logo
Sam Altman hopes AGI will allow people to have more kids in the future

Sam Altman hopes AGI will allow people to have more kids in the future

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman says having a kid has been "amazing" and thinks everyone else should have one, too.
He also says AGI could maybe help with that.
AGI, or artificial general intelligence, is a still theoretical version of AI that reasons as well as humans. Achieving AGI is the ultimate goal of many of the leading AI companies and is what's largely driving the AI talent wars.
Meanwhile, the world's population growth is slowing down. In the United States, Gen Z and millennials are delaying having children or not having children at all to focus on their financial stability. Some prominent futurists, including Altman, say that's a cause for concern.
He said this trend is a "real problem" during an episode of "People by WTF" with Nikhil Kamath on Thursday. Altman, who had his first child earlier this year, said he hopes that building families and creating community "will become far more important in a post-AGI world."
He said he thinks this will be possible because AGI will allow for a world "where people have more abundance, more time, more resources, and potential, and ability." As AI progresses and becomes a more useful tool, he says society will grow richer and there will be more social support.
"I think it's pretty clear that family and community are two of the things that make us the happiest, and I hope we will turn back to that," Altman said.
When Kamath asked about Altman's own experience with fatherhood, the CEO said he strongly recommends having children. "It felt like the most important and meaningful and fulfilling thing I could imagine doing," he said.
Altman has described himself as "extremely kid-pilled" and said that in the first weeks of being a dad, he was "constantly" asking ChatGPT questions. Using AI is a skill that he says he plans to pass down to his children.
"My kids will never be smarter than AI," Altman said on an episode of The OpenAI Podcast in June. "They will grow up vastly more capable than we grew up, and able to do things that we cannot imagine, and they'll be really good at using AI."
Altman isn't the only prominent CEO in the AI industry who's passionate about procreation. Elon Musk, the founder of Grok-maker xAI, among other companies, has fathered over 10 known children. Musk has said he's "doing his best to help the underpopulation crisis."
"A collapsing birth rate is the biggest danger civilization faces by far," Musk said in an X post in 2022.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

7 GPT-5 prompts that finally made the new model click for me
7 GPT-5 prompts that finally made the new model click for me

Tom's Guide

time2 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

7 GPT-5 prompts that finally made the new model click for me

GPT-5 is finally here, and depending on who you ask, it's either a massive leap forward or a disappointing model that doesn't deserve the hype. If you've been using ChatGPT-5 this past week, you've probably noticed that the new model feels different from GPT-4o. It's faster, deeper and more intuitive, but also more likely to assume, overanalyze or completely shift the tone of your request. Whether you're loving it or low-key missing GPT-4o, the way to get better results with GPT-5 is understanding how it thinks and prompting accordingly. These 7 prompts are designed to show off what GPT-5 does well and help you sidestep some of the growing pains. Think of them as a warm-up round for your new AI co-pilot. Prompt: "Think step-by-step: Help me create a weekly schedule that balances work, family time and exercise. Keep it realistic for a parent with young kids." My life is pretty hectic from morning until night, which is why this prompt works for me. If you have a similar chaotic family life or an incredibly busy work schedule, this type of prompt is where GPT-5 shines. When you ask it to think step-by-step you'll discover the deeper reasoning for realistic, multi-variable planning. Prompt: "Organize my messy Google Drive into clear folders and subfolders. I'll paste a list of file names." GPT-5 can recognize patterns, which makes it a pro at organization, categorization and decluttering. It can spot naming conventions, redundant versions and suggest file clean-up strategies (like archiving old drafts or grouping by year or project). You can even ask it to output the structure in a ready-to-copy format, which is perfect if you're rebuilding your folder tree manually or importing it into a tool. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. If digital clutter overwhelms you like it does for me, this prompt turns GPT-5 into a surprisingly sharp personal assistant. Prompt: Plan a Sunday family day that works for kids ages 4, 8, and 10, includes one indoor and one outdoor activity and stays under $50." Unlike a time-strapped human, GPT-5 can multi-task, juggling everything at once with ease. Prompts that give specifics are no problem for this AI, so go ahead and let it take all the leg work out of planning your social life and weekend activities. Prompt: "Turn my grocery list into a healthy meal plan for the week, and rearrange it so the meals with fresh produce are earlier in the week." OpenAI upgraded several aspects of ChatGPT with this model, including health and wellness. While AI should never take the place of a human doctor, this type of prompt can help you better balance your health and lifestyle to stay on track where it matters most. Prompt: "I want to finish the summer off with another book. Recommend 5 books based on my favorite shows: [list 3–4 shows you love]." As someone who always has at least two books going at once and regularly binges shows, this prompt is one of my favorites. It combines everything I love about entertainment while also channeling GPT-5's ability to brainstorm. Prompts that combine your favorite things lean into the upgraded cultural matching to connect media tastes across formats. Prompt: "Give me 5 conversation starters for meeting new people at my kid's soccer game that aren't small talk about the weather." GPT-5 has a knack for generating natural, situationally relevant ideas and dialogue. Don't be afraid to turn to this advanced chatbot next time you're at a loss for words when socializing. This type of prompt is best done in the ChatGPT app when you're on-the-go and need immediate advice. Prompt:"Explain the latest pop culture trend everyone's talking about as if I'm a busy parent who hasn't been on social media in a month." The only thing that seems to move faster than the evolution of AI is the next pop culture trend. Stay in-the-know (and maybe use this in combination with the previous prompt) by asking GPT-5 to summarize and adjust tone for a specific audience. Whether you're trying to come up with your next TikTok post or connect with your teen, this prompt is a good one to have on hand. Whether you're still adjusting to GPT-5 or you've already made it your go-to assistant, one thing's clear: this model thrives when you give it structure, specificity and a little direction. These prompts are so much more productivity hacks because they actually help you build a better understanding of how to use this upgraded model. GPT-5 may not be perfect, but when you learn how to prompt it well, it's surprisingly great at helping you live, work and do just about everything else a little smarter (and easier). Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Gemini vs ChatGPT: Comparing Strengths, Weaknesses, and Real-World Uses
Gemini vs ChatGPT: Comparing Strengths, Weaknesses, and Real-World Uses

Time Business News

time3 hours ago

  • Time Business News

Gemini vs ChatGPT: Comparing Strengths, Weaknesses, and Real-World Uses

If you're short on time, here's the essence: ChatGPT excels at creativity, storytelling, and natural conversations, while Gemini is designed for accuracy, real-time information, and seamless integration with Google's ecosystem. Think of ChatGPT as the imaginative writer who can draft essays, brainstorm ideas, and simulate engaging conversations. Gemini, on the other hand, is like a research assistant who always has the latest news, data, and Google-powered insights at hand. Which one is better? The answer depends on what you need most from an AI assistant. AI isn't just a buzzword anymore — it's becoming part of daily work, study, and even leisure. From helping students finish assignments to supporting businesses in decision-making, AI tools are shaping the way we live and work. With Google's Gemini entering the scene and OpenAI's ChatGPT already being widely adopted, the question isn't just about features. It's about trust, usability, and real-world value. Users want to know which model can best save them time, improve creativity, or provide reliable answers. That's why looking at Gemini vs ChatGPT side by side is so important. OpenAI launched ChatGPT as part of its mission to create AI that benefits humanity. Its foundation is built on the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) models, which specialize in generating human-like text from prompts. Google's Gemini, however, is part of its DeepMind and AI-first strategy, aiming to combine cutting-edge research with practical applications. Gemini was designed not just to chat, but also to integrate across Google's massive ecosystem — from Docs to YouTube. This difference in origin also explains their strengths: ChatGPT leans toward conversation and creativity, while Gemini leans toward information accuracy and tool integration. ChatGPT is known for sounding natural, friendly, and often surprisingly human. It can role-play, tell stories, draft emails, and even write poetry with ease. Gemini, while conversational, tends to stay closer to facts. Its responses are polished, but you might notice they sometimes feel more formal or structured compared to ChatGPT's casual flow. If your priority is creative writing or brainstorming, ChatGPT usually has the upper hand. One of Gemini's biggest advantages is its ability to pull live data from the web. Ask about today's news, stock prices, or a trending video, and Gemini can bring you accurate, up-to-date answers. ChatGPT, on the other hand, relies on its training data unless paired with a browsing plugin or third-party integration. While the GPT-4 model has improved knowledge, it still cannot natively access the latest information in the way Gemini can. This makes Gemini especially valuable for researchers, journalists, or anyone who depends on real-time updates. When comparing Gemini vs ChatGPT, accuracy is one of the most debated aspects. ChatGPT can sometimes 'hallucinate,' meaning it generates information that sounds convincing but isn't factually correct. can sometimes 'hallucinate,' meaning it generates information that sounds convincing but isn't factually correct. Gemini, with its Google integration, has a stronger foundation for fact-based responses. It's less prone to fabricating details, though it can still simplify or omit complexities. If your work requires verified and up-to-date information, Gemini has the edge. But if you're more interested in creative problem-solving, ChatGPT often feels more flexible. Gemini was built to be multimodal from the ground up — meaning it can handle text, images, audio, and video input/output more natively. This aligns with Google's vision of AI being able to process the world the way humans do. ChatGPT has also added multimodal capabilities in GPT-4, such as analyzing images or generating visuals through integrations like DALL·E. However, Gemini's design is expected to push these features even further in the future. This makes Gemini potentially more powerful in fields like education, media, and accessibility, where AI must process different types of content seamlessly. Here's where Gemini truly shines: it's part of the Google ecosystem. Imagine drafting an essay in Google Docs, asking Gemini to fact-check it, then pulling in a YouTube video summary — all without switching tabs. ChatGPT doesn't have the same native integration with platforms like Google Workspace. However, it's widely used through third-party integrations, APIs, and plugins, making it extremely versatile for businesses, developers, and individual users. If you're already heavily invested in Google tools, Gemini might feel like a natural fit. If you prefer broader customization, ChatGPT offers more flexibility. People use ChatGPT for a wide range of tasks: Students use it to explain complex topics in simpler terms. Writers and marketers rely on it for brainstorming, drafting, and editing. Professionals turn to it for email writing, meeting summaries, and idea generation. In short, ChatGPT acts as a creative partner for anyone who needs text-based assistance. Gemini's strength lies in practical productivity. For example: Journalists use it to pull breaking news updates. Analysts leverage it for quick data interpretation from Google Sheets. Everyday users rely on it to summarize YouTube content or answer factual questions instantly. It's less about brainstorming and more about getting accurate, actionable information quickly. Neither Gemini nor ChatGPT is the 'final form' of AI. Both companies are in an arms race to improve usability, accuracy, and creativity. ChatGPT will likely continue leading in conversational depth and creativity . . Gemini will likely dominate in real-time data, integrations, and multimodal performance. For users, this means more choice, more power, and more ways to work smarter with AI. When it comes to Gemini vs ChatGPT, there's no universal 'winner.' The smarter choice depends on your personal or professional needs: Pick ChatGPT if you value creativity, natural conversation, and flexible brainstorming. if you value creativity, natural conversation, and flexible brainstorming. Pick Gemini if you prioritize accuracy, real-time information, and seamless Google integration. In reality, many people may find themselves using both — one as a creative companion, the other as a reliable researcher. 1. Is Gemini more accurate than ChatGPT? Yes, Gemini is generally more accurate for real-time facts because it pulls data from the web, while ChatGPT relies on trained data unless extended with browsing. 2. Can ChatGPT generate more creative content than Gemini? Yes, ChatGPT is often better at writing stories, brainstorming ideas, or creating content that requires imagination. 3. Which is better for students: Gemini or ChatGPT? Students may benefit more from ChatGPT for essays and explanations, while Gemini is useful for research and fact-checking. 4. Does Gemini replace ChatGPT? Not necessarily. Gemini complements ChatGPT by excelling in areas like real-time accuracy and Google tool integration. 5. Will both Gemini and ChatGPT keep improving? Absolutely. Both Google and OpenAI are investing heavily in AI, meaning users can expect faster, smarter, and more capable versions in the future. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

OpenAI CEO sparks controversy after refusing to disclose information about latest AI model: 'It's more critical than ever to address'
OpenAI CEO sparks controversy after refusing to disclose information about latest AI model: 'It's more critical than ever to address'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

OpenAI CEO sparks controversy after refusing to disclose information about latest AI model: 'It's more critical than ever to address'

OpenAI CEO sparks controversy after refusing to disclose information about latest AI model: 'It's more critical than ever to address' ChatGPT's popularity exploded instantly upon its November 2022 debut — acquiring a staggering 100 million active users in two months — but concerns about the technology's drain on resources have risen in tandem. Quantifying the environmental impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT has been an elusive endeavor, and as The Guardian observed, OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman have been frustratingly opaque about the energy demands of its newest offering, GPT-5. What's happening? Per The Guardian, as of mid-2023, a simple query using ChatGPT used "about as much electricity as an incandescent bulb consumes in 2 minutes." Research published as a preprint in March 2023 looked at ChatGPT's water usage, asserting that training the GPT-3 model could "directly evaporate 700,000 liters of clean freshwater, but such information has been kept a secret." On August 7, ChatGPT's parent company OpenAI introduced GPT-5, its latest and most feature-heavy offering. GPT-5 represented "a significant leap in intelligence over all our previous models, featuring state-of-the-art performance across coding, math, writing, health, visual perception, and more," OpenAI claimed as the model was unveiled. The Guardian's coverage pointed out that ChatGPT's usage of resources would likely increase in conjunction with its capabilities, adding that OpenAI had been markedly silent on the subject over the past five years. While OpenAI hasn't been forthcoming, experts weighed in on what they suspect is necessarily a thirstier, energy-gobbling ChatGPT model. "A more complex model like GPT-5 consumes more power both during training and during inference … I can safely say that it's going to consume a lot more power than GPT-4," said University of Illinois professor Rakesh Kumar, who researches AI and energy usage. Why is GPT-5's energy usage concerning? ChatGPT's leap from a million to 100 million users wasn't a blip — back in March, TechCrunch analyzed more recent usage trends following its introduction in November 2022. Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "By November 2023, ChatGPT had reached another milestone of 100 million weekly active users, which grew to 300 million by December 2024, then 400 million in February 2025," the outlet explained. Citing initial calculations from the University of Rhode Island's AI lab on Friday, August 8, The Guardian surmised that GPT-5's capabilities could require an amount of energy that "would correspond to burning that incandescent bulb for 18 minutes." Put another way, GPT-5 could use as much daily energy as 1.5 million households in the United States. University of California, Riverside, AI researcher Shaolei Ren said GPT-5's energy requirements "should be orders of magnitude higher than that for GPT-3" based on its size alone. What can be done about AI's environmental impact? Although AI researchers can make credible estimates, experts called for responsible corporate disclosures. "It's more critical than ever to address AI's true environmental cost. We call on OpenAI and other developers to use this moment to commit to full transparency by publicly disclosing GPT-5's environmental impact," said University of Rhode Island professor Marwan Abdelatti. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store