logo
New era beckons for Air Force One after Qatari offer - but what's it like inside?

New era beckons for Air Force One after Qatari offer - but what's it like inside?

Yahoo18-05-2025

Most journalists travelling with the US president don't see much of the interior of Air Force One, the presidential jet.
The press cabin is in the back of the plane, accessible by a rear set of steps and a quick turn of a corner.
To reach the presidential suite at the front of the plane would require negotiating with the armed Secret Service agents in the next-door cabin.
On Donald Trump's trip to the Middle East this week, when the future of the famous plane was a huge talking point, Fox News host Sean Hannity had priority seating and access to the president to conduct an in-flight interview.
But the rest of us in the travelling press pool were consigned to our small section of the plane.
It was a whirlwind trip, hitting three nations in three nights, half a world away. The president described it as an "endurance test" - one that his staff and those of us in the press pool had to manage, as well.
The presidential jet is not a bad way to fly, however. The 14 seats are comfortable, roughly on par with a first-class domestic flight.
There's a bathroom and a table with snacks (including the coveted Air Force One-branded M&Ms bearing the president's signature, which aren't available anywhere else).
Qatar's Air Force One offer angers Trump supporters
Is Trump allowed to accept 747 gift?
The cabin has a pair of television monitors - usually tuned to the president's preferred cable news channel (CNN during Joe Biden's term; Fox News for Trump). On occasion, they've been set to a football game or other sporting events.
For longer flights, the on-board kitchen serves plated meals (the president eats from a different, fancier menu). On short hops, there's usually food in a takeaway bag.
But the interior of this famous aircraft could soon undergo a radical refit if, as looks likely, Trump accepts the Qatari offer to supply a new "palace in the sky" - the biggest foreign gift ever received by a US president.
Technically, "Air Force One" is a radio call sign, the designation for any Air Force aircraft with the US president aboard. The small prop plane Lyndon Baines Johnson took from Austin to his Texas ranch in the 1960s was Air Force One, too.
But the Air Force One most people picture, the one featured in the Harrison Ford action film, is the 747-200b with water blue, steel blue and white paint set against a chrome underbody - a colour scheme picked out by First Lady Jackie Kennedy in 1962.
Currently there are two of these 747s in the Air Force passenger fleet, in use since 1990. Needless to say, technology – both in aircraft design and everything else – has come a long way in the ensuing years. The planes have been upgraded, but the costs of maintaining the airframe and engines are growing. The aircrafts are showing their age.
This has clearly irked the current White House occupant – the only president to own his own jet, or for that matter, his own airline, prior to taking office.
"I leave now and get onto a 42-year-old Boeing," he said, exaggerating the plane's age during an industry briefing on Thursday in Abu Dhabi. "But new ones are coming."
Coming, but not soon enough for Trump. During his first term, he touted an updated presidential aircraft, made by Boeing, that was in the works. He even picked out his own colour palette, scrapping Kennedy's design for a red-white-and-blue livery. He proudly displays a model of that jet in the Oval Office.
Originally planned to be delivered by 2021, delays and cost overruns for the estimated $4bn construction programme have made it less likely that the two new planes on order will be available for much, if any, of Trump's second term in office, which expires in January 2029.
He has tasked tech multi-billionaire Elon Musk with speeding up the process and reportedly groused in private that he is embarrassed to travel in such an outdated plane.
That explains why the president has become enamoured with the prospect of a seemingly more immediate solution to his air transport woes – courtesy of the Persian Gulf nation of Qatar.
News of Qatar's offer of a lavish $400m 747-8 made headlines last week, but the gift apparently has been in the works for months.
Trump surreptitiously visited the aircraft in question in mid-February, just a few weeks after the start of his second term in office.
Aside from the legal and ethical concerns of such a substantial gift – raised by critics and some allies of the president - converting a foreign 747 for use by an American president creates a number of technical challenges.
The aircraft would have to be made capable of in-flight refuelling and retrofitted with a sophisticated package of communications and security equipment. The current models have systems built to withstand the electromagnetic pulse of a nuclear explosion.
Such a refitting process, says aviation analyst Richard Aboulafia, managing director of AeroDynamic Advisory, would take years, until 2030 at least.
"They have to assume the jet has been left unattended in a dangerous place for 13 years," he says. "Which means it's not enough to take the plane apart. You also have to take every single component apart."
The plane would need additional power to run its new systems, and its interior might have to be rearranged. Chances are there's no press cabin in the flying palace as originally designed.
Mark Cancian, a senior adviser with the Center for Strategic and International Studies' Defense and Security Department, says the costs of such retrofitting could easily run to $1bn.
He adds, however, that Trump could waive some, or all, of the security modifications if he so chooses.
"He's the president," he said.
When the Air Force ultimately does retire its current crop of 747s, it will put to pasture an aircraft that have been part of fabric of American history for decades. One that transported President Bill Clinton, along with former Presidents Jimmy Carter and George W Bush, to Israel for Yitzhak Rabin's funeral in 1995.
After the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, George W Bush took to the skies in Air Force One and stayed aloft for hours, refuelling mid-air, until his security team determined it was safe for him to land and address the nation, before ultimately returning to Washington.
Six US presidents have travelled on these jets, criss-crossing the US and visiting all corners of the globe. One took Biden to Israel just days after the 7 October attack by Hamas.
Trump has effectively employed the aircraft as a campaign device, holding political rallies at airfields and making low-speed passes over the crowds before landing and using Air Force One as a dramatic backdrop for his speeches.
On Trump's recent Mid East trip, military fighters from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the UAE accompanied Air Force One as it flew through their national airspace.
Aging though it may be, Air Force One is still one of the most recognisable signs of American presidential authority and power in the world - a military aircraft that serves a higher purpose.
"It's not made for luxury," says Aboulafia. "It's a flying command post. You're not there to throw parties."
Additional reporting by Max Matza

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Concerned Sean Hannity Pleads with Trump and Musk to Make Up Soon
Concerned Sean Hannity Pleads with Trump and Musk to Make Up Soon

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Concerned Sean Hannity Pleads with Trump and Musk to Make Up Soon

Sean Hannity desperately tried to downplay the bitter fallout between Elon Musk and Donald Trump on Thursday night, as he implored the estranged 'best friends' to patch things up. Just hours after Musk claimed the president appears in the Jeffrey Epstein files and suggested he should be impeached, Hannity framed the drama as the 'legacy media mob' making a fuss. He sought to soften the impact of the fiery fallout, deflect by attacking Bill Clinton, and then predicted Musk and Trump will 'become friends again.' 'So let's be very blunt here: Big deal. It's an online, public spat between two very powerful men over what is really a policy difference,' the Fox News host said on Hannity. 'It got personal and still, despite all the bad blood, I'm going to make a bold prediction. I could be wrong. I think that Donald Trump and Elon Musk, they'll work it out eventually, they'll become friends again.' 'These are two very talented individuals. Frankly, they don't need each other to be successful, but I do hope they work it out and set an example for the rest of the country,' he added. Hannity implied Musk was upset over provisions in Trump's spending bill that would cut government support for electric vehicles. The ugly feud began this week with Musk slamming Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as a 'disgusting abomination' because of the trillions it would add to the national debt. Trump claimed on Truth Social Thursday that Musk 'just went CRAZY' after he 'took away his EV Mandate.' 'I can certainly understand why Elon, you know, wants that in the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill.' Pretty obvious, pretty apparent, understandable difference,' Hannity commented. As for the claims about Epstein, the late convicted sex offender with whom Trump was once friends, Hannity said Trump was 'one of the first people to realize just how horrible Epstein really was,' and had ended the relationship two decades ago. Then, he brought up former President Clinton, who also had documented ties to Epstein. 'Is he in those files?' Hannity wondered, attempting to shift the conversation. 'I haven't seen them, but if I was a betting man, I know where I'd put my money.' 'Now if by some, you know, chance that Bill Clinton is in there, I wonder if he kicked Epstein out of his life as publicly as Donald Trump did,' he added. The clash between Musk and Trump has escalated rapidly over the past week, devolving from what appeared on the surface to be a policy disagreement to much more personal attacks. The Epstein claim was a particularly shocking bomb, amid criticism accusing the Trump administration of failing to follow through on its promise to release additional documents and information about the disgraced financier, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.

USSS Ordered Destruction of White House Cocaine Day After Closing Case
USSS Ordered Destruction of White House Cocaine Day After Closing Case

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

USSS Ordered Destruction of White House Cocaine Day After Closing Case

Two years after the U.S. Secret Service discovered a bag of cocaine in the White House in July, 2023, documents showing orders for its destruction within 24 hours after the agency closed the case are raising new questions about the scrupulousness of the investigation. A U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency documenttitled "Destruction" states that the bag of cocaine was sent to the Metropolitan Police Department for incineration. That document obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, doesnt display a date for the destruction. But other internal Secret Service records show that the cocaine was tested by the Secret Service, the D.C. Fire Department hazmat technicians, and the FBI before being sent back to the Secret Service for storage on July 12. Two days later, it was transferred to the D.C. police department for destruction. The Secret Service shut down the cocaine investigation 11 days after discovering it. The destruction of narcotics evidence must comply with environmental and safety regulations, and the D.C. police department has an Environmental Protection Agency-approved incinerator that federal agencies often use to destroy narcotics that are not involved in active legal cases. D.C. police officials referred all questions about the cocaines apparent destruction to the FBI. Theres no entry or date for the cocaines actual destruction. Early last week, FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino announced that he was re-opening the investigation into the cocaine found in the White House, as well as the leak of the Supreme Courts Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade and the discovery of a pipe bomb at the Democratic National Committee headquarters on Jan. 6, 2021. Bongino reiterated his commitment to getting to the bottom of those cases in a Wednesday night interview with Fox News Sean Hannity. "Well, I get a kick out of it on social media," Bongino said. "People say, 'This case isnt a big deal. I dont care. Well, I care. … You dont care that a [potentially] hazardous substance made its way into the White House? We didnt know what it was, and we dont seem to have answers? Well, were going to get them. Ive got a great team on it." While the cocaine bag found in the White House appears to have been destroyed, internal Secret Service documents show that the agency retained and stored a second piece of evidence, an envelope of three tubes of DNA that the FBI attained from the plastic bag of cocaine. Its unclear how much DNA those tubes contain, though the Secret Service has stood by its statements that the FBI found insufficient DNA to pursue any investigative leads. When the Secret Service closed its investigation into who left the cocaine in the White House on July 13, the agency issued a statement explaining its decision. Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi asserted that camera surveillance footage didnt provide any "investigative leads or any other means for investigators to identify who may have deposited" the cocaine in the White House, adding that FBI laboratory results "did not develop latent fingerprints and insufficient evidence was present for investigative comparisons." But neither the FBI nor the Secret Service has publicly released the FBI laboratory results, and DNA experts say the only fool-proof way to demonstrate whether sufficient DNA existed on the baggie now to run against hits in national and state criminal DNA databases is to test it again. "The only way to really tell, is to test it again and see what happens," Gary Clayton Harmor, chief forensic DNA analyst at the Serological Research Institute in Richmond, California, told RCP. "Some labs will test anything, and others are more reluctant if they think its not a good enough sample to [test against national DNA databases]. The FBI, knowing them, theyre probably very conservative, and it may be that they said, 'Nope, theres not enough here to do anything meaningful with. It really depends on whos doing the testing and how they did it." RealClearPolitics over the last week submitted a FOIA request for the FBI laboratory findings on the cocaine bag to the FBI and the Secret Service, but so far, the Secret Service FOIA office has denied RCPs request for expedited service and the FBIs counterpart has yet to respond. Two sources tell RCP that Secret Service surveillance video clearly shows all the White House staff and other individuals who entered through the West Wing entrance, where the agency says the cocaine was found inside a locker in a vestibule leading to a lobby area down the hall from the Situation Room. The Secret Service, however, never interviewed that group of individuals, citing the FBIs alleged inability to find sufficient DNA evidence to link the cocaine to anyone. There are strict narcotics evidence retention policies for many federal law enforcement agencies. Department of Justice agencies, including the DEA and the FBI, must retain the narcotics evidence for two months before destroying it unless it is deemed abandoned or no longer needed as evidence. The Homeland Security Department, which oversees the Secret Service, has no specific publicly documented policy for destroying abandoned narcotics. The Secret Service also did not respond to a request for any written policy it followed when it sent the cocaine bag to D.C. police for destruction. The push to quickly destroy the cocaine factors into allegations RCP reported last fall in which three sources alleged that former Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle and others in top agency leadership positions wanted to destroy the cocaine quickly but faced internal resistance from the Secret Service Uniformed Division and the Forensics Services Division. The Uniformed Division, which is charged with protecting the facilities and venues for presidents, was a key player in the decision-making because one of its officers had discovered the cocaine on July 2, 2023, a quiet Sunday when President Biden and his family were at Camp David in Maryland. On Sunday night, after Secret Service Technical Services Division officers couldnt identify the white substance, the Uniformed Division locked down the White House and called in the D.C. Fire Department hazmat teams to ensure that it wasnt anthrax or ricin. The discovery of the bag of cocaine posed a problem for Cheatle, who resigned in the face of bipartisan pressure after the July 13 assassination attempt against Donald Trump. Hunter Biden had a well-documented addiction to cocaine, crack cocaine, and other substances for many years but repeatedly claimed to be sober since 2021, an assertion that had prompted former President Biden to often proclaim how "proud" he is of his son. While neither Joe nor Hunter Biden were at the executive mansion when the cocaine was found, it was discovered after a period when Hunter had been staying there. Cheatle became close to the Biden family while serving on Vice President Joe Bidens protective detail - so close that Biden tapped Cheatle for the director job in2022, in part because of her close relationship to first lady Jill Biden. During the feverish speculation in the days and weeks after the cocaines discovery, the White House refused to answer whether the cocaine came from a Biden family member and labeled as"irresponsible"reporters who asked about a possible link to Hunter or another Biden family member. Its unclear exactly when Cheatle and other top officials tried to persuade the Forensics Services Division to destroy the evidence. At some point during the brief investigation, Matt White, the vault supervisor, received a call from Cheatle or someone speaking on her behalf asking him to destroy the bag of cocaine because agency leaders wanted to close the case, according to two sources in the Secret Service community. Whites boss, Glenn Dennis, head of the Forensics Services Division, then conferred with the Uniformed Division, which first discovered the cocaine. At some point, Cheatle appears to have overruled Richard Macauley, who appears to have paid a price in his Secret Service career - at least temporarily - for standing his ground. At the time of the cocaines discovery, Macauley was serving as the acting chief of the Uniformed Division after the recent retirement of Alfonso Dyson Sr., a 29-year veteran of the agency. When Dyson left his position, Macauley, who is black, and was named the Secret Services Uniformed Division Officer of the Year in 2018, became acting director. Despite Cheatles push to hire and promote minority men and women, Macauley was passed over for the job of Uniformed Division chief in what some in the agency suspected was an act of retaliation for supporting those who refused to dispose of the cocaine. Cheatle brought in Mike Buck, an agent who was in retirement, to serve in the top U.D. role instead of Macauley. After Trump chose Sean Curran to lead the agency, however, Buck left, and Curran tapped Macauley to replace him. Shifting Secret Service public statements, overly redacted documents, and media misinterpretations have contributed to an avalanche of lingering questions about the cocaine. Several major media outlets initially reported that the Secret Service had discovered the drug in the White House library, citing a D.C. Fire EMS dispatch call that appeared to state that the substance was found there. This information was based on early communications from a firefighter on the hazardous materials team who radioed into headquarters about a "yellow bar saying cocaine hydrochloride" and another statement about "no match found in the library" during the response to the incident. Several hazmat experts tell RCP that the reference to the "library" was not a physical location in the White House but a reference to the chemical library from a handheld device known as a "Gemini" that fire departments and others use to identify substances. Mike Parsons, a product manager for Thermo Fisher Scientific, the company that manufactures the Gemini handheld device, said the term "library" is used to identify the collection of chemical spectra that the Gemini can identify and display on its screen. "The library is built on known samples and substances," Parsons said in an interview. "Its going to compare the spectra collected in the field to the spectra in the library and make an identification match." After correcting mistaken reports that the cocaine was found in the White House library, media reports then cited a Guglielmi statement that the cocaine was found in a "West Wing workspace." Days later, Guglielmi clarified further that it was found in a small locker in a vestibule near the West Executive Avenue entrance to the West Wing, a heavily trafficked area where visitors and lower-level staff store electronics before VIP tours. A FOIA-released internal Secret Service document further muddied the waters by claiming that the cocaine was found in the "[redacted] lobby floor," creating even more suspicion surrounding the location where the cocaine was first discovered. Sources familiar with the statement in a Secret Service Protective Division document said it was not a reference to the physical floor of a room, but the lobby level of the West Wing where the lockers were located in a vestibule leading into it. The Secret Service has confirmed that "locker 50," where the cocaine was allegedly left, has a missing key. Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' national political correspondent.

Charlamagne knocks Jean-Pierre's book, says 'nobody wants to hear' from person who 'lied' for Biden admin
Charlamagne knocks Jean-Pierre's book, says 'nobody wants to hear' from person who 'lied' for Biden admin

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Charlamagne knocks Jean-Pierre's book, says 'nobody wants to hear' from person who 'lied' for Biden admin

Radio host Charlamagne Tha God on Thursday said while he would gladly read former White House spokeswoman Karine Jean-Pierre's new book, her credibility is dubious. Former Biden White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Wednesday revealed she was registering as an independent and announced a forthcoming book about her time in the tumultuous administration. The longtime Democratic Party operative is urging Americans to step outside harsh party lines in her new book, "Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines." "Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States," she said in a statement, according to The Associated Press. "At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically." Charlamagne, who hasn't been shy about criticizing either party, offered mixed praise for Jean-Pierre's move during his radio show. Fox News White House Correspondents Share Shock Over Karine Jean-pierre's Party Switch "I respect her being independent because I feel like if you Black in this country, you shouldn't be loyal to any party," he said on Thursday's episode. "You should only be voting your interest. You should only be voting for politicians who are implementing legislation and policies for your communities and your people. And if you ask me, none of these parties have done enough for us to be screaming, 'We Republican or Democrat,' so independent is the way to go." Read On The Fox News App Jean-Pierre's reputation is still questionable in his eyes, however. "When it comes to her in particular, I'm probably going to read the book, but nobody wants to hear from anyone who got up there and lied for the Biden administration," he said. He argued such proclamations from people like Jean-Pierre are too little, too late, even if he approves of her general points. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "It's like a lot of these folks are having a come to Jesus moment way too late," he said. "They should have been talking like this two or three years ago, and she had a very interesting quote in her press release. The quote was, 'We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically. We need to be clear-eyed and questioning rather than blindly loyal and obedient as we may have been in the past.' And that right there is the problem with Democrat supporters, especially Black ones, just blindly loyal and obedient for no damn reason." When asked by a co-host about whether such loyalty is referring to Biden or to the presidency as an institution, Charlamagne argued it ultimately resulted in betraying the American article source: Charlamagne knocks Jean-Pierre's book, says 'nobody wants to hear' from person who 'lied' for Biden admin

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store