Glendale man among 4 soldiers killed on training mission in Lithuania
The four soldiers were reported missing last week when their armored vehicle sank in a bog, the New York Times reports.
'The four U.S. soldiers, from the 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, were reported missing early on March 25, when they did not return from a training mission in an M88A2 Hercules, a 70-ton vehicle that is essentially a giant military tow truck,' the Times explained.
Among the dead is 25-year-old Sgt. Edvin F. Franco of Glendale, who along with Sgt. Jose Duenez Jr., 25, of Illinois and Pfc. Dante D. Taitano, 21, of Guam was an M1 Abrams tank system maintainer.
The fourth soldier has not been publicly identified, though the Army confirmed that the fourth body was located Tuesday, one day after the other three bodies and the armored vehicle were removed from the bog.
'This past week has been devastating. Today our hearts bear the weight of an unbearable pain with the loss of our final Dogface Soldier,' said Maj. Gen. Christopher Norrie, commanding general of the 3rd Infantry Division. 'Though we have received some closure, the world is darker without them.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
13 hours ago
- Fox News
Washington, DC crime reporter turned victim speaks out, says Trump recognizes ‘major issue' impacting lives
While much of the legacy media has downplayed or dismissed crime in Washington, D.C., on the heels of the Trump administration's crackdown, one journalist decided to speak out about a horrific attack that changed the course of her life. President Donald Trump announced the federalization of Washington, D.C.'s police force on Monday, an unprecedented move taken by no prior U.S. president. D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb condemned the move, insisting there is "no crime emergency" in the nation's capital, and many liberal pundits and mainstream news outlets have suggested Trump is overreaching. New York Times reporter Peter Baker called it a "nonexistent crime crisis," while CNN and MSNBC filled their shows with guests to slam Trump's move. A variety of outlets harped on data that violent crime in D.C. is down by 26% this year, and many others insisted the move is simply a "distraction." In 2020, during the early stages of the COVID pandemic, Anna Giaritelli took a Saturday morning stroll in what she believed was a "really safe part of town" near Union Station, only a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol. At the time, Giaritelli covered crime and civil unrest for the Washington Examiner, but she had no idea she was about to become a victim herself. "I was randomly attacked by a homeless man and fought with him for my life and survived. And that event has had a significant impact on my life, changed the course of my life," Giaritelli told Fox News Digital. Giaritelli was injured and sexually abused during the horrific attack. Police used DNA found on her clothing to determine that the suspect was a repeat offender and already in their system. She said he was finally arrested "months later" and a "judge chose to release him onto the streets" before his trial. Giaritelli planned to live in Washington, D.C., for "decades," but the harrowing ordeal changed her plans. She first moved to another part of town, hoping the distance would allow her to remain in the city, but frustration continued to grow. "Through the year and a half that we waited for our case to go to trial, this man was arrested five more times, including for wielding a machete on Capitol Hill. And the judge chose in all five times to release him from jail back onto the street," Giaritelli said. "I didn't feel protected by the judicial system. I didn't feel safe in Washington, D.C. because of these decisions by the courts," she continued. "And so ultimately, I had to take my own safety into concern, and I left D.C. with nowhere to go really, trying to figure out how to start a life and what that would look like somewhere else." Giaritelli believes the police worked extremely hard to put her attacker behind bars ahead of his trial but the decision by the court "enabled him to victimize more and more people." "I found out at sentencing that he [assaulted] an off-duty police officer, a woman, several weeks, months prior to what he did to me. So, this was an individual that had a clear trajectory and as much as police wanted to keep him off the streets, the courts would not let them do that," Giaritelli said. "He was sentenced to federal prison in 2022," Giaritelli continued. "He has since been released from federal prison and to my knowledge is back in Washington, D.C." Giaritelli, who moved to Texas and began covering homeland security, immigration and border issues for the Washington Examiner, said the attack completely changed the trajectory of her career. "Trying to work in politics and media, you're limited to what you can do if you're not actually in Washington," Giaritelli said. "I don't know where I would be now if I was still living in D.C." Giaritelli was extremely grateful the Examiner allowed her to switch beats and work remotely, but she was in a "bad place for months," and initially found it very difficult to adapt to life in a new city. "I've recovered. I've done a lot of work in therapy… to get to a good place," she said. The journalist was eager to hear other victims speak out, not just about the crime issue and needing more police, but also about "the courts and making sure people who are a danger to the public are not released." But many victims remain silent, so Giaritelli decided to share her own story with an emotional social media post that began, "For people who say they don't know a DC crime victim... Hi, I'm Anna." "I wanted to be part of the solution," she said. "I think the Trump administration recognizes… this isn't a one-off. This is a mass problem that we've seen for years." Giaritelli plans to release a book that answers many questions she had five years ago. "What is it like as a victim? Are the thoughts I'm having, is the anxiety and the depression, is this all normal? Is this what people go through? And so, I wrote a book really aimed at women in particular who've been through sexual assault, been through different crimes, and come out and say, 'Now what? How do I get back the rest of my life?' And that was what I wanted to put forward," Giaritelli said. Giaritelli, who was hesitant to offer her take on the Trump administration's crackdown because of her role as a working journalist, wants Americans to understand that crime remains a serious issue in the nation's capital. "I think President Trump is taking action because the people around him who live in Washington, D.C., have brought this to his attention and know that this is a major issue," she said.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Haberman warns Democrats against pushback on Trump's DC crime claims
New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman warned Democrats run a risk of alienating voters if they push back on President Trump's attempt to crack down in crime in Washington, D.C. and other large cities run by members of the party. 'I think you see that in terms of [DC] Mayor [Muriel] Bowser, how she has reacted,' Haberman, who is also a contributor to CNN, said during an appearance on the network on Tuesday. 'There is a crime problem everywhere, in multiple cities. Big cities have traditionally had crime problems.' 'There are a lot of people who feel unsafe in big cities,' she continued. 'And so if the mayor pushes back on the president, she sounds like she's not addressing concerns of constituents.' The journalist's comments were first highlighted by Mediaite. Trump on Monday declared a state of emergency over crime in the district, taking control of its police force and deploying National Guard troops to help law enforcement on city streets. Bowser, a democrat, on Monday called Trump's actions 'unprecedented' and 'unsettling' but has said she welcomes help to fight crime in the district, meeting this week with Attorney General Pam Bondi about the administration's moves. Other Democrats have vocally condemned Trump's actions, citing statistics showing crime declining in D.C. in recent years and arguing the president is overstepping his authority for political reasons. 'Violent crime in Washington, D.C. is at a thirty-year low,' House Minority Leader Hakeen Jeffries (D-N.Y.) posted on social platform X. 'Donald Trump has no basis to take over the local police department. And zero credibility on the issue of law and order. Get lost.' Trump has suggested federal agencies and the military could also deploy to other major U.S. cities, naming Chicago, New York City and Baltimore as possible targets.
Gizmodo
a day ago
- Gizmodo
‘Are You Surprised?': Trump Shrugs Off New Suspected Hack of Documents by Russia
President Donald Trump was asked on Wednesday about the recent hack of a computer system that holds highly sensitive federal court documents. Russia is suspected to be behind the attack, as the New York Times first reported on Tuesday. But Trump doesn't seem to think it was a big deal, even as the president prepares to meet with Russia's President Vladimir Putin. Trump was asked by a reporter if he would bring up the hack when he meets Putin in Alaska on Friday. 'I guess I could,' Trump replied without committing to anything. 'Are you surprised, you know? Are you surprised they hack in? That's what they do.' Trump went on to say, 'They're good at it. We're good at it. We're actually better at it, but, no, I have heard about it. I have heard about it.' The president has a long history of brushing off attacks on the U.S. as insignificant because America has done the same kinds of things to its adversaries. And while that's true, it's not the kind of thing U.S. presidents typically say to excuse attacks on the U.S. and subsequent inaction. Trump recently went so far as to admit that he gave Iran permission to bomb a U.S. base in Qatar, suggesting that's just the kind of thing that should be allowed. 'They said, 'We're going to shoot them. Is one o'clock OK?' I said it's fine,' Trump said during a press conference in June. 'And everybody was emptied off the base so they couldn't get hurt, except for the gunners.' It's easy to imagine how Republicans would've responded if a president like Barack Obama or Joe Biden gave another country a green light to attack the U.S. The New York Times describes the hack of the federal court records as a 'yearslong effort,' and it's not clear which specific entity may have been involved. It's also not clear if any countries besides Russia or known hacking groups may have contributed to the effort. An internal memo to the U.S. Department of Justice from system administrators of the system, known as PACER, describes the hack as 'persistent and sophisticated,' compromising 'sealed records' that are not otherwise available to the public. REPORTER: There's new reporting that Russians have hacked into computer systems that manage US federal courts documents. Do you plan to bring it up with Putin? TRUMP: I guess I could. Are you surprised? They hack in — what's what they do [image or embed] — Aaron Rupar (@ August 13, 2025 at 9:03 AMThe compromised records come from court districts in a variety of states, including New York, South Dakota, Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, and Arkansas, according to the Times. The attempts to infiltrate the federal court records system date to at least January 2021, according to a press release from that era. That release was published on Jan. 6, 2021, the day of Trump's coup attempt at the U.S. Capitol, though it's not clear if the attacks are in any way related to Russia's preference for Trump as president. Russia was not named as the entity trying to access sensitive court documents at the time, but the Times reports that federal law enforcement officials believed Russia was behind it. Trump is scheduled to meet with Putin on Friday, though he accidentally said he was going to Russia during a press conference on Tuesday: 'You know, I'm going to see Putin. I'm going to Russia on Friday. I don't like being up here, talking about how unsafe and how dirty and disgusting this once-beautiful capital [is].' Trump, whose mind often seems to be slipping (he referred to St. Petersburg as 'Leningrad' on Wednesday), is actually meeting the Russian leader at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. The presidents will be discussing ways to end the war in Ukraine, which has been raging ever since Russia first invaded in early 2022. Trump promised to stop the war even before he was sworn into office, though that obviously didn't happen. Trump was asked by a reporter whether he would request that Putin stop bombing civilians, to which he replied 'No,' insisting that he'd already had that discussion with the Russian leader. President Trump instead insisted that he was just going to end the war, something he described as 'Biden's war,' as he often does to escape accountability for his failure to bring an end to the conflict. REPORTER: Can you convince Putin to stop targeting civilians in Ukraine? TRUMP: I guess the answer to that is no, because I've had this conversation. I want to end the war. [image or embed] — Aaron Rupar (@ August 13, 2025 at 9:33 AMTrump then pivoted to talking about what he called the 'Russia hoax,' a reference to the extensive contacts his campaign had with Russian operatives in the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election and subsequent investigations. By his own admission, Putin wanted Trump to become president, something Trump has denied so frequently that many apolitical observers assume it must be true. Trump had even publicly encouraged Putin to hack into Hillary Clinton's emails in July of 2016, something the Russians eventually did successfully. Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, had a call with Trump and European leaders on Wednesday morning before Trump's press conference at the Kennedy Center. Zelensky has been excluded from the Friday meeting with Putin, but Trump said that he'll include Ukraine in the discussions if it goes well. 'If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one,' Trump said. 'I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky, and myself, if they'd like to have me there.'
