Fort Smith Public Schools announce new Zone IV board member following Richardson's exit
According to a press release, Carthon works as the Chief Civil Rights Officer for Fort Smith Transit and has lived in the city for more than 20 years.
'We are excited to welcome Mr. Carthon to the Board of Education,' said FSPS Board President Dalton Person. 'His passion for education will be a great asset as we continue to provide high-quality learning opportunities for all students.'
The previous occupant of the Zone IV seat, Talicia Richardson resigned following the board's response to the grievance process with former Northside High School football coach Felix Curry.
Curry's lawyer, Joey McCutchen, presented to the school board what he claims is a copy of the grievance that was filed, asking for an official, written response to explain the decision.
McCutchen contends that the termination of Curry was premature and claims the grievance process was not properly followed.
Richardson believes race may have played a role in Curry's reassignment. She addressed her concerns at a school board meeting on Dec. 16.
'We have never had a Black head football coach. I'm going to state the elephant that is in the room. It's called color. And I think that there comes a certain level of obligation of the individual who has that complexion to do the best they possibly can on the backs of their own community. Some people will never understand that – the toll that it takes to make sure that you are doing the best that you can for every student, every young man and woman that you touch,' Richardson said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Kate Merrill lawsuit: Microaggression vs. discrimination
In this case, the meteorologist, Jason Mikell, allegedly took offense at her correction and, according to the lawsuit, confronted her by 'loudly yelling at her on the studio floor and asserting that she was being critical of him.' After she complained to human resources about his reaction, she subsequently learned that she was under investigation for other alleged microaggressions. Faced with demotion from the anchor desk, she quit and is now suing WBZ, CBS, and its parent company, Paramount Global, along with several former colleagues for discrimination, saying she lost her career in television journalism because she is white. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Advertisement What if everyone involved had simply tried to talk to each other instead of marching to HR to lodge a complaint? Is there no middle ground where people of basic good will can meet, talk, and move on? Without it, this country is going to swing back and forth between the extremes of cancel culture, where every utterance can be taken as an expression of bias, and the anti-DEI fervor, led by President Trump, that is empowering a new class of aggrieved white people. Are microaggressions teachable moments? Or is someone charged with launching them so beyond redemption that they are unworthy of employment? Addressing a School Committee chair and her assistant as 'ladies' cost Vito Perrone, a candidate for school superintendent in Easthampton, a job offer in 2023. Former state treasurer Shannon O'Brien was fired as chair of the Cannabis Control Commission in 2024 for alleged grievances that included suggesting to a Black commission member that she would know a lawmaker who was also Black. Advertisement In Merrill's lawsuit, the former anchor said she learned that Mikell, who is named as a defendant, had complained that she welcomed him to Boston by saying he would 'find his people.' She contends she only meant he would 'create a community of friends' but he interpreted it differently. Courtney Cole, another Black colleague who is named in the suit, was allegedly upset because Merrill said she should go to Nashville where she could become the main anchor, a statement that Cole interpreted as implying she would be a better racial fit in Nashville. Saying nothing was also a problem for Merrill. For example, Mikell also allegedly complained that Merrill did not ask him about his weekends. Other complaints involved allegations that Merrill rolled her eyes when talking to people of color and did not greet people of color when they entered a room. In her lawsuit, Merrill also said that when Mikell was hired, he allegedly told her he had never been to Boston before, asked for help in getting acclimated, and specifically asked for help with pronouncing local town names. Since a television meteorologist is part of a news broadcast, proper pronunciation does matter. 'There's always been a certain charm about the peculiar spellings and unusual pronunciations of local city and town names, but on-air reporters' failing to say them correctly can undermine the reporter's credibility and authenticity for people who live here and call into question other aspects of the reporter's work,' Marjorie Arons-Barron, the longtime WCVB editorial director who is now a blogger, told me. 'Faith in our institutions, including media, is already low enough.' Advertisement Mispronouncing Concord, if that's what happened, isn't the end of journalism. But even in a weather report, it would be better to say it correctly. There should be some way to tell someone that. Joan Vennochi is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump is targeting sanctuary cities to settle political scores and potentially arrest his opponents
It's not about immigration – or rather, it's not just about immigration. Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, sent letters this week to dozens of cities and counties around the country, warning them that their leaders could be prosecuted and federal funds stripped from their cities if they don't 'cooperate' with Donald Trump's deportation scheme. The threats against cities come amid a backdrop of a crackdown on crime in Washington DC, where Trump, after similar actions in Los Angeles, has sent in the military against the wishes of local leaders. The attacks on cities will not stop with Washington. Using immigration as a pretext, the Trump administration wants to go after Democratic-run cities across the country to settle political scores, assert the president as a strongman and, potentially, arrest his opponents. 'Individuals operating under the color of law, using their official position to obstruct federal immigration enforcement efforts and facilitating or inducing illegal immigration may be subject to criminal charges,' Bondi wrote. Or, as Bondi told Fox News after the letters were sent, she is telling local leaders: 'You better be abiding by our federal policies and with our federal law enforcement, because if you aren't, we're going to come after you.' In DC, the administration drew a lawsuit over its takeover of the city's police force, after Bondi sought to end sanctuary policies that prevent local law enforcement from sharing information with immigration officials about people in custody. Related: How Trump is using 'pure lies' about high crime in US cities to justify federal takeovers If the Trump administration moves forward with threats to charge local officials, it would be an escalation of Trump's long-simmering war on cities. The president has sought to paint cities as liberal 'hellholes' in need of liberation, delivered through military takeovers and arrests. On the campaign trail in 2024, Trump often went on diatribes against cities, calling out specific places that he wanted to target. In one speech from early 2024, he promised to 'take over the horribly run capital of our nation' and said he would 'rebuild our cities into beacons of hope, safety and beauty – better than they have ever been before'. He continued this tradition this week, naming majority Democratic cities run by Black mayors – Baltimore, Oakland, Los Angeles, Chicago – and putting them on notice that he could come there next. Bondi's letter spells out what cities are facing financially if they defy the president: Trump has directed federal agencies to look at their statutory ability to tie 'immigration-related terms and conditions' to 'combat sanctuary policies' when they are doling out federal grants, contracts and funds. Trump's allies who wrote Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration, suggested using this tactic to force cities, counties and states to aid immigration enforcement. In his first administration, Trump tried to use a justice department grant program this way, but the plan was tied up in court for years. Cities are ready to fight back. They have been in court defending their rights to create local policies that prevent their police forces from carrying out Trump's immigration agenda. Localities that received the letter have said it mischaracterizes their policies and ignores local control. Bruce Harrell, Seattle's mayor, said his city will remain a 'welcoming city for all' and will continue to defend itself in court if needed. And if Trump brings troops to their streets, they say they will be ready to push back. 'We will be prepared to take any legal and any other action that we need to take,' said Brandon Scott, Baltimore's mayor, in a press call on Thursday. 'And I know that my brother and sister mayors around the country feel the same way.'
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
SpaceX seeks exemption in South Africa from what Musk called an 'openly racist' law
South Africa's Black ownership requirements for telecom carriers have been publicly questioned by Elon Musk's SpaceX, which suggests that the nation implement an alternative equity-equivalent scheme for new businesses. Elon Musk's SpaceX has questioned South Africa's Black ownership requirements for the telecom industry, proposing alternative equity-equivalent schemes. SpaceX has suggested investment-based programs that provide regulatory certainty and foster infrastructure investment. The South African government is exploring approaches to balance restitution measures with attracting international companies. SpaceX requested in a letter to the government that regulators should permit investment-based alternatives to the existing requirement that Black South Africans own at least 30% of companies in the ICT industry. 'Equity equivalent investment programs will provide much-needed regulatory certainty and foster investment in infrastructure,' SpaceX said. 'Uniform empowerment regulation will motivate both current and prospective operators to expand their business activities and network reach.' The company contended that these initiatives had to be standardized throughout the telecom sector, allowing foreign corporations to participate in research, digital inclusion, infrastructure, and small business support. South Africa's Black Economic Empowerment Framework (BEE) South Africa's Black Economic Empowerment Framework (BEE) was implemented at the end of apartheid to address profound structural disparities that prevented the Black majority from the formal economy. While the system remains a cornerstone of the country's economic strategy, it has drawn criticism from investors, including Musk, who has previously described the laws as "openly racist." In response to industry concerns, South Africa's Department of Communications and Digital Technologies has directed the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) to investigate alternatives that might increase participation without requiring equitable transfers. A similar system was previously implemented in the automobile industry in 2019, when carmakers such as BMW, Ford, and Toyota established a transformation fund to benefit historically underprivileged neighborhoods while keeping complete control over their operations. SpaceX's participation underlines the balancing act that South Africa must perform: maintain the economic restitution measures meant to repair apartheid's damage while also luring global firms keen to enter Africa's largest and most advanced telecom market. In May, news surfaced that the South African government was considering granting Musk a special exception from the country's Black ownership regulations, allowing Starlink to operate lawfully within its boundaries. Obtaining legislative clarification in South Africa might be a critical step for SpaceX, which is expanding its Starlink satellite broadband service throughout Africa. In June, Starlink was reportedly contemplating a R2 billion ($112.7 million) investment in South Africa as a potential solution to the country's Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) regulations. Starlink has disclosed plans to work with local South African enterprises for different infrastructure needs, including land leasing, fiber optics, energy services, security, and continuous maintenance, to satisfy compliance standards. Starlink is already accessible in 17 African nations, including Namibia, Botswana, and Mozambique, but not in South Africa, the continent's largest economy.
