Porn star, 34, who ‘dumped suitcases with decapitated couple's bodies on bridge' says he was ‘raped every day' by victim
A PORN star accused of murdering two men and cutting them up before travelling to the Clifton Suspension Bridge with some of their body parts has claimed he was "raped every day" by one of his alleged victims.
Yostin Andres Mosquera, 35, is on trial for the murders of Albert Alfonso, 62, and Paul Longworth, 71, on July 8 last year in the flat the two shared in Scotts Road, Shepherd's Bush, west London.
5
Yostin Andres Mosquera is on trial for the murders of Albert Alfonso, 62, and Paul Longworth, 71
5
Yostin Andres Mosquera, left, with Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth
5
Mosquera is alleged to have repeatedly stabbed Mr Alfonso, who suffered injuries to his torso, face and neck, while Mr Longworth was attacked with a hammer to the back of his head and his skull shattered, jurors at Woolwich Crown Court have previously heard.
Mosquera was planning to steal money from them and he has also "made up" a claim of rape against Mr Alfonso, prosecutor Deanna Heer KC said.
Under cross-examination on Monday, Mosquera claimed that Mr Alfonso had "raped him every day" and that made him feel "sad" but not angry.
Speaking through a translator, Mosquera, who was involved in filmed sex sessions with Mr Alfonso, told the court: "I felt sad. I never felt anger. I do not get angry with anybody,"
Mosquera had first come to the UK from Colombia in June 2024 on the promise of English lessons and financial support from Mr Alfonso, whom he had met years earlier through webcam sex websites.
Of the alleged sex assaults, Mosquera told the court: "I felt humiliated, sad, trapped - I never tend to get to anger."
The alleged rapes sometimes "would happen so quickly because he (Mr Alfonso) would drink beer and not be aware of what was happening".
He also claimed there were times when Mr Alfonso was "out of control."
Ms Heer took Mosquera to his "detailed" defence statement produced for the trial and said "there is no mention of Albert Alfonso raping you".
She told Mosquera: "Albert Alfonso insisted the defendant and he would make a number of sex videos and you did not feel you had any option, you felt sexually exploited.
"You were aware that Mr Alfonso was making money out of posting videos of your sexual activity and that made you feel even more exploited - but you do not mention at all Mr Mosquera, that Mr Alfonso was raping you every day.
"Is that because you are making it up?"
Mosquera replied: "No."
Mosquera admits killing Mr Alfonso but claims it was manslaughter by reason of loss of control.
He denies murdering either man and insists Mr Alfonso killed Mr Longworth.
Both Mr Alfonso's and Mr Longworth's remains were later found in a suitcase near Clifton Suspension Bridge in Bristol.
Mosquera had been sharing paid sexual content of himself online for more than a decade, including under the name I Am Black Master, the jury heard.
His claim of not knowing Mr Alfonso was posting their videos online was branded as "a nonsense" by the prosecution.
It said he had signed a form which gave his permission that he could have got translated.
Mr Alfonso killed Mr Longworth after they had a row in the bathroom, according to Mosquera.
The court heard he saw Mr Alfonso get some black gloves from a bedroom, before hearing noises from the next room. Then Mr Alfonso walked Mr Longworth to a bedroom and went on to have a long shower.
Mosquera said he could not tell if Mr Longworth was injured, and told the jury "I wasn't sure if he was alive or not" and "I was quite afraid".
Mr Alfonso was wearing the gloves and there was "bleeding on his hands".
Within minutes of killing Mr Alfonso, Mosquera was online and trying to look at the man's bank account, the court heard.
Then in the early hours of the morning, Mosquera took Mr Alfonso's bank card and walked to the cashpoint and withdrew money.
Mosquera said: "In the beginning I did not know where I was going to take the suitcases. I was going to go to Brighton."
Ms Heer said: "You decided to take money from Mr Alfonso after you killed him."
Mosquera said: "Yes, because he was supposed to give me money before but he was not able to. He was supposed to give me money to go to Brighton."
The prosecution also said that Mosquera had got hold of Mr Alfonso's financial information.
Ms Heer said: "You copied over pages from spreadsheets containing Mr Alfonso's bank account details, user names and id's, passwords - relating to Barclays, Halifax, Natwest, Moneygram, PayPal account - all of that information you copied on to your computer on June 27."
Ms Heer continued: "The purpose of taking this document was because you wanted to steal money from Mr Alfonso."
Mosquera replied "no", saying he moved "many documents, not just that one" and he sometimes cleared space on Mr Alfonso's computer.
Ms Heer said that by 4 July, Mosquera had access to all of Mr Alfonso's and Mr Longworth's bank details.
He was making searches in Spanish about whether it is possible to connect to a switched-off computer to see what is on the hard disc, posing questions about property values and how much he could withdraw from the Halifax Bank - even though he did not have an account with them.
Mosquera said he was studying English and claimed some of his fellow Spanish-speaking students said bank accounts could be opened with certain data, so he tried it.
The court heard Mosquera also made a search for buildings for sale in his hometown of Medellin, Colombia.
Mosquera said: "I was always searching for these things. When I am in Colombia -how much building cost and cars. I even looked up how much Liverpool Football Club cost, because I am a fan."
Searches on his computer brought up the value of the Scotts Road flat, including one on July 8 at 8.30am, the jury heard.
Mosquera said the search was done out of "curiosity like always" and that this information would come up when you put the address into the computer but he was not looking for properties to rent or sell.
Ms Heer told him: "You were planning to steal from Albert Alfonso and Paul Longworth and you were trying to find out what they were worth."
Mosquera replied: "No, if I wanted to do that I would have done this in Medellin in my own country. Why would I look for something I do not know."
5
The court heard Mosquera had created a PowerPoint of the couple's banking information
Credit: PA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
5 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Boarding school pupils ‘were abused by paedophiles', inquiry finds
Findings on the Keil School in Dumbarton, West Dunbartonshire – which closed in 2000 – were delayed until the conclusion of the prosecution against a former physics teacher who was branded a 'prolific' paedophile. William Bain admitted 11 charges and was jailed for nine years in June at the High Court in Glasgow, after a criminal investigation was sparked by evidence at the SCAI in 2021. In a report published on Wednesday, chair of the inquiry, Lady Smith, condemned the school's failure to investigate Bain and said it was a 'disgraceful abdication of responsibility' which allowed predators 'free rein', including another recently convicted paedophile ex-teacher. Bain, of Crieff, Perthshire, was described as a sadist by detectives and the scale of his abuse of pupils aged between 11 and 14 was deemed 'horrendous', following his sentencing on June 30. Lady Smith found that school leaders carried out a 'cover-up' to protect their reputation and hailed the 'fresh prosecutions' of Bain and another recently convicted paedophile, following evidence heard at the inquiry. She warned that further abusers could be prosecuted as a result of the SCAI. The findings are part of SCAI's Boarding Schools case study, including Loretto School, Gordonstoun and Merchiston Castle School. READ NEXT: Residents oppose this to be built near Ibrox Stadium Keil School was established by philanthropists to educate rural boys and moved to Dumbarton in the 1920s, where it became an environment where pupils 'were expected to endure violence and suffer in silence', according to the SCAI. From the 1950s until the 1980s, abuse was 'normalised', with prolific abuser Bain remaining at the school until it closed in 2000 and other offences carried out by paedophile English teacher David Gutteridge in the early 1990s. Both men were house tutors and the SCAI condemned a lack of oversight. Bain, who worked there for 23 years, was previously convicted in May 2016 of offences at Keil and jailed for six-and-a-half years, while Gutteridge was jailed last year for indecent assault of a pupil at the school, set up by the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust. In her report, Lady Smith said that a headteacher was responsible for a 'cover-up', while abusers such as Bain had 'free rein on a daily basis'. Lady Smith said: 'Protection of the reputation of the school was prioritised over the interests of children, that was a disgraceful abdication of responsibility. The prevailing culture allowed two paedophiles to operate without fear. 'William Bain sexually abused some children on hundreds of occasions, on an almost daily basis. The abuse Bain perpetrated persisted for years, despite concerns arising early on, after a parent complained.' She branded an investigation 'inadequate' and said parents were falsely reassured. Boarding school pupils 'were abused by paedophiles', inquiry finds READ NEXT: Police report identifies 'growing threat' from Glasgow and Edinburgh gang violence Lady Smith said: 'The problem was covered up by headmaster Christopher Tongue and other senior staff. Despite parents being assured that reports would go on record, this did not happen. Tongue's successor was never told about it.' Gutteridge, who taught at Keil from 1989 to 1991, abused a pupil, having 'carefully engineered the circumstances', according to the SCAI. He was jailed for 17 months following a conviction for indecent assault at Forfar Sheriff Court in September 2024. But his predatory behaviour towards teenage boys predated Keil and in 2015, he was jailed for 18 months after being convicted of two charges of indecent assault at Harrow Crown Court, committed in England in the 1980s. Other staff physically abused pupils, justifying it as 'officially sanctioned punishment', including a housemaster remembered for his 'sadistic brutality' and 'mass beatings', including using the belt, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'Keil was a school with inadequate senior leadership and a lack of the most basic of child protection systems.' She branded it a 'remarkable example of naivety and false optimism trumping reality', which resulted in children being abused. Lady Smith added: 'The cases of Bain and Gutteridge are examples of a significant outcome. 'Fresh prosecutions followed exposure of their behaviour through the inquiry's investigations and evidence – demonstrating that those who abuse children in care may find it catching up with them decades later.' Responsibility for running boarding houses was left to senior boys appointed 'chiefs', who controlled squads of junior boys, with some staff considering themselves 'immune from management', a report from the inquiry said. Governors of the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust 'failed to challenge the situation' and have since apologised for the abuse, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'I would encourage anyone who has relevant information on any aspect of our work to get in touch with our witness support team. We want to hear from you.' On Wednesday, nuns from a Catholic order, Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul, said that children were abused in the care of their establishments for deaf and disabled children. Sister Eileen Glancy, speaking about St Vincent's School for the Deaf and Blind in Glasgow, told a hearing of the inquiry in Edinburgh: 'We'd have to accept some children were abused.' She added: 'Children weren't as well protected as they should have been.' A former pupil of St Vincent's, using the pseudonym Gordon, said in a witness statement that he told his mother about abuse from nuns, and was punished after she contacted the police. The man said that he told his mother on two occasions, and said: 'The physical abuse used to shock me as these were Christians. We lived with fear and intimidation all the time.' He said: 'My mum spoke to a nun and challenged her about the treatment of children. I know the nun told my mum it wasn't true and I had been a bad boy. 'After that, I was assaulted again and my mum told the police, but nothing happened.' Gordon alleged that he was subjected to sexual abuse as well as physical violence, including having his head 'batted against a desk'. He said that the nuns and a priest were 'hypocrites', and that the school felt like a 'prison' as it was surrounded by 15-foot walls – but there was no alternative, as it was the only school for deaf children. Gordon said: 'There was so much cruelty at St Vincent's and none of us could understand that, the Sisters were supposed to be so holy and caring but were so cruel. This was a period of suffering for all deaf children of my generation. We all suffered, we were all terrified. 'I would like to see charges brought against the people who were responsible.' The inquiry continues.
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Asylum seeker 'living in fear' as he begs hotel protesters to stop abusing him
Khadar Mohamed revealed that the residents living inside the Epping asylum hotel were 'living in pain and fear' every time protests were held outside the Bell Hotel A resident of the asylum hotel at the centre of angry anti- migrant protests has pleaded for the demonstrations to end after the Home Office was ordered to curb their stay. Khadar Mohamed, 24, revealed those ensconced inside the Bell Hotel in Epping were 'living in pain and fear' each time locals held protests outside the hotel and that many now were more uncertain about their futures. Mr Mohamed, who said he had won his claim for political asylum against the Home Office, added: "I want everybody to know that there are no paedophiles and rapists living inside this hotel. "We don't sympathise with that behaviour and if we had had the chance we would have stopped it. It is only one claim against an individual, not against everybody inside the hotel. "So now we've got 50 to 60 days to leave and none of us know what it's going to happen. But there is no need for these people to be shouting at us from outside. "I speak very good English but I've never heard the word "scumbag" until these people came along. It is very painful to be called these names and when people pass you in their cars and you walk along the streets they make noises at you and bad faces. "When I walk past them the ladies hold their purses tighter. But I'm not a thief and I'm not a threat to anyone." Mr Mohamed fled his village of Elbur in Somalia in 2022 after terrorists took command and ordered him to join their ranks. He said his sister Farxiya was killed by members of Al-Shabaab after she was forced into marriage with a member at the age of 21, but refused to comply with their ideology. He said he was pulled into their ranks and ordered to teach the Quran to school children even though he did not agree with their violent struggle and was attacked with a knife which left a scar on his right arm. He added: "They also cut off a fingernail to show me that they could control me." After refusing to 'be weaponised' and join the terrorists in actions against Somalian authorities, he was held in a jail for two years before a friendly associate of the government paid for his release and managed to obtain a Turkish Visa for him. He travelled to Turkey and onto, Greece and Austria where he worked washing dishes and finally got to the UK three months ago. He travelled on a boat which left Dunkirk at 3 am on May 11 carrying 70 migrants and paid people smugglers £800 for their help. He added: "I'm happy that my application for asylum has been accepted. But I don't know what is going to happen next to me or all the people inside there. "I have to get a job and find somewhere to live, but everybody is uncertain about what happens next to them. The people who don't want us here have achieved the result they were looking for, now let us hope that there are no more protests or anger against us. Life is already very difficult." Epping Forest District Council argued that the hotel had become a public safety risk because of its alleged planning law breach by ceasing to be a true hotel. Dan Jarvis, Minister of State for Security, told the BBC the government had "never thought that hotels were an appropriate source of accommodation for asylum seekers." He said the government was "looking at options" to rehouse them in "suitably appropriate alternative accommodation." The case brought by Epping Forest was that the alleged planning breach had led to evidenced harms. Critically, these harms related to protests which had led to violence and arrests. Tory-run Broxbourne Council was the first local authority to declare it was seeking legal advice after the ruling "as a matter of urgency about whether it could take a similar action" over a hotel. Epping Forest District Council has said it had set a precedent and the local councils were now standing up against the influx of asylum seekers into hotels. Government ministers say they are braced for other councils to follow Epping's lead. The ruling causes immediate practical difficulties for the Home Office, which has to find alternative accommodation for the asylum seekers currently housed at the Bell Hotel. It is believed that around 32,000 asylum seekers are living in 210 hotels across the UK who also now face uncertainty over whether other councils will pursue similar action to Epping Forest District Council.
Leader Live
7 hours ago
- Leader Live
Boarding school pupils ‘exposed to paedophiles' amid ‘cover-up', inquiry finds
Findings on the Keil School in Dumbarton, West Dunbartonshire – which closed in 2000 – were delayed until the conclusion of the prosecution against a former physics teacher who was branded a 'prolific' paedophile. William Bain admitted 11 charges and was jailed for nine years in June at the High Court in Glasgow, after a criminal investigation was sparked by evidence at the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) in 2021. In a report published on Wednesday, chair of the inquiry Lady Smith condemned the school's failure to investigate Bain and said it was a 'disgraceful abdication of responsibility' which allowed predators 'free rein', including another recently convicted paedophile ex-teacher. Bain, of Crieff, Perthshire, was described as a sadist by detectives and the scale of his abuse of pupils aged between 11 and 14 was deemed 'horrendous', following his sentencing at the High Court in Glasgow on June 30. Lady Smith found that school leaders carried out a 'cover-up' to protect its reputation and hailed the 'fresh prosecutions' of Bain and another recently convicted paedophile, following evidence heard at the inquiry. She warned that further abusers could be prosecuted as a result of the SCAI. The findings are part of SCAI's Boarding Schools case study including Loretto School, Gordonstoun, and Merchiston Castle School. Keil School was established by philanthropists to educate rural boys, and moved to Dumbarton in the 1920s where it became an environment where pupils 'were expected to endure violence and suffer in silence', according to the SCAI. By the 1950s until the 1980s, abuse was 'normalised', with prolific abuser Bain remaining at the school until it closed in 2000, and other offences carried out by paedophile English teacher David Gutteridge in the early 1990s. Both men were house tutors, and the SCAI condemned a lack of oversight. Bain, who worked there for 23 years, was previously convicted in May 2016 of offences at Keil and jailed for six-and-a-half years, while Gutteridge was jailed last year for indecent assault of a pupil at the school, set up by the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust. In her report, Lady Smith said that a headteacher was responsible for a 'cover-up', while abusers such as Bain had 'free rein on a daily basis'. Lady Smith said: 'Protection of the reputation of the school was prioritised over the interests of children, that was a disgraceful abdication of responsibility. The prevailing culture allowed two paedophiles to operate without fear. 'William Bain sexually abused some children on hundreds of occasions, on an almost daily basis. The abuse Bain perpetrated persisted for years, despite concerns arising early on, after a parent complained.' She branded an investigation 'inadequate' and said parents were falsely reassured. Lady Smith said: 'The problem was covered up by headmaster Christopher Tongue and other senior staff. Despite parents being assured that reports would go on record, this did not happen. Tongue's successor was never told about it.' Gutteridge, who taught at Keil from 1989 to 1991, abused a pupil having 'carefully engineered the circumstances', according to the SCAI. He was jailed for 17 months following a conviction for indecent assault at Forfar Sheriff Court in September 2024. But his predatory behaviour towards teenage boys predated Keil, and in 2015 he was jailed for 18 months after being convicted of two charges of indecent assault at Harrow Crown Court, committed in England in the 1980s. Other staff physically abused pupils justifying it as 'officially sanctioned punishment', including a housemaster remembered for his 'sadistic brutality' and 'mass beatings' including using the belt, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'Keil was a school with inadequate senior leadership and a lack of the most basic of child protection systems.' She branded it a 'remarkable example of naivety and false optimism trumping reality' which resulted in children being abused. Lady Smith added: 'The cases of Bain and Gutteridge are examples of a significant outcome. 'Fresh prosecutions followed exposure of their behaviour through the inquiry's investigations and evidence – demonstrating that those who abuse children in care may find it catching up with them decades later.' Responsibility for running boarding houses was left to senior boys appointed 'chiefs', who controlled squads of junior boys, with some staff considering themselves 'immune from management', a report from the inquiry said. Governors of the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust 'failed to challenge the situation', and have since apologised for the abuse, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'I would encourage anyone who has relevant information on any aspect of our work to get in touch with our witness support team. We want to hear from you.' On Wednesday, nuns from a Catholic order, Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul, said that children were abused in the care of their establishments for deaf and disabled children. Sister Eileen Glancy, speaking about St Vincent's School for the Deaf and Blind in Glasgow, told a hearing of the inquiry in Edinburgh: 'We'd have to accept some children were abused.' She added: 'Children weren't as well protected as they should have been.' A former pupil of St Vincent's, using the pseudonym Gordon, said in a witness statement that he told his mother about abuse from nuns, and was punished after she contacted police. The man said that he told his mother on two occasions, and said: 'The physical abuse used to shock me as these were Christians. We lived with fear and intimidation all the time.' He said: 'My mum spoke to a nun and challenged her about the treatment of children. I know the nun told my mum it wasn't true and I had been a bad boy. 'After that, I was assaulted again and my mum told the police, but nothing happened.' Gordon alleged that he was subjected to sexual abuse as well as physical violence, including having his head 'batted against a desk'. He said that the nuns and a priest were 'hypocrites', and that the school felt like a 'prison' as it was surrounded by 15-foot walls – but there was no alternative, as it was the only school for deaf children. Gordon said: 'There was so much cruelty at St Vincent's and none of us could understand that, the Sisters were supposed to be so holy and caring but were so cruel. This was a period of suffering for all deaf children of my generation. We all suffered, we were all terrified. 'I would like to see charges brought against the people who were responsible.' The inquiry continues.
