Stateless in Serbia: Russians, Belarusians left in limbo
'It has now been almost a year and a half that I've been without any citizenship,' former Russian citizen Igor Grishin told AFP. 'And I don't know how long it will last,' he added. 'A month, a year... or the rest of my life.' The 58-year-old health podcaster has lived for 11 years in the northern town of Sremski Karlovci with his wife and two daughters. His wife and older daughter obtained Serbian citizenship earlier, while the younger acquired it by birth.
'I cannot travel with my family,' Grishin said. 'I couldn't go to my mother's funeral in the Russian Federation and I cannot even visit her grave,' he added. Grishin is in contact with more than 20 others in the same situation — though these are only the known cases. Those AFP spoke to claim they have never expressed any political views — either about Russia or Serbia — which in the past has cost some Russians in Serbia their residency there. All said they had passed all security checks and renounced their original nationality as the final step.
Big Russian influx
'Serbia gave us confirmation — a guarantee — that it would accept us if we renounced our citizenship,' Sergei Stets, a former Belarusian citizen who lives in Novi Sad, told AFP. 'I've now been without any citizenship for a year and a half,' said the 46-year-old former mountain bike coach from Minsk. 'I feel as if we're not wanted — neither there, nor here,' he said.
Once the selector of Serbia's national team, he had to give it up because he is unable to leave the country, and now gets by delivering meals on his bike. His wife, a horse-riding and equine therapy instructor, faces the same issue, having previously worked across the region. 'I wrote to the police several times. The answer was always the same — the documentation is under review, and I need to wait,' he said. The Ombudsman's Office confirmed that they 'are aware of the issue', adding that 'the review of complaints is ongoing'.
'Special' cases linked to FSB
Every country has the right to conduct additional checks, said experts on migration and asylum. 'Although they completed all procedures and renounced their previous citizenship, the process can still take time,' Rados Djurovic, a lawyer and director of the Asylum Protection Center NGO, told AFP. However, 'there is no justification for keeping people in an unregulated status long-term,' he added. Djurovic said outside factors linked to 'state policy and international relations' may also be to blame for the delays.
Proposed amendments to the Citizenship Law in October 2023 aimed at simplifying the process for foreigners were withdrawn after objections from the European Commission. 'The more liberal reforms drew criticism from Europe, with concerns that easing citizenship rules could pose risks to Western countries,' with Serbian citizens allowed to travel freely in the EU without a visa. Despite being a candidate for EU membership, Serbia maintains close ties with Russia and has not joined Western sanctions — including visa restrictions — imposed on Moscow.
As a result, demand for Serbian passports has surged, with between 80,000 and 110,000 Russians settling in the country in recent years, according to the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy (BCSP). While some applicants remain in limbo, others — notably influential Russians — have reportedly obtained citizenship through special procedures. Last month the respected outlet KRIK revealed that 204 Russian nationals were granted Serbian passports for 'national interest' reasons. The list includes individuals linked to Russia's FSB security service, war profiteers from Ukraine and oligarchs under international sanctions. Serbian authorities have not commented on the report. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab Times
3 hours ago
- Arab Times
Trump to meet Putin in coming days, Kremlin says
WASHINGTON, Aug 7, (AP): The Kremlin said Thursday that a meeting in the coming days between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump has been agreed on, as a new Gallup poll found that Ukrainians are increasingly eager for a settlement that ends the fight against Russia's invasion. Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said the two sides are working on setting up a meeting, and that a venue for the meeting has been agreed on and will be announced later. A meeting between Putin and Trump would be their first since Trump returned to office this year. It would be a significant milestone in the more than 3-year-old war, though there's no promise such a meeting would lead to the end of the fighting, since Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on their demands. The enthusiasm for a negotiated deal is a sharp reversal from 2022 - the year the war began - when Gallup found that about three-quarters of Ukrainians wanted to keep fighting until victory. Now only about one-quarter hold that view, with support for continuing the war declining steadily across all regions and demographic groups. The findings were based on samples of 1,000 or more respondents ages 15 and older living in Ukraine. Some territories under entrenched Russian control, representing about 10% of the population, were excluded from surveys conducted after 2022 due to lack of access. Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. The poll came out on the eve of US President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about 7 in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month renewed his offer to meet with Russia's Vladimir Putin, but his overture was rebuffed as Russia sticks to its demands, and the sides remain far apart.
Kuwait Times
4 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Hezbollah rejects cabinet's decision to disarm it
BEIRUT: Hezbollah said Wednesday it would treat a Lebanese government decision to disarm the militant group 'as if it did not exist', accusing the cabinet of committing a 'grave sin'. Amid heavy US pressure and fears Zionist entity could expand its strikes on Lebanon, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Tuesday that the government had tasked the army with developing a plan to restrict weapons to government forces by year end. The plan is to be presented to the government by the end of August for discussion and approval, and another cabinet session has been scheduled for Thursday to continue the talks, including on a US-proposed timetable for disarmament. Hezbollah said the government had 'committed a grave sin by taking the decision to disarm Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Zionist enemy'. The decision on the thorny issue is unprecedented since Lebanon's civil war factions gave up their weapons three and a half decades ago. 'This decision undermines Lebanon's sovereignty and gives (Zionist entity) a free hand to tamper with its security, geography, politics and future existence... Therefore, we will treat this decision as if it does not exist,' the Iran-backed group said in a statement. BAABDA: Lebanon's President Joseph Aoun (center) chairs a cabinet session to discuss the issue of disarming Hezbollah at the presidential palace of Baabda east of Beirut. – AFP 'Serves Zionist interests' The government said its decision came as part of implementing a November ceasefire that sought to end more than a year of hostilities between Zionists and Hezbollah, including two months of full-blown war. Hezbollah said it viewed the government's move as 'the result of dictates from US envoy' Tom Barrack. It 'fully serves Zionist interests and leaves Lebanon exposed to the Zionist enemy without any deterrence', the group said. Hezbollah was the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war. It emerged weakened politically and militarily from its latest conflict with Zionist entity, its arsenal pummeled and its senior leadership decimated. Zionist entity has kept up its strikes on Hezbollah and other targets despite the November truce, and has threatened to keep doing so until the group has been disarmed. The group said Zionist entity must halt those strikes before any domestic debate about its weapons and a new defense strategy can begin. 'Pivotal moment' 'We are open to dialogue, ending the Zionist aggression against Lebanon, liberating its land, releasing prisoners, working to build the state, and rebuilding what was destroyed by the brutal aggression,' the group said. Hezbollah is 'prepared to discuss a national security strategy', but not under Zionist fire, it added. Two ministers affiliated with Hezbollah and its ally the Amal movement walked out of Tuesday's meeting. Hezbollah described the walkout as 'an expression of rejection' of the government's 'decision to subject Lebanon to American tutelage and (Zionist) occupation'. The Amal movement, headed by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, accused the government of 'rushing to offer more gratuitous concessions' to Zionist entity when it should have sought to end the ongoing attacks. It called Thursday's cabinet meeting 'an opportunity for correction'. Hezbollah opponent the Lebanese Forces, one of the country's two main Christian parties, said the cabinet's decision to disarm the militant group was 'a pivotal moment in Lebanon's modern history - a long-overdue step toward restoring full state authority and sovereignty'. The Kataeb, another Christian party, called the cabinet's move 'historic' and warned against 'any attempt to deal with the decision negatively'. It accused the Hezbollah leader of being in denial and 'trying to drag the country into a confrontation that Lebanese reject'. - AFP
Kuwait Times
4 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
M23 killed ‘319 civilians' in DR Congo in July: UN
DOHA: Qatar's chief negotiator Mohammed al-Khulaifi (center) stands between peace mediator Sumbu Sita Mambu, a high representative of the head of state in the Democratic Republic of Congo (seated-left) and Rwanda-backed armed group M23 executive secretary Benjamin Mbonimp (right) as they sign a ceasefire deal in Doha on July 19, 2025.-- AFP GENEVA: UN rights chief Volker Turk on Wednesday denounced the Rwanda-backed M23 militia, which he said had killed at least 319 civilians in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo in July. With Rwanda's support the M23 has seized swathes of the mineral-rich Congolese east from the DRC's army since its resurgence in 2021, triggering a spiraling humanitarian crisis in a region already riven by three decades of conflict. July's violence came only weeks after the Congolese government and the M23 signed a declaration of principle on June 19 reaffirming their commitment to a permanent ceasefire, following months of broken truces. 'I am appalled by the attacks on civilians by the M23 and other armed groups in eastern DRC amid continued fighting, despite the ceasefire that was recently signed in Doha,' Turk said in a statement. 'All attacks against civilians must stop immediately, and all those responsible must be held to account,' he added. Turk's UN Human Rights Office said it had documented multiple attacks in North Kivu, South Kivu and Ituri provinces, in the conflict-ridden east of the country bordering Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi. In the agreement signed in Doha, the warring parties agreed to 'uphold their commitment to a permanent ceasefire', refraining from 'hate propaganda' and 'any attempt to seize by force new positions'. The deal includes a roadmap for restoring state authority in eastern DRC, and an agreement for the two sides to open direct talks toward a comprehensive peace agreement. It followed a separate agreement signed in Washington by the Congolese government and Rwanda, which has a history of intervention in the eastern DRC stretching back to the 1990s. Rwandan President Paul Kagame and Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi are due to meet in the coming months to firm up the Washington agreement, whose terms have not yet been implemented. 'I urge the signatories and facilitators of both the Doha and Washington agreements to ensure that they rapidly translate into safety, security and real progress for civilians in the DRC, who continue to endure the devastating consequences of these conflicts,' said Turk. - AFP
