sought, as interim relief, a direction compelling the officials to attend the syndicate meeting scheduled for Aug 13. The single bench declined to grant such relief. Meanwhile, in a subsequent development, the Supreme Court appointed a former judge of the apex court to oversee the selection of a permanent vice-chancellor for the Technological University in a petition filed by the governor in his capacity as chancellor. Citing this development, the state govt argued before the single bench that Sivaprasad's petition had become infructuous. The bench accordingly adjourned the matter without granting interim relief, prompting Sivaprasad to file the present appeal, which has now been dismissed. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

Trump administration targets student loan forgiveness with rule linking relief to employers' conduct
Trump administration targets student loan forgiveness with rule linking relief to employers' conduct

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump administration targets student loan forgiveness with rule linking relief to employers' conduct

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon) The Trump administration is preparing to redraw the contours of the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) programme in a move that could fundamentally alter its reach and purpose. The Department for Education, now under Linda McMahon's leadership, has proposed a sweeping rule that would bar borrowers from receiving loan forgiveness if their employers are deemed to be engaged in 'illegal activities undermining national security or American values.' Under this draft rule, graduates whose organizations are found to have a 'substantial illegal purpose,' ranging from supporting terrorism to violating immigration laws, would be excluded from eligibility. The move marks a sharp departure from the programme's original framework, which has for nearly two decades sought to ease the burden of federal student debt for teachers, law enforcement officers, and other public servants who dedicate a decade of service to their communities. The original intent of PSLF Introduced in 2007 during George W. Bush's presidency, PSLF was envisioned as a way to strengthen public service by making it financially sustainable. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Passive Income Ideas Sitting at Home Mone Click Here Undo For thousands of professionals entering modestly paid but socially vital roles, the promise of eventual loan forgiveness has been a critical incentive. The Trump administration's proposed changes, however, shift the programme's emphasis from rewarding service to scrutinizing employers, injecting legal and political considerations into a process once defined by public benefit. Preserving values or policing ideology? The Department for Education has defended its plan as a safeguard to ensure that taxpayer-funded relief does not flow to individuals working for organizations acting against the nation's interests. Framed as a measure to uphold the integrity of public service, the policy is positioned as a corrective to what the administration views as loopholes that allow unscrupulous actors to benefit from federal largesse. Yet the scope of the proposal raises fundamental questions. By tethering loan forgiveness not simply to the borrower's service but to their employer's perceived alignment with 'American values,' the administration risks blurring the line between legitimate legal enforcement and political gatekeeping. Critics have already voiced alarm that such an approach could open the door to disqualification based on ideological disagreements rather than clear-cut legal violations. A deepening polarisation in higher education policy The announcement comes against the backdrop of intensifying national debates over education, immigration, and cultural policy. Where earlier reforms to PSLF have largely centred on administrative efficiency or expanded eligibility, this marks the first attempt to impose a moral and political filter on the programme. It is a shift that reflects not only a legal recalibration but also a broader cultural struggle over who defines the values that public service should uphold. The rule's broad phrasing, particularly the emphasis on activities that 'undermine national security' or 'American values,' creates significant ambiguity. Such language could empower the Department to deny relief based on contentious interpretations of what constitutes a threat or an offense, potentially chilling the work of organizations that serve vulnerable communities or engage in advocacy at odds with federal priorities. The road ahead The Department for Education has opened a public comment period until September 17, signaling that it expects robust debate over the proposal. Early reactions suggest that this will be no routine administrative adjustment but a flashpoint in the larger battle over student debt and the political role of education policy. If implemented, the changes would mark one of the most consequential shifts in PSLF since its inception, transforming it from a straightforward debt-relief mechanism into an instrument shaped by the government's judgment of organizational conduct. The long-term implications could reverberate far beyond student loan policy, touching the relationship between public service, political authority, and the contested definition of American values itself. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!

India-China ties: How both countries are planning to resolve border dispute; Chinese envoy explains
India-China ties: How both countries are planning to resolve border dispute; Chinese envoy explains

Time of India

time44 minutes ago

  • Time of India

India-China ties: How both countries are planning to resolve border dispute; Chinese envoy explains

NEW DELHI: Chinese ambassador to India Xu Feihong on Thursday said that two groups will be set up to resolve border disputes between India and China. Xu said that a consensus on 10 points was reached between the two countries during Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi's two day visit to New Delhi. "Two groups will be set up by our two sides over the border issue. One group will be for border delimitation into appropriate sectors," Xu said. "The second group will focus on proper management of the border and border areas," he added. Earlier, Doval and Wang co-chaired 24th round of the Special Representatives' dialogue on the Boundary Question. Both sides agreed to reopen trade through the three designated passes — Lipulekh, Shipki La, and Nathu La — to boost cross-border economic activity. The Chinese ambassador also said that the relationship between two countries should not be defined by the border issue. "We should not define the border issue as relationship between our two countries. The border issue is on one side, and cooperation between India and China is on the other side," he said. "The visit of Prime Minister Modi to China will be a very important event not only for the SCO but for the bilateral relationship between the two countries. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Beyond Text Generation: An AI Tool That Helps You Write Better Grammarly Install Now Undo A working group from China and India are preparing to make this visit a successful one. We attach great importance to this visit," he added. PM Modi will arrive in Tianjin on Aug 31 for what will be his first visit to China in over seven years. He had last visited China in 2018, again for the SCO summit. SCO has been an important forum for India to assert its strategic autonomy but his visit on this occasion has evoked more than just a cursory interest, as it comes in the middle of what many see as the worst phase in India's ties with the US in decades.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store