
BMP says new Tax Ordinance could stifle investment growth
LAHORE: The Businessmen Panel (BMP) of the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) has raised significant concerns about the recently implemented Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2025.
FPCCI's Businessmen Panel Chairman Mian Anjum Nisar observed that the ordinance could severely harm the country's investment climate, which is already under pressure due to various economic challenges. He further warned that if not reconsidered, these tax measures may discourage both domestic and foreign investors from engaging with Pakistan's economy, thus hindering growth.
Anjum Nisar expressed disappointment that the new tax laws, while aimed at increasing government revenue, could backfire by creating unnecessary complexities in the business environment. 'The tax laws are intended to increase compliance and improve revenue, but they bring with them a set of challenges that may, in fact, make it harder for businesses to operate efficiently,' Nisar said. He emphasized that businesses already face multiple hurdles, including rising costs and an unpredictable economic environment, and the new tax regime could add additional layers of burden on businesses.
'The government needs to understand that businesses are the backbone of the economy. They are the ones who create jobs, drive innovation, and generate the taxes that support government functions,' he said. 'Unfortunately, this new ordinance adds layers of complexity that may make it more difficult for businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to thrive.'
The FPCCI former Chairman highlighted that while Pakistan's economy is struggling to recover from previous setbacks, the business community must be supported, not further burdened. He stated that the law, as it stands, does not provide the needed incentives for businesses to flourish. 'What we need is a policy environment that fosters growth, encourages investment, and provides a stable foundation for entrepreneurs to take risks. This ordinance does the opposite by imposing measures that will only increase the difficulty of doing business,' Nisar added.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
15 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) gave a deadline to the respondents to submit comments in the petitions challenging amendments in the PECA Act. A single bench of Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas on Wednesday heard the petitions of Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), anchors association and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA). In the petition, counsel of the journalist body adopted the stance that the PECA (Amendment) Act is unconstitutional and illegal; hence, the court should conduct judicial review on it. The petition said the PECA (Amendment) 2025 increased the government control and restrictions on freedom of speech. It said the PECA law violated Article 19 and 19(A) of the Constitution as well. Therefore, it pleaded, the law should be suspended. PECA amendments challenged in SC During the hearing, Advocate Imran Shafiq and other lawyers appeared in the court on behalf of the petitioners. Advocate Shafiq said the federal government has filed its reply only through the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Information while the Ministry of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs and the PTA have not submitted any response yet. He informed the bench that the federal government has raised a question on the jurisdiction of this court. He added that the federation has stated that after the 26th Constitutional Amendment, only the Constitutional Bench of the High Court can hear this case. The lawyer said the second objection was raised while giving a reference of a Quranic verse that before spreading the words, do research. The lawyer said the FIRs are being registered against people and the court should hear this case soon. The IHC bench asked whether there is no news going on? Is someone preventing news from being given or published? Riasat Ali Azad advocate prayed the court to issue a stay order that there will be no FIR or arrest against the journalist for reporting the news. He said that the parties are not submitting a response and are taking time from the court. Journalist Mazhar Abbas said that an atmosphere of harassment has been created in the media industry and the journalists are being summoned and harassed by the FIA. The petitioner's lawyer said the parties should be directed to file their replies and provide a copy of the replies to the petitioners in advance before the next hearing. Justice Inaam remarked that even if the response is not filed, the hearing will still be continued. He said that this case would take a long time and therefore, it will be scheduled after Eid. Later, the court deferred hearing of the case till the second week of July. The PFUJ said in the petition that the law infringed international human rights as well as digital rights in Pakistan. The petition read: '…a writ may be issued declaring that the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025 is unconstitutional, being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, due process, fair trial, and the concept of regulatory independence, as well as the doctrines of fairness, proportionality, reasonableness, and constitutional limitations or restrictions, hence void, and liable to be struck down.' Therefore, the PFUJ prayed that the respondents may be restrained and prevented from employing the coercive powers under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, in general, and against the journalist community, in particular till final disposal of the instant petition. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
IHC halts FBR tax recovery under Tax Laws Ord, 2025
ISLAMABAD: In a major development, Islamabad High Court (IHC) has stopped the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) from immediate tax recovery against taxpayers under the controversial Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025. In this regard, IHC has issued an order on Tuesday in favour of the private limited companies (petitioners). The National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance has also categorically conveyed to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) that the government has bypassed Parliament for promulgating Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025, and urgently communicated ordinance to the FBR's field formations for recovery from taxpayers. Tax laws bill: NA panel defers Sec 114C until FBR system overhaul According to the order of the IHC, the court has issued notices to the FBR to submit comments and meanwhile, no coercive measure to be taken by the FBR against the petitioners. The petitioners have requested the IHC to declare that the Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2025, promulgated on May 2, 2025, as Ultra Vires of the Constitution and void ab initio. IHC should declare that sections 138 (3A), 140(6A), 175 C of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 (as amended), and section 27 (4) of the Federal Excise Act, 2005 are inconsistent with Articles 4, 8, 10-A, 18, and 25 of the Constitution, hence void. IHC should suspend the operation of impugned Tax Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025 dated 02.05.2025, till pendency of this Writ Petition and restrain the Respondents (FBR) from enforcing or taking any coercive action under the impugned provisions till pendency of this Writ Petition, petitioners added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
FPCCI opposes new taxes in budget
KARACHI: The Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) Vice President Muhammad Aman Paracha has voiced strong opposition to reports of new taxes being imposed on existing taxpayers in the upcoming federal budget for the fiscal year 2025-26. The organization has urged the government to refrain from introducing new taxes on imports, exports, and other sectors in order to promote national trade, industrial growth, and to encourage new investments. The FPCCI warned that if the government imposes additional taxes under pressure from the IMF, the FPCCI will actively oppose such measures. FPCCI Vice President Muhammad Aman Paracha emphasized the need to separate tax policy from tax administration to avoid conflicts of interest. He further suggested that the budget-making process should not be treated merely as a routine financial exercise but should be transformed into a strategic economic tool. Aman Paracha stressed the importance of expanding the tax net to include all untaxed and under-taxed sectors, noting that imposing additional taxes on those who are already compliant would have adverse effects. He highlighted that business activity is already sluggish and the business community is struggling to stay afloat. Imposing further tax burdens on existing taxpayers could lead to decreased revenue collection as it would open more avenues for tax evasion. He also expressed concerns over amendments introduced through Ordinance IV of 2025, particularly Sections 138(3A), 140(6A), and 175C, stating that these amendments grant excessive powers to tax authorities and violate Articles 4, 18, and 77 of the Constitution. He warned that such changes would significantly erode investor confidence. Paracha proposed the development of a harmonized structure for General Sales Tax (GST), featuring a unified compliance portal. He recommended gradually reducing the GST rate to 12% to lower business costs for the formal sector and stimulates economic growth. He also called for comprehensive reforms in Pakistan Customs, identifying outdated laws, tariff segmentation, under-invoicing, and weak enforcement as major challenges. He underscored the need for economic policy to strike a balance between revenue requirements and industrial development, especially through measures that boost Pakistan's export potential and attract investors. Finally, Muhammad Amaan Paracha appealed to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to immediately release the long-pending Rs23 billion subsidies related to additional electricity consumption and ensure that funds for this are allocated in the upcoming 2025-26 federal budget. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025