logo
Court orders reinstatement of convictions of ex-Fox executive, marketing firm in FIFA bribery case

Court orders reinstatement of convictions of ex-Fox executive, marketing firm in FIFA bribery case

Independent2 days ago
A federal appeals court on Tuesday ordered reinstatement of the convictions of a former Fox executive and a South American sports media and marketing company in the FIFA bribery investigation.
Hernan Lopez, the former CEO of Fox International Channels, was convicted by a jury in March 2023 along with the marketing company Full Play Group SA of one count each of wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering conspiracy related to the Copa Libertadores soccer tournament.
Full Play was convicted of two additional counts each of wire fraud conspiracy and money laundering conspiracy related to World Cup qualifiers and friendlies and to the Copa America, the continent's national team championship.
U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, who presided over the trial in Brooklyn federal court, granted a motion for an acquittal in September 2023, citing a May 2023 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in cases involving Joseph Percoco, an aide to former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, and construction firm owner Louis Ciminelli. Chen wrote those decisions meant Lopez's conviction could not be sustained under the honest services fraud statute. The U.S. government then appealed.
U.S. Senior Circuit Judge John M. Walker Jr. and U.S. Circuit Judges Beth Robinson and Sarah A. L. Merriam vacated Chen's decision and ordered her to reinstate the convictions and to conduct additional proceedings consistent with their opinion.
Walker, writing for the panel, said 'the nature of defendants' conduct (bribery), coupled with the character of the relationship between the bribed officials and the organizations to whom they owed a duty of loyalty (employer-employee relationships), place the schemes presumptively within the scope of' the statute.
They added: 'The foreign identity of certain organizations and officials does not remove the schemes from the ambit of' the statute, 'especially where, as here, relevant conduct occurred in the United States, for the benefit of United States-based executives and organizations (e.g., Lopez and Fox), and the victims were multinational organizations with global operations and significant ties to the United States.'
The circuit judges said it was up to Chen to decide whether to grant a defense motion questioning whether the government's evidence was sufficient to prove a conspiracy to deceive the South American governing body CONMEBOL.
'The proceedings that resulted in Hernan's conviction were afflicted with numerous defects,' John Gleeson, a lawyer for Lopez, wrote in an email to The Associated Press. 'Today, the Court of Appeals ruled against us on one discrete legal issue — the same issue that we believe Judge Pamela Chen ruled on correctly when she acquitted our client after trial. We intend to seek review of that issue in the Supreme Court of the United States, and have no doubt that our client will eventually be fully vindicated.'
Mayling C. Blanco and Michael Martinez, lawyers for Full Play, did not respond to emails from the AP seeking comment. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York had no comment.
Dozens of people have pleaded guilty or been convicted after a U.S.-led investigation into FIFA and international soccer. The probe became public in 2015 when U.S. prosecutors accused the leaders of soccer federations of tarnishing the sport for nearly a quarter-century by taking $150 million in bribes and payoffs.
'Corruption in international soccer is not new,' the circuit court wrote. 'It was rampant for decades before the events at issue here.'
Fox Corp., which split from a subsidiary of international channels during a restructuring in 2019, was not charged and has denied any involvement in the bribery scandal.
___
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans celebrate as Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes in House
Republicans celebrate as Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes in House

The Independent

time43 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Republicans celebrate as Trump's ‘Big, Beautiful Bill' passes in House

Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" was passed by the House of Representatives on Thursday, 3 July 2025, with a vote of 218 in favour to 214 against. The legislation features sweeping cuts to Medicaid and nutrition assistance programmes. It also extends the 2017 tax cuts and includes funding for 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and 3,000 Border Patrol agents. Mr Trump has set a loose deadline of 4 July to sign the bill into law. Watch the video in full above

For retailers, US-Vietnam trade deal leaves questions
For retailers, US-Vietnam trade deal leaves questions

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

For retailers, US-Vietnam trade deal leaves questions

LONDON, July 3 (Reuters) - A trade deal announced by the U.S. and Vietnam creates new question marks for sportswear and clothing retailers like Nike and Adidas that source shoes and clothes from factories in the Southeast Asian country, industry experts said on Thursday. The U.S. will impose a 20% tariff on many imports from Vietnam, while "transshipping" from third countries through Vietnam will face a 40% levy, President Donald Trump said on Wednesday. Garment and shoe factories in Vietnam rely heavily on yarns, polyester fabrics, and trims like buttons and zippers imported from neighbouring China. It was not immediately clear whether such products assembled in Vietnam from Chinese inputs would be vulnerable to the transshipment tariff. Typically, transshipment would designate a product mostly made in China, shipped to Vietnam and then relabelled and exported as made in Vietnam. U.S. customs already watches for that practice, but the Trump administration has hardened its stance on it, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying that "a huge amount" of trade from Vietnam is transshipment from China, in a CNBC interview Thursday. Many questions remain over the trade agreement, said Sheng Lu, professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware. "Strictly speaking, transshipment is illegal, whereas using foreign components in compliance with rules of origin requirements is common practice," said Lu. "Confusing these two distinct practices will only create greater uncertainty and risk further supply chain disruption." Vietnam has been a top destination for retailers and brands looking to reduce their reliance on factories in China, but has also become a target of Trump's aggressive trade policy. Vietnam is a key producer of sports shoes for Nike, accounting for 50% of Nike branded shoes overall in the company's fiscal year 2024, and is also Adidas' biggest supplier country, producing 27% of the German brand's products. A Nike spokesperson said the company is still looking into the details of the deal. Adidas declined to comment. "With this new change and with the potential for this transshipment tariff, I think it's going to cause a lot of importers to really question, is Vietnam really a good other option?" said Lila Landis, a customs compliance consultant based in Fort Worth, Texas. While details are still not confirmed, the 40% tariff could possibly be stacked atop the correct China duty for any given product, making it highly punitive, Landis added. Overall, the U.S. imported 274 million pairs of shoes from Vietnam last year, according to industry group Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America (FDRA), which on Wednesday called the tariffs unnecessary and said they would hit American consumers. "There's disappointment in the 20% on the Vietnam side," said Joe Jurken, managing director at supply chain management company The ABC Group. The announced tariff on Vietnam narrows the gap with China, which the U.S. has hit with a 55% tariff, and may even tempt some brands to stick with China, Jurken said, instead of switching suppliers which is lengthy and costly. "There's a lack of capacity in Vietnam because there's not enough factories, and there's an overabundance of capacity in China... so the Chinese factories, in our opinion, will benefit from this over the short term," Jurken said. Still, the 20% tariff rate is better than the 25-30% rate the market feared, according to analysts at Raymond James. And the deal announcement goes some way to end uncertainty, and could encourage some retailers that were considering Vietnam to go ahead and place orders, said Jim Kennemer, managing director at Cosmo Sourcing. "It's going to be nearly impossible to get a 100% not-China supply chain," he said.

Terrifying threats made by female cop before being shot in wild encounter with officers trying to serve restraining order
Terrifying threats made by female cop before being shot in wild encounter with officers trying to serve restraining order

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Terrifying threats made by female cop before being shot in wild encounter with officers trying to serve restraining order

A cop who was shot by a fellow officer while off duty had threatened to kill herself and her infant son, court documents show. Kelsey Fitzsimmons, 28, was shot once on Monday evening after three fellow officers arrived at her home to serve a protection order on behalf of her fiance. The off-duty North Andover Police Department officer had allegedly voiced suicidal ideation both while she was pregnant and after she gave birth. Her firefighter fiance had expressed concerns that it would escalate to physical violence against their four-month-old son, according to The Boston Globe. 'I fear she will kill the baby at any moment,' he wrote in the restraining order application. 'Kelsey is threatening to take the baby 'far, far, far away for a long, long time.' This is how she has spoken about killing herself in the past. 'She punched her stomach repeatedly while pregnant, saying she would kill herself and the baby.' He claimed that during a June 28 outing, Fitzsimmons allegedly punched him in the face three times while intoxicated. He added that during that altercation, she chased after him and their child, prompting him to seek shelter at a motel as their friends called four different police departments for help. The firefighter said the baby boy was staying with his parents at the time, but Fitzsimmons' parents came to collect him. 'I fear if she doesn't have me she will kill the baby because she has said she has nothing besides me,' he wrote. 'Fitzsimmons is a danger to myself, her son and herself.' He is now seeking full custody of their son, and that matter is still being heard by the courts. As per Fitzsimmons' restraining order, she must surrender all weapons and stay away from both the North Andover Fire Department and his current home. The order will effect until at least July 14. The new dad had warned officers in his initial report that Fitzsimmons may respond poorly to being served the order. When officers came to knock on her door, an 'armed confrontation' took place. 'As a result of that armed confrontation, one of the responding officers discharged their weapon, which struck Ms. Fitzsimmons once,' Essex County District Attorney Paul Tucker said. The wounded officer had to be airlifted by medical helicopter to a Boston hospital, where she remains in a stable condition. Fitzsimmons, who had been with the department about 18 months, was already on administrative leave and had filed to have her service weapon returned during her leave, according to police. Her leave will now be extended. In March, police and emergency medical responders were called to Fitzsimmons's home for what was described as a 'female having a mental health episode,' records show. She was hospitalized for 12 hours and diagnosed with postpartum depression. At that time, she turned in her service weapon. After being medically cleared in June, Fitzsimmons was reinstated to active duty, along with her license to carry a firearm. A note in the court paperwork had warned officers that serving Fitzsimmons could carry additional risk. 'Defendant is an officer with a license to carry. Plaintiff expressed concerns regarding Defendant's reaction to being served.' 'Pursuant to the court order, one of the standard boxes to check is retrieval of any firearms in the home,' Tucker said. He added that the restraining order process can be 'some of the most dangerous duties that police officers can cover, no matter who the object of that order is.' The officer who fired the shot is a veteran with more than 20 years of experience, Tucker added. The department does not use body cameras, so there is no video of the shooting, according to Chief Gray. The incident is under investigation by Massachusetts State Police detectives assigned to Tucker's office, while Fitzsimmons recovers in the hospital.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store