Children of non-local talent must reside 2 years in Hong Kong for education benefits
The government announced on Thursday the key change requiring holders of dependent visas or entry permits under the age of 18 to have lived in the city for two years before applying for subsidised sub-degree, undergraduate and post-graduate programmes as local students.
'To clarify the eligibility criteria for government-subsidised post-secondary student institutions and subsidies and to ensure the proper use of public funds, the Education Bureau ... considers it necessary for dependent children to reside in Hong Kong for two years before becoming eligible,' the bureau said.
'Holders of a full-time employment visa/work permit or a visa/entry permit for various admission schemes will no longer be eligible for government-subsidised post-secondary student places.'
The bureau said the revision would take effect from the 2027-28 academic year, with the application cycle starting in October 2026.
It added that the time frame would ensure reasonable time for applicants to make their own plans.
In October 2024, a group of parents claimed that some individuals and intermediaries arranged for non-local talent who had no intention of settling in Hong Kong to apply for various admission schemes to obtain dependent visas for their children's tertiary education in the city.
This is due to non-local students paying tuition fees that are three times higher than those of local students.
About 142,000 children under the age of 18 were approved for entry as dependants under various talent admission schemes up to May this year. May Tse
Students who first received dependent visas or entry permits when they were under 18 years old are considered local under the Joint University Programmes Admissions System (Jupas), a centralised application system for full-time undergraduate courses.
The parents said that non-local families arranged for children to attend tutorial classes in mainland China to prepare for the city's university entrance exams as private candidates, thereby labelling them as 'examination immigrants'.
Once admitted, these children would only need to pay the local tuition fee of HK$44,500 (US$5,668), whereas non-local students are required to pay three times that amount.
About 142,000 children under the age of 18 were approved for entry as dependants under various talent admission schemes up to May this year, according to official data.
While immigration authorities did not provide an age breakdown, they earlier reported a significant increase in the number of dependants admitted to public universities through Jupas.
According to the Jupas Office, the number of dependants admitted to University Grants Committee-funded first-year first-degree programmes in the three academic years from 2022-23 to 2024-25 was 62, 68 and 185, respectively.
The 172 per cent surge over the past two years coincided with the launch of the Top Talent Pass Scheme in late December 2022.
The Top Talent Pass Scheme, which is popular among mainlanders, is open to candidates who earned more than HK$2.5 million over the past 12 months or graduates of the world's top 100 universities.
Lawmaker Gary Zhang Xinyu said that tightening the requirements was a responsible decision for local students and the future education system, noting that 2,500 non-locals, mostly from the mainland, took the university entrance exam this year, 13 times more than the number recorded in 2021 and the highest since 2012.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Australia targets Southeast Asians with eased foreign student cap
Australia will raise its cap on foreign students by 9 per cent to 295,000 next year and prioritise applicants from Southeast Asia , the government said on Monday. Limits on places were announced last year as a way to rein in record migration that had contributed to a surge in housing prices, with 270,000 places made available for 2025. An additional 25,000 places were being granted in 2026 as the policy successfully brought down 'out of control' international student numbers, the government said. 'This is about making sure international education grows in a way that supports students, universities and the national interest,' Education Minister Jason Clare said in a statement. Australia granted nearly 600,000 student visas in the 2023 financial year, as international students returned to the country in record numbers following Covid-19 Australia's largest cohorts of students come from China and India As well as introducing the cap on numbers, the government also more than doubled the visa fee for foreign students in 2024 and pledged to close loopholes in rules that allowed them to continuously extend their stay.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Slovak PM Robert Fico to attend China's WWII commemorations amid EU tensions
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico has confirmed he will attend China's World War II commemorations next month, making him the first EU leader to publicly announce his plans to be at the event, which will feature a military parade in Tiananmen Square. Advertisement 'Apparently, I will visit China again on the occasion of the celebration of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II,' Fico said in a video posted on his private social media account on Sunday. 'I would like to use this visit to confirm joint economic projects and intentions.' Fico is the first leader of a Nato member state to confirm attendance at the commemoration. Chinese President Xi Jinping meets Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico during an official visit to China in November. Photo: Xinhua His comes as Brussels and Beijing struggle to bridge their broad political divide, with the two parties failing to make any major progress at a summit last month.
AllAfrica
4 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Trump's tariffs to hurt the US more than most others
The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US-European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. The tariffs reduce US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead. Niven Winchester is professor of economics, Auckland University of Technology This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
