Bill banning energy companies from using eminent domain moves through OK Senate
Senate Bill 352 states that eminent domain can not be used by 'wind energy facilities, solar energy facilities, battery storage facilities, or hydrogen gas facilities on private property.'
'Private property owners must have protections,' said Sen. Todd Gollihare (R-Kellyville).
Gollihare authored the legislation. He was asked how he identified these businesses as ones to restrict.
Bill locking the clock on standard time in OK passes committee
'These green energy facilities and all the conflict that's going on in rural Oklahoma with wind turbines as well as solar projects,' said Gollihare.
He cited recent projects in northern Oklahoma, where companies used eminent domain to move forward. He said his bill adds safeguards for landowners.'These landowners want to have a say in who's taking their property and who's using their land for what. That's how we identified that,' said Gollihare.
The legislation would also require electric companies to get approval from the Oklahoma Corporation Commission on high-voltage line projects.
Senator Mary Boren (D-Norman) said she started looking into the state's eminent domain laws after having to deal with the possibility it would be enforced for a turnpike in her district.'I learned that Oklahoma has some of the worst eminent domain laws in the nation as far as private property owners,' said Boren.
Gollihare said the legislation would strengthen those statutes while protecting private property owners.'Since 1915 no significant changes have been made to the eminent domain statute. Other than prohibiting its use for wind turbine in 2011,' said Gollihare. 'Senate Bill 352 is the first step in updating this statute to protect private property rights in the modern era.'
The measure passed the full Senate and will now make its way to the House.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vox
3 minutes ago
- Vox
Trump's plan to win the House just took a big step forward
This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here. Welcome to The Logoff: Texas is forging ahead with its plan to add five Republican seats to its congressional map at the behest of President Donald Trump, in preparation for what is likely to be a difficult midterm election for the party next year. What just happened? On Wednesday, the Texas House approved a mid-decade redistricting plan that will even more aggressively gerrymander the state, creating five new congressional districts that are likely to elect Republicans. The plan still needs to pass the state Senate before Texas Gov. Greg Abbott can sign it into law, but is expected to advance without difficulty. Why is this so abnormal? Every decade, states redraw their congressional maps in accordance with the results of the decennial US Census; Texas's current effort would see the state break that pattern and do so five years early, and for clearly partisan purposes. How are other states reacting? California Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to advance a retaliatory redistricting measure in California if Texas moves forward with its plan, with the goal of creating five new Democratic seats. On Wednesday night, he tweeted, 'It's on, Texas.' However, the California process will be more difficult — voters will first need to approve an amendment to the state constitution. On the flip side, a number of Republican states are following Texas's lead in redistricting at Trump's urging, including Missouri, Ohio, Indiana, and possibly Florida. Together, they could help the GOP net even more seats. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. What's the big picture? Gerrymandering is inherently partisan (and done by both parties), but Texas's plan represents a particularly aggressive, cynical power play ahead of the 2026 midterm elections (and one that's bad for Texans). Republicans' current margin of control in the House of Representatives is just three seats, which means Texas alone could conceivably decide power in the chamber — and with it, the course of Trump's final two years in office. And with that, it's time to log off… I'm willing to concede that 'Nightmare at the end of the universe' doesn't sound like a cheerful topic to sign off with. But the latest episode from Vox's Unexplainable podcast is actually a fascinating, not-at-all-nightmarish look at 'the biggest mystery ever': understanding dark energy, which makes up something like 70 percent of the universe and has implications for its eventual end — if it exists at all. You can listen to the episode here.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge says former Trump lawyer Alina Habba has been unlawfully serving as US attorney in New Jersey
A federal judge ruled Thursday that President Donald Trump's former lawyer, Alina Habba, has been unlawfully serving as the the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey. The court, saying the administration used 'a novel series of legal and personnel moves,' held that Habba's term as the interim U.S. attorney ended in July, and the Trump administration's maneuvers to keep her in the role without getting confirmation from the U.S. Senate didn't follow procedures required by federal law. 'Faced with the question of whether Ms. Habba is lawfully performing the functions and duties of the office of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, I conclude that she is not,' Chief U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann wrote. The opinion says that Habba's actions since July 'may be declared void." Brann, a Barack Obama appointee, said he's putting his order on hold pending an appeal. It wasn't immediately clear if that meant Habba would remain in charge of the U.S. attorney's office. A message seeking comment was sent to Habba's office Thursday. The Justice Department said it intends to appeal the ruling. Brann's decision comes in response to a filing on behalf of New Jersey defendants challenging Habba's tenure and the charges she was prosecuting against them. They sought to block the charges against them, arguing that Habba didn't have the authority to prosecute the case after her 120-day term as interim U.S. attorney expired in July. The defendants' motion to block Habba, a onetime White House adviser to President Donald Trump and his former personal defense attorney, is another high-profile chapter in her short tenure. She made headlines when Trump named her U.S. attorney for New Jersey in March. She said the state could 'turn red,' a rare, overt political expression from a prosecutor, and said she planned to investigate the state's Democratic governor and attorney general. She then brought a trespassing charge, which was eventually dropped, against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka stemming from his visit to a federal immigration detention center. Habba later charged Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver with assault stemming from the same incident, a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress other than for corruption. She denies the charges and has pleaded not guilty. Volatility over her tenure unfolded in late July when the four-month temporary appointment was coming to a close and it became clear that she would not get support from home state Sens. Cory Booker and Andy Kim, both Democrats, effectively torpedoing her chances of Senate approval. The president withdrew her nomination. Around the same time, federal judges in New Jersey exercised their power under the law to replace Habba with a career prosecutor when Habba's temprorary appointment lapsed, but Attorney General Pam Bondi fired that prosecutor and renamed Habba as acting U.S. attorney. In his opinion Brann questioned the legal moves the administration conducted to keep Habba in place. 'Taken to the extreme, the President could use this method to staff the United States Attorney's office with individuals of his personal choice for an entire term without seeking the Senate's advice and consent," he wrote. The Justice Department has said in filings that the judges acted prematurely and that the executive has the authority to appoint his preferred candidate to enforce federal laws in the state. Trump had formally nominated Habba as his pick for U.S. attorney on July 1, but Booker and Kim's opposition meant that under long-standing Senate practice known as senatorial courtesy, the nomination would stall out. A handful of other Trump picks for U.S. attorney are facing a similar circumstance.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California to take on Newsom-backed redistricting plan today
California's contentious new congressional maps, championed by Gov. Gavin Newsom, easily advanced in the state Assembly on Thursday, setting up for final passage in the Senate before landing on Newsom's desk. The new map would shift five of California's Republican U.S. House seats to be more favorable to Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections. The measure passed the Assembly on Thursday with 57 legislators voting in favor and 20 against, and now heads to the state Senate. If the measure is successful, Californians would then vote on a constitutional amendment for the new boundaries during a special election on Nov. 4. That election is likely to be expensive and unpredictable given how quickly the effort has come together and how little time there is between the legislature's actions and voters starting to have their say. California's legislative votes are happening just one day after Texas state representatives passed a GOP-backed congressional map on Wednesday at the request of President Trump, following a weekslong standoff in which Democratic lawmakers left Texas to delay a vote. These new Texas maps could help secure five additional GOP-leaning seats during the upcoming midterm elections. Republicans in the state have been adamant the Texas changes are fair, while Texas Democrats have already signaled the maps will be challenged in court. Shortly after the Texas House passed the maps, Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom posted "It's on" on social media. When Texas first launched its redistricting effort, Newsom had vowed to redraw the Golden State's congressional districts to counter the Lone Star State's plan and neutralize any potential GOP gains. Newsom — who is widely seen as a possible 2028 presidential contender — sarcastically congratulated Texas GOP Gov. Greg Abbott on X, saying, "you will now go down in history as one of Donald Trump's most loyal lapdogs. Shredding our nation's founding principles. What a legacy." Although California Republicans have denounced the redistricting plan as a "tit-for-tat strategy," the state's Democrats on Thursday touted that the effort is different from Texas since it will be ultimately approved by the state's voters. "In California, we will do whatever it takes to ensure that voters, not Donald Trump, will decide the direction of this country," said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. "This is a proud moment in the history of this assembly. Californians, we believe in freedom. We will not let our political system be hijacked by authoritarianism, and today, we give every Californian the power to say no. To say no to Donald Trump's power grab and yes to our people, to our state and to our democracy." Although Newsom and California Democrats had previously insisted redistricting would only move forward if GOP-led states such as Texas, Florida, Indiana or others continued with their maps, that language was struck from Thursday's measure shortly before the Assembly voted on it. President Trump late Wednesday congratulated Texas Republicans for advancing the new maps, writing on social media that "Everything Passed, on our way to FIVE more Congressional seats and saving your Rights, your Freedoms, and your Country, itself." He also encouraged GOP-led Indiana and Florida to take on redistricting. The relatively rare mid-decade redistricting gambit comes as both parties prepare to face off in 2026 and has major implications nationwide. Republicans have a narrow majority at the moment, and Democrats winning back three seats in the 2026 midterms could be enough to flip control of the chamber if the lines used in the 2024 election were still in place. Redistricting in red states could change that dynamic significantly however, and with it the impact of the final two years on Mr. Trump's second term in office. Texas and California are the two biggest redistricting battlegrounds, but Mr. Trump has pushed similar efforts in GOP-led Indiana and Florida, and New York Democrats have floated redrawing their House map. The Republican-led state of Missouri could also try and redraw a Democratic district in the coming weeks, and new maps are also expected in Ohio, where a redraw brought about by state law could impact some of the red state's Democratic members of Congress. Earlier this week, former President Barack Obama acknowledged that he was not a fan of partisan gerrymandering but he backed Newsom's redistricting plan anyway at a fundraiser in Martha's Vineyard and on social media, calling it a "smart, measured approach." Less than 24 hours before California's scheduled vote, Newsom joined a press call with Democratic party leaders, urging support for his state's redistricting effort. "This is about taking back our country," Newsom told reporters. "This is about the Democratic Party now punching back forcefully and very intentionally. A draft congressional map unveiled by California Democrats late last week would heavily impact five of the state's nine Republican U.S. House members. It would redraw Reps. Doug LaMalfa and Kevin Kiley's Northern California districts, tweak Rep. David Valadao's district in the Central Valley and rearrange parts of densely populated Southern California, impacting Reps. Ken Calvert and Darrell Issa. And some more competitive Democrat-held districts could be tilted further from the GOP. There's no guarantee that Democrats will win in all five newly recast districts. Democrats hold large majorities in both chambers of California's state legislature. But some legal hurdles still lie ahead, and Republicans in the state have pushed back against the redistricting plans. Unlike Texas, California has an independent redistricting commission that was created by voters earlier this century. To overhaul the current congressional map, a constitutional amendment would need to be passed by a two-thirds vote in California's Assembly and Senate and be approved by voters in the fast-moving fall election. On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court denied a GOP attempt to stop the mid-cycle redistricting. California Republicans had legally challenged Democrats' efforts, claiming the state's constitution gives Californians the right to review new legislation for 30 days. But Chief Justice Patricia Guerrero said they "failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time." The GOP legislators who filed the legal challenge told CBS News the ruling is "not the end of this fight," vowing to keep fighting the redistricting plan in the courts. In a phone interview with CBS News on Wednesday, California Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones, a Republican, condemned Newsom's redistricting efforts. "This whole process is illegal from the beginning and violates the current California Constitution," Jones said. "The voters spoke with a loud voice in 2008 and 2010 that they were taking this process out of the politicians' hands and putting the responsibility into an independent commission." Democrats faced a flurry of questions from Republican lawmakers during hearings this week on the alleged lack of transparency in the drafting of these maps and the financial implications of the Nov. 4 special election. "If we're talking about the cost of a special election versus the cost of our democracy or the cost that Californians are already paying to subsidize this corrupt administration, those costs seem well worth paying at this moment," said Democratic state Assemblyman Isaac G. Bryan. Democratic lawmakers and Newsom have repeatedly emphasized that these redistricting efforts would not get rid of the independent commission and that the new maps he's hoping to put in place will be the lines used through the 2030 election. The commission would go back to drawing the state's congressional maps after the 2030 census, according to Newsom, who says this is only being done as a response to Mr. Trump and Texas' redistricting. That notion was rejected by Jones, who said: "Growing up, I was taught two wrongs don't make a right, so no, it is not justified." Unsealed video shows TikTok employees' concerns about its impact on teens Hurricane Erin bringing coastal flooding to New York as it churns off East Coast Energy prices climbing twice as fast as inflation in U.S.
