X criticises the UK's Online Safety Act
In a statement, X criticised the breadth of the law's enforcement, stating that its 'laudable intentions' are at risk of being overridden by regulatory overreach.
'When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety',' the company posted on X. 'It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made.'
X said the rollout has come with 'unnecessarily tight' timelines and significant compliance costs. Despite meeting the obligations under the law, the company said it continues to face threats of fines and enforcement, pushing platforms toward 'over-censorship.'
The Online Safety Act introduced wide-ranging rules for platforms including X, Meta, YouTube and TikTok as well as pornography sites to enforce age verification and remove harmful and illegal content. While the government maintains the measures are essential to protecting children and users, it has attracted criticism from free-speech activists.
More than 470,000 people have signed a petition calling for the law's withdrawal, citing privacy concerns as users are required to upload personal data for age verification. However, the government confirmed earlier this week that it has 'no plans to repeal' the legislation.
Technology secretary Peter Kyle defended the law in a post on X earlier this week, stating that those opposing the Online Safety Act are 'on the side of predators'.
Heavy-handed approach
In its statement, Musk's platform also flagged concerns about a new National Internet Intelligence Investigations unit established within the British Police to monitor online content for signs of unrest and hate speech, warning it could further curb free speech.
'Instead of specifically and collaboratively addressing a problem everyone agrees needs to be solved', X stated that regulators have adopted a 'heavy-handed approach by rapidly increasing enforcement resources, adding layers of bureaucratic oversight'.
'It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK,' the platform concluded, calling for a balanced approach to ensuring online safety alongside personal liberties and innovation.
Source: Mobile World Live
Image Credit: X
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
Witkoff and Putin meeting 'highly productive', Trump says
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday said the meeting between US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian President Vladimir Putin was "highly productive". He added that "great progress was made" and that he had updated some European allies on the details of the meeting. "Everyone agrees this War must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come," he said on his Truth Social platform. But Washington still expects to impose secondary tariffs on Moscow's trading partners on Friday, a senior administration official told The National. In July, the US set a 50-day deadline for Moscow to stop hostilities, threatening to impose secondary tariffs on trading partners importing Russian fuel. Mr Witkoff's visit is viewed as a last-ditch effort to end the conflict ahead of a deadline on Friday. The administration official added that 'the Russians are eager to continue engaging with the United States'. Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser said that the two men had a 'useful and constructive conversation' that focused on Ukraine as well as 'prospects for possible development of strategic co-operation between the US and Russia '. Mr Trump, who campaigned on ending the war that has raged since early 2022, has become increasingly frustrated with his counterpart as Moscow's forces advance in Ukraine and its bomb and missile strikes killed hundreds of civilians. Overnight on Tuesday, Russian forces hit a recreational centre in Ukraine's southern Zaporizhzhia region, killing two people and injuring 12, including two children, according to local authorities. On entering office, Mr Trump attempted a more conciliatory tone with his Russian counterpart, in contrast to his predecessor Joe Biden, who enacted punishing sanctions against Moscow over the conflict. But relations frayed following a series of meetings with Ukrainian and Russian officials that failed to bring the war to a halt.
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
Palestine Action claims 200 arrested supporters have not been charged
None of the 200 demonstrators arrested in the UK for supporting Palestine Action in recent weeks have been charged, campaigners have claimed, as they sought support for a protest on Saturday. The direct action protest group was designated a terrorist organisation in July after it claimed to be behind millions of pounds worth of damage at a Royal Air Force base. The High Court has agreed to review the decision in November. Until then, the ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000. But Tim Crosland, a spokesman for the campaign group Defend Our Juries, said the group believes potential legal claims against police should proscription be deemed unlawful lay behind the lack of prosecutions. 'Nobody has been charged. It's important to say, and there's a sense that there aren't going to be any charges till the other side of the judicial review,' Mr Crosland said at a press briefing on Wednesday. More than 500 people have committed to holding a sign saying 'I Support Palestine Action' in Central London on Saturday, he said. Mr Crosland, who is organising the protest alongside Palestine Action's co-founder Huda Ammori, said they had received advice from solicitors that those arrested would be able to make legal claims against the police for 'unlawful arrest' if the proscription order is eventually struck down. 'We've specifically asked them: if the order is struck down in November, does that open up the possibility for legal claims against the police for unlawful arrest and for trespass to people's property? And the answer to that was yes,' Mr Crosland said. Ms Ammori said she was hopeful the decision would be overturned by then, but acknowledged there was a 'substantial risk' in showing support for the group. 'Obviously there is a substantial risk, but you know, we do hope to be successful in this legal challenge,' she said. The British activist, of Palestinian and Iraqi heritage, sought an injunction to delay the proscription in early July, which was denied by the High Court. Last week, she was granted her bid to challenge the ban, though the terrorism designation will remain in place until then. Further demonstrations are being planned for the coming months until the High Court ruling. 'If arresting and prosecuting more than 500 people is an absurd waste of public resources, that's not on us. We're not the ones who made this law. We're not the ones doing the arresting. We will keep going as long as people keep wanting to take part in this action,' Mr Crosland said. The proscription has caused outcry, particularly from veteran campaigners who say that direct action has a long history in British politics, going all the way back to the Suffragettes. Among those arrested was 83-year-old priest Sue Parfitt and an 81-year-old former magistrate. Angie Zelter, a veteran peace protestor, said there was visible 'discomfort' among the police making arrests at demonstrations supporting Palestine Action. 'There's a lot of discomfort amongst the police, because they are making a mockery of the definition of terrorism,' she said, adding that she plans to attend the demonstration on Saturday. Discussing the arrests, Mr Crosland said that in Derry, Edinburgh, Kendal and Chichester, police did not act. "It shows they can exercise common sense if they want to," he said. "In London, people have been arrested under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, which is the lesser of the two possible charges, and somewhere between six and 12 hours after a police interview in the police cells, people have been arrested without charge. "In Cardiff, people were arrested under Section 12, which is an offence punishable with 14 years' imprisonment - doing exactly the same thing, holding the same sign, quietly sitting - they were held in police custody beyond the 24-hour maximum. The time was extended under the terrorism laws while those people's houses were raided." The Metropolitan Police have been contacted by The National over the claims it is holding back on bringing charges. However, it has warned it would arrest demonstrators on Saturday and suggested that they were attempting to put the UK's overcrowded criminal justice system under further pressure. 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people to turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system,' a representative of the force said. 'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests. Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription. Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.' The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying the vandalism of the planes was "disgraceful" and the group had a "long history of unacceptable criminal damage".
Tahawul Tech
12 hours ago
- Tahawul Tech
Most UAE security experts overwhelmed by multi-vendor tools, says Kaspersky research
86% of companies in the UAE rely on multi-vendor ecosystems despite the fact that such fragmented security solutions lead to operational and financial strains. Such findings were revealed in the recent Kaspersky research. A study titled 'Improving resilience: cybersecurity through system immunity,' conducted by Kaspersky, examined how organisations manage cybersecurity today, focusing on vendor fragmentation, operational inefficiencies and future consolidation plans. The survey was conducted across the META (the Middle East, Turkiye and Africa) region, as well as Europe, Russia, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of cybersecurity management across organisations, highlighting significant challenges associated with multi-vendor security environments. Despite these persistent challenges, a majority of organisations in the UAE continue to operate within multi-vendor environments – 86% currently manage security across multiple providers. Interestingly, nearly half (42%) believe that a single cybersecurity provider could sufficiently meet all their needs, suggesting a recognition of the potential benefits of consolidation. However, only 14% have adopted a single-vendor approach in practice, reflecting a cautious approach driven by concerns over over-reliance on one supplier or the perceived risks associated with vendor lock-in. The landscape is rapidly shifting toward consolidation: an overwhelming 93% of firms are actively moving in this direction, a quarter (21%) have already begun merging their security tools into unified platforms, while an additional 72% plan to do so within the next two years. This trend underscores a strategic shift toward simplifying cybersecurity operations, reducing costs, and achieving more effective threat management through integrated solutions. As organisations increasingly recogniSe the advantages of streamlined security architectures, the move toward vendor consolidation is poised to reshape the cybersecurity landscape in the near future. 'The data from our research indicates that many organisations rely on multiple vendors by default, rather than through deliberate strategic planning. While diversification of security solutions can offer certain benefits, such as risk mitigation and coverage breadth, an unchecked increase in complexity often leads to significant resource drain and operational inefficiencies. Moreover, this complexity can create critical blind spots, making it harder to maintain comprehensive threat visibility and respond effectively to emerging risks. The emerging trend toward consolidation reflects a maturation in cybersecurity strategies, emphasising the adoption of integrated platforms that streamline management, reduce manual effort, and enhance overall visibility into security posture,' said Ilya Markelov, Head of Unified Platform product line at Kaspersky. To enable comprehensive protection of all business assets and processes, Kaspersky experts recommend to use centralised and automated solutions such as Kaspersky Next XDR Expert. By aggregating and correlating data from multiple sources in one place and using machine-learning technologies, this solution provides effective threat detection and fast automated response. Out-of-the-box integrations, automation features and case management help make infrastructure complexity much less of an issue.
