
Mark Carney revives tough talk about America and warns ‘a new imperialism threatens'
OTTAWA—Prime Minister Mark Carney, in unveiling $9 billion in new defence spending, revived tough talk against the United States Monday, describing America as hustling its allies to pay now or risk losing their ability to sell products to American consumers.
Speaking in Toronto, Carney did not use words like 'grift' or 'hustle' but he also did not mince words when it came to describing the U.S. as abandoning its role as a powerful leader on the world stage in favour of flexing its market muscle.
The sharper rhetoric comes at a time when the prime minister and his officials are scrambling to strike a new 'economic and security' agreement with President Donald Trump before next week's G7 leaders' summit. Canada's stated goal is to get Trump to lift tariffs the U.S. president levied on Canada and other global trading partners, even as Washington also demands NATO allies cough up billions more for military budgets.
A Canadian government official told the Star Monday that it is 'difficult to say whether or not we'll get to a deal before the G7' with not much having changed since the most recent meetings in Washington last week.
In fact, last week, Trump doubled down on tariffs, hiking surcharges on Canadian and other steel and aluminum imports to 50 per cent.
Carney opted not to increase Canada's level of counter-tariffs in response, but on Monday he did amp up his political rhetoric several notches. Carney justified Ottawa's accelerated military spending as he outlined a 'darker, more competitive world' and an 'age of disorder' that he said requires Canada to better defend this country and diversify its security and economic partners.
After the Second World War, Carney said, Canada grew more distant from Britain and aligned itself more closely with the U.S., a rapprochement that intensified after the fall of the Soviet Union established the U.S. as the leading world power.
'Its gravitational pull on Canada, always strong, became virtually irresistible and made the U.S. our closest ally and dominant trading partner,' said Carney. 'But now the United States is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contribution to our collective security.'
At the same time, Carney said, global 'trade routes, allegiances, energy systems, and even intelligence itself are being rewired.'
'Rising great powers are now in strategic competition with America. A new imperialism threatens,' he said, adding at other points in the speech that threats from Russia, China, non-state actors and terrorist organizations are on the rise.
'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they're on the menu.'
Carney will host the leaders of the largest western democratic economies, the so-called Group of Seven, next week in Kananaskis, Alta. Trump has said he'll attend.
Carney has also invited a range of 'middle powers' too. Leaders of Ukraine, India, Brazil, South Africa, and Australia are coming. Newly-elected South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, have confirmed in the last two days they will attend.
The Star has learned Carney has also invited Saudi Arabia Crown prince and prime minister, Mohammed bin Salman, the de facto ruler of the Saudi kingdom once tied to the order to kill a journalist, whom Trump met last month. The Saudi prince has not formally yet responded to the invitation, an official confirmed to the Star.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The fist bump seems so long ago.
Canada is focusing discussions at the summit on global economic and energy security among other concerns, as it looks ahead to the NATO summit at the end of June.
On Monday, Carney said his sharp increase in military spending in one year — which he once said would take five years to achieve — is needed to protect Canada's security needs, not a move to meet Trump's demands.
Yet it was clear the U.S. is a big factor in Carney's decision.
The prime minister, who campaigned on criticism of Trump as someone who wanted to 'break us to own us' and often used to describe the integrated Canada-U.S. relationship as 'over,' had dropped that talk in the weeks since he won.
When Carney met Trump in Washington, he flattered the president as a 'transformational' leader, and appealed to him to see the mutual benefit of renewed ties, saying Canada is the 'largest client' of the U.S.
However, the talks to renew a more integrated relationship do not seem to be headed where Carney wants.
Trump's ambassador to Canada, Pete Hoekstra, told the Toronto Star last week any new 'framework' nevertheless almost certainly still includes tariffs. 'This is discussing the level of tariffs, how broad they apply and these kinds of things,' Hoekstra said, 'not getting to zero' tariffs.
Meanwhile, slim hope remains that direct talks between Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney
Roy Norton, a former Canadian diplomat who spent years in the U.S. and is now a professor at the University of Waterloo, said in an interview the prime minister's comments Monday reflect that 'Carney understands how all this is evolving. He understands that Trump is not going to change, that we do have to act dramatically, seriously, to strengthen our position globally, that the dependence is unhealthy in the current context, as in, Trump is not going to give us a break.'
'We've heard from the U.S. ambassador that we're just supposed to arrive at a deal, but some measure of tariffs will remain. So they breached the existing deal that he (Trump) signed and instituted tariffs that we consider to be illegal. And we're supposed to make concessions to arrive effectively at a new deal, with no indication that there's any reciprocality in terms of willingness on their part to negotiate any of our concerns and accommodate us. And most importantly,' Norton added, 'no indication that there will be a pledge to not do this again.'
On Monday, Hoekstra welcomed Carney's decision to increase its military spending but he disputed Carney's characterization, telling CBC the U.S. is 'not squeezing' its trading partners, adding, 'we'll get past this.'
'We will have an agreement with the Canadians. You know that the timing and the, you know, and the content of when that agreement will be reached, you know, that's between the president and your prime minister,' he told Power and Politics host David Cochrane.
Carney had earlier acknowledged that because Canada buys so much military materiel from U.S. defence manufacturers that any increase in spending will benefit them and continue the cross-border relationship.
'First and foremost, we're doing this for us. Relatedly, we're doing it as a strong NATO partner,' said Carney. 'And of course, the United States is a fundamental ally of the country, so I think it's very complementary to the process of developing that new economic and security partnership with the Americans.'
However, he also said looking to others, like Europe, is 'just smart. It's better to be diversified. It's better to have options. It's better to have different supply chains and broader partners.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
3 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
I regret some of my posts about President Trump: Elon Musk expresses regret
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 12:44 IST In what appears to be a shift in tone, Elon Musk on Tuesday posted that he regrets some of his recent remarks about President Donald Trump, saying, 'They went too far.' I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025 This comes just days after Trump addressed their ongoing feud, stating he wished Musk 'very well' and suggesting the tech mogul might be seeking a conversation. In a gesture that caught attention, Musk had responded with a heart emoji on X (formerly Twitter), sparking speculation about a possible reconciliation. Tensions between the two escalated last week after Musk called Trump's proposed 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' a 'pork-filled abomination' and accused the President of suppressing Jeffrey Epstein-related files. The latter post, which Musk later deleted, reportedly infuriated Trump, who retaliated with harsh criticism and even threatened to sever government contracts with Musk-led firms. The feud intensified when Musk countered by threatening to halt NASA-linked SpaceX missions and claimed Trump would have lost the 2024 election without his support. He also floated the possibility of impeachment. However, Musk's latest message—posted at 12:34 PM on June 11—marks a notable departure from his confrontational stance, possibly signaling the beginning of a de-escalation. While no official conversation has been confirmed, both camps appear to be softening their positions, leaving the door open for future dialogue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

6 minutes ago
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his 'big, beautiful' bill
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Congress includes more than tax breaks and spending cuts — it also seeks to pour billions of dollars into the administration's mass deportation agenda. Republican leaders capitalized Tuesday on the demonstrations in Los Angeles, where people are protesting Trump's immigration raids at Home Depot and other places, to make the case for swift passage of their sprawling 1,000-plus-page bill over staunch Democratic opposition. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the One Big Beautiful Bill Act delivers 'much-needed reinforcements,' including 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, $45 billion to expand migrant detention facilities and billions more to carry out at least 1 million deportations a year. 'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families," he said. "It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.'


Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom Compares Donald Trump to Emperor Palpatine
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's office shared a meme portraying President Donald Trump as Star Wars villain Emperor Palpatine. In the video, Palpatine's voice reads out a Truth Social post by Trump talking about the riots in Los Angeles. The Democratic governor and Republican president have clashed over the latter's decision to send in National Guard troops and Marines to quell the disorder that erupted from protests against federal immigration raids in Los Angeles. A ONCE GREAT AMERICAN CITY HAS BEEN OCCUPIED! — Governor Newsom Press Office (@GovPressOffice) June 10, 2025 This is a developing article. Updates to follow.