NZ's first aquatic sensory experience almost finished
The Parakiore Recreation and Sport Centre will include the unique multi-sensory aquatic environment, specifically designed to be explored and played by people with sensory or disability needs.
The centre, off Saint Asaph St, is almost completed and construction is on track to be finished by October.
Among the features of the centre's aquatic sensory experience is a 'how things work' wall, allowing visitors to control the flow of water through elements such as toilet cisterns and water pumps.
A tactile, Canterbury-themed wall, paying homage to the region's natural environment, is also included, alongside bubble columns and interactive water features.
The unique creations are being meticulously crafted by Christchurch-based firm, Development Engineering.
The Aquatic Sensory Experience will have eight water features including fountains, misting spray, and jets activated by sensors and switches. Photo: Christchurch City Council
Director Graham Christie said creating the one-of-a-kind equipment is challenging but rewarding.
"I design these bespoke features, then comes the even harder job of working out how to actually make them.
"There's no manual on how to cleanly cut the front off a porcelain sink.
"I've exported this type of interactive equipment all over the world and have no doubt that what will be on offer at the aquatic sensory experience at Parakiore will make it a truly unique attraction."
Parakiore is being built by Crown Infrastructure Delivery Limited and will be owned and operated by Christchurch City Council.
CID project director Alistair Young said an aquatic sensory experience like this is rare globally.
"While we are creating New Zealand's largest indoor sports and aquatics facility, our goal is to provide access for as many people as possible.
"The aquatic sensory experience, along with features like the MOVE circo arts studio and dry diving space, plays a crucial role in achieving this."
Sinks are being sliced, custom-made hand pumps are being cast, and bubbling tubes are being illuminated for New Zealand's first Aquatic Sensory Experience in Christchurch. Photo: Christchurch City Council
Christchurch City Council head of recreation, sport and events Nigel Cox highlights the success of the Southern Centre: Multi-Sensory Experience at Pioneer Recreation and Sport Centre, which serves as a foundation for the new initiative.
"Our aspiration is for visitors to have such a positive experience with the aquatic sensory experience's water features that they gain newfound confidence to explore the diverse water play equipment and pools throughout Parakiore."
Aquatic Sensory Experience features
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Alternative alert system 'mothballed' despite benefits
Some people claim they received the tsunami alert dozens of times. Photo: RNZ/ Karoline Tuckey The founder of an alternative emergency alert framework says officials never gave it a look-in when they were setting up the under-fire Emergency Mobile Alert system. And he reckons his was better, proving its worth during the aftermath of the Christchurch quakes. The National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA) is investigating glitches in the current system following the magnitude 8.8 earthquake off Russia on Wednesday . Some Kiwis say they received up to 50 alerts, while some did not receive any at all. Matthew Nolan founded an alternative system, Readynet, which was used during the Christchurch Earthquakes and to mobilise volunteers cleaning up the Rena oil spill. "I think that the NEMA system - which costs them the best part of $20 million - has miscued for them, and it's certainly not the first time," he told Morning Report on Friday. "There is a record of it waking people up at night for messages that were text messages only, and as well as circumstances where people did not get the alert that they should have got." NEMA spokesperson John Price told Checkpoint on Thursday there were many reasons for the differences. "It could be different providers and different cell towers. There's a lot of possibilities, but this is something we're working through. We'll look into it, absolutely." Nolan criticised the NEMA system as being "one-way" only, and unable to tell if people had actually received the message as no information was sent back. "Whereas other systems and a better system, and yes, our system was interactive, and we could see where the messages had been received. "So for example, you send a message out into an area where there's a big river and cell towers have been wiped out. Our system would tell you that all the people in that river have not received the message - all the people in that river valley have not received the message. You can deduct from that, that in fact, the cell phone towers are out." Where the magnitude 8.8 quake struck. Photo: AFP He claimed the Emergency Mobile Alert system "can't target messages". "It's a modern equivalent of a World War 2 fire siren. It alerts people that something's happening and it gives them a brief message, but it can't target messages. "So for example… people in Upper Hutt got no message. In Lower Hutt, lots of people got the message. So, you know, why is there a difference between one area and another?" According to the NEMA website, the current system can "broadcast to all capable phones from targeted cell towers to areas affected by serious hazards". "You may not receive an alert if you are out of mobile coverage, mobile phone towers are damaged, or there is a power outage." Price said the variation in coverage "could be different providers and different cell towers, there's a lot of possibilities". Nolan suggested the system was not working as well as it could because it was now owned by "a banking conglomerate out of New York". New Zealand's system was provided by Dutch company one2many, which is now a division of Everbridge Public Warning, an American software company that specialises in alert systems. "Now, those sorts of companies are chasing the big markets, the multi-million markets, and I think New Zealand is a very small end of that market," Nolan said. "There is no office of that organisation in Wellington to work alongside emergency services in New Zealand… "I think that a New Zealand-owned, developed, supported, helpdesked system is the best, and that's what we had built, and our system is now mothballed." He said he asked officials to look at using Readynet for the national system, but "they never ever fully examined what we had, even though it was used during Christchurch to communicate after the Christchurch earthquake, to communicate with all the residents and contractors left inside the cordons. "And that was, information such as, well, 'The cordon will be open on the corner of such and such street at four o'clock this afternoon to allow people in and out for shopping there.' That's the sort of stuff you can't put on Facebook." As of Friday morning, a tsunami advisory remained in place . Pacific nations emerged relatively unscathed . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 days ago
- RNZ News
Dogs allowed on Canterbury buses – but is it workable?
Environment Canterbury councillor Joe Davies is advocating for dogs to be allowed to ride on buses. Photo: Supplied/Environment Canterbury A last minute rule change to allow small dogs on buses has left Environment Canterbury (ECan) staff scrambling to make workable. Councillors adopted the Canterbury Regional Transport Plan 2025/35 at a council meeting on Wednesday [July 30] after a late amendment from councillor David East to allow passengers to take a small dog on the bus with a lead and a muzzle. Cr East's motion passed by 8-7, and followed an earlier amendment proposed by Cr Joe Davies, which would have allowed small dogs to travel in their owner's lap, which lost 9-6. This was despite staff advice that dogs are not permitted in the Christchurch bus interchange, administered by the Christchurch City Council, unless they are in a secure carrier. It could mean passengers are able to board a bus with their dog but are unable to get off with their dog at the interchange. Cr Davies has been lobbying for pets on buses for the last two years, following lobbying by resident JJ Smith. He said the plan is a good example of how policy takes time. ''This is about dogs on buses. When people think about taking a pet on the bus, a dog is different because people take them to the park or to visit people. ''Dogs are companions in ways that cats and guinea pigs aren't.'' Environment Canterbury councillor Joe Davies is advocating for dogs to be allowed to ride on buses. Photo: Supplied/Environment Canterbury But Cr Claire McKay said she felt allowing dogs was a risk to public safety, as ''we can never be certain what a dog is going to do''. ECan staff have been working on the regional transport plan since 2021 with the Canterbury Regional Transport Committee, which comprises the region's mayors and Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency, and the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee. The proposed plan had a clause allowing pets to travel on buses, as long as they were in a secure carrier. Cr Grant Edge, who chaired the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee's hearing panel, said he was disappointed to see the amendment pass. ''It is incredibly naive for us not to have simply adopted the plan. ''As staff have told us, leashing and muzzling has issues with the Christchurch City Council's rules and we have no definition of a small dog.'' Chairperson Craig Pauling questioned how bus drivers will ''determine what is a small dog?'' Dogs may soon be riding on Canterbury buses. Photo: RNZ/Dom Thomas There is still work to do before dogs can ride on buses. ECan staff will now engage with the Christchurch City Council, bus drivers and other stakeholders to come up with a revised code of conduct for pets on buses to present to a future council meeting. The Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee comprises the Christchurch, Selwyn and Waimakariri councils, ECan, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and government agencies. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Dogs allowed on Canterbury buses - but is it workable?
A last-minute rule change to allow small dogs on buses has left Environment Canterbury staff scrambling to make it workable. Councillors adopted the Canterbury Regional Transport Plan 2025/35 at a council meeting yesterday after a late amendment from councillor David East to allow passengers to take a small dog on the bus with a lead and a muzzle. Cr East's motion passed by 8-7, and followed an earlier amendment proposed by Cr Joe Davies, which would have allowed small dogs to travel in their owner's lap, which lost 9-6. This was despite staff advice that dogs were not permitted in the Christchurch bus interchange, administered by the Christchurch City Council, unless they are in a secure carrier. It could mean passengers are able to board a bus with their dog, but are unable to get off with their canine at the interchange. Cr Davies has been lobbying for pets on buses for the last two years, following lobbying by resident JJ Smith. The plan was a good example of how policy takes time, he said. ''This is about dogs on buses. When people think about taking a pet on the bus, a dog is different because people take them to the park or to visit people. ''Dogs are companions in ways that cats and guinea pigs aren't.'' But Cr Claire McKay said she felt allowing dogs was a risk to public safety as ''we can never be certain what a dog is going to do''. ECan staff have been working on the regional transport plan since 2021 with the Canterbury Regional Transport Committee, which comprises the region's mayors, the NZ Transport Agency/Waka Kotahi and the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee. The proposed plan had a clause allowing pets to travel on buses, as long as they were in a secure carrier. Cr Grant Edge, who chaired the Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee's hearing panel, said he was disappointed to see the amendment pass. ''It is incredibly naive for us not to have simply adopted the plan. ''As staff have told us, leashing and muzzling has issues with the Christchurch City Council's rules and we have no definition of a small dog.'' Chairman Craig Pauling questioned how bus drivers will ''determine what is a small dog?'' There is still work to do before dogs can ride on buses. ECan staff will now engage with the Christchurch City Council, bus drivers and other stakeholders to come up with a revised code of conduct for pets on buses to present to a future council meeting. The Greater Christchurch Partnership Committee comprises the Christchurch, Selwyn and Waimakariri councils, ECan, Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and government agencies. - By David Hill, Local Democracy Reporter • LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
