
3 weeks later, CDS sheds new light on combat ops
Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan's interviews to news agencies Reuters and Bloomberg on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore shed new light on combat operations during Operation Sindoor, going beyond the media briefings by the Indian Armed Forces during the hostilities.
First, General Chauhan's remark about initial losses in the air, without going into details or giving a count of aircraft lost, is the first official admission of fighter jets being downed in combat operations.
This comes exactly three weeks after India and Pakistan agreed on cessation of military strikes against each other. To be clear, at no point, during and after the hostilities, did the IAF ever deny losing any aircraft.
On May 11, a day after the two militaries reached a truce, Air Marshal A K Bharti, Director of Air Operations, responding to a question at a media briefing, said he would not like to comment on whether India lost any aircraft and cited the prevailing combat situation. He said losses were part of any combat, and the Indian military had achieved all its selected objectives and all IAF pilots were back home.
Air Marshal Bharti said the Pakistan Air Force lost 'a few' aircraft, apart from suffering massive damage to assets and air bases during retaliatory high-precision strikes by Indian Armed Forces during the operation.
General Chauhan, while acknowledging Indian losses in the air, underlined that what was more important was why these losses (of aircraft) occurred, and what India did after that.
He spoke of how 'we rectified tactics and then went back' to 'hit air bases deep inside Pakistan, penetrated all their air defences with impunity, carried out precision strikes'.
He told Reuters that the IAF 'flew all types of aircraft with all types of ordinances on the 10th' of May, the day India struck air bases deep inside Pakistan, including the Nur Khan air base in Rawalpindi.
He spoke on similar lines to Bloomberg: 'What is important is not the jet being down, but why they were being (downed),' General Chauhan said.
'The good part is that we were able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it and then implement it again after two days… flew all our jets again, targeting at long range,' he said.
Significantly, the CDS also told Reuters that although Pakistan is closely allied with China, there was no sign of any actual help from Beijing during the conflict.
'While this was unfolding from (April) 22nd onwards, we didn't find any unusual activity in the operational or tactical depth of our northern borders, and things were generally all right,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
Lavrov dials Rubio after Ukraine's Operation Spider's Web sees Russian airfields rattle
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov held a phone call with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio after Ukraine's Operation Spider's Web rattled its five airfields and 40 bombers read more US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Russian President Vladimir Putin's foreign policy advisor Yuri Ushakov and members of the delegations attend talks at Diriyah Palace in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Reuters As the Russia-Ukraine war continues to escalate, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov spoke late June 1, regarding the prospects of peace talks in Turkey . According to the statement released by the US State Department, the call was conducted at Lavorv's request soon after the tensions between Moscow and Kyiv escalated. 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke today with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, at Russia's request. Secretary Rubio reiterated President (Donald ) Trump's call for continued direct talks between Russia and Ukraine to achieve a lasting peace,' US Department of State spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Meanwhile, the Russian foreign ministry issued a separate statement in which they mentioned that 'the situation linked to the Ukraine crisis was discussed'. 'SV Lavrov and M Rubio also exchanged views on various initiatives concerning a settlement of the Ukraine crisis, including plans to resume direct Russian-Ukrainian talks in Istanbul on June 2,' the ministry statement reads. The ministry also noted that during the conversation, Rubio expressed condolences over the deaths that occurred when two bridges collapsed in two separate regions in Russia, bordering Ukraine. Russian officials noted that at least seven people were killed and 69 were injured when the two bridges were blown up on Saturday. The escalation The talks between the two diplomats came after Ukraine staged a dramatic series of strikes across Russia, deploying drones hidden in trucks deep inside the country to hit strategic airfields far away in eastern Siberia. Meanwhile, Moscow launched one of its longest drone and missile attacks against Kyiv. The tensions between the two nations have been escalating ahead of crucial peace talks between Russia and Ukraine this week. Multiple reports suggested that over 40 Russian aircraft, including the Tu-95 and Tu-22 M3 long-range bombers capable of deploying conventional and nuclear weapons, as well as the A-50, have been damaged in the operation on Sunday. The preparation took over a year and a half. Planning, organisation, every detail was perfectly executed. It can be said with confidence that this was an absolutely unique operation. — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) June 1, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a series of posts on X, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hailed the operations and revealed that the plan took a year and a half to prepare. 'Today, a brilliant operation was carried out — on enemy territory, targeting only military objectives, specifically the equipment used to strike Ukraine. Russia suffered significant losses, entirely justified and deserved,' Zelenskyy wrote in the post. 'The preparation took over a year and a half. Planning, organisation, and every detail were perfectly executed. It can be said with confidence that this was a unique operation,' he added. With inputs from agencies.


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade pact: Effort on to facilitate preferential market access for both sides, says Piyush Goyal
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India and the United States are keen on providing preferential market access to each other's businesses, with teams from both nations collaborating on a proposed bilateral trade agreement, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said on June 2. In February, Donald Trump and Narendra Modi underlined the two sides' intentions to negotiate the initial phase of a mutually advantageous multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by the fall of 2025, specifically targeting agreement aims to increase bilateral trade from the current figure of $191 billion to $500 billion by the year told reporters in Paris, during an official visit, that both nations are dedicated to collaborating and that there is a mutual desire to provide preferential access to each other's response to a question regarding Trump's announcement to raise tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent, Goyal stated that both countries will continue to work on resolving such issues through bilateral discussions."Let's wait and see; both the US and India share a positive relationship and will persist in resolving these matters through dialogue," Goyal specialists have indicated that the Trump administration's potential increase in import duties could adversely affect Indian exporters, particularly those involved in value-added steel products and auto May 30, Trump declared his plan to raise the existing 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, effective June 4. The initial tariffs were invoked in 2018, with a 25 per cent tariff on steel and 10 per cent on aluminum, which was later raised to 25 per cent on aluminum in February the fiscal year 2024-25, India exported iron, steel, and aluminum products worth $4.56 billion to the US, with key exports including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in iron or steel articles, and $860 million in aluminum and related has also lodged a formal complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO), asserting its right to impose retaliatory tariffs on American goods in reaction to the previous steel tariffs. This week, a delegation of US officials is visiting India to discuss the proposed interim trade agreement between the two significance of this visit is heightened by the expectation that India and the US may reach an interim trade agreement by the end of June, with India advocating for a complete exemption from the 26 per cent reciprocal tariff on domestic Agrawal, India's chief negotiator and Special Secretary in the Department of Commerce, concluded a four-day visit to Washington last month, where he engaged in discussions with his US counterpart regarding the proposed agreement. Goyal was also in Washington to further advance trade negotiations. There is a possibility that both nations might finalize an interim trade deal prior to the first phase the fourth consecutive year in 2024-25, the US maintained its status as India's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $131.84 billion. The US contributes approximately 18 per cent to India's total goods exports, 6.22 per cent to imports, and 10.73 per cent to the overall merchandise trade of the India's free trade agreement with the four-nation European bloc EFTA, Goyal clarified that the $100 billion foreign direct investment (FDI) commitment under this agreement does not account for funds entering the stock market through foreign institutional investors (FIIs)."This represents solid FDI coming into the nation... This $100 billion in FDI is accompanied by technologies... It will likely catalyze approximately $500 billion in investments," he stated. He emphasized that such investments would foster the development of a comprehensive ecosystem, leading to the establishment of hotels, infrastructure, and the utilization of power and water resources, thus significantly contributing to the economy. The implementation of this pact is advancing rapidly, with expectations for it to be operational by the year's Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) was signed by the two sides on March 10, 2024. Under this agreement, India has secured an investment pledge of $100 billion over 15 years from the grouping, while allowing several products, including Swiss watches, chocolates, and cut and polished diamonds, to be imported at lower or zero members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) include Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland. When queried about the possibility of a similar arrangement in the proposed trade pact with the 27-nation EU bloc, Goyal remarked, "The member countries are significant investors in India, so we may not pursue that avenue in our FTA with the EU."


Indian Express
33 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lawyers don't need to wear black coats in summer: Delhi Bar Association
In a major relief to lawyers practising in the Capital amidst the scorching heat, the Delhi Bar Association (DBA) has decided that advocates will be exempt from wearing black coats, their usual dress code, from May 16 to September 30. Rules framed under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act, 1961, prescribe a dress code for all practising advocates. This comprises a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan (a knee-length upper garment with long sleeves, side slits and a standing collar), black sherwani and white bands with advocate's gown for men advocates. Women advocates have to wear a black and full or half-sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar, stiff or soft, and white bands with advocates' gowns or sarees and long skirts (white or black without any design). 'All the members are hereby informed that advocates are exempted from wearing a black coat during summer (from May 16 to September 30) as per amendment in rules under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act,1961,' DBA said in a circular dated May 24. 'Therefore, the members are at liberty to appear in the Courts subordinate to the Delhi High Court without wearing a black coat… The members are, however, advised to adhere to other rules of the dress code…,' the circular issued by Vikas Goyal, Secretary, DBA, said. DBA also said the district and sessions judges of various court complexes across Delhi have been informed of this decision. 'This is a very good step. The weather is very erratic and humid. In June, the heat will be way worse. This should be done by all Bar Associations and Councils across North India,' said Advocate Dhir Singh Kasana, former Saket Bar Association secretary. 'Indian district courts lack proper infrastructure in terms of fans, air conditioners, unhygienic washrooms, and sitting rooms, coupled with rising temperatures, it has become a daily physical and mental challenge for the advocates to wear black coats during court hours, especially in summer…This move is a welcome step towards the welfare of the advocates practising at district courts,' Advocate Paras Jain, who practices in Delhi, said. On February 27 this year, the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) issued a circular stating that advocates need not wear black coats from March 1 to June 30 every year. Similarly, Bhopal's Bar Council gave a similar exemption to lawyers from April 15 to July 15, 2025.