Artwork featuring JK Rowling's name taken off display to stop ‘tampering'
An artwork featuring author JK Rowling's name has been taken down by the National Trust, which wants to 'protect it from further tampering or damage'.
Visitors who went to Hardwick Hall in Derbyshire between April and November 2024 were invited to nominate a 'contemporary Virtuous Woman', whose name was then sewn into the fabric.
Since the project ended, the participatory artwork, A Virtuous Woman, has continued to be on display, featuring Rowling's name which was at an unspecified time 'stitched over by other participants'.
Last week on X, feminist campaigner Jean Hatchet said she had 'corrected' the work by taking off the stitching over Harry Potter author Rowling's name.
It follows criticism of Scotland-based Rowling's views on gender issues that have seen her called transphobic by activists, which she has denied.
A spokeswoman for the National Trust said: 'The artwork was open to contributions for eight months and closed in November when the piece was finished and put on public display.
'During the participation phase, JK Rowling's name was stitched onto the piece seven times and in two instances it was stitched over by other participants.
'At the time the artwork was completed and subsequently hung, JK Rowling's name appeared five times without any overstitching.
'We ask people not to damage or tamper with artworks once they are finished and on public display.
'The piece has been taken off display for investigation and to protect it from further tampering or damage. We take all claims and incidents of damage to items in our care seriously and investigate each one.'
Ms Hatchet criticised the response from the National Trust, saying she removed the 'stitching with the correct tool', took 'great time and care', and did not damage it.
The stitched names of British queens, artist Yoko Ono, former prime minister Baroness Margaret Thatcher, climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, and Taylor Swift among others appear not to have stitching over them on the recycled textile.
The work comes from artist Layla Khoo in association with the University of Leeds and National Trust, and is inspired by wealthy Elizabethan woman Elizabeth Talbot, known as Bess of Hardwick, commissioning a series of large embroideries featuring noble women from the ancient world, such as Cleopatra.
The trust had previously responded to criticism from the organisation, Women's Rights Network Derbyshire and Staffordshire, who advocated for 'a simple addition to their description', with a statement explaining why the crossing-out stitching on Rowling's name remains.
Responding on X, the trust said that it is a 'collaborative piece of art formed of participants' views from a variety of age groups, life experiences and beliefs', and 'any contributions to the piece have been made by those who chose to take part'.
'None of the views expressed or actions taken by participants represent the views of the National Trust, the artist or the University of Leeds,' the organisation said
Ellie Evans, from WRN Derbyshire and Staffordshire, criticised the artwork being covered up, saying the move would 'erase all the women'.
Rowling declined to comment.
Khoo and the University of Leeds have also been contacted.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
11 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Reform and indy will be at the heart of our debate for years
Of course, by now you already know the result, so you'll know which of the following scenarios and their consequences are the most accurate. But let me start with what the national polls tell us ought to have happened, by-election peculiarities – which I'll come to – notwithstanding. The SNP should have won with around 33% of the vote, down significantly on the 46.2% it won in 2021, with Labour in a narrow second on around 28% of the vote. Reform should have come third with just under 20% of the vote, while the Conservatives should have collapsed to under 10% of the vote. The rest of the vote, around 10%, will have been split among the Greens, Liberal Democrats, and myriad minor parties and independents. But by-elections rarely work out this way, even when the national polls are accurate. Firstly, voters are more likely to have voted in protest than they are at national elections, which may well help Reform in this case. As Jamie, a service engineer from Hamilton, told a focus group run by More in Common, it's 'time to give someone else a chance,' even if he thinks Nigel Farage is an 'a***hole'. Read more by Mark McGeoghegan Secondly, turnout will likely have collapsed. In the Hamilton and Rutherglen West by-election in October 2023, turnout fell by 43% compared to the 2019 General Election. A similar decline here would see around 15,600 voters who would otherwise turn out in a national election stay at home instead. Given that voters turning out to vote Reform as a protest against both the SNP and Labour governments are likely to be more motivated than SNP and Labour voters, this may also advantage Reform. In fact, assuming predictions based on national polling would otherwise have been accurate, Reform's vote will only have to have been marginally more resilient for it to finish ahead of Labour and narrowly behind the SNP. Factor in that first peculiarity of by-election campaigns, and such a scenario is hardly far-fetched. On the eve of the by-election, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar accused the First Minister, John Swinney, and journalists of manufacturing Reform's competitiveness in the seat. Nothing could be further from the truth, and a Reform underperformance yesterday will have been more surprising than it coming second. It has demonstrated its strength in a succession of local by-elections, the latest of which saw it beat Labour to come second behind the SNP. Whether or not Reform came second yesterday, its performance will shape the narrative in Scottish politics going into next year's elections in conjunction with its UK-wide polling lead (it has led in 25 consecutive polls going back to the beginning of May) and strong results in recent local elections and Parliamentary by-elections in England. Ultimately, regardless of yesterday's result, the spectre of Nigel Farage looms over Scottish politics. There are three broad scenarios. Firstly, that Reform performed to its Scotland-wide polling, confirming that it is on course to win between 15 and 20 seats in next year's Scottish Parliament election. Secondly, that it did overperform, perhaps coming second, leading to the next 11 months to being dominated by the SNP seeking to present next year's elections as a choice between the SNP and Nigel Farage, and a bitter fight between Reform and Labour for status as the main challengers to the SNP. Thirdly, that it underperformed, in which case the SNP will be quick to emphasise divergence between Scottish and English politics. In any case, the SNP will use the prospect of a Reform government at Westminster to try to increase the salience of the constitutional question, attempting to return independence to the heart of the Scottish political agenda ahead of next year's elections and the following UK general election. It knows that that is its best bet for winning back pro-independence voters who have swung to Labour in recent years. Replacing Humza Yousaf with John Swinney may have stabilised the SNP's support, but the party not really recovered in any meaningful way. The longer Reform leads in UK-wide polls, the more likely that narrative will be to gain purchase among the independence-supporting electorate. Strong Reform showings in Scotland will reinforce the sense that they could win power in 2029; weak performances will emphasise the ways in which Scottish and English politics may be diverging. Both provide hooks for the SNP. The spectre of Nigel Farage looms large over Scottish politics (Image: PA) The bigger question is whether this leads to a change in the constitutional deadlock. Some recent polling suggests that support for independence may have edged up. Norstat recently recorded its first Yes leads in three years, finding Yes ahead by seven points in the wake of Reform's strong showing in the English local elections. Survation still has No ahead by two or three points, down from leads of seven or eight points a year ago. The data is not conclusive, and we should be cautious of hypotheticals around whether developments will change voters' minds – we had enough such polls around Brexit and Boris Johnson becoming Prime Minister that never bore out. But the prominence of Reform UK and Nigel Farage in UK politics is a gift to the SNP and the independence movement, regardless of how they performed yesterday or how they perform north of the Border in the coming year. If Anas Sarwar is frustrated with his opponents' and the media's "obsession" with Reform UK, he should get used to that feeling – they'll be at the heart of Scottish political debate for years to come. Mark McGeoghegan is a Glasgow University researcher of nationalism and contentious politics and an Associate Member of the Centre on Constitutional Change. He can be found on BlueSky @
Metro
17 minutes ago
- Metro
In pictures: How the D-Day landings unfolded on June 6, 1944
Today – June 6, 2025 – marks 81 years since the the D-Day landings began on the Normandy beaches of France during World War Two. D-Day in 1944 was an important turning point during World War Two and to this day is one of the biggest seaborne invasions in history. Considered a key component in the defeat of Hitler and his forces during WWII, the D-Day operation against Nazi Germany was a combined effort, and included support from the UK, US and Canada. Planning for the D-Day landings, codenamed Operation Overlord, began several months in advance. British forces used military deception to mislead the German army of the date and location of the operation, so that what took place on June 6 1944 held some element of surprise. D-Day on June 6 1944 marked the date when approximately 156,000 British, American and Canadian forces landed on five different beaches along the coast of France's Normandy region. The coastline invaded by the Allied troops stretched over 50 miles and was heavily fortified by Nazi forces at the time, who had occupied France. The invasion of Nazi-occupied France began before dawn on June 6 1944, with paratroopers and glider troops landing in the country from the air in order to secure bridges and roads for Allied forces. The D-Day landings on Normandy beaches began at 6:30 a.m with troops wading from the sea to the land whilst battling German resistance from the shore. The term D-Day is used by the Armed Forces to refer to the beginning of an operation. The 'D' itself actually stands for 'Day', meaning it's short for 'Day-Day' – as it connotes the first day in a major military operation. D-Day was the start of 'Operation Overlord', which was the official codenamefor the Battle of Normandy, The Allies utilised over 5,000 ships and landing craft over the course of the day to land over 150,000 troops and gain a foothold on the five beaches – codenamed Utah, Omaha, Gold, Juno and Sword. It is estimated that 4,000 Allied troops lost their lives during the D-Day invasion, while thousands more were wounded or reported missing after the attack. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The genealogy website Ancestry found in 2019 that only 25 per cent of the 61,715 soldiers who took part in the Normandy landings ever spoke to family members about the invasion. The study showed 31 per cent of veterans didn't want to discuss their role in the historic WWII invasion with family members because they lost too many friends during the battle. 81 years after the historic landings and very few of the veterans who participated are still alive to share their stories. More Trending Of the 150,000 troops who took part in the landings, only around 1% of them are still thought to be alive. Many of the surviving veterans were in attendance at the 80th anniversary celebrations last year, although sadly 100 year-old veteran David Teacher died just days before he was planning to attend the celebrations. Follow Metro across our social channels, on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I went to Cannes Film Festival on a £30 daily budget — here's what happened MORE: Your favourite places to eat in Europe that aren't the usual tourist traps MORE: Second World War bombs discovery in Cologne forces 20,000 people to evacuate their homes
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Hamilton byelection win is vindication of Scottish Labour's doorstep strategy
Labour's victory in Hamilton is both a surprise and a vindication – a demonstration that in a byelection, shocks can take different forms. It is a surprise to those of us in the outside world who felt certain of a Scottish National party victory, who saw Labour support plummet in the Scottish opinion polls, and the same polls showing Reform's steeply rising. The question became: would Labour scrape home in second, behind an experienced and personable SNP candidate, or even endure the humiliation of coming third behind a resurgent Reform. After all, it seemed Scottish Labour's candidate, Davy Graham, was ill-equipped, so much so his party refused to put him up for a live television debate. But for Scottish Labour's strategists this is vindication. In a very clear way, this demonstrates the differences between what some call the 'air war' – the contest taking place on social media and the airwaves, of rows over 'racist' adverts and defeats in other contests, and the 'ground war', the dull and relentless grind of sending out activists to doorsteps, of leaflet delivering and face-to-face engagement. While Reform was ploughing a record sum, up to £15,000, into a single advert wrongly and unjustifiably accusing Anas Sarwar, Scottish Labour's leader, of prioritising Pakistanis, Labour canvassers were going door to door, or forensically using their social media advertising spend to target voters on YouTube and Facebook. In the final phase of the campaign last week, Labour strategists were quietly insisting their canvassing told a different story. While their data showed more people were voting Reform than ever before, with their vote boosted by the Runcorn byelection victory in May, most of those came from Conservatives, they argued. The Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse byelection, called after the untimely death of the popular SNP MSP Christine McKelvie, was certainly a three-horse race, said one senior Labour figure. 'People are annoyed with us', they acknowledged. 'But I genuinely don't believe that the Reform vote is the size that people are speculating about.' Scottish Labour believed it had begun the contest in April at about 20% – a figure close to the party's national polling. Last week, Labour doorstep returns were putting its support at nearer 35%. 'I'm walking around quite happy,' the source said. 'People have written us off and people have made a mistake. But it's conditional on getting people out to vote.' Some voters have been visited four times by Labour canvassers and politicians: Labour MPs and MSPs flooded the constituency – in part because the UK party, from Keir Starmer downwards, knew they could not afford further humiliation at the hands of Reform. It seemed in the final days of the campaign that Reform's 'air war' was seriously wounding Labour's campaign: Farage revealed on Monday that a Scottish Labour councillor, a young man who had previously been chair of Glasgow University's Labour students group, had defected to Reform. That did shock the party. But in the event, the ground war won – to the great relief of a UK party that has just been pummelled by Reform in Runcorn and England's recent council elections. 'I think we have the better field operation and we've been around people's doors,' the strategist said. 'We're hungry for the votes and people see that.' This victory has sent a significant signal for Scotland's political parties with less than a year to go before next May's Holyrood elections. While the national polls repeatedly put Scottish Labour at 19%, with Reform only one point behind, and the SNP in the mid-30s, election campaigns are different. Labour's electoral machine – the machine that won a landslide on a 34% share of the vote in last year's general election, remains formidable. For John Swinney, the SNP's leader and first minister, this result has demonstrated his party has now to reequip itself by greatly improving its campaign machinery, its data-gathering and its strategies. The SNP was once the UK's most formidable electoral machine but, based on this byelection result, that seems no longer to be the case.
