
The ‘Great Dying' wiped out 90% of life, then came 5 million years of lethal heat. New fossils explain why
What followed has long puzzled scientists. The planet became lethally hot and remained so for 5 million years.
A team of international researchers say they have now figured out why using a vast trove of fossils — and it all revolves around tropical forests.
Their findings, published Wednesday in the journal Nature Communications, may help solve a mystery, but they also spell out a dire warning for the future as humans continue to heat up the planet by burning fossil fuels.
The Great Dying was the worst of the five mass extinction events that have punctuated Earth's history, and it marked the end of the Permian geological period.
It has been attributed to a period of volcanic activity in a region known as the Siberian Traps, which released huge amounts of carbon and other planet-heating gases into the atmosphere, causing intense global warming. Enormous numbers of marine and land-based plants and animals died, ecosystems collapsed and oceans acidified.
What has been less clear, however, is why it got so hot and why 'super greenhouse' conditions persisted for so long, even after volcanic activity ceased.
'The level of warming is far beyond any other event,' said Zhen Xu, a study author and a research fellow at the School of Earth and Environment at the University of Leeds.
Some theories revolve around the ocean and the idea that extreme heat wiped out carbon-absorbing plankton, or changed the ocean's chemical composition to make it less effective at storing carbon.
But scientists from the University of Leeds in England and the China University of Geosciences thought the answer may lie in a climate tipping point: the collapse of tropical forests.
The Great Dying extinction event is unique 'because it's the only one in which the plants all die off,' said Benjamin Mills, a study author and a professor of Earth system evolution at the University of Leeds.
To test the theory, they used an archive of fossil data in China that has been put together over decades by three generations of Chinese geologists.
They analyzed the fossils and rock formations to get clues about climate conditions in the past, allowing them to reconstruct maps of plants and trees living on each part of the planet before, during and after the extinction event. 'Nobody's ever done that before,' Mills told CNN.
The results confirmed their hypothesis, showing that the loss of vegetation during the mass extinction event significantly reduced the planet's ability to store carbon, meaning very high levels remained in the atmosphere.
Forests are a vital climate buffer as they suck up and store planet-heating carbon. They also play a crucial role in 'silicate weathering,' a chemical process involving rocks and rainwater — a key way of removing carbon from the atmosphere. Tree and plant roots help this process by breaking up rock and allowing fresh water and air to reach it.
Once the forests die, 'you're changing the carbon cycle,' Mills said, referring to the way carbon moves around the Earth, between the atmosphere, land, oceans and living organisms.
Michael Benton, a professor of paleontology at the University of Bristol, who was not involved in the study, said the research shows 'the absence of forests really impacts the regular oxygen-carbon cycles and suppresses carbon burial and so high levels of CO2 remain in the atmosphere over prolonged periods,' he told CNN.
It highlights 'a threshold effect,' he added, where the loss of forests becomes 'irreversible on ecological time scales.' Global politics currently revolve around the idea that if carbon dioxide levels can be controlled, damage can be reversed. 'But at the threshold, it then becomes hard for life to recover,' Benton said.
This is a key takeaway from the study, Mills said. It shows what might happen if rapid global warming causes the planet's rainforests to collapse in the future — a tipping point scientists are very concerned about.
Even if humans stop pumping out planet-heating pollution altogether, the Earth may not cool. In fact, warming could accelerate, he said.
There is a sliver of hope: The rainforests that currently carpet the tropics may be more resilient to high temperatures than those that existed before the Great Dying. This is the question the scientists are tackling next.
This study is still a warning, Mills said. 'There is a tipping point there. If you warm tropical forests too much, then we have a very good record of what happens. And it's extremely bad.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Aliens Can Detect Earth's Airports From 200 Light-Years Away
Humans might not know of any intelligent beings beyond Earth, but if they exist, they might already know about us. New research shows that radar systems at commercial and military airports are inadvertently announcing our presence to any aliens with the ability to listen. Preliminary results from a study led by Ramiro Caisse Saide, an astrophysics PhD candidate at the University of Manchester, suggest extraterrestrials up to 200 light-years away could theoretically detect electromagnetic signals leaking from global airline hubs such as John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York and Heathrow Airport in London. Military radar systems are also detectable, and thanks to their unique pattern, these signals would look 'clearly artificial to anyone watching from interstellar distances with powerful radio telescopes,' Caisse Saide said in a statement. 'In fact, these military signals can appear up to a hundred times stronger from certain points in space, depending on where an observer is located,' he added. 'Our findings suggest that radar signals—produced unintentionally by any planet with advanced technology and complex aviation system—could act as a universal sign of intelligent life.' It's important to note, however, that it will take many more years for signals to reach any extraterrestrial civilizations located 200 light-years away from Earth. Airports and military operations have only been emitting signals of this strength since the 1950s, and therefore, the maximum distance at which aliens could currently detect them is about 75 light-years in all directions. Seeing as we live in an unfathomably vast, ancient universe with billions of trillions of planets and moons, it stands to reason that we aren't the only intelligent lifeforms in it. Humanity's desire to contact extraterrestrials dates back more than 150 years. The first real communication attempt took place in 1974, when astronomers beamed a radio signal from a powerful transmitter at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico into space. This signal, known as the Arecibo message, consisted of binary code that conveyed information about the basic chemicals of life, the structure of DNA, Earth's place in the solar system, and even a stick figure of a human. If any aliens received it, they haven't responded. That hasn't discouraged scientists from trying to find them. Those working on the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) do this passively, scanning space for electromagnetic signals that can't be explained by natural phenomena. Others have taken a more active approach by intentionally transmitting signals or messages to space, like the Arecibo message. These efforts are called METI (Messaging to Extraterrestrial Intelligence) or CETI (Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence). Not everyone believes this is a good idea. Detractors point out that telling aliens where we are could have disastrous consequences if these beings are capable of harming us or our planet. That's a scary thought. Perhaps even more frightening is the fact that Earth is unwittingly shouting out our existence and location to any radar-detecting extraterrestrial civilizations within earshot. To get an idea of just how noisy our planet is, Caisse Saide and his colleagues simulated how radar signals from airports proliferate across time and space, then analyzed how detectable they would be from stars such as Barnard's Star and AU Microscopii. These stars are located roughly 6 and 32 light-years away from the Sun, respectively. They found that airport radar systems, which sweep the skies for airplanes to inform air traffic control, send out a combined radio signal strong enough for aliens to detect it from up to 200 light-years away using telescopes similar to the Green Bank radio telescope in West Virginia. That's a vast distance. The nearest potentially habitable planet outside our solar system—Proxima Centauri b—is just over 4 light-years away, and it would still take humanity's most advanced spacecraft tens of thousands of years to get there. Signals from Earth's military radar systems are weaker, but more focused and directional, creating an obviously artificial pattern similar to a lighthouse beam sweeping the sky. It's important to note, however, that it will take many more years for signals to reach any extraterrestrial civilizations located 200 light-years away from Earth. Airports and military operations have only been emitting signals of this strength since the 1950s, and therefore, the maximum distance at which aliens could currently detect them is about 75 light-years in all directions. But the point of the study stands; aliens located on a planet 200 light-years away should be able to detect airport signals—but not for another 125 years. Understanding how intelligent extraterrestrials might become aware of our existence can also help guide our search for them, according to Caisse Saide. Identifying and characterizing our own planet's technosignatures, or detectable signs of technology, can tell astronomers what to look for from other planets, he said. At the same time, 'we gain valuable insights into how to protect the radio spectrum for communications and design future radar systems,' said co-researcher Michael Garrett, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Manchester, in the statement. 'The methods developed for modeling and detecting these weak signals can also be used in astronomy, planetary defense, and even in monitoring the impact of human technology on our space environment.' 'In this way, our work supports both the scientific quest to answer the question 'Are we alone?' and practical efforts to manage the influence of technology on our world and beyond,' Caisse Saide said.

Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Biggest piece of Mars on Earth, juvenile dinosaur skeleton up for auction at Sotheby's
Sotheby's is putting some rare items up for auction, including what it calls the largest piece of Mars ever found on Earth. The auction house is also selling a juvenile ceratosaurus dinosaur skeleton that's more than 6 feet tall and nearly 11 feet long. (AP video: Joseph B. Frederick)
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
This is why moonlight changes colors
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Blue moons and blood moons. While some of these names are meant to coincide with other astronomical or worldly event — the strawberry moon is so named because it's the time when strawberries are usually ready to harvest in certain parts of the world — there's no arguing that moonlight sometimes seems to change color right before our eyes. But this doesn't really make much sense when you think about it. After all, the Moon isn't putting off any light itself. Instead, it's just reflecting light from the sun. So, then, why does moonlight change color? The answer is simpler than you think. Today's Top Deals XGIMI Prime Day deals feature the new MoGo 4 and up to 42% off smart projectors Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals The way that our Moon absorbs and reflects light all comes down to science. Samples taken from Earth's satellite suggest that the Moon is mostly made up of gray rock called anorthosite. Sure, there are darker areas — made up of basalt, analysis has shown — but overall, it's the same uniform gray across most of the lunar surface. And, it turns out, gray absorbs energy in pretty equal terms. This means that it takes a tiny bit of every part of the light spectrum, so to speak, and then reflects the rest of the light back down to Earth, which is what gives our moon its iconic grayish-white appearance. But the state of our atmosphere can greatly affect how much of that light reaches our eyes here on Earth. Depending on various conditions, different wavelengths of light might reach our eyes from night to night. When the Moon is positioned high in the sky, the path light travels through the atmosphere is relatively short. This means that the light doesn't scatters very much, making all that white light reach the surface. However, when the Moon is closer to the horizon, the angle that the light travels through the atmosphere changes significantly. This can change what light scatters, and which wavelengths make it through, giving the moonlight a different color entirely. And because moonlight contains a smattering of all visible wavelengths, the atmosphere can affect which of those wavelengths gets through. This, in turn, can change what color the Moon appears to be in our eyes. A blood moon or lunar eclipse, as Live Science explains, sees all of the blue light wavelengths absorbed by our atmosphere as the light bounces through our atmosphere and out to the Moon. Since the blue light is absorbed, only the red and orange wavelengths make it through. So, that is what is reflected back to us, and that's why lunar eclipses have a red-orange appearance. It's an interesting reminder of just how complex light really is, and how it can literally change how we see the world. It is also a reminder that the Moon, though a bit dull in color normally, has a lot to offer when it comes to understanding the science that guides our universe. More Top Deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 See the