
Tom Hanks remembers Apollo 13 hero Jim Lovell
The incident took place in the late 1990s while Thompson was filming Primary Colors, the political satire inspired by the Clinton era. She was in her trailer when the phone rang and what happened next was so surreal she initially thought it was a prank. 'A phone rang in my trailer, and it was Donald Trump,' she said. 'I thought it was a joke. 'Hi, it's Donald Trump here.' I said, 'How can I help you?''
Trump, who at the time was a high-profile real estate mogul and tabloid fixture, offered to take Thompson to dinner. He also extended an invitation to stay in one of his 'beautiful' properties. The timing was uncanny; Thompson had just finalised her divorce from Kenneth Branagh. She joked that perhaps this was why Trump thought she might be interested.
With her signature wit, Thompson told the crowd, 'I could have gone on a date with Donald Trump. I could have changed the course of American history!' It was a line that drew gasps and laughter, a reminder of the strange intersections that occur between celebrity and politics.
Reflecting further, Thompson admitted she had no real intention of accepting the offer, but she can't help but imagine the ripple effects had she done so. Would the evening have been awkward small talk? Would it have become a strange friendship? Or might it have altered Trump's trajectory entirely?
The story, told with warmth and comic timing, fits neatly into Thompson's long history of candid, self-deprecating anecdotes. It's also a small glimpse into the unpredictable, sometimes absurd, situations that come with fame and how a single phone call could, in theory, rewrite history.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
3 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan, India should talk before it is too late
Listen to article A dove by obsession, I had been campaigning for peace inside-out. Hoping to see serenity in the region has led me to be part of the yesteryears rubbing of shoulders of Who's Who from the civil society under the Track2.5 informal intellectual meddling, between Pakistan and India. I just tried to push the envelope through my intangible journalistic input. Those days are now mere footnotes in history, and the evolving relationship between the two countries is one of hate and otherness. Unfortunately, it has little or no room for any accommodation. Perhaps, Napoleon Bonaparte was unheard of in this part of the world who believed that one has to live with geography, and ignoring the ground realities of neighbourhood is tantamount to disaster. It's now years that Pakistan and India are in an uneasy peace, and are not talking. Their diplomatic interactions are at the lowest ebb, rather infructuous. Missions on either side of the divide are without High Commissioners for years, and are being run on an ad hoc basis with no care and concern for those who might be in need of instant consular assistance. That's a callous approach towards their respective citizens. Issuance of visas to divided families and genuine travelers in exigency is a cumbersome task. State-centrism has been in perpetual confrontation since the Pahalgam calamity. The subsequent four-day war in May has hardened their positions, and pundits of doom predict another showdown in weeks to come. India is not interested in a dialogue, despite Pakistan's overtures, even on issues of existential crisis. Efforts on the part of the world community to make them talk have hit snags. One such initiative was of President Donald Trump who, on the euphoria of his peace-making, offered to mediate between the two sides after he had brokered a ceasefire in their May duel. The offer has fallen on deaf ears in Delhi, irrespective of the fact that Islamabad was hoping to see light at the end of the tunnel. India's premise of hiding behind bilateralism when it comes to multilateralism is a ploy, and has hampered any headway in normalising relations to this day. To count a few irritants, Pakistan is facing a water embargo as Delhi unilaterally abrogated the 1960 Indus Water Treaty. The flow of water to the lower riparian state is now politicised, in contravention of International Law, and could be a prelude to another military brawl as it is a matter of life and death for 240 million subjects. Last but not least is the pestering mistrust wherein each side is blaming the other for cross-border terrorism footprints. The revoking, likewise, of Articles 370 and 35A on August 5, 2019, which granted special rights to the people of Jammu & Kashmir, has jeopardised ties, and nothing seems to be plausible until the same is rescinded by India. Pakistan's stance is that it violates not only bilateral conventions but also UN resolutions on the disputed state. Things have boiled down to such a misery that even Pakistan is now talking of pulling out of Simla Agreement, a landmark piece of bilateral understanding signed in 1972, as a disheartened rejoinder to India's suspension of IWT. Is there a way forward? For how long will this stalemate come to haunt not only regional peace and stability but also geo-economics that is going down the drain? Trans-regional multibillion dollar projects such as BRI, CPEC, CASA-1000 and TAPI are in doldrums. That is so because India and Pakistan are not at peace, and refuse to see from the same prism of commonality. SAARC and SCO too are victims of this bilateral bullfight. Less to talk of the India-Pakistan-Iran (IPI) pipeline that faced abortion owing to realpolitik. This disconnect at the state level has brought prospects of trade and connectivity to a naught, providing oxygen to hardliners who are out to capitalise on animosity. India as a responsible emerging power should be empathetic to its neighbours, especially Pakistan. It's high time for the brainy South Bloc in New Delhi to realise that making permanent peace with Pakistan is a sine qua non for its own rise and stability. The xenophobic attitude of India towards Pakistan is costing it dearly in a strategic sense, and the political currency that is being derived from it is immaterial for a billion-plus egalitarian Indians in the long run. India's enthusiasm to escort the United States as part of QUAD and contain China is rapidly backfiring. As a politically reshaped South Asia is emerging, it is putting India in a tight corner. Delhi has suffered a military setback with China in recent years, and saw its clout decimate at the hands of Pakistan too in its May 2025 expedition. Thus, the status quo that abhors each other has kept both countries in a state of confrontation for decades at the altar of its citizens. This is where a proactive role of civil society, intelligentsia and political parties is desired to come up with a narrative that is pluralistic and logical and one that leads from the front in normalising relations. That is what diplomacy is all about. Pakistan's civil-military leadership in 2022 had come up with a chronicle, wherein it was stated officially that Islamabad was willing to talk on all irritants, and the issue of Kashmir could wait for its turn. Likewise, the enthusiasm that was expressed by both the countries in realising Musharraf's Four-Point Plan – proposing softening of LoC; self-governance/autonomy but not total independence of Kashmir; demilitarisation of borders; and joint management and supervision by both the states – can be an ideal start even today. For that to happen, the populace of India must shun the creeping in of Hindutva in its state edifice and, likewise, Pakistan's political voices must assert themselves for realising their manifesto in foreign policy. As the BJP nurses a jaundiced attitude, other political entities of India especially the Congress, the Leftist, the Communists, the regional parties and the Dalits must rise for a cause of secure regionalism. These two course corrections are indispensable if peace has to take roots. It's time to talk it out unconditionally, and without any delay in all statesmanship. Otherwise, a few more decades will be consumed in abomination.


Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Trump says to move homeless people ‘far' from Washington
President Donald Trump said Sunday that homeless people must be moved 'far' from Washington, after days of musing about taking federal control of the US capital where he has falsely suggested crime is rising. The Republican billionaire has announced a press conference for Monday in which he is expected to reveal his plans for Washington – which is run by the locally elected government of the District of Columbia under congressional oversight. It is an arrangement Trump has long publicly chafed at. He has threatened to federalize the city and give the White House the final say in how it is run. Trump demands new US census excluding undocumented immigrants 'I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before,' the president posted on his Truth Social platform Sunday. 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital,' he continued, adding that criminals in the city would be swiftly imprisoned. 'It's all going to happen very fast,' he said. Washington is ranked 15th on a list of major US cities by homeless population, according to government statistics from last year. While thousands of people spend each night in shelters or on the streets, the figure are down from pre-pandemic levels. Earlier this week Trump also threatened to deploy the National Guard as part of a crackdown on what he falsely says is rising crime in Washington. Violent crime in the capital fell in the first half of 2025 by 26 percent compared with a year earlier, police statistics show. The city's crime rates in 2024 were already their lowest in three decades, according to figures produced by the Justice Department before Trump took office. 'We are not experiencing a crime spike,' Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said Sunday on MSNBC. While the mayor, a Democrat, was not critical of Trump in her remarks, she said 'any comparison to a war torn country is hyperbolic and false.' Trump's threat to send in the National Guard comes weeks after he deployed California's military reserve force into Los Angeles to quell protests over immigration raids, despite objections from local leaders and law enforcement. The president has frequently mused about using the military to control America's cities, many of which are under Democratic control and hostile to his nationalist impulses.


Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Money Just Went Digital, Bitcoin Ethereum Stablecoins and CBDCs, Pakistan's Moment
Most people felt the shift without seeing it. Payments got faster, crypto stopped feeling fringe, and a new rulebook started to settle in. What changed is simple, and profound. The world is moving money onto programmable rails. Some countries are building central bank digital currencies, CBDCs, and the United States is embracing fully reserved dollar stablecoins through a clear federal framework. Two paths, one destination, a digital monetary system that settles in seconds, speaks to software, and reaches anywhere a network can go. The new American playbook, regulated stablecoins In the United States, private companies can issue fully reserved dollar tokens under federal oversight. These tokens must be backed one to one by cash and short duration United States Treasuries, they must meet strict disclosure and compliance standards, and they must redeem at par. That single design choice matters. Every new token creates steady demand for dollars and Treasury bills, which deepens the dollar's reach in a digital world. Monetary policy still flows through the instruments the Federal Reserve already influences, only now those instruments back digital dollars that live in wallets and move at internet speed. This is not only about speed, it is about precision. In the old world, policy moved through slow pipes and blunt tools. In the new world, digital dollars can be directed to a person, a region, a merchant category, or a time window. A government can airdrop relief to a city after a flood, it can set transaction rules for a specific program, it can even consider features like negative rates on a narrow slice of balances in an emergency. A country that favors licensed stablecoin issuers can do this through regulated partners and payment networks, which turns money into a sharper policy instrument than the one we read about in classic textbooks. Europe and China, public money on new rails Europe is preparing a digital euro, China has piloted the e CNY for years. These are retail CBDCs, digital legal tender issued by a central bank, designed to work like cash in your phone, with strong privacy controls and offline features. Different governance, same purpose, fast settlement, clear rules, programmable money for a networked economy. Bitcoin's role, digital gold for the digital rails Bitcoin has fortified its place as digital gold. It plays for the digital financial system the role gold has long played for the traditional one, a neutral, scarce, non sovereign store of value. This does not replace gold, it complements it. With each halving, new issuance slows, and over the next cycles supply becomes even more scarce. In a world where money moves on programmable rails, a widely held reserve asset that sits outside any single government's control provides a familiar anchor. Bitcoin fills that role for a growing share of portfolios, treasuries, and long term savers. Real world assets, the other half of the story If stablecoins are digital cash, real world assets are the digital bonds, bills, and funds that sit beside that cash. Treasuries, money market funds, repo, and even slices of private credit are moving onchain. When a dollar token and a tokenized Treasury live on the same ledger, collateral moves instantly, settlement becomes one click, yield pays straight into a wallet, and portfolios behave more like software. This is why Wall Street cares. Not because of slogans, but because the plumbing is better, the audit trail is stronger, and the cost is lower. Why Ethereum matters so much Ethereum is where much of this tokenization is happening today. The network has been live for nearly a decade, has weathered real stress, and has not suffered a catastrophic protocol failure. It is programmable, mature, and well understood by developers, auditors, custodians, and large institutions. That makes it a natural home for tokenized Treasuries, tokenized funds, and fully reserved stablecoins. The standards are stable, the tooling is robust, and the network effects are real. When large issuers and asset managers choose a settlement layer for real world assets, they tend to choose the chain that has run reliably for years and already speaks the language of finance. This does not mean there is only one chain. Solana has become a serious option for high throughput consumer payments and trading. Other networks bring useful tradeoffs, lower fees, faster finality, and different security assumptions. What matters is simple, cash and assets must sit on programmable rails, and moving between chains should feel as seamless as moving between bank accounts. Bridges, custody networks, and common token standards are improving that experience month by month. Fintech and traditional finance, the glue that makes it usable Wallets make this simple for people and for businesses. Fiat on ramps and off ramps connect salaries, invoices, and subscriptions. Banks, trust companies, and qualified custodians hold reserves and run attestations. Fund administrators and transfer agents bring regulated structure to tokenized funds. Payment processors and card networks add merchant acceptance. Compliance analytics and identity providers monitor flows in real time. The result is a stack that looks familiar to CFOs and regulators, only now it runs in real time, shows its work on chain, and can be programmed to fit policy and business logic. AI, robotics, and machine to machine money Over the next fifteen to twenty years, AI agents and robots will transact constantly. A car pays for charging, a device buys compute, a factory orders parts, a supply chain reconciles in the background. These are machine to machine payments. They need instant settlement, clear identity, and embedded rules. CBDCs and stablecoins both fit that need. Bitcoin sits beside them as a neutral reserve asset, and Ethereum provides a widely adopted environment for contracts, identity, and tokenized collateral. Together, these layers give automated economies the financial plumbing they require. Geopolitics and global connectivity The Middle East is already active in cross border CBDC projects, Europe is building a digital euro, Asia has large pilots, and the United States has chosen a regulated private issuance model for digital dollars. Over time these networks will interoperate. A merchant in Dubai, a freelancer in Karachi, and a manufacturer in Vietnam will settle with each other in seconds, with finality, and with rules that satisfy local regulators. Pakistan's moment, from undocumented to digitized Pakistan is taking bold steps to bring crypto and blockchain into a regulated framework. The authorities are setting out clear guardrails for responsible innovation, and the direction is visible. Build the rules, connect to global rails, invite capital and talent, and protect consumers. This shift can do more than modernize payments. Pakistan has a large undocumented economy. As the country adopts digital payment rails, tokenization, and compliant crypto activity, everyday transactions become easier to trace, taxes become simpler to collect, and credit can flow based on real data rather than guesswork. Documentation is not a punishment, it is how small businesses graduate into formal finance, how exporters settle faster, and how households build a verifiable economic record. If Pakistan keeps moving with clarity and care, this effort can become a real engine for growth, jobs, and trust in the system. The takeaway Money is becoming a digital platform. Stablecoins create a steady bid for dollars and bills. Bitcoin provides a scarce, neutral reserve for the digital age. Ethereum anchors tokenized assets and programmable settlement, with other chains adding speed and choice for specific use cases. CBDCs bring public money onto new rails. Fintech glues the experience together, from wallets to on ramps to acceptance. The public sector keeps the core safe, the private sector builds great user experiences, and the economy finally runs on rails designed for the internet. If you build, focus on wallets, identity, and the integrations that make this invisible for users. If you invest, understand how Bitcoin and real world assets fit into a digital portfolio that settles in seconds. If you regulate, treat CBDCs and stablecoins as complementary tools that strengthen policy transmission and improve market plumbing. The shift already happened, now the work is to scale it with care. Faisal Aftab is CEO of Zayn VC , the most active investor into the Pakistani financial infrastructure especially on the intersection of Finance, AI and Blockchain.