Trump threatens to take over D.C. police and says he might deploy the National Guard
The president's remarks went further than his threat Tuesday to take federal control of the nation's capital after a well-known Department of Government Efficiency staffer was assaulted over the weekend.
Asked by a reporter at a White House event Wednesday if taking over the Metropolitan Police Department is an 'an option on the table,' Trump said it was.
'We're considering it. Yeah, because the crime is — is ridiculous,' Trump said before referencing the DOGE employee, Edward Coristine, without naming him.
'We have a capital that's very unsafe, you know, we just almost lost a young man, beautiful, handsome guy that got the hell knocked out of him the night before last," Trump said.
Trump then threatened to bring in the National Guard.
'What a shame, rate of crime, the rate of muggings, killings and everything else, we're not going to let it, and that includes bringing in the National Guard, maybe very quickly too,' he said.
A spokesperson for D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, declined to comment on Trump's remarks.
It wouldn't be the first time a Trump administration has deployed the National Guard in Washington. Following protests in the wake of George Floyd's murder in 2020, some of which turned violent, National Guard troops were brought in, despite opposition from Bowser.
Two months ago, Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles in a legally contested move amid protests related to the administration's immigration enforcement.
Violent crime in Washington is down 26% year to date, according to preliminary data from the Metropolitan Police Department.
Trump has long expressed a desire to assume control of the D.C. government. Washington has a limited ability to self-govern in which its laws and budget are subject to congressional oversight.
Taking over parts of the district involves a mix of congressional and unilateral actions. For example, Trump could unilaterally assume control of the police, but experts told NBC Washington earlier this year that it would require some 'justifying emergency' and would likely be challenged in court.
A full federal takeover of the district would require an act of Congress, in which both the House and Senate would need to vote to repeal the 1973 Home Rule Act that grants D.C. residents the right to elect their own city government.
Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for D.C., said in an interview with Fox News Wednesday night that she "totally" supports Trump if he decides to seek a federal takeover of the district.
"It's up to the president," Pirro said. "If that's what we need to do to get it done, that's what he should do. And I support the president."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mexico discounts risk of 'invasion' after Trump order to target cartels
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said Friday that there would be "no invasion of Mexico" following reports that President Donald Trump had ordered the US military to target Latin American drug cartels. "There will be no invasion of Mexico," Sheinbaum said after The New York Times reported that Trump had secretly signed a directive to use military force against cartels that his administration has declared terrorist organizations. "We were informed that this executive order was coming and that it had nothing to do with the participation of any military personnel or any institution in our territory," Sheinbaum told her regular morning conference. The Mexican foreign ministry said later that Mexico "would not accept the participation of US military forces on our territory." The remarks followed a statement released by the US embassy in Mexico, which said both countries would use "every tool at our disposal to protect our peoples" from drug trafficking groups. US ambassador to Mexico Ronald Johnson said on X that the countries "face a common enemy: the violent criminal cartels." The Pentagon referred questions on the issue to the White House, which did not immediately confirm the order. The Times said Trump's order provided an official basis for military operations at sea or on foreign soil against the cartels. In February, his administration designated eight drug trafficking groups as terrorist organizations. Six are Mexican, one is Venezuelan and the eighth originates in El Salvador. Two weeks ago, his administration added another Venezuelan gang, the Cartel of the Suns, which has shipped hundreds of tons of narcotics into the United States over two decades. On Thursday, the US Justice Department doubled to $50 million its bounty on Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro, whom it accuses of leading the Cartel of the Suns. Venezuela has dismissed the allegations, with Foreign Minister Yvan Gil calling it "the most ridiculous smokescreen we have ever seen." Sheinbaum has made strenuous efforts to show Trump she is acting against her country's cartels, whom he accuses of flooding the United States with drugs, particularly fentanyl. "We are cooperating, we are collaborating, but there will be no invasion. That is absolutely ruled out," she said. She said that in "every call" with US officials, Mexico insisted that this "is not permitted." The 63-year-old has been dubbed the "Trump whisperer" for repeatedly securing reprieves from his threats of stiff tariffs over the smuggling of drugs and migrants across their shared border. yug/cb/sst/abs/tym
NBC News
17 minutes ago
- NBC News
Zelenskyy rejects Trump's proposal that Ukraine could swap territories with Russia
A defiant Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy declared Saturday that his countrymen 'will not give their land to occupiers,' after President Donald Trump suggested that a peace deal would include some "swapping" of territories with Russia. 'The answer to Ukraine's territorial question is already in the constitution of Ukraine,' Zelenskyy said in a message on Telegram early Saturday. 'No one will and no one can deviate from it. Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier.' His comments came after Trump announced on social media that a long-awaited meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin had been scheduled for next week in Alaska.
Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Texas just opened Pandora's box, and voters everywhere could pay the price
Redistricting is meant to occur every 10 years after the census. District maps should ensure that all voters have an equal chance to influence their representation, not to serve the personal or political interests of those in power at a given moment. Advertisement What makes this instance particularly troubling is the brazen nature of the effort. Trump and Republican leaders in Texas have been blunt: This new map is designed purely for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But this is not just a Texas problem. The consequences are already rippling outward: Lawmakers in New York and California are now considering redrawing their own maps in response — not to better serve communities but to counterbalance Texas's partisan moves. This tit-for-tat escalation is exactly what our democratic system cannot afford. Partisan gerrymandering has always been problematic, but Texas's mid-decade redistricting solely for political advantage is particularly corrosive to our democracy. Political leaders in Washington, D.C., have been gutting health care, tearing apart families with abusive deportation squads, and using federal power for revenge and personal gain. Rather than earning electoral victories by engaging with their constituents and championing policies that improve people's lives, they have chosen to simply redraw the district boundaries. As state Representative Advertisement This power grab is particularly harmful in Texas, a state with a long history of racially discriminatory map drawing and other forms of voter suppression. In Americans deserve better. We deserve fair maps designed to reflect communities, not to boost the political fortunes of the map drawers. And no matter which party is in power, partisan gerrymandering cannot come at the expense of voters of color and diluting their vote and voice. We the voters should choose our elected officials — not the other way around. This moment demands national urgency. Mid-decade gerrymandering to avoid answering to voters is already dangerous. Now the governor and attorney general of Texas are Advertisement Texas's actions set a dangerous precedent. If the nation's second largest state can conduct partisan redistricting mid-decade with impunity, other states will follow suit. We're witnessing a race to the bottom that erodes faith in democratic institutions, regardless of which party benefits. We the people are supposed to command our own fate. That means our representatives are supposed to work for us. Texas must back away from mid-decade redistricting. And Congress must act to end partisan gerrymandering and protect the freedom to vote for all Americans, especially those most targeted by these power grabs. Texas is showing us what happens when those in power use that power to entrench themselves instead of serving their constituents. If Texas gets away with this, this mid-decade power grab won't be an aberration — it will drag other states into the same game, and voters and our democracy will be the losers.
