
India-US trade pact: Effort on to facilitate preferential market access for both sides, says Piyush Goyal
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
India and the United States are keen on providing preferential market access to each other's businesses, with teams from both nations collaborating on a proposed bilateral trade agreement, Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal said on June 2. In February, Donald Trump and Narendra Modi underlined the two sides' intentions to negotiate the initial phase of a mutually advantageous multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by the fall of 2025, specifically targeting September-October.This agreement aims to increase bilateral trade from the current figure of $191 billion to $500 billion by the year 2030.Goyal told reporters in Paris, during an official visit, that both nations are dedicated to collaborating and that there is a mutual desire to provide preferential access to each other's businesses.In response to a question regarding Trump's announcement to raise tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent, Goyal stated that both countries will continue to work on resolving such issues through bilateral discussions."Let's wait and see; both the US and India share a positive relationship and will persist in resolving these matters through dialogue," Goyal said.Trade specialists have indicated that the Trump administration's potential increase in import duties could adversely affect Indian exporters, particularly those involved in value-added steel products and auto components.On May 30, Trump declared his plan to raise the existing 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, effective June 4. The initial tariffs were invoked in 2018, with a 25 per cent tariff on steel and 10 per cent on aluminum, which was later raised to 25 per cent on aluminum in February 2025.In the fiscal year 2024-25, India exported iron, steel, and aluminum products worth $4.56 billion to the US, with key exports including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in iron or steel articles, and $860 million in aluminum and related products.India has also lodged a formal complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO), asserting its right to impose retaliatory tariffs on American goods in reaction to the previous steel tariffs. This week, a delegation of US officials is visiting India to discuss the proposed interim trade agreement between the two nations.The significance of this visit is heightened by the expectation that India and the US may reach an interim trade agreement by the end of June, with India advocating for a complete exemption from the 26 per cent reciprocal tariff on domestic goods.Rajesh Agrawal, India's chief negotiator and Special Secretary in the Department of Commerce, concluded a four-day visit to Washington last month, where he engaged in discussions with his US counterpart regarding the proposed agreement. Goyal was also in Washington to further advance trade negotiations. There is a possibility that both nations might finalize an interim trade deal prior to the first phase agreement.For the fourth consecutive year in 2024-25, the US maintained its status as India's largest trading partner, with bilateral trade reaching $131.84 billion. The US contributes approximately 18 per cent to India's total goods exports, 6.22 per cent to imports, and 10.73 per cent to the overall merchandise trade of the country.Regarding India's free trade agreement with the four-nation European bloc EFTA, Goyal clarified that the $100 billion foreign direct investment (FDI) commitment under this agreement does not account for funds entering the stock market through foreign institutional investors (FIIs)."This represents solid FDI coming into the nation... This $100 billion in FDI is accompanied by technologies... It will likely catalyze approximately $500 billion in investments," he stated. He emphasized that such investments would foster the development of a comprehensive ecosystem, leading to the establishment of hotels, infrastructure, and the utilization of power and water resources, thus significantly contributing to the economy. The implementation of this pact is advancing rapidly, with expectations for it to be operational by the year's end.The Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) was signed by the two sides on March 10, 2024. Under this agreement, India has secured an investment pledge of $100 billion over 15 years from the grouping, while allowing several products, including Swiss watches, chocolates, and cut and polished diamonds, to be imported at lower or zero duties.The members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) include Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland. When queried about the possibility of a similar arrangement in the proposed trade pact with the 27-nation EU bloc, Goyal remarked, "The member countries are significant investors in India, so we may not pursue that avenue in our FTA with the EU."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
36 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US judge says prisons must provide gender-affirming care for trans inmates
A US judge on Tuesday ruled the US Bureau of Prisons must keep providing transgender inmates gender-affirming care, despite an executive order President Donald Trump signed on his first day back in office to halt funding for such care. US District Judge Royce Lamberth in Washington, D.C., allowed a group of more than 2,000 transgender inmates in federal prisons to pursue a lawsuit challenging the order as a class action. He ordered the Bureau of Prisons to provide them with hormone therapy and accommodations such as clothing and hair-removal devices while the lawsuit plays out. The ruling does not require the bureau to provide surgical care related to gender transitions. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said the Trump administration expects to ultimately prevail in the legal dispute. "The District Court's decision allowing transgender women, aka MEN, in women's prisons fundamentally makes women less safe and ignores the biological truth that there are only two genders," Fields said in an email. The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents the inmates, said the ruling was "a critical reminder to the Trump administration that trans people, like all people, have constitutional rights that don't simply disappear because the president has decided to wage an ideological battle." About 2,230 transgender inmates are housed in federal custodial facilities and halfway houses, according to the US Department of Justice. About two-thirds of them, 1,506, are transgender women, most of whom are housed in men's prisons. The named plaintiffs, two transgender men and one transgender woman, sued the Trump administration in March to challenge Trump's January 20 executive order aimed at combating what the administration called "gender ideology extremism." The executive order directed the federal government to only recognize two, biologically distinct sexes, male and female; and house transgender women in men's prisons. It also ordered the bureau to stop spending any money on "any medical procedure, treatment, or drug for the purpose of conforming an inmate's appearance to that of the opposite sex." Lamberth, appointed by Republican President Ronald Reagan, said in Tuesday's ruling that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their lawsuit because the bureau did not perform any analysis before cutting off treatment that its own medical staff had previously deemed to be medically appropriate for the inmates. Even if it had extensively studied the issue before deciding to stop gender-affirming care, the decision might still violate the US Constitution's Eighth Amendment's protections against "cruel and unusual" punishment, Lamberth wrote. The Department of Justice had argued that the judge should defer to the policy decision of a democratically elected president, but Lamberth said a functioning democracy requires respect for "all duly enacted laws," including those that blocked the executive branch from acting in an "arbitrary and capricious" manner. Democratic self-governance "does not mean blind submission to the whims of the most recent election-victor," Lamberth wrote. The executive order said it was meant to promote the "dignity, safety, and wellbeing of women, and to stop the spread of "gender ideology" which denies "the immutable biological reality of sex." But the inmates receiving hormone treatments had little interest in promoting any ideology, and were instead taking "measures to lessen the personal anguish caused by their gender dysphoria," Lamberth wrote. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Richard Chang)


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor: Pakistan dossier 'reveals' 7 more targets India hit
NEW DELHI: Pakistan said India conducted strikes at seven more locations than the targets officially acknowledged by Indian armed forces between May 7 and 10 during Operation Sindoor . A Pakistan govt document on its Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos (Iron Wall) and India's "unprovoked aggression", shared with its media, lists out Indian drone strikes at Attock, Bahawalnagar, Gujrat and Jhang (Punjab province), Peshawar (Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa province), and Chhor and Hyderabad (Sindh province), which it claimed killed many civilians. None of these places were mentioned in the detailed briefings conducted by Indian foreign and military establishments. "We had disclosed the targets we hit in the briefings. This Pakistani document could be a propaganda attempt to show that India also targeted civilian sites," an Indian defence official said. After Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians, India on May 7 hit 4 terror hubs in Pakistan and five in POK, in calibrated strikes against terror infrastructure across the border, without targeting any Pakistani military base or civilian centre. The targets ranged from Sawai Nala camp in Muzaffarabad in north to Markaz Taiba in Muridke (Lashkar-e-Taiba HQ) and Markaz Subhan at Bahawalpur (Jaish-e-Muhammed HQ) in south. After Pakistan escalated the situation by targeting Indian military bases and civilian centres with missiles and waves of drone swarms, IAF struck at least nine Pakistani airbases and at least four military radar sites.


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
In New York, Khalistan backers heckle doctor who aided 2020-21 farm stir; Dr Swaiman says he is proud of Indian roots, Tricolour
Bathinda: Dr Swaiman Singh, who played a vital role during the 2020-21 farm stir on Delhi borders, was heckled by pro-Khalistan individuals at a gurdwara in New York on Sunday afternoon. The pro-Khalistan elements were angry because he displayed the Indian tricolour during the farmers' protest. The show of resentment came just days ahead of Sikhs across the world remembering those who were killed in Indian Army's Operation Bluestar at Golden Temple on June 6, 1984. Despite the opposition, Dr Swaiman stood his ground and delivered a speech for which he was invited by New York Sikh Cultural Society. A large congregation was held at the NY Sikh Cultural Society Gurdwara on Sunday afternoon (early hours of Monday in India). Dr Swaiman and former New York governor Andrew Mark Cuomo were invited by the society to deliver a lecture. Undeterred, Dr Swaiman delivered his response, challenging the group to open dialogue. Speaking to TOI over the phone from the US, Dr Swaiman said it was true that Sikhs living in various parts of the world were angry over the way their revered religious place was attacked by the govt in 1984, and how justice had not been delivered till now. "But, being an Indian, I have displayed the tricolour a number of times, and I am proud of it. Whatever happened in 1984 was an attack by a govt of a particular political party, it does not denote all of India. We may be angry with the govt or party, but not with India," he said. Dr Swaiman added he too had been branded a "Khalistani" in the past and this was not right. "ThzZ country should look into the grievances of Sikhs and deliver justice. But, just some people opposing me cannot undermine my commitment the people of my nation, where my team is regularly working," he added. The NY Sikh Cultural Society Gurdwara remains a vital community hub, fostering dialogue and cultural unity. "This incident highlights the need for constructive conversations to bridge divides within our communities," he said. Dr Swaiman's family belongs to Tarn Taran district in Punjab. During the farm struggle, his organisation, '5 Rivers Heart Association', held medical camps at the protest site to help the protesters.