Meta's platforms showed hundreds of "nudify" deepfake ads, CBS News investigation finds
Meta has removed a number of ads promoting "nudify" apps — AI tools used to create sexually explicit deepfakes using images of real people — after a CBS News investigation found hundreds of such advertisements on its platforms.
"We have strict rules against non-consensual intimate imagery; we removed these ads, deleted the Pages responsible for running them and permanently blocked the URLs associated with these apps," a Meta spokesperson told CBS News in an emailed statement.
CBS News uncovered dozens of those ads on Meta's Instagram platform, in its "Stories" feature, promoting AI tools that, in many cases, advertised the ability to "upload a photo" and "see anyone naked." Other ads in Instagram's Stories promoted the ability to upload and manipulate videos of real people. One promotional ad even read "how is this filter even allowed?" as text underneath an example of a nude deepfake.
One ad promoted its AI product by using highly sexualized, underwear-clad deepfake images of actors Scarlett Johansson and Anne Hathaway. Some of the ads ads' URL links redirect to websites that promote the ability to animate real people's images and get them to perform sex acts. And some of the applications charged users between $20 and $80 to access these "exclusive" and "advance" features. In other cases, an ad's URL redirected users to Apple's app store, where "nudify" apps were available to download.
Meta platforms such as Instagram have marketed AI tools that let users create sexually explicit images of real people.
An analysis of the advertisements in Meta's ad library found that there were, at a minimum, hundreds of these ads available across the company's social media platforms, including on Facebook, Instagram, Threads, the Facebook Messenger application and Meta Audience Network — a platform that allows Meta advertisers to reach users on mobile apps and websites that partner with the company.
According to Meta's own Ad Library data, many of these ads were specifically targeted at men between the ages of 18 and 65, and were active in the United States, European Union and United Kingdom.
A Meta spokesperson told CBS News the spread of this sort of AI-generated content is an ongoing problem and they are facing increasingly sophisticated challenges in trying to combat it.
"The people behind these exploitative apps constantly evolve their tactics to evade detection, so we're continuously working to strengthen our enforcement," a Meta spokesperson said.
CBS News found that ads for "nudify" deepfake tools were still available on the company's Instagram platform even after Meta had removed those initially flagged.
Meta platforms such as Instagram have marketed AI tools that let users create sexually explicit images of real people.
Deepfakes are manipulated images, audio recordings, or videos of real people that have been altered with artificial intelligence to misrepresent someone as saying or doing something that the person did not actually say or do.
Last month, President Trump signed into law the bipartisan "Take It Down Act," which, among other things, requires websites and social media companies to remove deepfake content within 48 hours of notice from a victim.
Although the law makes it illegal to "knowingly publish" or threaten to publish intimate images without a person's consent, including AI-created deepfakes, it does not target the tools used to create such AI-generated content.
Those tools do violate platform safety and moderation rules implemented by both Apple and Meta on their respective platforms.
Meta's advertising standards policy says, "ads must not contain adult nudity and sexual activity. This includes nudity, depictions of people in explicit or sexually suggestive positions, or activities that are sexually suggestive."
Under Meta's "bullying and harassment" policy, the company also prohibits "derogatory sexualized photoshop or drawings" on its platforms. The company says its regulations are intended to block users from sharing or threatening to share nonconsensual intimate imagery.
Apple's guidelines for its app store explicitly state that "content that is offensive, insensitive, upsetting, intended to disgust, in exceptionally poor taste, or just plain creepy" is banned.
Alexios Mantzarlis, director of the Security, Trust, and Safety Initiative at Cornell University's tech research center, has been studying the surge in AI deepfake networks marketing on social platforms for more than a year. He told CBS News in a phone interview on Tuesday that he'd seen thousands more of these ads across Meta platforms, as well as on platforms such as X and Telegram, during that period.
Although Telegram and X have what he described as a structural "lawlessness" that allows for this sort of content, he believes Meta's leadership lacks the will to address the issue, despite having content moderators in place.
"I do think that trust and safety teams at these companies care. I don't think, frankly, that they care at the very top of the company in Meta's case," he said. "They're clearly under-resourcing the teams that have to fight this stuff, because as sophisticated as these [deepfake] networks are … they don't have Meta money to throw at it."
Mantzarlis also said that he found in his research that "nudify" deepfake generators are available to download on both Apple's app store and Google's Play store, expressing frustration with these massive platforms' inability to enforce such content.
"The problem with apps is that they have this dual-use front where they present on the app store as a fun way to face swap, but then they are marketing on Meta as their primary purpose being nudification. So when these apps come up for review on the Apple or Google store, they don't necessarily have the wherewithal to ban them," he said.
"There needs to be cross-industry cooperation where if the app or the website markets itself as a tool for nudification on any place on the web, then everyone else can be like, 'All right, I don't care what you present yourself as on my platform, you're gone,'" Mantzarlis added.
CBS News has reached out to both Apple and Google for comment as to how they moderate their respective platforms. Neither company had responded by the time of writing.
Major tech companies' promotion of such apps raises serious questions about both user consent and about online safety for minors. A CBS News analysis of one "nudify" website promoted on Instagram showed that the site did not prompt any form of age verification prior to a user uploading a photo to generate a deepfake image.
Such issues are widespread. In December, CBS News' 60 Minutes reported on the lack of age verification on one of the most popular sites using artificial intelligence to generate fake nude photos of real people.
Despite visitors being told that they must be 18 or older to use the site, and that "processing of minors is impossible," 60 Minutes was able to immediately gain access to uploading photos once the user clicked "accept" on the age warning prompt, with no other age verification necessary.
Data also shows that a high percentage of underage teenagers have interacted with deepfake content. A March 2025 study conducted by the children's protection nonprofit Thorn showed that among teens, 41% said they had heard of the term "deepfake nudes," while 10% reported personally knowing someone who had had deepfake nude imagery created of them.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
17 minutes ago
- Business Insider
AI Daily: WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple lags in AI
Catch up on the top artificial intelligence news and commentary by Wall Street analysts on publicly traded companies in the space with this daily recap compiled by The Fly: Confident Investing Starts Here: SIDELINED ON AI: Apple's (AAPL) upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference will do little to assuage fears that the iPhone maker is a laggard in AI, Blomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Instead, the event will focus on design and productivity enhancements for its long-established operating system franchises. The company's keynote address will introduce redesigned software interfaces for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV and Apple Watch, in addition to more minor tweaks to the Vision Pro headset. As part of the end-to-end overhaul, the company is also making a sweeping change to its software branding, which will shift from version numbers to a year-based system. That means Apple will introduce iOS 26, iPadOS 26, tvOS 26, visionOS 26, macOS 26 and watchOS 26 – named for 2026. Internally, the operating systems are known as Luck, Charisma, Discovery, Cheer and Nepali, respectively, the author notes. The AI changes will be surprisingly minor and are 'unlikely to impress' industry watchers, especially considering the rapid pace of innovation by Alphabet's (GOOGL) Google, Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI, the publication adds. Apple's upcoming conference is expected to demonstrate how far behind the company is in the AI sector, Dan Gallagher of The Wall Street Journal reports. The Apple Intelligence service introduced at last year's conference is still being worked on and the Siri digital assistant is waiting for a previously announced AI makeover. Additionally, on top of its issues with AI, Apple is facing significant problems with tariffs threatening its profit margin and U.S. President Donald Trump pressuring the company to undo its two-decade-old business model of exclusively producing overseas. ROBOTAXI ROAD TESTING: (PONY) is ramping up its Robotaxi mass production and commercialization efforts with the launch of public road testing for its seventh-generation Robotaxis in China. The vehicles now testing on roads in the southern Chinese megacities of Guangzhou and Shenzhen are based on Guangzhou Auto's second-generation Aion V model and equipped with most advanced autonomous driving system, unveiled just over a month ago at the Shanghai Auto Show. recently obtained regulatory permit to conduct these road tests for its seventh generation Robotaxi jointly developed with GAC, marking a significant transition from laboratory and closed-track validation into real-world traffic environments. UNTETHER AI ACQUISITION: Untether AI, a developer of AI inference chips marketed as faster and more energy-efficient than rival products for edge environments and enterprise data centers, announced that it has entered into a transaction with AMD (AMD). 'As a result of the transaction, Untether AI will no longer be supplying or supporting our speedAI products and imAIgine Software Development Kit. While today marks the end of Untether AI's journey, we are proud of the pioneering research that underpinned our work in advancing state-of-the-art AI chip technology. We are grateful for the dedication of our team and the support of our customers, partners, and investors. We look forward to the contributions our world-class team will make with AMD.' AI EFFORTS: Wells Fargo raised the firm's price target on Shopify (SHOP) to $125 from $107 and keeps an Overweight rating on the shares. While not typically perceived as an AI play, the firm believes Shopify's AI efforts are differentiated and can serve as another important growth and efficiency driver for years to come.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Hawley breaks with Republicans to oppose a major crypto bill
While the clash between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump captivated Washington on Thursday, another drama was playing out behind closed doors over a bill to regulate the $250 billion market for stablecoins, which could transform America's relationship with the dollar, upend the credit card industry, and benefit both Musk and Trump. The bill, the GENIUS Act, is poised to pass the Senate within days. But a prominent Republican, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, said that he will vote against the bill in its current form, warning that it would hand too much control of America's financial system to tech giants. 'It's a huge giveaway to Big Tech,' Hawley said in an interview. Hawley, who previously voted against the bill, is concerned that the legislation would allow tech giants to create digital currencies that compete with the dollar. And he fears that such companies would then be motivated to collect even more data on users' finances. 'It allows these tech companies to issue stablecoins without any kind of controls,' he said. 'I don't see why we would do that.' Similar worries scuttled an effort by Meta to get into stablecoins. In 2019, Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, among others, raised 'serious concerns' about Meta's cryptocurrency initiative, called Libra and then Diem. It abandoned the project in 2022. The GENIUS Act has exposed divisions in both parties. Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts oppose the bill, warning it would make it easier for Trump, whose family announced its own USD1 stablecoin in March, to engage in corrupt practices. But Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., a co-sponsor of the bill, has argued that it would provide regulatory clarity to the industry, and contends that the legislation includes 'robust consumer protections.' Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., a co-sponsor, said the bill would bolster demand for U.S. Treasury notes and bonds, as well as the dollar. Stablecoins are often backed by short-term U.S. Treasurys and dollar deposits. Yet there are other Republican skeptics in the Senate that include Rand Paul of Kentucky, John Kennedy of Louisiana and Jerry Moran of Kansas. Paul has argued that the bill would add needless federal regulations. Hawley's frustrations with the bill have only grown as the bill took shape. His office submitted an amendment that would place limits on Big Tech's push into stablecoins. Hawley's draft amendment was used as the basis for writing a new provision requiring that publicly listed, nonfinancial companies such as Meta secure approval from a new regulatory body called the Stablecoin Certification Review Committee before it could issue stablecoins. That provision has gained traction with other senators. But Hawley says Republican negotiators 'gutted' key parts of his amendment that would safeguard against the risks of letting tech companies issue their own digital currencies, and that he no longer supports it. 'It's essentially window dressing,' he said. Some Democrats oppose the proposed guardrails, but for another reason: that they could benefit Musk, according to a person familiar with the discussions. These lawmakers worry that private companies including Musk's X and OpenAI would not have to undergo the more stringent regulatory vetting process. Such companies 'could issue stablecoins with abandon, and that seems tailor-drafted for Elon Musk and his X platform,' said Hilary Allen, a professor at American University's Washington College of Law. Musk recently announced that X Money, a crypto token designed for payments on his social media platform, would enter beta testing soon. X Money did not respond to a request for comment. (Several Republicans said that Musk wasn't a factor in drafting the bill. Lawmakers had considered sorting companies based on revenue or user count, but ultimately decided on the public-versus-private test as the cleanest way to capture such firms, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions.) Democrats plan to introduce an amendment that would bar Big Tech companies -- publicly traded and private -- from creating their own stablecoins, according to a person with knowledge of the plan. Hawley said he would support such an amendment but was skeptical of its prospects. There is also a potential clash with the House. While the White House is pressuring Congress to pass the GENIUS Act, a competing House bill, the STABLE Act, calls for different regulatory requirements and a two-year moratorium on certain kinds of stablecoins. That, and the CLARITY Act, a recently proposed bill defining the broader market structure for digital assets, could complicate what shape a law would resemble. 'I've heard everything' is still on the table, said Tim Massad, a research fellow at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University and former chair of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
2025 will be a 'pivotal year' for Meta's augmented and virtual reality, says CTO
Meta CTO Andrew 'Boz' Bosworth, who was one of the company's first 15 engineers, published a memo earlier this year forecasting that 2025 could be the year of greatness for Reality Labs, the company's augmented and virtual reality unit. Or, it would be the year when the metaverse goes down as a 'legendary misadventure.' These days, Boz appears to be leaning towards its potential for greatness. But, the market will be the final determinant. 'We'll judge at the end of the decade, but this does feel like the pivotal year,' Boz said Thursday during a Bloomberg Technology interview. Boz noted that Meta's Ray Ban AI glasses had been a breakthrough that excited both consumers and competitors. As of February, Meta has sold more than 2 million pairs since their October 2023 debut. Last fall, they outsold traditional Ray Bans, even before Meta rolled out AI features. Meanwhile, Google last month announced partnerships with Gentle Monster and Warby Parker to create smart glasses based on Android XR. Apple is also reportedly making a push to release smart glasses in 2026. 'Suddenly, we go from toiling in the realms of obscurity to being very much in the world with a product that is very attractive to consumers, and thus competitors,' Boz said. 'The clock has started on competition coming, and that just means that the progress we make in this year is of disproportionate value to any year before or after it closes.' Still, competition among other incumbents means nothing if the market doesn't adopt Meta's AR and VR products, which is what would drive the industry to standardize the technology. 'The market is actually, especially when it comes to hardware, a trailing indicator,' Boz said. 'So you look for early indicators. To some degree, you do have to have a level of confidence and taste in-house.' He said this was something he learned from Sheryl Sandberg, former chief operating officer at Meta. 'Sheryl used to always talk about how most companies don't fail because they got beaten by a competitor,' Boz said. 'Most companies fail because they didn't execute their own plan correctly. And so what I try to do with the team is really focus us, not so much on the competitive landscape as on [whether] we're executing to our standards.' The Meta CTO said the company has 'a set of ambitious plans for the year' that it is on track for. 'What we'll know by the end of the year is whether we executed on our plan or not,' said Boz. 'What we'll know in five years time is whether that was enough.' This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
