Hip Mexican restaurant brings another late-night spot to Southeast Portland
PORTLAND, Ore. () — Late-night Mexican eats and cocktails are on the menu for a hip Southeast Portland eatery updating its weekend hours.
Located on 2832 SE Belmont St., is now open from 4 p.m. to 2 a.m. on Friday and Saturday. The business originally closed at 10 p.m. nightly.
Portland Diamond Project's stadium funding bill heads for House vote
Owner Lucy De León — whose parents founded Salsas Locas, previously known as Tortilleria Y Tienda DeLeon's — said she has wanted to extend the hours for 'a while' since .
'We wanted to create a space where people can unwind and celebrate summer, especially on the weekend,' De León told KOIN 6. 'We just feel like [in] Portland, you know there's always a shift of energy in summer.'
La Patroncita's food menu will be more limited past 10 p.m., when it will only serve customers over 21. The eatery will still offer small bites like chips and guacamole, shrimp ceviche, beef or cheese-stuffed flautas and pink churros — and the owner said chefs will remain 'open' to making other dishes, as long as the kitchen has the needed ingredients.
The restaurant's dinner menu additionally includes nachos, quesabirria, tacos and even churro cheesecake.
Thirsty guests can still look forward to a full bar. The eatery's summer cocktail menu includes beverages inspired by the flavors Mexican people 'grew up with,' like hibiscus and tamarind, according to De León. Beer and wine will be available as well.
St. Johns Bizarre seeks alternative options for lighting that could 'diminish' event
The restaurateur said the business also plans to host local talent, such as DJs and other artists, during its late-night service.
'It's important for us to be supporting our creative community, and it's part of our mission, too. We invite everyone to come and experience, you know, our space and our flavors and music and the magic of La Patroncita,' she said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
18 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
What will happen to food assistance under Trump's tax cut plan? A look at the numbers
President Trump's plan to cut taxes by trillions of dollars could also trim billions in spending from social safety net programs, including food assistance for lower-income people. The proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program would make states pick up more of the costs, require several million more recipients to work or lose their benefits, and potentially reduce the amount of food aid people receive in the future. The legislation, which narrowly passed the U.S. House, could undergo further changes in the Senate, where it's currently being debated. Trump wants lawmakers to send the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' to his desk by July 4, when the nation marks the 249th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Here's a look at the food assistance program, by the numbers: The federal aid program formerly known as food stamps was renamed the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, on Oct. 1, 2008. The program provides monthly payments for food purchases to low-income residents generally earning less than $1,632 monthly for individuals, or $3,380 monthly for a household of four. The nation's first experiment with food stamps began in 1939. But the modern version of the program dates to 1979, when a change in federal law eliminated a requirement that participants purchase food stamps. There currently is no cost to people participating in the program. A little over 42 million people nationwide received SNAP benefits in February, the latest month for which figures are available. That's roughly one out of every eight people in the country. Participation is down from a peak average of 47.6 million people during the 2013 federal fiscal year. Often, more than one person in a household is eligible for food aid. As of February, nearly 22.5 million households were enrolled in SNAP, receiving an average monthly household benefit of $353. The money can be spent on most groceries, but the Trump administration recently approved requests by six states — Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska and Utah — to exclude certain items, such as soda or candy. Legislation passed by the House is projected to cut about $295 billion in federal spending from SNAP over the next 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. A little more than half of those federal savings would come from shifting costs to states, which administer SNAP. Nearly one-third of those savings would come from expanding a work requirement for some SNAP participants, which the CBO assumes would force some people off the rolls. Additional money would be saved by eliminating SNAP benefits for between 120,000 and 250,000 immigrants legally in the U.S. who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents. Another provision in the legislation would cap the annual inflationary growth in food benefits. As a result, the CBO estimates that the average monthly food benefit would be about $15 lower than it otherwise would have been by 2034. To receive SNAP benefits, current law says adults ages 18 through 54 who are physically and mentally able and don't have dependents need to work, volunteer or participate in training programs for at least 80 hours a month. Those who don't do so are limited to just three months of benefits in a three-year period. The legislation that passed the House would expand work requirements to those ages 55 through 64. It also would extend work requirements to some parents without children younger than age 7. And it would limit the ability of states to waive work requirements in areas that lack sufficient jobs. The combined effect of those changes is projected by the CBO to reduce SNAP participation by a monthly average of 3.2 million people. The federal government currently splits the administrative costs of SNAP with states but covers the full cost of food benefits. Under the legislation, states would have to cover three-fourths of the administrative costs. States also would have to pay a portion of the food benefits starting with the 2028 fiscal year. All states would be required to pay at least 5% of the food aid benefits, and could pay more depending on how often they make mistakes with people's payments. States that had payment error rates between 6-8% in the most recent federal fiscal year for which data is available would have to cover 15% of the food costs. States with error rates between 8-10% would have to cover 20% of the food benefits, and those with error rates greater than 10% would have to cover 25% of the food costs. Many states could get hit with higher costs. The national error rate stood at 11.7% in the 2023 fiscal year, and just three states — Idaho, South Dakota and Vermont — had error rates below 5%. But the 2023 figures are unlikely to serve as the base year, so the exact costs to states remains unclear. As a result of the cost shift, the CBO assumes that some states would reduce or eliminate benefits for people. The House resolution containing the SNAP changes and tax cuts passed last month by a margin of just one vote — 215-214. A vote also could be close in the Senate, where Republicans hold 53 of the 100 seats. Democrats did not support the bill in the House and are unlikely to do so in the Senate. Some Republican senators have expressed reservations about proposed cuts to food assistance and Medicaid and the potential impact of the bill on the federal deficit. GOP Senate leaders may have to make some changes to the bill to ensure enough support to pass it. Lieb writes for the Associated Press.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
An Open Letter to the President: Addressing our Debt
Donald J. TrumpThe Mar-a-Lago Club1100 South Ocean BoulevardPalm Beach, Florida Dear President Trump: I voted for you in all three of your presidential campaigns. The first time, I cast my vote with cautious optimism. The third time, with enthusiasm. And I contributed financially to your campaign. You have achieved what few thought possible - a triumphant return, driven by a deep-seated belief among millions of Americans that only you can effectively challenge the entrenched political establishment. Your first 100 days were extraordinary, but if your presidency is to be remembered not just as bold but also historic, one challenge must rise above all others: - the national debt. The national debt, currently $37 trillion, is the result of pervasive fiscal irresponsibility, accumulated over many decades. Our annual interest payments now exceed $1trillion - more than we spend on our national defense. This is not just a financial burden. It is a threat to the survival of our country as a democratic republic. Without immediate, decisive action, the consequences are predictable: more credit downgrades, more increases in interest rates, and crippling obligations to service the debt. What would happen to our great country if annual interest payments exceeded not just our defense budget but also Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare? Mr. President, if we are to remain a vibrant nation, this exploding national debt has to be attacked immediately and significantly. That will not happen without your leadership. Sadly, the Republican Party has shown that it is not a reliable ally. Even before Republicans regained control of the House, they held a secret vote. By a margin of 158 to 2 they brought back earmarks - the very same pork barrel spending practices that Speaker John Boehner put to bed. Since then, the Democratic Congress never dared to bring back earmarks. House Republicans did. The results were predictable, and immediate: $16 billion in earmarks. More than 7,500 pet projects. In the Senate, eight of the 12 largest earmarkers are Republicans. In the House, 48 of the top earmarkers are Republicans. Here are the largest earmarkers: Sen. Susan Collins of Maine (population 1.4 million) secured $870 million in earmarks. Sen. Lisa Murkowski grabbed $851.1 million in earmarks. Sen. Mitch McConnell took nearly $500 million in earmarks. My own congressman, Brian Mast, walked away with $437 million in earmarks. Obviously, eliminating pork barrel spending wont, by itself, address the structural problems in Washingtons budget process - or make the "big, beautiful bill" currently being debated in Congress deficit-neutral. But if members of Congress cant even control themselves, what kind of example do they set for the American people? How can politicians ask their fellow Americans to sacrifice when they wont do it themselves? Actions speak louder than words. Fiscal irresponsibility dominates the culture within Congress, within our government. That culture, obviously, will not change on its own. It can be changed. But only with your leadership. Mr. President, fortunately, today you have a tool to attack waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence. Because of the cloud, Big Data, and the Freedom of Information Act, you can deliver every government expenditure to every citizens cell phone, iPad, and computer. You can bring a new era to government, i.e., transparency. Mr. President, you can be the launch pad for transparency. Imagine a government where every single taxpayer dollar that government spends is tracked and reported to the public. Imagine the cultural shift from secret votes, from wasteful spending to one where every government official knows their budgets will be scrutinized in detail. Mr. President, here are several all-encompassing, culture-changing, deficit-attacking actions you can announce tomorrow: Lead by example: Cut White House expenses by a defined percentage. Report the savings to the public every quarter. Challenge Congress: Ask every member to cut their office and committee budgets. Suggest at least 10%. Publish a quarterly report on every senator and representative. Eliminate pork-barrel projects: Call on Congress to abolish earmarks. Shine a light on every remaining earmarker until they fall in line. Mobilize the bureaucracy: Instruct all agencies to focus on rooting out waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence, and report the progress quarterly. Say explicitly that you will monitor progress and report the bold and expose the complacent. Bringing transparency to government can do more than clean up wasted taxpayer dollars. It can rebuild trust. It can remind the American people that the government can still work for them. It will solidify your legacy as the chief executive who did not just talk about draining the swamp, you did it. Imagine our country if we did not have to spend $1 trillion each year on interest payments. That is the future Americans deserve. Mr. President, you have been given a historic mandate. You can leave office with a legacy as the president who did not just promise to "Make America Great Again," but who actually did it. America cannot be made great again without addressing the greatest threat to our countrys survival as a democratic republic - the exploding national debt. Respectfully, Thomas W. Smith Thomas W. Smith is the founder of Prescott Investors, Inc.
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Bankrupt retailer sends urgent message after mass store closures
It's a pretty rough time to be in retail. On the one hand, it seems like most every small retailer is being gobbled up by a larger competitor. Related: Amazon makes a harsh decision amid concerning customer trend On the large, corporate side of things, however, things aren't any simpler. Bigger retail companies are grappling with a variety of problems that are now common among most stores around the U.S. Some of these include crushing levels of inventory shrink (the industry term for theft and other losses), changing customer preferences, and a race to the bottom for prices. This is especially difficult when shoppers expect nearly-instant and free shipping on everything -- a complicated effort when supply chains are either tied up or tariffs are taking their toll on global inventory. No matter which way you slice it, retail is a hard business to be in. And that's especially the case for many legacy mall retailers, who once enjoyed relative prowess in the U.S. shopping arena. What was once considered the gold standard for retail -- that is, having a large brick and mortar presence in shopping malls around the country -- has now become something more of a death knell. Image source: Bloomberg/Getty Across the country, many retailers that depend on malls for business are finding survival an increasingly uphill battle. With the exception of a few luxury malls located in particularly wealthy urban areas, the overarching trend across the country is that indoor shopping malls are on a downward trajectory. More closings: Popular local Dairy Queen rival suddenly closing, no bankruptcyAnother big Mexican chain closing down restaurant, no bankruptcyUPS suddenly closing more stores amid chaotic new change, layoffsPopular fast-food burger chain closes all restaurants in key area Popularity has waned for a variety of reasons. It's true that a lot more shoppers prefer to find products online, where things are often cheaper and more selection abounds. But it's also just an increasingly unappealing prospect to trudge through an indoor shopping mall in search of everything from furniture to formalwear. In the 1980s and 1990s, at the height of the indoor shopping mall, the average U.S. consumer spent 12 hours per month inside of one. Now, that number has dramatically dwindled, as it's easier to find products either online or at discount stores closer to home. Some of the largest mall retailers are the most vulnerable amidst changing consumer behavior. Forever 21, an iconic fast fashion store clustered mostly in and around shopping malls, is one such brand. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the second time in six years in March 2025. After it was unable to find a buyer, its operating parent company, F21 OpCo, said it would begin closing down all 354 of its leased U.S. stores by May 2025. Related: Another giant cosmetics brand closing store unexpectedly Now, however, Forever 21 has issued an update on social media, indicating things may not be completely over for the brand. "Hey Forever 21 Fam," Forever 21's official Instagram wrote in a post. "We know there's been some buzz, and we want to clear things up. Forever21 isn't going anywhere and we are still committed to bringing you the styles you love. Right now, we're evolving, refreshing and building what's next." "We get that change can feel unexpected," the post continued, "but we're excited for what's ahead, and we'll be sharing more with you soon. Thanks for sticking with us, you're the heart of everything we do." Forever 21's official website contains some information about the ongoing bankruptcy process. "Decisions about which stores will ultimately close are ongoing, pending further discussions with landlords and potential buyers," the site reads. Related: Troubled retailer puts 100s of stores at risk after drastic move The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
