Elderly couple ‘abandoned' in their Gurgaon flat for 3 years, community steps in
Gurgaon: Behind the closed doors of an apartment at Ridgewood Estate, the muffled cries of a nonagenarian man and his octogenarian wife have stirred neighbours into action, making it a rare case of a community seeking the state's intervention to guarantee care, safety and dignity for the allegedly abandoned couple.
Left in the care of two untrained attendants by their son who is abroad, residents of the society, also members of Ridgewood Estate Condominium Association (RECA), said they repeatedly tried to contact the son, but their appeals fell on deaf ears. The association then approached Haryana Human Rights Commission (HHRC), which took cognisance immediately and ordered a comprehensive medical, psychological, and social assessment of the couple by govt.
The couple has been living here for three years, when the son purchased the flat and moved them, transferring power of attorney to his father, according to RECA. However, two caregivers working in day and night shifts became the couple's only connection with the outside world soon after. Concerned neighbours visited, making inquiries and offering assistance, but were turned away at the door.
Residents said the son regularly made online payments for maintenance charges for the flat, but the association had no information about his whereabouts except his phone number and email ID in the society's records.
None recollected having seen him in the compound either.
"All we know is that he lives somewhere abroad. Earlier, a lady would visit the elderly couple, but she stopped coming a few months ago. We requested the son to visit his parents or arrange some help for them, but to no avail. The woman is bedridden, and the man's cries of distress echo in the corridor. It's deeply distressing," said Kittu Mathur, the association secretary.
Mathur said they had no information about the couple, not even their names. The couple have never attended any society event. Last month, an elderly neighbour ventured in seeing the door ajar and discovered the house to be in a complete mess, according to RECA members. A few days later, the son allegedly responded with a threat to lodge a police complaint against the neighbour for trespass.
Lalit Batra, the HHRC chairperson, expressed deep concern over the couple's prolonged mental and physical suffering, calling it a blatant violation of Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to live with dignity.
The rights panel emphasised that such situations were not merely "private family matters" but public human rights concerns. "Failure to ensure essential medical care, emotional support, and regular supervision reflects gross negligence.
It amounts to a breach of not only the basic human rights of the senior citizens themselves but also of the larger community that has been involuntarily subjected to such trauma," the rights panel observed.
Describing the situation as "alarmingly tragic", HHRC noted that the elderly should receive full family support, especially when they require love, care, and medical intervention the most. "Society and the state have a shared responsibility to intervene when the elderly are deprived of due care and dignity," the commission said.
Batra ordered immediate intervention in the case, asking the deputy commissioner to form a multi-disciplinary medical and welfare committee. This team, comprising the police commissioner, sub-divisional magistrate, civil surgeon, and district social welfare officer, must now assess the couple's condition and submit a comprehensive care plan before the next hearing on July 3. Puneet Arora, the commission's protocol officer, assured strict compliance by all authorities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Kiren Rijiju starts speaking with political parties for impeachment motion against HC Judge Yashwant Varma
New Delhi [India], June 3 (ANI): Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has started speaking with various political parties for an impeachment motion against High Court judge Yashwant Varma in the next Parliament Session, government sources said on Tuesday. The Supreme Court had constituted an inquiry committee following allegations of 'burnt cash' found at a storeroom of Justice Varma's residence when he was a Judge of the Delhi High Court. The in-house inquiry committee submitted its report on the issue last month, which has since been forwarded to the Prime Minister and the President of India. 'The Parliamentary Affairs Minister has started speaking to all parties for impeachment motion against HC judge Yashwant Varma,' a source said. On May 4, a panel of judges tasked with conducting an internal inquiry into allegations of cash being discovered at Justice Yashwant Varma's official residence submitted its report to the then Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna. According to an official communication from the Supreme Court, the three-member committee, comprising Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Justice GS Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh and Justice Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka concluded its investigation and presented its findings in a report dated May 3. The Chief Justice of India constituted this committee on March 22 to examine the allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma, a sitting judge of the High Court of Delhi. On April 5, Justice Yashwant Varma was sworn in as a judge of the Allahabad High Court under unusual and contentious circumstances. CPI general secretary D Raja had said on Wednesday that credibility of judiciary needs to be restored and his party will support the action against Justice Varma. 'Let them bring the impeachment motion. The Judiciary should understand that it has to work within the framework of the Constitution... To restore the credibility of our judiciary, there must be some strong action. We will support the impeachment motion. But the point is, when will it be brought? We raised several critical questions about the money found in the judge's residence, but concrete action has been delayed... Our party will participate in the debate before the Parliament when this issue is discussed,' Raja told ANI. Vice President Jagdeep Dhankar had last month referred to the cash-discovery row, saying there is no FIR to date. 'We're confronted with the jarring reality. A judge's residence in Lutyens Delhi had burnt notes. There is no FIR to in the country is now thinking whether this will be washed off or fade with time, and they are really concerned. How come the criminal justice system was not operationalised as it would have been done for every other individual?... This issue for which people are waiting with bated breath, the money trail, its source, its purpose,' Dhankhar said at an event in the national capital. 'Did it pollute the judicial system? Who are the bigger sharks? We need to find out. Already two months have gone by. An investigation is required to be conducted with expedition. So is the case with the registration of an FIR. I do hope and believe that the Supreme Court acted the very best so far because it had a legacy issue of judgments imparted in the nineties,' he added. He lauded some of the steps taken by the Supreme Court. 'But now is the time to take a call. Partly the confidence has been restored by Justice Khanna. When you put in public domain documentation which people thought will never be shown to them. That was a big step by him to project accountability and transparency. If democratic values have to prosper, I am sure this is a test case. There must be a swift investigation by those concerned with the investigation,' the Vice President said. (ANI)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Woman seeks bail for live-in partner she charged with abuse of minor daughter
Kolkata: In a bizarre turn of events, a Salt Lake-based entrepreneur, who lodged a complaint against her live-in partner for allegedly abusing her minor daughter leading to his arrest under Pocso charges, pleaded for his bail in Calcutta High Court on Tuesday because her "child misses her father (the live-in partner)". The woman told the HC that while her partner "is dying in prison", she was "dying outside". The court granted bail to the accused, who is at Dum Dum Central Jail since Aug 8, 2024, stating that "there is no immediate chance of conclusion of trial". Moving the bail plea before Justice Prasenjit Biswas, senior advocate Phiroze Edulji argued that Pocso charges were being "weaponised" in this case. Edulji said the woman met the accused in prison, and the minor daughter, who was allegedly abused, refused to corroborate the claims before the trial court. The state had to declare the child a "hostile witness", he said. The state counsel opposed the bail plea, citing several "incriminating documents" about the involvement of the accused in the crime. The state argued that it would be risky to grant bail when the trial was ongoing, and that the accused could tamper with evidence. Edulji said: "The woman said she lodged the complaint in a fit of rage. Her daughter, she said, misses her partner." "Failure to conclude the trial within a reasonable time resulting in prolonged incarceration militates against the precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution," Justice Biswas said. The court noted that the victim girl (PW1), who already deposed before the trial court, was examined on Jan 8, 2025. It also noted that the victim girl was declared "hostile" by the prosecution, and nothing came out after her cross-examination. It was also noted that the de facto complainant didn't turn up in trial court on several dates despite receiving summons, the latest being on May 7. Justice Biswas directed the accused to furnish a bail bond of Rs 20,000 and directed him to appear before the Pocso special court, Barasat, on each hearing date. The court also asked him to stay outside the jurisdiction of Bidhannagar Police Commissionerate until further orders.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Arrest illegal, court orders release of 2 Pocso accused
Mumbai: In a strong rebuke to police procedure, the sessions court at Kalyan ordered the immediate release of two individuals arrested under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, ruling that their detention was illegal due to violations of constitutional safeguards. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now VA Patravale, the special judge of the Pocso court, observed that the accused, arrested on May 13, 2025, by Vitthalwadi police, were not informed of the grounds of arrest at the time of detention, nor were any such details conveyed to their families. This omission, the court said, amounted to a gross breach of Article 22(1) of the Constitution. The minor girl's parents alleged that three boys, including one juvenile boy, allegedly sexually assaulted their minor daughter. According to the girl's mother, her daughter stepped outside their building around noon to relieve herself near a tree where construction work was underway. Shortly after, they heard the girl screaming. On rushing outside, the girl alleged three boys dragged her into a nearby room, physically assaulted her and then fled. — Ahmed Ali
