Victoria's Whitney Gardner explores fame, phantoms and free (not haunted) pianos in new graphic novel
"That piano is obviously very haunted," she told CBC's North by Northwest host Margaret Gallagher.
And while she never learned the story of that particular piano, the Victoria-based author and illustrator felt moved to write her own story that includes a haunted instrument. The book, a young adult graphic novel, is centred around a pre-teen girl searching for fame. It begins in 1980 and then jumps forward to the present day.
"When I sat down to write the book, I first thought that it would be like this big wooden stand up piano haunted by a Victorian ghost," Gardner said. "I kept hitting roadblocks and hitting the wall and not wanting to write this sad dreary piano music book. And then I realized, wait, I'm in charge. I can write whatever I want."
So, she chose a haunted synthesizer, one just like the model John Carpenter used to compose the soundtracks for the Halloween horror films.
In Gardner's book, the synthesizer is haunted by a ghost from the 80s, named Vision. The ghost is based on the American pop star Tiffany, who rose to fame with her cover of I Think We're Alone Now in 1987.
While writing the book Gardner watched the music video for I Think We're Alone Now every day.
"Just to put myself in the mindset of this superstar and also to see all of the backgrounds and the antics of the 80s," Gardner said.
The book's main character, Margot, has a lot in common with her creator, Gardner. For one, they both have fathers who spent much of their lives in search of fame, which left Margot and Gardner feeling that they had to compete for attention with their father's fans. Second, Margot and Gardner both tend to write light-hearted pieces.
"There's a lot of myself in Margot, probably more so than any of the other books I've written."
LISTEN | The story behind Whitney Gardner's latest book:
In the story, Vision and Margot share a commonality: by making music that makes them popular, they're giving up making music for themselves.
Gardner is both the author and illustrator of this book as well as her previous works, Fake Blood and Long Distance. While art and drawing are her first loves, writing stories for younger audiences has become her passion.
"These books, comic books, have more pictures than any kind of book. This is where my heart is now. I sort of fell in love with telling stories through words and pictures together. And now it's like all I want to do."
Free Piano (Not Haunted) is available now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
American Eagle Defends Sydney Sweeney Ad Campaign Amid Controversy: ‘Her Jeans. Her Story… Great Jeans Look Good on Everyone'
American Eagle is standing by its controversial ad campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney, which includes various commercials with the tagline: 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans.' The campaign creates a pun around 'great genes,' which ignited outrage online over American Eagle glorifying the Emmy nominee's white heritage and thin physique. Some users on social media even compared the ads to 'Nazi propaganda.' 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story,' the company said in a statement posted on social media. 'We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone. More from Variety JD Vance Urges Democrats Angry Over Sydney Sweeney Jeans Ads to Keep It Up: 'Continue to Tell Everybody' Who Thinks She Is Attractive That They're 'a Nazi' White House Says Liberal Outrage Over Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle Jeans Commercial Is 'Moronic' and a 'Big Reason Americans' Voted for Trump Katy O'Brian Says Sydney Sweeney 'Didn't Care' About Getting Hurt During Fight Scenes in Christy Martin Biopic: 'She Was Like, "If You Break My Nose, That's Fine"' Sweeney's American Eagle campaign caused so much chatter online that even Trump's White House weighed in on the backlash, with communications manager Steven Cheung calling the backlash a prime example of 'cancel culture run amok.' 'This warped, moronic and dense liberal thinking is a big reason why Americans voted the way they did in 2024,' Cheung added. 'They're tired of this bullshit.' Vice president JD Vance also mocked liberals for creating a hysteria around the American Eagle campaign, saying on an episode of the 'Ruthless' podcast: 'My political advice to the Democrats is continue to tell everybody who thinks Sydney Sweeney is attractive is a Nazi. That appears to be their actual strategy.' Vance continued, 'I mean, it actually reveals something pretty interesting about the Dems, though, which is that you have, like, a normal all-American beautiful girl doing like a normal jeans ad, right? They're trying to sell, you know, sell jeans to kids in America and they have managed to so unhinge themselves over this thing. And it's like, you guys, did you learn nothing from the November 2024 election? I actually thought that one of the lessons [Democrats] might take is we're going to be less crazy. And the lesson they have apparently taken is we're going to attack people as Nazis for thinking Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.' Even Stephen Colbert, who frequently speaks out against Trump and the White House, called the backlash against Sweeney and American Eagle overblown 'Now, some people look at [the ads] and they're seeing something sinister, saying that the genes-jeans denim wordplay in an ad featuring a white blond woman means American Eagle could be promoting eugenics, white supremacy and Nazi propaganda,' Colbert said this week on 'The Late Show.' 'That might be a bit of an overreaction.' Sweeney has yet to publicly comment on the outcry over the advertisements. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025 What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Fantastic Four: First Steps' review: Ugh, here we go again
movie review FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Running time: 115 minutes. Rated PG-13 (action/violence and some language). In theaters July 25. Calling 'Fantastic Four: First Steps' the best 'Fantastic Four' movie is not exactly a quote I'd advise Disney to slap on the poster. Talk about grading on a curve. The last three pathetic attempts to put the story of Mister Fantastic, the Invisible Woman, the Human Torch and the Thing onscreen have made miserable viewers go, 'Global annihilation? Sounds nice.' Not to be deterred, the Marvel Cinematic Universe is dragging the raggedy group out of storage for their 37th movie. That figure is unfortunately not a typo. The result? 'First Steps' marks a slight improvement from the preceding trilogy of terror. But Marvel still can't nail what should be one of its premiere attractions. 'Fantastic Four'? Forgettable, 1 ½. The movie begins, appropriately, with a pep in its step. Dropping the heroes in the retro-futuristic NYC that appears to be a technologically advanced 1960s is the right call by director Matt Shakman and his army of screenwriters. There's 'Jetsons' visual panache that sets the film apart from the other, oy, 36. The team's New York lair could be the TWA Hotel at JFK. Also, gold star for racing through the exposition in a newsreel at the beginning — four years ago some astronauts got neat powers in space, yada yada — to avoid the usual origin story portentousness. However, trembling in fear, 'First Steps' can't resist the comic-book urge to contort the mood ASAP to grave, gloomy and un-fun for most of the runtime. The stakes may be stratospherically high, but our serotonin levels are low, low, low. For the supes, Marvel has recruited some super-serious actors. There's Pedro Pascal, who has probably been frowning so much because he's overworked, as stretchy Reed Richards; Vanessa Kirby, making Medea seem like the life of the party, as vanishing Sue Storm; Joseph Quinn, nervously tip-toeing around genuine comedy, as flaming Johnny Storm; and Ebon Moss-Bachrach with a Zen take on rocky Ben Grimm. They're all fine, if oddly joyless for people wearing powder-blue 'Star Trek' uniforms. I can't say I ever want to see them play these parts again. Good thing they've been cast in at least two more MCU films through 2027. The Four face a couple foes. There's the humongous Galactus, who is essentially Megatron from 'Transformers.' And his shiny cowabunga henchwoman, the Silver Surfer, played by Julia Garner. Whose dumb idea was it to cast Garner, one of the most expressive and electric actors working today, as a slab of metal that speaks in monotone? Fee-fi-ho-hum Galactus is going to gobble up the world. But he offers the Four another option: He'll slow his roll if Reed and Sue hand over their new baby. The doting parents aren't on board with that plan. So, in a scene that lasts — I kid you not — two minutes, they try and fail to teleport the Earth to another part of the universe. In the end, Galactus goes Godzilla and stomps around Manhattan crushing skyscrapers. The Thing, a dude made of rocks, is the closest the movie comes to a fleshed-out person. And only because he cooks pasta and flirts with Natasha Lyonne twice. I'll give 'First Steps' this: It doesn't tie itself in knots making tedious connections to the rest of the MCU. The story is relatively simple, if poorly paced, and the neat aesthetic imagines what an Apple Store would look like during the Kennedy administration. But that's just not enough to prevent Shakman from joining the sorry ranks of filmmakers who couldn't wrap their heads around what the tone of the Fantastic Four should be. Are they funny? Are they grounded? Are they deep? The film is so unbalanced, one wonders if the director and writers donned a blindfold and threw a dart. How dramatic and depressing can a character named Mister Fantastic possibly be? Just you wait. During the climactic battle scene, Galactus torturously stretches Mister Fantastic nearly beyond his limits as Pascal wails an excruciating cry worthy of 'One Life to Live.' I, on the other hand, let out a big laugh. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
American Eagle Responds to Backlash Over Sydney Sweeney Campaign: 'It Was Always About the Jeans'
American Eagle has responded after its latest denim campaign with actress Sydney Sweeney was greeted with an online backlash. The brand issued a statement on August 1 following backlash that the campaign slogan 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans' was a tone-deaf and offensive pun, one which some said was advocating for eugenics. The ad, which debuted on July 23, features the Euphoria and Anyone But You star modeling American Eagle denim as she is accompanied by her German shepherd, Sully Bear. In one of the campaign clips that has been widely shared, Sweeney says, 'Eyes up here,' as the camera pans across her body, with viewers questioning the intent of the commercial's sexual tone and marketing strategy. But it was not just the racy photos that created a buzz. Offense was taken at the headline 'Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans,' which was seen as an objectionable allusion to Sweeney's physical characteristics, such as her blonde hair, blue eyes, and white race, because of the homophone of 'jeans' and 'genes.' Critics took it a step further when some on social media linked the campaign to a legacy of beauty standards long predicated on exclusionary ideas. One since-removed version of the ad even called out Sweeney's blue eyes, fueling further speculation that the campaign was using retro, racially charged aesthetics. Some went as far as to say it was reminiscent of Nazi propaganda, with some accusing the brand of aping eugenics language for the sake of catchy wordplay. In an statement published on Instagram, American Eagle denied those claims: ''Sydney Sweeney has great jeans' is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We'll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone.' The company emphasized that the campaign's focus was denim and individuality, not genetics or appearances. However, there is still controversy over the tone and audience of the advertisement. Critics argued that the campaign was for the male gaze, despite being designed to sell women's clothing. An Instagram commenter wrote under AE's post, 'This was not the move AE, we needed and wanted something DIFFERENT as women.' The scandal has even touched the political arena. On July 29, Steven Cheung, Director of Communications at the White House, had this to say on X (formerly Twitter), 'Cancel culture run amok,' suggesting that the outrage over the advert might be overboard. As for Sydney Sweeney herself, the 27-year-old actress has remained largely removed from the drama. Aside from posting one image from the campaign on her Instagram grid, Sweeney has continued to post casual content featuring her dogs and snippets from her daily life, seemingly bypassing the media storm. While not the inaugural fashion brand to be rebuked for sexy denim ads, this does bring to mind past controversies, such as the 1980 Calvin Klein campaign starring a then-15-year-old Brooke Shields. The campaign included the line, 'You want to know what comes between me and my Calvins? Nothing.' Shields later told Vogue she was 'naive' to the ad's implications, although she did acknowledge its lasting cultural relevance. 'The controversy backfired,' Shields said in the 2021 interview. 'The campaign was really successful, and then the underwear overtook the jeans.' It remains to be seen if American Eagle's latest marketing mishap will have the same destiny or enjoy the same lifespan. In the meantime, the brand insists that it's standing by its campaign and standing by Sweeney. The post American Eagle Responds to Backlash Over Sydney Sweeney Campaign: 'It Was Always About the Jeans' appeared first on Where Is The Buzz | Breaking News, Entertainment, Exclusive Interviews & More. Solve the daily Crossword
