logo
Trump Seeks to Lower Drug Prices Through Medicare and Some Imports

Trump Seeks to Lower Drug Prices Through Medicare and Some Imports

New York Times15-04-2025

President Trump signed an executive order on Tuesday outlining a series of actions intended to lower drug prices, including helping states import drugs from Canada.
The policies were more modest than proposals to reduce drug prices that Mr. Trump offered in his first term.
And one of his new directives could increase drug prices. It calls for the Trump administration to work with Congress to change a 2022 law in a way that could defang a negotiation program meant to reduce Medicare's spending on commonly used or costly drugs.
Such a change has the potential to increase costs for the government, because it would most likely delay the existing timetable for some drugs to become eligible for Medicare price cuts.
Depending on how it is structured, it could increase Medicare's drug spending by billions of dollars compared with outlays under the current law. The negotiation program was approved by a Democratic-controlled Congress and supported by former President Joseph R. Biden Jr.
The executive order says that changes to the Medicare price negotiation program should be 'coupled with other reforms to prevent any increase in overall costs to Medicare and its beneficiaries.'
Drug pricing experts said that with the exception of the Medicare negotiation proposal, other directives in the executive order had the potential to save money for patients and government programs. None of the actions represented major changes that would lead to huge savings.
One provision would lower the co-payments that some people on Medicare face when they undergo treatments like chemotherapy infusions at certain clinics and at outpatient hospital sites. Another would give certain lower-income people access to heavily discounted insulin and epinephrine injections.
Tuesday's executive order was the most prominent move Mr. Trump's second administration has made so far on drug pricing.
It followed Mr. Trump's decision to move closer to imposing tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals, which manufacturers are likely to try to pass on. That could force government programs, employers and patients to pay more for some medications and could exacerbate shortages of critical drugs.
Some of the directives, like changing the Medicare negotiation program, would require congressional approval. The pharmaceutical industry has fiercely opposed some of the ideas in the executive order while supporting others.
Mr. Trump has long complained that the United States pays much more than other wealthy countries for the same drugs. Notably absent from the order was a reprise of a most favored nation pricing policy, which he proposed in his first term aimed at making U.S. drug prices closer to those that peer countries pay. Like several of Mr. Trump's first-term policies on drug prices, his most favored nation plan was halted by federal courts. Last fall, Mr. Trump's presidential campaign walked back the proposal.
Here's a breakdown of some of the most notable parts of Mr. Trump's executive order.
Eliminating the 'pill penalty'
The order directs Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health secretary, to work with Congress to address a difference in how certain types of drugs are treated in the Medicare negotiation program.
Under the law, pills and other drugs produced through synthetic processes do not become eligible for price cuts until they have been on the market for nine years. Drugs known as biologics — created from living cells and often given as an infusion — would not be eligible for 13 years.
Drugmakers, who unsuccessfully sued the federal government over the program, bitterly call the difference a 'pill penalty.' They say it discourages them from developing medications, because they have less time to build up sales before the price cuts kick in, depriving patients of new treatments. They have lobbied for pills to be exempted from the price cuts for 13 years instead of nine.
Lawmakers have introduced legislation that would change the law to treat the two types of drugs equally.
The president's order does not specify how many years each type of drug should be exempt from Medicare price cuts.
Biden officials oversaw the first round of negotiations in the program, resulting in price cuts that will go into effect in 2026. The Trump administration is overseeing negotiations this year for lower prices in 2027 for drugs including the blockbuster weight-loss medication sold as Ozempic and Wegovy.
The White House said in a fact sheet on Tuesday that it wanted to capture more savings for the government with the Medicare negotiation program than the Biden administration did last year. That would be difficult to do if Congress reduces the time during which Medicare can obtain lower prices.
Importing drugs from Canada
The executive order directs the Food and Drug Administration to improve the process by which states can apply to import lower-cost drugs from Canada.
In his first term, Mr. Trump created a pathway enabling states to pursue these imports. Under the Biden administration, the F.D.A. approved one importation program, in Florida. As of late last year, Florida had not yet begun importing drugs from Canada. The pharmaceutical industry opposes the idea because it would cut into its profits.
If Mr. Trump follows through on imposing tariffs on pharmaceuticals, importing drugs from Canada would be unlikely to offer the same savings as in the past.
Different co-pays at different clinics
The order calls for rules to equalize the fees doctors are paid to administer drugs to patients across settings.
Currently, many medical practices owned by hospitals can charge higher fees to Medicare than independent practices can, even for the exact same services. Because Medicare beneficiaries are often responsible for a percentage of their medical bills, those higher costs for the visits are passed along in the form of co-payments.
Efforts to equalize such payments broadly have been under bipartisan discussion for years in Congress but have faced opposition from hospitals, who say they require the higher payments. Legislation passed during the Obama administration addressed some of these payment differences.
Encouraging cheaper copycats
Mr. Trump directed the F.D.A. to make recommendations for streamlining approvals for generic drugs and biosimilars, which are lower-priced copycats of biologic drugs.
The first biosimilar was approved in 2015, with dozens more approved since. There was widespread hope that biosimilars would displace patent-protected brand-name biologics, such as Humira for conditions like arthritis, that sent drug costs soaring. But patients have been slow to switch over, and savings have not materialized as quickly as many wanted.
Insulin for the poor
Mr. Trump revived an executive order from his first term directing community health clinics to provide insulin and epinephrine injections at heavily discounted prices to certain lower-income people, including the uninsured.
The clinics balked when Mr. Trump first proposed the idea in 2020. The Biden administration soon froze the regulation, saying it created too much of an administrative burden for the clinics.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic
Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump for uninviting him and his family from the White House picnic. Paul has opposed the Trump administration's decision to 'actively' seek to suspend habeas corpus. Habeas corpus — the constitutional freedom that translates to 'you should have the body' in Latin — ensures that detained individuals, whether or not they are citizens, are able to physically appear in front of a judge. 'I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Paul told reporters on Wednesday. 'I just find this incredibly petty. I mean — I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the president.' The picnic is an annual event held by the White House on the South Lawn, which members from both aisles of Congress typically attend. 'They've decided they want to declare war on my family and exclude us from the White House, and I just think it's incredibly petty,' Paul added on Wednesday, saying that White House staffers are 'running sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' Paul said his son, daughter-in-law and infant grandson were supposed to attend the picnic with him. He also added that he did not receive an explanation as to why they all were no longer invited, and he's not sure if the revoked invitation came from Trump or his staffers. Habeas corpus is 'one most fundamental rights we have,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells it they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' Paul has drawn Trump's ire on more than one occasion in recent days. Earlier this month, Paul voiced concerns about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' prompting Trump to take jabs at him online. 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' Paul also criticized Trump's upcoming military parade on Saturday, Trump's birthday. Paul told HuffPost the parade reminded him of the Soviet Union and North Korea. The White House did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. Trump Seethes Over Rand Paul Continuing To Oppose 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million

US governors are divided along party lines about military troops deployed to protests
US governors are divided along party lines about military troops deployed to protests

Hamilton Spectator

time30 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

US governors are divided along party lines about military troops deployed to protests

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is calling President Donald Trump's military intervention at protests over federal immigration policy in Los Angeles an assault on democracy and has sued to try to stop it. Meanwhile, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is putting the National Guard on standby in areas in his state where demonstrations are planned. The divergent approaches illustrate the ways the two parties are trying to navigate national politics and the role of executive power in enforcing immigration policies. In his live TV address this week, Newsom said that Trump's move escalated the situation — and for political gain. All 22 other Democratic governors signed a statement sent by the Democratic Governors Association on Sunday backing Newsom, calling the Guard deployment and threats to send in Marines 'an alarming abuse of power' that 'undermines the mission of our service members, erodes public trust, and shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.' The protests in Los Angeles have mostly been contained to five blocks in a small section of downtown; nearly 200 people were detained on Tuesday and at least seven police officers have been injured. In Republican-controlled states, governors have not said when or how they're planning to deploy military troops for protests. Since Trump's return to office, Democratic governors have been calculating about when to criticize him, when to emphasize common ground and when to bite their tongues. The governors' responses are guided partly by a series of political considerations, said Kristoffer Shields, director of the Eagleton Center on the American Governor at Rutgers University: How would criticizing Trump play with Democrats, Republicans and independent voters in their states? And for those with presidential ambitions, how does that message resonate nationally? Democratic governors are weighing a number of considerations. 'There probably is some concern about retributions — what the reaction of the administration could be for a governor who takes a strong stance,' Shields said. And in this case, polling indicates about half of U.S. adults approve of how Trump is handling immigration, though that polling was conducted before the recent military deployment. On other issues, Democratic governors have taken a variety of approaches with Trump. At a White House meeting in February, Maine Democratic Gov. Janet Mills told Trump, ' we'll see you in court ' over his push to cut off funding to the state because it allowed transgender athletes in girls' school sports. Michigan's Gretchen Whitmer, a possible 2028 presidential candidate, publicly sparred with Trump during his first term but this time around, has met with him privately to find common ground. Initially, Hawaii Gov. Josh Green referred to Trump as a 'straight-up dictator,' but the next month he told a local outlet that he was treading carefully, saying: 'I'm not going to criticize him directly much at all.' Democratic governors speaking out — but some cautiously Apart from their joint statement, some of the highest-profile Democratic governors have not talked publicly about the situation in California. When asked, on Wednesday, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul's office pointed to a Sunday social media post about the joint statement. Whitmer didn't respond. The office of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who is set to testify before Congress on Thursday about his state laws protecting people who are in the country without legal status, reiterated in a statement that he stands with Newsom. The office said 'local authorities should be able to do their jobs without the chaos of this federal interference and intimidation.' Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, in an interview Wednesday in The Washington Post, said Trump should not send troops to a weekend protest scheduled in Philadelphia. 'He's injected chaos into the world order, he's injected it into our economy, he is trying to inject chaos into our streets by doing what he did with the Guard in California,' Shapiro said. As state attorney general during Trump's first term, Shapiro routinely boasted that he sued Trump over 40 times and won each time. As governor he has often treaded more carefully, by bashing Trump's tariffs, but not necessarily targeting Trump himself. GOP governors weighing in Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has often clashed with Newsom, a fellow term-limited governor with national ambitions . Newsom's office said DeSantis offered to send Florida State Guard troops to California. 'Given the guard were not needed in the first place, we declined Governor DeSantis attempt to inflame an already chaotic situation made worse by his Party's leader,' Newsom spokesperson Diana Crofts-Pelayo said in an email to The Associated Press. Speaking on Fox News on Tuesday, DeSantis said the gesture was a typical offer of mutual aid during a crisis — and was dismissive of the reasons it was turned down. 'The way to put the fire out is to make sure you have law and order,' he said. States are preparing for more protests this weekend Protests against immigration enforcement raids have sprung up in other cities — and a series of 'No Kings' demonstrations are planned for the weekend — with governors preparing to respond. In Connecticut, Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont said he has spoken with his public safety commissioner to make sure state and local police work together. 'I don't want to give the president any pretext to think he can come into Connecticut and militarize the situation. That just makes the situation worse,' said Lamont, who called Trump 'a little eager to send federal troops and militarize the situation in Los Angeles.' It is unclear how many Texas National Guard members will be deployed or how many cities asked for assistance. In Austin, where police used chemical irritants to disperse several hundred protesters on Monday, the mayor's office said the National Guard was not requested. San Antonio officials also said they didn't request the Guard. Florida's DeSantis said law enforcement in his state is preparing 'The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you,' DeSantis said Tuesday. 'And we will make an example of you, you can guarantee it.' ___ Associated Press reporters Nadia Lathan and Jim Vertuno in Austin, Texas; Sophie Austin in Sacramento, California; Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan; Andrew DeMillo in Little Rock, Arkansas; Susan Haigh in Hartford, Connecticut; Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York; Marc Levy in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; and Sophia Tareen in Chicago; contributed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump's military parade is a US outlier in peacetime but parades and reviews have a long history
Trump's military parade is a US outlier in peacetime but parades and reviews have a long history

Hamilton Spectator

time30 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Trump's military parade is a US outlier in peacetime but parades and reviews have a long history

Troops marching in lockstep. Patriotic tunes filling the air. The commander in chief looking on at it all. The military parade commemorating the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary and coinciding with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday will be a new spectacle for many Americans. This will not be the first U.S. military parade. However, it is unusual outside of wartime, and Trump's approach stands out compared to his predecessors. The Army had long planned a celebration for its semi-quincentennial on June 14. Trump has wanted to preside over a grand military parade since his first presidency from 2017 to 2021. When he took office a second time, he found the ideal convergence and ratcheted the Pentagon's plans into a full-scale military parade on his birthday. The president, who is expected to speak in Washington as part of the affair, pitches the occasion as a way to celebrate U.S. power and service members' sacrifice. But there are bipartisan concerns about the cost as well as concerns about whether Trump is blurring traditional understandings of what it means to be a civilian commander in chief. Early US troop reviews Ceremonial reviews — troops looking their best and conducting drills for top commanders — trace back through medieval kingdoms to ancient empires of Rome, Persia and China. The pageantry continued in the young U.S. republic: Early presidents held military reviews as part of July 4th independence celebrations. That ended with James K. Polk , who was president from 1845 to 1849. President Andrew Johnson resurrected the tradition in 1865, holding a two-day 'Grand Review of the Armies' five weeks after Abraham Lincoln's assassination . It came after Johnson declared the Civil War over, a show of force meant to salve a war-weary nation — though more fighting and casualties would occur. Infantry, cavalry and artillery units — 145,000 soldiers, and even cattle — traversed Pennsylvania Avenue. Johnson, his Cabinet and top Army officers, including Ulysses S. Grant , Lincoln's last commanding general and the future 18th president, watched from a White House viewing stand. Spanish-American War and World War I: An era of victory parades begins The Spanish-American War was the first major international conflict for a reunited nation since the Civil War. It ended in a U.S. victory that established an American empire: Spain ceded Cuba, Puerto Rico, and Guam, and the U.S. purchased the Philippines for $20 million. Puerto Rico and Guam remain U.S. territories. New York City hosted multiple celebrations of a new global power. In August 1898, a fleet of warships, including the Brooklyn, the Texas, and the Oregon, sailed up the North River, more commonly known today as the Hudson River. American inventor Thomas Edison filmed the floating parade. The following September, New York hosted a naval and street parade to welcome home Rear Adm. George Dewey, who joined President William McKinley in a viewing stand. Many U.S. cities held World War I victory parades a few decades later. But neither Washington nor President Woodrow Wilson were the focal point. In Boston, a million civilians celebrated 20,000 troops in 1919. New York honored 25,000 troops marching in full uniform and combat gear. New York was the parade epicenter again for World War II On June 13, 1942, as U.S. involvement in World War II accelerated, about 30,000 people formed a mobilization parade in New York City. Participants included Army and Navy personnel, American Women's Voluntary Services members, Boy Scouts and military school cadets. Scores of floats rolled, too. One carried a massive bust of President Franklin Roosevelt , who did not attend. Less than four years later, the 82nd Airborne Division and Sherman tanks led a victory parade down Manhattan's Fifth Avenue. Gen. Dwight Eisenhower , the Allied commander during World War II, rode in a victory parade in Washington, D.C. In 1952, Eisenhower would join Grant and George Washington as top wartime commanders elevated to the presidency following their military achievements. Other World War II generals were honored in other homecoming parades. A long parade gap, despite multiple wars The U.S. did not hold national or major city parades after wars in Korea and Vietnam. Both ended without clear victory; Vietnam, especially, sparked bitter societal division, enough so that President Gerald Ford opted against a strong military presence in 1976 bicentennial celebrations, held a year after the fall of Saigon. Washington finally hosted a victory parade in 1991 after the first Persian Gulf War. The Constitution Avenue lineup included 8,000 troops, tanks, Patriot missiles and representatives of the international coalition, led by the U.S., that quickly drove an invading Iraq out of Kuwait. The commander in chief, George H.W. Bush , is the last U.S. president to have held an active-duty military post. He had been a World War II combat pilot who survived his plane being shot down over the Pacific Ocean. Veterans of the second Iraq and Afghanistan wars that followed the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks have not been honored in national parades. Inaugurations and a flight suit Inaugural parades include and sometimes feature military elements. Eisenhower's 1953 inaugural parade, at the outset of the Cold War, included 22,000 service members and an atomic cannon. Eight years later, President John F. Kennedy , a World War II Naval officer, watched armored tanks, Army and Navy personnel, dozens of missiles and Navy boats pass in front of his reviewing stand. More recent inaugurations have included honor guards, academy cadets, military bands and other personnel but not large combat assets. Notably, U.S. presidents, even when leading or attending military events, wear civilian attire rather than military garb, a standard set by Washington, who also eschewed being called 'General Washington' in favor of 'Mr. President.' Perhaps the lone exception came in 2003, when President George W. Bush , who had been a National Guard pilot, wore a flight suit when he landed on the USS Abraham Lincoln and declared the end of major combat operations in Iraq, which U.S. forces had invaded six weeks earlier. The aircraft carrier was not a parade venue but the president emerged to raucous cheers from uniformed service members. He put on a business suit to deliver a nationally televised speech in front a 'Mission Accomplished' banner. As the war dragged on to a less decisive outcome, that scene and its enduring images would become a political liability for the president. ___ Barrow reported from Atlanta. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store