
Kurdish Distrust of Syria's New Government Runs Deep
When rebel forces took over Syria, they pledged to unite the country's disparate armed groups into a unified national army.
The biggest challenge for them by far has been in northeastern Syria, an autonomous region run by the country's Kurdish minority where suspicion of the new leadership runs deep.
In past years, the rebels and the Kurds fought each other. But with the rebels now governing Syria, they are working to form an alliance and merge the powerful Kurdish-led military into the new national force.
Interviews with dozens of people in the northeast in late March revealed that Kurdish distrust of the new government is rooted partly in the fact that the former rebels now in charge were once affiliated with Al Qaeda. Some Kurds are also wary because the new government is backed by Turkey, which has tried for years to undercut Kurdish power in Syria.
'How can we trust this new government in Damascus?' asked Amina Mahmoud, 31, a Kurdish resident of the northeastern town of Kobani.
Her skepticism is shared by other members of Syria's diverse range of ethnic and religious minorities, who worry that the new government will not protect, include or represent them.
The Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, or S.D.F., agreed on March 10 to integrate its military and other institutions, including its prized oil and gas fields, under the central government's control by year's end. It was a major breakthrough for the new Syrian president, Ahmed al-Shara, in his efforts to unify a country still wrestling with violent turmoil.
In the last month, the Kurds began to reduce their military presence in the major northeastern city of Aleppo and the two sides exchanged prisoners even as the rhetoric on both sides has become more confrontational, underscoring the long history of tensions.
Initially, the merger deal had been applauded in the northeast — an area with a mixed population of Arabs and Kurds that is administered by a Kurdish-led regional government. The Kurds, who make up about 10 percent of Syria's population, particularly welcomed a provision in the accord stipulating that they would have the same rights as other Syrians.
But doubts quickly surfaced.
Members of the regional government described the agreement as merely a first step. Important details have yet to be worked out, such as whether the S.D.F. will join the national military as a bloc or have a continuing role in securing the northeast.
'Al-Shara and the new government want to control all of Syria,' said Badran Kurdi, a Kurdish political figure who took part in the merger negotiations with Mr. al-Shara. 'And of course they are dreaming about controlling all of our areas. But it's very difficult.'
Ali Ahmed, 55, a Kurd from the northeastern city of Hasakah who teaches chemistry, called Mr. al-Shara 'a terrorist.' He spoke as his family enjoyed a picnic in the countryside to celebrate the spring festival of Nowruz, the Persian new year.
'We know him,' he said.
He was referring to the period from 2013 to 2016, when Mr. al-Shara led Al Qaeda's Syrian affiliate, the Nusra Front. During those years, the Nusra Front fought a number of battles against the S.D.F. over control of several northeastern towns. Mr. al-Shara now speaks of reconstruction and inclusion.
As Mr. Ahmed looked across a haze of greening fields toward the Turkish border, barely 10 miles away, he said that Mr. al-Shara's close ties with Turkey only added to his doubts.
But not all Kurds see the deal as a negative.
One senior member of the Kurdish political leadership, Salih Muslim, said that despite the distance between the two sides, he sees this as a historic opportunity for Kurds to gain recognition from the government.
Inextricably woven into every conversation, however, were questions about whether the deal will stop Turkey's attacks on Syrian Kurds.
Turkey links Kurdish fighters in Syria's northeast to the Kurdish militants inside Turkey who have been fighting the government for more than 40 years. For the past several years, Turkey has been launching air attacks on Syrian Kurdish-forces across the border and has also supported Syrian proxy forces against the Kurds.
The Turkish military initially kept up some drone attacks and airstrikes even after Mr. al-Shara and the S.D.F. leader, Mazloum Abdi, signed the merger accord. But it has now suspended the attacks.
One of the deadliest Turkish strikes since the accord hit a farming hamlet outside the Kurdish-majority town of Kobani in March. It killed a family of farm laborers — a couple and their eight children, the youngest 7 months old, according to Firas Qassim Lo, the farmer they were working for, and the Syrian Democratic Forces.
Turkey denied killing the family and said in a statement that its operations 'exclusively target terrorist organizations.' Turkey routinely refers to the S.D.F. as 'terrorists.'
There was no indication that anyone connected to the Kurdish-led force was in the family's home when it was struck.
A funeral for the family drew more than a thousand Kurds who lined a road leading to a small cemetery in Kobani. Each of the coffins, a photo of the deceased taped to the outside, was hoisted onto the shoulders of local men and carried to the burial ground.
Ms. Mahmoud, the Kurdish resident of Kobani, lives in an apartment overlooking the cemetery and watched with tears in her eyes.
'Why does Erdogan do this to us? What have we done?' she said, referring to Turkey's president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Shortly after the Kobani strike, Turkey largely suspended its attacks on the S.D.F., as did its Syrian proxy forces.
Some Christians, who practice their faith openly in the northeast, sounded fearful of any agreement that would allow Mr. al-Shara's military forces to deploy there.
Their fears were heightened last month by violence directed primarily at another Syrian minority, the Alawites, in two northwestern provinces along the Mediterranean coast. The violence began when loyalists of the ousted dictator Bashar al-Assad attacked the new government's forces.
The soldiers responded, but so did thousands of others fighters, including foreign fighters and armed groups nominally linked to the new government. About 1,600 people were killed, most of them civilians from the Alawite minority, which the Assad family belongs to.
Alis Marderos, 50, an Armenian Christian in the northeastern town of Qamishli, said that the Kurds needed to remain in charge of security. 'If the Kurds did not exist here, we would have been beheaded,' she said after attending Sunday Mass at the Armenian Orthodox church.
For years, the United States has given military, financial and political support to the S.D.F. after deeming it the ground force most capable of defeating the Islamic State, the terrorist group that took over a large swath of Syrian territory during the civil war. U.S. troops have maintained a small presence in northeastern Syria for years but began this month to draw them down.
After years of fighting, the S.D.F. managed to wrest back all the territory captured by the Islamic State.
Some Arab residents of the northeast said they were pleased with the deal because it would bring the S.D.F. under the control of the central government, which they see as a needed check on Kurdish power. Arabs, who are the majority ethnic group in Syria, were divided, however, on the role they want the Kurdish-led forces to play in the future.
Sheikh Hassan al Muslat al-Milhim, an Arab Syrian from Hasakah, said he resented the power of the S.D.F. in a region that has a large Arab population. The American support for the force made things worse, in his view, by augmenting its power.
'We the Arabs, up until this moment, do not like having the Americans here,' said Mr. al-Milhim. He said he had appreciated Mr. al-Shara's approach when he led the Nusra Front and was active in the northeast.
'They respected us, they helped us,' Mr. al-Milhim said. 'They were Islamist, but not radical.'
But his view is not shared by all Arab Syrians.
Mann Aldaneh, a tribal leader of several Bedouin Arab villages near the Turkish border, has warm relations with nearby Kurdish villages.
He welcomed the agreement but said he did not trust the new central government in Damascus to guard prisons and camps in the northeast that hold thousands of Islamic State fighters and some 40,000 of their family members.
That sentiment has been echoed by security officials in neighboring Iraq and Europe as well.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Israel And Yemen's Houthis Threaten To Blockade Each Other's Ports
An Israeli navy missile boat patrols in the Red Sea off the coast of Israel's southern port city of ... More Eliat on December 26, 2023. (Photo by Alberto PIZZOLI / AFP) (Photo by ALBERTO PIZZOLI/AFP via Getty Images) Israel attacked the major Houthi-controlled Yemeni port of Hodeidah using its naval forces for the first time on Tuesday. The Israeli defense minister warned the Houthis that it will impose a 'naval and air blockade' if it doesn't cease targeting Israel with ballistic missiles and drones. Katz's threat follows similar threats by the Yemen-based group to blockade Israeli ports. However, given the vast distances and logistical resources required to impose such blockades, are these mere empty threats? 'We warned the Houthi terror organization that if they continue to fire at Israel they will face a powerful response and enter a naval and air blockade,' warned Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz on Tuesday. Katz also declared that Israel's 'long arm in the air and at sea will reach everywhere.' Israeli missile boats hit the Red Sea Yemeni port on Tuesday morning using missile boats. Hodeidah is at least 1,180 miles from Israel's southernmost port of Eilat, also on the Red Sea. Before Tuesday's unprecedented attack, Israel invariably retaliated to Houthi attacks using fighter jets to carry out long-range strikes targeting Hodeidah, Sanaa International Airport, and other ports and economic-related targets controlled by the Houthis. The use of the warships for such a long-distance raid was notable and may signal Israel's willingness to use different tactics against the group. Katz's mention of a naval blockade comes less than a month after the Houthis declared a 'maritime blockade' on Israel's Haifa port on the Eastern Mediterranean, warning all companies and ships that the port is on its target list. 'The Houthis lack the capability to conduct a blockade. They can only threaten episodic attacks on shipping in the hopes that it will deter shipping companies from traveling to Israel,' Bryan Clark, a naval expert at the Hudson Institute think tank, told me. Mohammed Al-Basha, a Middle East security analyst at the Basha Report Risk Advisory, similarly believes that the likelihood of the Houthis successfully blockading Haifa's port remains low. 'Haifa receives its maritime traffic from the Mediterranean Sea and not the Red Sea, unlike Eilat Port (in southern Israel), which has already experienced near-closure due to repeated Houthi attacks,' Al-Basha told me. 'The Houthis do not currently possess the range or naval power to seriously affect Mediterranean shipping routes.' On the other hand, Israel's capability to enforce a blockade against Hodeidah and other Houthi-controlled ports is markedly greater. The most advanced warship in the Israeli Navy's surface fleet is undoubtedly its Sa'ar 6 corvette, which Al-Basha described as the 'central element' of Israel's expanding Red Sea presence. 'Earlier this week, the Sa'ar 6 reportedly launched only two missiles to strike berths at Hodeidah Port,' he said. 'Despite this limited action, the ship is capable of remaining at sea for more than a month, providing sustained offensive and defensive capabilities against Houthi targets as operations continue.' Outfitted with long-range precision-guided missiles such as the Gabriel V sea-skimming anti-ship missile and Delilah GL cruise missile, the Sa'ar 6 can engage targets from up to 186 mile off Yemen's coast. The small vessels also feature advanced defensive systems, including Barak 8 surface-to-air missiles and the naval version of Israel's well-known Iron Dome, the C-Dome. The corvettes can each carry an MH-60 Seahawk helicopter that can fire AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-surface missiles. During previous clashes with the Houthis, U.S. Navy destroyer often defended themselves and commercial shipping using expensive SM-3 and SM-6 air defense missiles to intercept Houthi ballistic missiles and drones. The U.S. has since ceased operations against the Houthis after reaching a ceasefire in early May, which did not stipulate that the Houthis must cease targeting Israel. Consequently, Israel has been going it alone against the group ever since with long-range airstrikes and now seaborne attacks. 'I think the threat to Israeli ships is about the same as that posed to U.S. destroyers, although the Israeli missile boats have less air defense capacity,' Clark said. However, the smaller Israeli missile corvettes have some advantages over their much bulkier counterparts serving in the all-mighty U.S. Navy. 'Beyond tactical missions, the deployment of the Sa'ar 6 serves as a strategic signal of Israel's intent to expand their projection of power in the Red Sea,' Al-Basha said. 'Unlike a U.S. carrier strike group, which is slower and logistically complex, the Sa'ar 6 offers speed and maneuverability, making it a more elusive and survivable platform against asymmetric threats like those posed by the Houthis.' Despite such advantages, Israel would undoubtedly find imposing even a limited blockade on Yemen significantly challenging. 'There is growing speculation that Israel may also deploy the ship to intercept suspected Iranian weapons shipments destined for the Houthis,' Al-Basha said. 'Israeli military leadership has hinted at the possibility of imposing a limited maritime blockade on Houthi-controlled ports.' 'However, enforcing a full naval blockade would be challenging due to the limited operational range of Israel's air force and navy, the high logistical and financial costs involved, and the significant threat posed by the Houthis' array of anti-ship capabilities.' Al-Basha anticipates that Israeli commandos may board vessels Israel suspects of smuggling arms to the Houthis, which would align with Israel's broader strategy of disrupting Houthi supply lines without having to commit to a full blockade. The Hudson Institute's Clark similarly believes that the Israeli Navy could 'sustain a force' at Yemeni ports to stop traffic and inspect vessels it suspects of arms smuggling. 'However, it would likely take most of Israel's naval forces to do it,' he said. Aside from its Sa'ar-class corvettes on the surface, the Israeli Navy also has a fleet of German-built Dolphin-class diesel-electric submarines armed with torpedos and cruise missiles. 'Submarines could be used to attack shipping, but it is difficult for a submarine to determine if a ship is carrying humanitarian aid or weapons,' Clark said. 'Therefore, subs are unlikely to be used to be used as part of a blockade,' Undoubtedly, Israel is much more capable of imposing a blockade on Yemeni ports than vice-versa. Nevertheless, the Houthis can credibly threaten Israel in other ways and may ultimately prove capable of harming Haifa's port. 'Looking ahead, the Houthis may attempt to escalate their campaign using advanced missile technology,' Al-Basha said. 'There are credible reports that they could deploy multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles or MIRVs on their Palestine 2 and Zulfiqar medium-range ballistic missiles.' 'A successful strike on Haifa's port infrastructure or a vessel docked in port could temporarily disrupt shipping operations and increase pressure on Israeli logistics.' The Houthis have fired repeatedly at Israel's main airport, Ben Gurion International. While they have so far failed to directly hit the airport, a Houthi ballistic missile evaded Israeli Arrow and American THAAD air defenses hit the perimeter of the main terminal on May 4. Israel responded by heavily bombing Sanaa airport and Hodeidah. Al-Basha noted there are fears that a 'single successful strike' by the Houthis on Ben Gurion or other critical Israeli infrastructure could 'change the strategic balance' in the group's favor. He noted the Houthis have 'already demonstrated determination and persistence' in targeting Israeli infrastructure. Furthermore, while Houthi threats to impose an aerial blockade over Tel Aviv were largely dismissed before May 4, that's certainly no longer the case. 'In May, about a quarter of international airlines canceled their flights to and from Ben Gurion due to the security risks,' Al-Basha said. 'That number may increase, especially after video footage showed a missile interception occurring dangerously close to a departing commercial airliner.' 'The conflict is entering a more volatile and unpredictable phase, and both Israel and the Houthis appear ready to escalate further if provoked.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Education advocates push for adequate K-12 funding
A rally goer rolls out a scroll with the names of every school district that has gone to referendum since the last state budget. Photo by Baylor Spears/Wisconsin Examiner. Education advocates are making a push for more investment in public schools from the state as the Republican-led Joint Finance Committee plans to take up portions of the budget related to K-12 schools during its Thursday meeting. The issue has been a top concern for Wisconsinites who came out to budget listening sessions and was one of Gov. Tony Evers' priorities in his budget proposal. Evers proposed that the state spend an additional $3.1 billion on K-12 education. Evers and Republican leaders were negotiating on the spending for education as well as taxes and other parts of the budget until last week when negotiations reached an impasse. Evers has said that Republicans were unwilling to compromise on his funding priorities, including making 'meaningful investments for K-12 schools, to continue Child Care Counts to help lower the cost of child care for working families and to prevent further campus closures and layoffs at our UW System.' He said he was willing to support their tax proposal, which Republicans have said included income and retiree tax cuts. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) said on WISN 12's UpFront that Evers 'lied' about Republicans walking away from the negotiating table. 'We're willing to do it, just not as much as he wanted… When you read that statement, it makes it sound like we were at zero,' Vos said. 'We were not at zero on any of those topics. We tried to find a way to invest in child care that actually went to the parents, and to make sure that we weren't just having to go to a business. We tried to find a way to look at education so that money would actually go back to school districts across the state. It just wasn't enough for what he wanted.' Public education advocates said school districts are in dire need of a significant investment of state dollars, especially for special education. After lobbying for the last week, many are concerned that when Republicans finally announce their proposal it won't be enough. State Superintendent Jill Underly told the Wisconsin Examiner in an interview Wednesday afternoon that she is anticipating that Republicans will put forth more short-term solutions, but she said schools and students can't continue functioning in that way. Underly compared the situation of education funding in Wisconsin to a road trip. 'The gas tank is nearly empty, and you're trying to coast… you're turning the air conditioning off… going at a lower speed limit, just to save a little fuel and the state budget every two years. I kind of look at them as like these exits to gas stations,' Underly said. 'We keep passing up these opportunities to refuel. Schools are running on fumes, and we see the stress that is having an our system — the number of referendums, the anxiety around whether or not we're going to have the referendum or not in our communities. Wisconsin public schools have been underfunded for decades.' The one thing lawmakers must do, Underly said, is increase the special education reimbursement rate to a minimum of 60%, back to the levels of the 1990s. 'It used to be 60% but they haven't been keeping up their promise to public schools,' Underly said. 'They need to raise the special education reimbursement rate. Anything less than 60% is once again failing to meet urgent needs.' The Wisconsin Public Education Network is encouraging advocates to show up at the committee meeting Thursday and continue pushing lawmakers and Evers to invest. Executive Director Heather DuBois Bourenane told the Examiner that she is concerned lawmakers are planning on 'low balling' special education funding, even as she said she has never seen the education community so united in its insistence on one need. 'We're familiar with the way they work in that caucus and in the Joint Finance Committee,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'The pattern of the past has been to go around the state and listen to the concerns that are raised or at least get the appearance of listening, and then reject those concerns and demands and put forward a budget that fails in almost every way to prioritize the priority needs for our communities.' While it's unclear what Republicans will ultimately do, budget papers prepared by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau includes three options when it comes to special education reimbursement rate: the first is to raise the rate to 60% sum sufficient — as Evers has proposed; the second is to leave the rate at 31.5% sum certain by investing an additional $35.8 million and the third is to raise the rate to an estimated 35% by providing an additional $68.6 million in 2023-24 and $86.2 million in 2024-25. The paper also includes options for investing more in the high cost of special education, which provides additional aid to reimburse 90% of the cost of educating students whose special education costs exceed $30,000 in a single year. The School Administrators Alliance (SAA) sent an update to its members on Monday, pointing out what was in the budget papers and saying the committee 'appears poised to focus spending on High-Cost Special Education Aid and the School Levy Tax Credit, rather than significantly raising the primary special education categorical aid.' SAA Executive Director Dee Pettack said in the email that if that's the route lawmakers take, it would 'result in minimal new, spendable resources for classrooms and students.' Public school funding was one of the top priorities mentioned by Wisconsinites at the four budget hearings held by the budget committee across the state in March. 'I just think it's time to say enough is enough,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'We're really urging people to do whatever they can before our lawmakers vote on this budget, to say that we are really going to accept nothing less than a budget that stops this cycle of insufficient state support for priority needs and demand better.' Pettack and leaders of the Wisconsin Association of School Boards, Southeast Wisconsin School Alliance and the Wisconsin Rural Schools Alliance also issued a joint letter Tuesday urging the committee to 'meet this moment with the urgency it requires,' adding that the budget provides the opportunity to allocate resources that will help students achieve. The letter detailed the situation that a low special education reimbursement has placed districts in as they struggle to fund the mandated services and must fill in the gaps with funds from their general budgets. 'The lack of an adequate state reimbursement for mandated special education programs and services negatively affects all other academic programs, including career and technical education, reading interventionists, teachers and counselors, STEM, dual enrollment, music, art and more,' the organizations stated. 'While small increases in special education reimbursement have been achieved in recent state budgets, costs for special education programming and services have grown much faster than those increases, leaving public schools in a stagnant situation.' 'Should we fail in this task, we are not only hurting Wisconsin's youth today but also our chances to compete in tomorrow's economy,' the leaders wrote. If the proposal from Republicans isn't adequate, Underly said Evers doesn't have to sign the budget. Republican lawmakers have expressed confidence that they will put a budget on Evers' desk that he will sign. 'There's that, and then we keep negotiating. We keep things as they are right now. We keep moving forward,' Underly said. 'But our schools and our kids, they can't continue to wait for this… These are short term fixes, I think, that they keep talking about, and we can't continue down this path. We need to fix it so that we're setting ourselves up for success. Everything else is just really short sighted.' WPEN and others want Evers to use his veto power should the proposal not be sufficient. DuBois Bourenane said dozens of organizations have signed on to a letter calling on Evers to reject any budget that doesn't meet the state's needs and priorities. 'What we want them to do is negotiate in good faith and reject any budget that doesn't meet the needs of our kids, and just keep going back to the drawing board until you reach a bipartisan agreement that actually does meet those needs,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'Gov. Evers has the power to break this cycle. He has the power of his veto pen. He has the power of his negotiating authority, and we expect him to use it right and people have got his back.' The budget deadline is June 30. If it is not completed by then, the state continues to operate under the 2023-25 budget. 'Nobody wants [the process] to be drawn out any longer than it is,' DuBois Bourenane said. 'Those are valid concerns. But the fact is we are in a really critical tension point right now, and if any people care even a little bit about this, now is the time that they should be speaking out.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Democratic governors will defend immigration policies before Republican-led House panel
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump spars with California's governor over immigration enforcement, Republicans in Congress are calling other Democratic governors to the Capitol on Thursday to question them over policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform posted a video ahead of the hearing highlighting crimes allegedly committed by immigrants in the U.S. illegally and pledging that 'sanctuary state governors will answer to the American people." The hearing is to include testimony from Govs. JB Pritzker of Illinois, Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. There's no legal definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but the term generally refers to governments with policies limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Courts previously have upheld the legality of such laws. But Trump's administration has sued Colorado, Illinois, New York and several cities — including Chicago and Rochester, New York — asserting their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal law. Illinois, Minnesota and New York also were among 14 states and hundreds of cities and counties recently listed by the Department of Homeland Security as 'sanctuary jurisdictions defying federal immigration law.' The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. As Trump steps up immigration enforcement, some Democratic-led states have intensified their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting cooperation with immigration agents. Following clashes between crowds of protesters and immigration agents in Los Angeles, Trump deployed the National Guard to protect federal buildings and agents, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom accused Trump of declaring 'a war' on the underpinnings of American democracy. The House Oversight Committee has long been a partisan battleground, and in recent months it has turned its focus to immigration policy. Thursday's hearing follows a similar one in March in which the Republican-led committee questioned the Democratic mayors of Chicago, Boston, Denver and New York about sanctuary policies. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades. In 2017, then-Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed legislation creating statewide protections for immigrants. The Illinois Trust Act prohibits police from searching, arresting or detaining people solely because of their immigration status. But it allows local authorities to hold people for federal immigration authorities if there's a valid criminal warrant. Pritzker, who succeeded Rauner in 2019, said in remarks prepared for the House committee that violent criminals 'have no place on our streets, and if they are undocumented, I want them out of Illinois and out of our country.' 'But we will not divert our limited resources and officers to do the job of the federal government when it is not in the best interest of our state, our local communities, or the safety of our residents,' he said. Pritzker has been among Trump's most outspoken opponents and is considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate. He said Illinois has provided shelter and services to more than 50,000 immigrants who were sent there from other states. A Department of Justice lawsuit against New York challenges a 2019 law that allows immigrants illegally in the U.S. to receive New York driver's licenses and shields driver's license data from federal immigration authorities. That built upon a 2017 executive order by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo that prohibited New York officials from inquiring about or disclosing a person's immigration status to federal authorities, unless required by law. Hochul's office said law enforcement officers still can cooperate with federal immigration authorities when people are convicted of or under investigation for crimes. Since Hochul took office in 2021, her office said, the state has transferred more than 1,300 incarcerated noncitizens to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the completion of their state sentences. Minnesota doesn't have a statewide sanctuary law protecting immigrants in the U.S. illegally, though Minneapolis and St. Paul both restrict the extent to which police and city employees can cooperate with immigration enforcement. Some laws signed by Walz have secured benefits for people regardless of immigration status. But at least one of those is getting rolled back. The Minnesota Legislature, meeting in a special session, passed legislation Monday to repeal a 2023 law that allowed adults in the U.S. illegally to be covered under a state-run health care program for the working poor. Walz insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, ___ Lieb reported from Jefferson City, Mo. Also contributing were Associated Press writers Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, N.Y.; Steve Karnowski in St. Paul, Minn.; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago.