The 4 North Korean officials arrested over a botched destroyer launch are in mortal danger
"I would say there's a very good chance they'd be executed," Joseph S. Bermudez, an analyst in North Korean defense at the Center for Strategic & International Studies, said.
One striking aspect was the speed at which state-controlled North Korean media publicized the incident that damaged its newest warship, and also named the officials.
The highly public nature of the announcements suggests Kim is "very upset," Bermudez added.
How it all went wrong
The arrests came within days of the botched launch of the nameless 5,000-ton destroyer, which saw the ship topple onto its side and its hull damaged. It's believed the mechanism that rolled the ship into the water malfunctioned, leaving the ship's bow stuck on the pier while its aft section lying in the water and flooded.
State-run outlets announced the arrests, placing the blame squarely on the shoulders of the shipyard's chief engineer, the head of the hull construction workshop, and a deputy manager for administrative affairs.
At the top of the list: Ri Hyong Son, a vice director of the Munitions Industry Department of the Korean Workers' Party Central Committee, who was also arrested.
The warship was one of two next-generation Choe Hyon-class destroyers. The first, the titular Choe Hyon, launched a month ago to great fanfare at Nampo Harbor on the peninsula's western coast.
However, the second was constructed at the eastern Chongjin Shipyard, which does not typically produce large warships, Bermudez told BI.
Rather than launching it in drydock or from a slipway, North Korea attempted a sideways launch — something the workers may not have been well-practiced at with a larger vessel, he said.
When it came to the bigger ship, "all of a sudden, you're starting to use a piece that hasn't been used in years," he said.
As of Monday, satellite images showed that the bow of the ship still stuck on the pier, with evidence of a dredging operation at the harbor entrance.
Why Kim is turning up the heat
Following the launch, state media put the "responsible" officials on blast.
This was a choice.
"Normally these things are done quietly," Bermudez said.
Within hours of the disaster, the Pyongyang Times reported Kim denouncing it at length, calling it a "criminal act" that "could not be tolerated." Multiple detailed updates to the recovery operation have followed.
The Choe Hyon-class destroyer is a step towards a major ambition of Kim's: transforming North Korea's primarily coastal navy into a blue-water fleet, Bermudez said.
A setback to that project is a "slap in the face" for Kim, he added.
Although the full capabilities of the new ship are not yet known, its sister ship the Choe Hyon — the first in the class — wields modern capabilities like an air defence system and vertically launched missiles.
State media has claimed it can carry nuclear-capable missiles — in which case, the program is "very much interlinked with North Korea's broader nuclear ambitions," according to Edward Howell, an expert on North Korean politics at the University of Oxford.
"The fact that it failed so miserably was pretty embarrassing for Kim," who is "captivated" by developing naval power, Bruce Bennett, a North Korea-focused defense analyst at the RAND think tank, told BI.
It's even more galling in the wake of large-scale South Korean naval drills in the Yellow Sea earlier this month — which showcased its naval power after the launch of the first Choe Hyon.
And there was another reason to denounce the named officials: In terms of domestic politics, "it puts everybody on notice," Bermudez said.
When big programs that really matter to Kim fail, "he's going to take retribution," he added.
Although officials have now said the damage is not as bad as first assessed — something that BI could not independently verify — it's still going to be treated with utmost seriousness in order to "deal a telling blow to incautiousness, irresponsibility and unscientific empiricist attitude prevailing in any field," state media declared.
A generational punishment
It's unclear exactly what will happen to the officials named.
Various punishments are possible through the judicial system, but all too often, "'due process' is a bullet in the head," RAND's Bennett said.
In January, North Korea executed two unnamed nuclear power plant construction researchers for failing to complete their project and improve technological standards, Daily NK reported. Their junior colleagues were transported to what is believed to be a political prison camp, the outlet reported.
Regardless of what punishment is handed down, one thing is likely: it'll also hit the officials' families. In the logic of the North Korean justice system, convictions are "because of a significant family flaw," Bennett said. "Therefore three generations of the family need to be dealt with."
That could mean the officials' spouses, parents, and even kids could be sent to grim prison camps — and could also be downgraded within the country's system of social hierarchy, Songbun.
"We don't know what their fates will be," said Howell. "Their fates don't look to be very pleasant."
"But crucially," he added, "this is going to make no impact on North Korea's broader quest for naval modernization, military modernization."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
11 hours ago
- Business Insider
Why the market is shrugging off Trump's firing of the BLS chief
August kicked off with a shocker, with Donald Trump firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics after a less-than-rosy July employment report. The move sparked prognostications about untrustworthy government data going forward and comparisons to China, which some believe is uninvestable due to issues with data quality. Then why is the market unfazed as trading kicks off on Monday? Stocks rallied to start the week, with the Dow up almost 500 points at midday and the Nasdaq Composite jumping as much as 2%. For now, markets are focused on other things, like the higher odds of a September rate cut after the employment picture suddenly soured. "Obviously, the firing was unconventional. That's pretty much everything with this administration compared to previous administrations, but at this point, there is so much private data that the market can look at other sources," Paul Hickey, cofounder of Bespoke Investment Group, told Business Insider. Apart from the BLS statistics that investors already parse, there's a patchwork of private and public data, including ADP data, hiring and firing data from a range of consulting firms, and labor market sentiment indicators from sources like the Conference Board. "There are private sources of data, and if they are moving in the opposite direction from the government data, then it becomes an indicator that something is off with the statistics,"Aleksandar Tomic, Associate Dean, Strategy, Innovation, & Technology at Boston College, told Business Insider. Trump said Erika McEntarfer's firing was justified and that the July data had been manipulated to make the administration look bad. He did not offer evidence for this claim, though White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said the revisions in the data are "hard evidence." The July revisions were substantial, showing that the US added nearly 260,000 fewer jobs in May and June than had been initially reported. Trump and Republicans have also criticized earlier revisions, including last year's that showed over 800,000 fewer jobs added in the 12 months leading up to March 2024. The irony of Trump's anger over the July jobs numbers is that the weak report has pushed up the odds of the September rate cut to nearly 90%, getting the president closer to seeing the Fed loosen monetary policy as he's been demanding all year. But for investors, things like the robust GDP report for the second quarter and solid corporate earnings, particularly among mega-cap tech giants, are boosting the outlook for the market even as Trump's move stirs some uncertainty. For Sergio Altomare, a former senior enterprise architect at the Fed, the next big question is who will replace McEntarfer at the helm of the BLS. "I think the ultimate impact is going to take time to sort itself out, but I think really the immediate thing is, who gets appointed? What is their background? What does the data show? Is it dramatically different from what we're seeing?" Altomare said that it will be difficult to properly assess the impact of Trump's decision on financial markets until these questions have clear answers. Luckily for markets, some answers could come soon. Trump has said that in the coming days, he'll nominate a new BLS chief, as well as a replacement for Fed Gov. Adriana Kugler, who resigned on Friday. Both positions require confirmation by the Senate. It is also worth noting that some agree with the president's decision. For his part, investing legend Ray Dalio said on Monday that he, too, would probably fire the BLS chief. In a post on X, he described the agency's process for making key economic estimates as "obsolete and error-prone," with no plan to fix it. "The revisions brought the numbers toward private estimates that were in fact much better," Dalio said.


UPI
13 hours ago
- UPI
Trump-Lee summit 2025: modernizing the South Korea-U.S. alliance
U.S. President Donald Trump has halted all Voice of America news transmissions, which includes broadcasts intended for Korea. File Photo by Shawn Thew/EPA Aug. 4 (UPI) -- Editor's Note: What follows is a work of fiction. The author imagines a conversation between the presidents of the United States and South Korea at their upcoming summit, that addresses challenging issues facing the ROK-U.S. alliance in the present and future. It highlights the shared interests of the two nations as well as the security and prosperity of their citizens, including the human rights and dignity of the Korean people in the north. It concludes with an imagined Joint Vision Statement, summarizing their discussion, which is the traditional output of Republic of Korea-United States presidential summits. Whether the two presidents will engage on all the significant issues raised here remains to be seen. A summit on the edge of history In August, President Donald J. Trump hosted President Lee Jae-myung of the Republic of Korea at the White House for a pivotal summit convened amid tectonic shifts in Northeast Asia -- and growing democratic unease within South Korea. This followed the new trade agreement concluded just two weeks earlier. While officially focused on modernizing the U.S.-ROK alliance, the summit became a consequential moment of recalibration on three critical fronts: • Strategic alignment in the face of North Korean aggression and Chinese revisionism; • Alliance tension over perceived democratic backsliding in South Korea, including the arrest of former President Yoon Suk-yeol: • Neglect of information warfare, after both the U.S. and ROK governments shuttered key channels broadcasting truth into North Korea. What emerged was a joint commitment to defend freedom not only with force, but with truth -- by reestablishing the information and influence architecture that once sustained the front lines of ideological competition. The Yoon controversy and the politics of perception Though outwardly cordial, the private Oval Office discussions turned frank when Trump addressed the arrest of former President Yoon, who had been admired in Washington for his staunch anti-communism and pro-U.S. alignment. Trump: "Mr. President, President Yoon stood shoulder-to-shoulder with us to counter communism and support liberty. Many Americans, and frankly many of my supporters, believe he's being politically persecuted. It raises serious questions about fairness in a key ally." Lee responded firmly but diplomatically: "President Yoon is entitled to due process under the law. Our judiciary is independent, and my administration does not interfere in legal proceedings. I welcome scrutiny, and I assure you democracy in Korea is strong because we adhere to the rule of law, not to protect power, but to protect justice." The discussion was intense but respectful. The leaders agreed to issue parallel statements: Trump would express concern about fairness without challenging Korea's sovereignty; Lee would emphasize institutional transparency and rule-of-law governance. The strategic blind spot: the collapse of information operations More consequential than the legal drama was the very public dismantling of information warfare infrastructure by both governments. In the United States, the Trump administration, in the name of reducing government bureaucracy and improving efficiencies, had terminated the Korea Services of Voice of America and Radio Free Asia this year, after decades of broadcasting uncensored news, U.S. policy information and human rights content into the North. In Seoul, the Lee government, under pressure from domestic political blocs, had halted the National Intelligence Service's radio broadcasts into North Korea, ending 50 years of Seoul's public engagement with northern audiences. This dual retreat from the airwaves was, in the words of one U.S. National Security Council official, "the greatest self-inflicted wound to our strategic influence since the cold war." Trump brought the issue up bluntly: "We've ceded the information battlespace to Kim Jong Un. The guy controls what 25 million people think, and we just went silent. I want VOA and RFA Korea back online. And frankly, I hope you'll restart Seoul's broadcasts, too." Lee, initially hesitant, agreed: "You are right, Mr. President. We cannot win the ideological war through silence. If we want unification and change, we must empower the people in the North with knowledge and truth. I will act." Breakthroughs and deliverables Despite early friction, the summit produced a series of landmark agreements: Information and Influence Restoration Initiative The United States will immediately reinstate Korean-language services at VOA and RFA under a new U.S. Information and Influence strategy for the Korean Peninsula. The ROK will resume strategic broadcasting into North Korea, coordinated through a new Inter-Ministerial Task Force on Unification Influence Operations. A Joint Information and Influence Coordination Group will be established to align messaging across U.S. and ROK platforms to: • Support civil society efforts, including escapees and human rights non-governmental organizations • Develop cyber-resilient digital delivery mechanisms to reach North Korean audiences. • Strategically realign military posture • Establish South Korea as a strategic agility platform to support mutual security interests throughout the Asia-Indo-Pacific in accordance with the mutual defense treaty • Determine the optimal force structure for ROK and U.S. forces to deter war, and respond to contingencies on the peninsula and throughout the Asia-Indo-Pacific • Establish Combined Multi-Domain Task Force that integrates U.S. and ROK capabilities across land, sea, air, cyber and space • Resume rotational U.S. infantry patrols along the DMZ, integrated under ROK tactical control -- marking a return to symbolic and operational resolve Commitment to human rights up front Both leaders agreed to center human rights as a strategic axis of their North Korea policy. The path to denuclearization, they affirmed, runs through internal transformation in the North -- driven by an informed, empowered population. Joint press conference: a unified message In the Rose Garden, the leaders delivered a carefully coordinated message: "We've restored something powerful today -- not just military strength, but our voice. We're bringing back VOA Korea. We're standing up for freedom in the North. And we're backing our great ally, South Korea, every step of the way." Lee: "The alliance between our two nations has always stood for freedom. That means not only deterrence, but truth. Today we recommit to broadcasting hope, information and dignity to the Korean people. This is how we build a path to unification." Strategic impact: truth as deterrence This summit marked a paradigm shift: from defense-only deterrence to comprehensive strategic engagement, blending: • Military readiness • Human rights up-front and including all diplomacy • Digital and psychological influence • The unapologetic assertion that a free and unified Korea is not just desirable, but it is achievable By restoring the tools of truth, the United States and South Korea signaled to Kim Jong Un and the world that the war of ideas is back on. Conclusion: realigning strategy with values The Trump-Lee Summit of 2025 may be remembered not for its controversies, but for its correction of course. It restored the power of narrative, reaffirmed the sanctity of information in the struggle for freedom and redefined the alliance not as a legacy of war, but as a vanguard of liberation and peace. After the press conference, the White House and the Korean Presidential Office issued this joint vision statement: Joint Vision Statement of the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, Washington, D.C., August 2025 President Lee Jae-myung of the Republic of Korea and President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America met in Washington, D.C., in August 2025 and reaffirmed the enduring strength, purpose and future trajectory of the ROK-U.S. Alliance. They affirmed their nations' shared commitment to defending liberty, promoting peace and advancing human dignity across the Korean Peninsula, the Asia-Indo-Pacific and beyond. Recognizing the evolving security landscape and internal challenges faced by both democracies, the two leaders pledged to elevate the ROK-U.S. Alliance into a Global Comprehensive Strategic Alliance, one grounded in freedom, unity, strategic agility and an unshakeable commitment to the Korean people's right to self-determination. Restoring the strategic narrative: information and influence as instruments of peace President Trump and President Lee jointly recognized that information is a critical domain of strategic competition and human freedom. They expressed deep concern over recent decisions that dismantled decades of information and broadcasting efforts to the Korean people in the North, including: • The 2025 termination of the Voice of America and Radio Free Asia Korea Services by the U.S. government • The 2025 suspension of ROK National Intelligence Service-led radio broadcasts into North Korea The leaders agreed that these decisions must be reversed. To this end, they pledged to: • Reinstate the VOA and RFA Korean Services immediately, with renewed mandates to support truth, human rights, and democratic values • Resume Republic of Korea radio broadcasts into North Korea, led by a newly chartered interagency unit under the Ministry of Unification. • Establish a Joint Information and Influence Coordination Group to synchronize alliance messaging, support defectors and civil society, and modernize information delivery across digital, cyber and unconventional channels. The presidents affirmed that the human rights of the Korean people in the North are not only a moral priority but a strategic center of gravity in the pursuit of permanent peace. They committed to a human rights upfront approach that informs all alliance strategy toward North Korea. Shared vision for a free and unified Korea The two leaders reaffirmed that the unnatural division of the Korean Peninsula must be resolved. They declared that a free and unified Korea, governed under democratic principles, is the only path to permanent peace, full denuclearization and justice. President Trump expressed support for the Republic of Korea's 8.15 Unification Doctrine, which offers a Korean-led framework for unification grounded in the values of freedom, peace, and prosperity. The leaders pledged to: • Promote the right of the Korean people to self-determination as enshrined in the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights • Empower the Korean people in the North with access to truth and knowledge • Align alliance policy toward long-term unification as a strategic end state Reaffirming democratic norms and rule of law President Trump raised concerns about perceptions surrounding recent legal proceedings involving former President Yoon Suk-yeol. President Lee emphasized the independence of South Korea's judiciary and the Republic's enduring commitment to the rule of law and democratic process. The leaders agreed that democracy must never be sacrificed to expediency and that freedom and fairness are the foundation of alliance legitimacy. Modernizing the alliance for strategic agility The leaders announced major steps to optimize the alliance's defense posture in support of regional and global stability: • Designating South Korea a strategic agility platform for the defense of Korea and the projection of ROK and U.S. forces for contingencies in the Asia-Indo-Pacific region • Establishing a Combined ROK-U.S. Multi-Domain Task Force operating across land, sea, air, cyber, space and the electromagnetic spectrum. • Resumption of rotational U.S. infantry combat patrols on the DMZ, under tactical control of ROK frontline units. • Increased combined training, missile defense integration and cyber defense coordination. • Dual-apportionment of U.S. forward forces in Korea to support both Korean Peninsula and Indo-Pacific contingencies, including in the Taiwan Strait. • Korea's geostrategic location will serve as a strategic agility platform to enable rapid response, deterrence and alliance resilience across the theater. Economic and technological partnership for freedom and security The leaders reaffirmed their countries' deep economic and innovation partnership: • South Korea remains one of the largest foreign direct investors in the United States, supporting tens of thousands of U.S. jobs in advanced manufacturing, semiconductors, batteries and clean energy. • The two countries committed to strengthen supply chain security for critical technologies and rare earth minerals. • Expanded cooperation artificial intelligence, quantum computing and cybersecurity will form a critical axis of alliance modernization. Conclusion: reclaiming the front lines of freedom President Lee and President Trump concluded that the ROK-U.S. alliance is not a legacy of the past, but rather a living, evolving instrument of democratic strategy. In an age of authoritarian revisionism and disinformation, the alliance must stand for more than deterrence. It must stand for truth, for liberty and for the unalienable rights of all people. Together, they pledged: "To speak clearly, act decisively and stand boldly with the Korean people in their journey to freedom and unification." The alliance remains ironclad in commitment, modern in strategy, and unbreakable in purpose. America First. Korea Unified. Truth Forward. Again, please note this is a work of fiction. David Maxwell is a retired U.S. Army Special Forces colonel who has spent more than 30 years in the Asia Pacific region. He specializes in Northeast Asian security affairs and irregular, unconventional and political warfare. He is vice president of the Center for Asia Pacific Strategy and a senior fellow at the Global Peace Foundation. After he retired, he became associate director of the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University. He is on the board of directors of the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea and the OSS Society and is the editor at large for the Small Wars Journal.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine says it stole intel from the Russian Navy and found weak points in its newest nuclear missile submarine
Ukraine said it obtained secret data on a new Russian nuclear missile submarine. The classified data includes information about the submarine's survivability systems. The Project 955A-class vessel Knyaz Pozharsky entered service less than two weeks ago. Ukraine said that it stole troves of classified information on Russia's newest nuclear missile submarine during a recent operation, including data that points to the vessel's vulnerabilities. Specialists working for Ukraine's military intelligence agency, the HUR, breached the Russian Navy and obtained internal documents concerning the new Project 955A Borei-class submarine Knyaz Pozharsky, which entered service less than two weeks ago. The HUR specialists got their hands on a list of the submarine's crew, including information about positions, fitness levels, and combat instructions, as well as data regarding the boat's layout, such as diagrams of its survivability systems, the intelligence agency said in a statement over the weekend. The HUR published several documents that appeared to have been obtained from the breach. It said that its intelligence agents also obtained access to the crew regulations, instructions for transferring wounded sailors and cargo, engineering documents, towing procedures, and details about the submarine's schedule. Business Insider was unable to independently verify the authenticity of the documents. Russia's defense ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the theft. The Ukrainian intel operation could be a setback for the Russian Navy and expose vulnerabilities within its Project 955A-class submarines, a key element of Moscow's nuclear triad — alongside its arsenal of ground- and air-launched missiles — and considered to be among its most advanced submarines. "The information obtained by the intelligence allows identifying the features and technical limitations not only of the 'Knyaz Pozharsky' but also of other submarines of Project 955A, critically important for maintaining the imperial myth of the aggressor state Russia," the HUR wrote in a Telegram post on Sunday. Russia operates one of the largest submarine fleets in the world, with an estimated 64 active vessels. Among them are five of the improved Project 955A "Borei-A" class variants. These stealthy, nuclear-powered boats are 170 meters long and can travel at speeds of 29 knots, or 33 mph, when submerged. Each of the Project 955A vessels, like Knyaz Pozharskiy, can carry 16 RSM-56 Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) equipped with nuclear warheads. The strategic RSM-56 is a three-stage solid propellant intercontinental ballistic missile that's been in service since 2013. The missile has an estimated range of over 8,000 kilometers and can carry up to 10 independently targetable warheads, each carrying about 100-150 kilotons of nuclear material. The submarines can also carry a dozen torpedoes. Construction of the new Knyaz Pozharskiy began in 2016, and the vessel was commissioned into service just recently on July 24 at a ceremony attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It joined the 31st submarine division of Russia's Northern Fleet, based in Gadzhievo, in the Murmansk region. Russian submarine and underwater activity, especially in the Arctic region, has increasingly become a focus for NATO. Just last week, for instance, the military alliance announced the deployment of a maritime task force to operate in the High North region amid efforts to increase its presence there. Read the original article on Business Insider