Lessons from DRC private partnership at state-owned ports
After the concession for the Durban Container Terminal Pier 2 was awarded, ICTSI's bid was subject to a further independent review.
By Hans-Ole Madsen
The ability of International Container Terminal Services, Inc. (ICTSI) to successfully meet its R12 billion tender commitment to the Durban port has been underscored by its recently announced financial results for the quarter ending 31 March.
The company posted revenue from operations of $745 million (R1.3 billion) – a 17% increase year on year. The results highlight its financial muscle and ability to operate South Africa's largest container port in partnership with Transnet and to help unlock South Africa's economic potential.
In an affidavit filed at the Durban High court, Transnet CEO Michelle Phillips also admitted 'ICTSI plainly had and continues to have the necessary financial capacity.'
Yet the partnership between ICTSI and Transnet has been delayed by losing bidder Maersk who have stalled the process by pursuing a spurious legal action. Maersk's legal case hinges on their own narrow interpretation of a non-material single accounting measure, despite the tender process being thorough, fair and transparent.
Independent auditors oversaw the process. After the concession for the Durban Container Terminal Pier 2 was awarded, ICTSI's bid was subject to a further independent review.
ICTSI's financial clout to deliver on its commitment to Durban is further revealed when it estimates its capital expenditure for 2025 would be approximately $580m, a significant part of which will be channelled into expansions to port projects in the Philippines, Mexico, Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
In addition to serious financial flows, ICTSI has experience in upgrading and managing ports in a range of economies and developing nations. ICTSI currently runs 32 ports in 19 countries.
The Port of Matadi in the DRC is one such a success story that should be noted by those concerned about South Africa's struggling export and import economies. When ICTSI partnered with the government of the DRC to develop the port, it had been beset by years of congestion, inefficiencies, and ageing infrastructure.
Matadi is located on the Congo River and serves as the country's primary gateway for containerised and general cargo. Within two years of the public-private partnership with ICTSI, Matadi had undergone a remarkable transformation: a new terminal was built, vessel turnaround times were slashed, and trade flows into Kinshasa and the interior dramatically improved.
What had once been a chokepoint in the country's logistics chain became a symbol of what well-executed public-private partnerships can achieve, even in challenging environments.
This turnaround in the DRC is not an isolated success. It reflects the broader value that private sector participation can bring to state-owned assets - particularly in sectors like transport and logistics, where operational efficiency, technical expertise, and capital investment are crucial.
Across the globe, and especially in developing economies, public-private partnerships have proven to be a catalyst for infrastructure renewal, service improvement, and long-term competitiveness. In South Africa, where state-owned enterprises face mounting pressure to deliver under tight fiscal conditions, now is the time to lean into these partnerships.
ICTSI sees immense potential for South Africa's trade economy – and the Durban Container Terminal Pier 2 is the economy's beating heart. It handles 46% of all SA's port traffic and handles over 70% of the container throughput at the Durban harbour. And, as has been noted by many observers, the infrastructure of DCT2 has basically remained the same since 1963.
That is why ICTSI jumped at the opportunity to become the private partner of Transnet when the concession was first announced.
However, after almost two years, South African exporters and importers are still frustrated with the lack of progress at the Durban port. ICTSI has not been able to implement its agreement with Transnet, due to Maersk's court action.
Bottlenecks and backlogs are still causing costly delays in loading and unloading ships, as well as in processing cargo for onward transportation. Despite efforts to improve operations, inefficiencies persist.
Such delays come at a financial cost. Ships stuck at anchorage or slow-moving cargo means higher port and transport fees, increased fuel costs, and lost productivity for trucking companies waiting at terminals. These inefficiencies also create ripple effects throughout the economy, as this burden is passed onto on consumers. Essential commodities, from electronics to food and medical supplies, become more expensive, reducing affordability and hampering economic growth.
Addressing these challenges is critical, and a partnership with an experienced private operator will provide the expertise, investment, and efficiency needed to modernise port operations and drive economic recovery.
ICTSI is more than able to deliver on its R12bn commitment to partner with Transnet. It is also noteworthy that Maersk's bid for the Durban tender came in at R2bn below ICTSI's.
All parties involved now await the court's judgement.
It is a sobering thought that, were it not for Maersk's spurious case, DCT2 would by now have been well on its way to offer efficient services to shipping lines and South Africa's importers and exporters, contributing substantially to the country's economy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Here's how much it cost to repair SA driver's licence card printing machine over three years
The machine was out of service for nearly 130 days. Over the past three and a half years, R12 million has been spent to repair and maintain South Africa's only driver's licence card printing machine, which has suffered frequent breakdowns. This information was disclosed by Transport Minister Barbara Creecy in a written parliamentary reply. Songezo Zibi, leader of Rise Mzansi, quizzed the minister regarding the 26-year-old machine, which had been out of operation for much of this year, resulting in a significant backlog of driver's licence cards. Zibi asked how many times the machine had broken down over the past three financial years, including the current 2025/2026 financial year, and the total cost of those repairs. He also sought details on how much overtime pay had been made to employees due to printing delays, as well as the number of staff required to operate the machine effectively. The machine, which produces around 300 000 cards per month, resumed production in early May. Driver's licence card printing machine repair costs In her response, Creecy revealed that the machine was non-operational for 26 working days during the 2022/2023 financial year, with repair and maintenance costs amounting to R9 267 862.33. In the 2023/2024 financial year, it was down for 48 days, incurring costs of R1 651 772.57. The following year, the machine was out of commission for 17 days, with R544 747.64 spent on repairs. The machine has been out of operation for 38 days in the current financial year, with R624 988.10 spent on repairs and maintenance. ALSO READ: The driver's licence machine is fixed, but another problem remains Over the entire period, the machine was offline for a total of 129 days, with total maintenance costs adding up to R12 089 370.57. Creecy also said overtime payments over the three years amounted to R4.4 million. The overtime breakdown was R1 435 376.79 in 2022/2023, R1 608 102.52 in 2023/2024, and R1 351 473.78 in 2024/2025. No overtime payments have been made so far in the current financial year. She added that four operators are needed to operate the printing machine effectively. As of 15 May, the backlog in driver's licence cards stood at 733 000. Red flags over new machine tender In response to a question about the acquisition of a new machine, Creecy said: 'The minister has directed that a declaratory order be sought from a competent court on the tender to acquire a new machine, in order to ensure that no further irregular expenditure occurs.' In March, Creecy instructed the Department of Transport to seek a High Court declaratory order regarding the tender. This decision followed findings by the Auditor-General that the procurement process for the R898 million contract awarded to the South African subsidiary of French multinational technology company, Idemia, in August 2024 was irregular. The bidding process began in April and concluded in May 2023. According to the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa), the Driving Licence Card Account had budgeted just over R486 million for the new machine, while Idemia's bid was reportedly either R762 million or R898 million. Other companies that submitted bids included Ren-Form Corporate Print Media, Nec Xon Systems, Muehlbauer ID Services, and Gemalto Altron Fintech Southern Africa. NOW READ: Why has the questionable driving licence card tender not been overturned?
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The strategic reforms that could transform South Africa's economy
The key is to break the strangleholds that Eskom and Transnet have on our electricity, ports and railways. Introducing real competition into electricity generation and the operation of ports and railways is the key to unlocking real growth in South Africa's stagnant economy. So said Deputy Finance Minister Ashor Sarupen at a seminar organised by the In Transformation Initiative last week, where Jakkie Cilliers, head of the African Futures unit at the Institute for Security Studies (ISS), presented the unit's latest report, co-written with Alize le Roux, which forecasts SA's growth trajectory to 2043. The seminar pondered why, despite the creation of a government of national unity (GNU) last June and the virtual end of load shedding, the South African economy only grew by a miserly 0.1% in the first quarter of 2025. Cilliers said South Africa was caught in a 'classic upper middle income growth trap'. From 1990 until 2025, South Africa's economy had grown by an average of 2.3% a year, and on its current path, without significant reforms, he forecast it would grow at an average 2.4% annually from now until 2043. That would expand GDP from about $402-billion in 2025 to about $628-billion in 2043, in constant 2017 US dollars. This 'slow but steady growth' would not be enough to dent poverty. It would barely keep pace with the population, which the unit forecast would expand from about 65.5 million in 2025 to about 77 million in 2043. Cilliers said annual GDP per capita would therefore rise from $12,600 in 2025 to about $14,700 in 2043 — with South Africa falling behind the rest of the world (except Africa) where he forecast average annual GDP per capita would climb from $20,300 in 2025 to $28,500 in 2043. He noted that on its current development trajectory it would take South Africa until 2037 to return to the peak GDP per capita of $13,800 that it reached in 2013. South Africa had been stagnating for years, with steady deindustrialisation, weak investment, and a growing dependence on social grants undermining growth, particularly during the Jacob Zuma presidency, Cilliers said. Cilliers noted that 740,000 South Africans entered the labour market every year, and because of slow growth and a very capital-intensive economy the number of unemployed people increased annually. In 2023, the International Labor Organization (ILO) found that South Africa had the highest unemployment rate globally after only Eswatini. Because being part of the informal sector is considered 'work' by the organisation, South Africa's relatively small informal sector contributed to this high percentage. In South Africa, only about 18% of the labour force is employed in the informal sector. Cilliers noted that about 62% of South Africans were now living below the World Bank's poverty datum line for upper middle income countries, of $6.85 per person a day. On South Africa's current economic path, that percentage would decline 'modestly' to 58% in 2043, though the absolute number of people living below that poverty datum line would increase, from some 40.9 million in 2025 to 44.4 million in 2043 (because the overall population would rise). Cilliers said South Africa should now be reaping a 'demographic dividend' because its ratio of working age population – aged 15 to 64 — to its dependent population (children and elderly) had now reached 2.1. In the African Futures calculations, the demographic dividend should kick in when the ratio of working people to dependents reached 1.7. he said, Economic growth stunted by poor human capital But South Africa was not earning this dividend largely because economic growth was being stunted by poor human capital, mainly an unhealthy population, many of whom were still afflicted by HIV/Aids and tuberculosis and low-quality education. The question, he said, was why South Africa did so poorly on social capital, education and health, given the very high levels of expenditure on those services. 'And the only answer that you can come up with is government inefficiency, the poor use of existing funds. And the question is, how do we escape the middle-income trap?' Cilliers asked. He said the African Futures team had modelled the effects of reforms in eight different sectors on South Africa's economic development. These were demographics and health; agriculture; education; manufacturing; infrastructure and 'leapfrogging' (i.e. bypassing older technologies); free trade; financial flows; and governance. They found that the largest return was from increased manufacturing, followed by freer trade and then better governance. So, for instance, all eight sectors combined would increase GDP per capita in 2043 by about 33%, from the $ 14,750 on the current path to $19,650. Of this, increased manufacturing would contribute about $930; freer trade (with the full implementation of the African Continental Free Trade Agreement) would contribute about $900; and better governance about $800. The combined impact of those eight reforms would decrease the percentage of South Africans living below the $6.85 a day poverty rate to 50% by 2043, down from 62% in 2023. This would represent 6.1 million fewer poor people than if the economy remained on its current path, though still leaving South Africa with a large poverty burden, Cilliers said. The African Futures team had compiled a laundry list of recommendations, starting with the need to strengthen governance and accountability through evidence-based policies, curtailing corruption and increasing accountability and inclusivity. Deputy Finance Minister Sarupen, of the DA, said much of Cilliers' analysis resonated with assessments by the Treasury's own economic policy team and the work being done by the government's Operation Vulindlela and by various parties in the GNU. He agreed that merely 60% growth in the size of the economy over the next two decades 'will not get us out of the trap that we're in' and that South Africa was in danger of falling from upper middle to lower middle income status. Structural constraints The low growth was driven by structural constraints, weak productivity, low investment in capital, higher inequality and an underperforming formal labour market. The Treasury was 'acutely aware of this'. But he said the government had to prioritise its reforms to tackle the problem because of the many competing demands of a massive amount of social ills and a very strong active civil society. He noted that South Africa had a system of fairly autonomous government ministries that made it harder to pursue coherent policies. Cilliers had identified manufacturing and freer trade as South Africa's best paths forward. Sarupen noted that cheap reliable energy with stability of pricing and supply underpinned manufacturing and industrialisation . 'And one of the drivers of our de-industrialisation has been excessive pricing and inefficiency of supply that really hurts manufacturing in South Africa,' he said. He noted that while prices in the rest of the economy had risen 196% since 2009, Eskom's prices had increased by 403%. So Eskom was driving inflation and deterring investment. Sarupen added that part of the reason GDP growth had been so low over the past year, despite an end to load shedding, was because companies had sunk so much money into load-shedding-proof themselves over the past few years that they had not spent enough on actual business expansion and employment. Sarupen also noted that free trade — another key reform advocated by Cilliers — 'requires you to be able to actually move goods and services cheaply and easily around, so the logistics reforms need a lot of depth and need to maximise competition. 'And so in the reform process that we're undergoing we need to be careful to not just bring the private sector into Transnet's monopoly structure. But rather how do we create competition, across multiple ports for example.' Likewise, South Africa had to maximise competition in railway freight lines. He agreed with Cilliers that crime had to be tackled much better as it was discouraging investment as well as acting as a deterrent to economic activity inside South Africa because, for example, citizens were fearful of using public transport to go to work. Rule of law He said the rule of law was the foundation of all other economic reforms, followed by macroeconomic stability, and then better education and health, and only after that global competitiveness and industrial masterplans. Sarupen did note though that South Africa's foundation of macroeconomic stability was 'probably one of our saving graces'. He also said that the government had to reduce debt. He noted that about 90% of South Africa's debt was denominated in rands, and about 75% of that was purchased by domestic markets. Rand debt was generally better than debt in foreign currency but the scale of government borrowing, about R300 to R400-billion a year, was crowding out the amount of capital that could be invested in business ventures and therefore growth. He added that the relatively high premium of about 11% on a 10-year South African Government Bond was discouraging businesses from investing in riskier ventures. He noted that many of the investments in this year's controversial national Budget were important — such as in public transport. He said, for example, that while a lower income worker in Vietnam earned a similar wage to a lower income worker in South Africa, the Vietnamese worker spent about 10% of his or her income on transport, the South African workers spent around 50%. 'People are going to work to earn money to be able to go to work,' he said. And this was diverting money away from workers buying goods and services, which was essential for economic growth. DM
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Are you one of the almost 16% who can afford a home loan over R1.3 million?
The question is not only if you can afford a home loan but if you can afford all the other expenses of owning a property. Recent research by an independent economist reveals that less than 16% of South Africans can genuinely afford homes priced above R1.3 million, underscoring a growing disparity between loan approvals and actual affordability. This raises questions about the financial sustainability of homeownership for the average buyer, Henri Le Grange, certified financial planner at Old Mutual Personal Finance, says. 'Qualifying for a bank loan does not necessarily mean you can afford all the costs that come with owning a home. 'The affordability gap often arises because banks assess loan eligibility primarily based on income thresholds, without considering your broader financial plan.' Le Grange says banks typically evaluate affordability based not only on gross income but also on disposable income, net income and previous monthly expenses. 'However, they consider past data and may not account for additional costs that come with homeownership, such as maintenance, insurance, or the impact of interest rate changes. ALSO READ: More SA consumers battling to pay their home loans and credit cards – report Some people get home loans but cannot afford true repayment 'As a result, I have seen customers approved for loans that exceed their true repayment capacity, threatening their financial well-being. This disconnect highlights the importance of seeking professional advice before buying a home.' Research by Izak Odendaal, Investment Strategist at Old Mutual Wealth, highlights key reasons why owning a home remains out of reach for many South Africans: stagnant wages, rising inflation and higher interest rates. 'South Africa's high interest rates and increasing property prices have made homeownership increasingly difficult. 'Many prospective buyers have been locked out of the market due to these combined factors, resulting in record-low affordability levels in the housing sector. 'Buying a home is one of the biggest financial decisions you will ever make, and it is easy to underestimate the true cost of ownership. 'Many customers also overlook the ongoing costs tied to homeownership, such as maintenance, insurance, property taxes and utilities, all expenses that can place additional strain on household budgets over time.' ALSO READ: South Africans cannot afford their homes but also can't afford to sell them Financial adviser can help look at your financial long-term plan However, he says that a financial adviser can help customers look beyond simply qualifying for a loan and ensure they are financially prepared for the long term. 'Many customers focus only on whether they can afford the loan repayment, often neglecting their long-term goals. It is not just about paying the bond. You must plan effectively to secure your long-term financial well-being.' Le Grange says working with a financial adviser helps you to create a realistic budget and prepare for upfront as well as long-term costs. 'A solid financial plan ensures you are ready for the responsibilities that come with homeownership. The goal is to help customers avoid borrowing more than they can manage and stay financially secure in the future.' Le Grange encourages consumers to take these practical steps to check if they can afford a home loan before committing to one: #1: Prepare for ongoing and unexpected costs: When you buy a home, do not just budget for the deposit and monthly home loan payments. Ensure you are ready for other costs, such as repairs, maintenance and higher utility bills. There are also transfer duty, conveyancing fees and bond registration costs, which consumers often overlook. These costs can arise unexpectedly, and therefore it is important to set aside extra money to cover these expenses and avoid financial strain. ALSO READ: Thinking of buying your first home, here are five key issues to consider #2: Test your ability to make home loan repayments: Before committing to a home loan, try putting aside the amount you would pay each month into a savings account. This will help you to see if you can afford the repayment comfortably and, if necessary, adjust your spending habits to make sure you are ready for the commitment. #3: Think about changes in interest rates: Interest rates can change, which means your home loan repayments may increase in the future. It is a good idea to think about how a rate increase could affect your budget and make sure you are in a position to handle any changes to your repayment amount. #4: Choose a loan term that fits your budget: When you take out a home loan, think about how much time you want to pay it off. A shorter loan term will mean higher monthly payments, but you will pay less interest overall. A longer loan term can lower your payments, but you will pay more interest in the long run. Choose a loan term that works for your budget and future needs. ALSO READ: How to finance your home loan if you do not have a regular income #5: Speak with a financial adviser and have a financial plan in place A financial adviser can help you consider your overall financial situation and create a plan that works for your short-term and long-term goals. They can also highlight any risks or hidden costs and suggest the best strategy for managing your home loan while keeping your finances healthy. In a challenging economic environment, affordability and financial resilience have never been more important, Le Grange says. 'Now more than ever, making informed financial decisions is key to building a secure future. Speaking to a trusted financial adviser can help to ensure your choices support both your immediate needs and long-term goals.'
