Protecting children ‘religious, moral duty of society'
On the World Day Against Child Labour, observed annually on June 12, the Council declared that addressing child exploitation and forced labour is a collective responsibility and demands unified efforts to develop sound policies, enact stringent laws, ensure social protection and quality education, foster a culture of societal responsibility towards children, and intensify initiatives to combat poverty and ignorance, which rank among the leading causes of child labour.
The Council praised the programmes and initiatives by various nation states and institutions that empower families and promote education, thereby helping curb this grave issue and fostering a safe environment for every child's healthy development.
The Council's statement also emphasised that in Islam, a child is a dignified being entitled to care, education, protection, and growth in a secure and nurturing environment.
Furthermore, the Council underscored the critical role of religious, educational, and media institutions in raising awareness and educating communities to combat this issue, actively shaping a collective consciousness that prioritises child protection which is especially vital in today's world, where wars and conflicts intensify the suffering of countless innocent children.
The Document on Human Fraternity, which was co-signed in 2019 in Abu Dhabi by the Grand Imam of Al Azhar, Chairman of the Muslim Council of Elders, alongside the late Pope Francis, Pontiff of the Catholic Church at the time, asserts that children's fundamental rights to family upbringing, nutrition, education, and care constitute a moral duty and responsibility for families and society.
These rights must be upheld, defended, and guaranteed for every child worldwide, without exception.
Additionally, any practice that undermines their dignity or violates their rights must be condemned, and vigilance is required to address the risks and violations they face in any form.
WAM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
5 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Pope Leo XIV to Visit Lebanon in First Foreign Trip as Pontiff
Pope Leo XIV is expected to make his first foreign trip as pontiff to Lebanon by December, according to Patriarch Bechara Rai, head of the country's Maronite Church. Preparations are already under way for the historic visit, he told Al Arabiya. Pope Leo, the first pope from the United States, was elected in May following the death of Pope Francis. Since his election, he has voiced calls for peace in the Middle East and urged a ceasefire in Gaza after Israel bombed the strip's only Catholic church, killing several people. The pontiff met Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, a Maronite Christian, at the Vatican in June. Both reaffirmed their commitment to dialogue between religions and cultures, with the pope expressing solidarity with Lebanon on the fifth anniversary of the Beirut port explosion. Pope Leo had earlier hinted at a possible visit to Turkey for the 1,700th anniversary of the First Council of Nicaea, but it remains unclear if the Lebanon trip will be linked to that occasion. Lebanon holds particular significance for the Church, with Christians making up around 30 percent of the population and the Maronite Church remaining in full communion with Rome. Foreign travel has become central to the papacy, with Pope Francis visiting 68 countries during 47 trips in his 12-year tenure, including landmark journeys to the UAE and Iraq.
Middle East Eye
a day ago
- Middle East Eye
UAE anti-terror laws 'cover' for crackdown on peaceful dissent, report shows
The United Arab Emirates' landmark 2014 anti-terror law is being used as a tool of political control rather than a way to protect national security, a new report by Women Journalists Without Chains (WJWC) said. The non-governmental organisation was founded in 2005 by Yemeni Nobel Peace Prize laureate, Tawakkol Karman. In a 48-page report released last week, the findings point to vague legal provisions in the UAE that allow for what the authors have couched as dangerous prosecutorial overreach. Federal Law No. 7 of 2014 represents the UAE's most comprehensive legal instrument addressing terrorism-related offenses. It was created because of a confluence of regional instability and the UAE's own strategic recalibration. There was also the regional rise of the Islamic State, which added to the urgency of the law's development. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Reformists have also long said that the law was designed to halt the rise of a popular brand of political Islam in the early 2010s. But its criminalisation efforts under broad terms such as "offending the state" and "undermining national unity" raise significant human rights concerns, the report said. "Compounding this issue is the law's reference to individuals who 'threaten', 'aim', 'plan', or 'seek' to commit terrorist crimes - formulations so vague that they could encompass expressions of opinion, political advocacy or even the exercise of conscience," the authors said. As a result, Federal Law No. 7 has caused the suppression of civil society engagement and dissent, leading to the detention of journalists, lawyers and academics, and creating a chilling effect across the country, the report explained. Among the most notable cases are individuals who received a decade or longer prison sentences for being part of the so-called 'UAE 94': when 94 activists were prosecuted for allegedly plotting to overthrow the government in the wake of the Arab Spring in 2012-2013. UAE top court upholds life terms for 24 convicted in mass trial Read More » The detainees were largely affiliated with the political reform party al-Islah, whose approach was solely non-violent. But for some of the most high profile dissidents, serving their sentence was not enough - the UAE tried several of them again in 2022-2023 under the vague terms of the 2014 anti-terror law, and extended their sentences, the report showed. Many of the alleged activities in the case that became known as the 'UAE 84' in its second round pre-dated the anti-terror law itself, raising concerns about the retroactive application of criminal law. Human rights lawyer Mohammed al-Roken - after spending a decade in prison - is now serving a life sentence for opposing the act of citizenship revocation by the Emirati government, the report said. Activists Maryam al-Balushi and Amina al-Abdouli were sentenced to an additional three years in prison in 2021 for "publishing information that disturbs public order", after they shared audio recordings with United Nations Special Procedures, in which they described torture and abuse in UAE prisons. "The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that both women were subjected to unfair trials and arbitrary detention. Their cases demonstrate how the law is used to silence prisoners who expose abuse, even while in custody," the report said. And even though they are now working in exile, Mohammed al-Zaabi and Hamad al-Shamsi, who remain advocates for the UAE's political prisoners, have been added to the country's terrorism blacklist. Recommendations But it's not just criticism of the UAE and its ruling family that has landed people in prison. The economist Nasser bin Ghaith has been arrested multiple times for his critical views of regional governments. In 2017 he was sentenced to a decade behind bars on charges including "offending the state" and "communicating with banned groups". Families of political prisoners often face harassment, travel bans and surveillance, and live in fear of acts of retaliation, the report also said. "These cases reflect the systematic use of counterterrorism legislation to dismantle civil society, criminalize peaceful expression and suppress legitimate dissent rather than targeting genuine threats," WJWC noted. Punishments in the UAE for perceived terror offenses also far exceed the international standard, it showed. "Arbitrary deprivation of liberty is prohibited; detention must be time-bound and subject to judicial oversight," the report said, adding that there must be "independent and transparent investigations into all torture allegations, holding perpetrators accountable". But the UAE allows for indefinite detention in "counseling centres" even after a prison sentence is served, without a clear path to contest continued detention. There are also no independent authorities to investigate torture complaints, which are widespread, the report indicated. "The UAE's continued failure to ratify key international treaties, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and its non-compliance with obligations under instruments it has ratified - such as the Convention Against Torture - highlight a profound gap between international human rights commitments and domestic legal practice," the authors wrote. The WJWC also issued a call to "international actors - including UN bodies, human rights organisations and the UAE's Western allies - to exert meaningful diplomatic and policy pressure to encourage reforms". The report argued that because the UAE presents itself as a key global counterterrorism partner, it legitimises its policies to governments abroad, when it is only further asserting authoritarian control. The WJWC urged immediate changes toward detailing the language in the anti-terror law, ensuring transparency in independent judicial proceedings and allowing public access to trials. It called for the repeal of provisions allowing for indefinite detention, and a "guarantee" that any "rehabilitation" programmes are in fact voluntary. The UAE must also assume full engagement with UN human rights bodies and allow for country visits for compliance assessments, the WJWC argued.
The National
a day ago
- The National
US could demand concessions from Lebanon to keep UN troops in place
The US could be persuaded to keep UN peacekeepers in Lebanon if the country makes concessions that would allow their budget and numbers to be cut, a retired Lebanese general has said. Members of the UN Security Council began debating on Monday whether to extend the mandate of Unifil, the UN interim force in Lebanon, for another year. The US holds a veto in the council and has yet to make its position known. The US could seek to 'extort' as many concessions as it can to allow the mandate to be extended, said Gen Mounir Shehadeh, who was the Lebanese government's co-ordinator with Unifil from 2021 to 2023. The prospect of cuts has led to concern from Lebanese officials that the peacekeepers would be rendered ineffective against surveillance efforts by Israel. Unifil had for several years sought to install advanced surveillance cameras and other equipment along the Blue Line that separates Israel and Lebanon. The Lebanese government resisted because of fears they might be used for espionage. But now Beirut could find itself in a tight corner as it wants Unifil's mandate to be renewed, and says the country's cash-strapped and overstretched army is not yet able to patrol the full area on its own. Donald Trump 's administration took an axe to peacekeeping budgets and the US was deeply dubious, at best, over the mission in southern Lebanon. The result is that Lebanon could be pressured to allow the surveillance cameras to be installed so the US might accept Unifil's mandate being extended for another year. 'The tap is closed, no more money, Unifil personnel is going to be reduced, and Unifil's mandate may end. So instead of ending it they're considering installing cameras with Britain's donation,' said Gen Shehadeh. 'The issue of extending Unifil mandate has an element of extortion in it … first of all they want to extort an agreement on the surveillance towers, secondly on the extension of Unifil's powers,' he said. The towers could be set up by the British, who helped build observation towers in eastern Lebanon to help in the fight against ISIS and prevent smuggling along the border with Syria. 'I know the surveillance towers well, and I was with the British [when they were installed]. The towers on the eastern borders work like a microwave – they are easily breached. 'What's the excuse? There are no more personnel. There's no budget. America won't pay. What's the alternative – to remove Unifil?' said Gen Shehadeh. The UN council this week began debating a resolution drafted by France to extend the Unifil's mandate for a year, before its current one expires at the end of August. The Trump administration and Israel have made no secret of their willingness to end the mandate. The US has significantly cut its funding to peacekeeping operations, while Israel has claimed – without evidence – that Unifil members are effectively human shields for Hezbollah. Under a fragile ceasefire agreed between Hezbollah and Israel last year, the Lebanese army has been posting to the south and dismantling the group's infrastructure there. The government has also been pushing to disarm the group by the end of the year. Despite the truce, Israel continues to bomb Lebanon on a daily basis and occupy five points of Lebanese territory. Without Unifil present, there are fears Israel could seek to expand on the five points it occupies in southern Lebanon and create a full-on buffer zone up to the Litani River, Gen Shehadeh said. Unifil is frequently accused of bias from all sides, which it denies. Hezbollah sympathisers in Lebanon have frequently often the UN mission of collusion with Israel and sometimes attacked peacekeepers on patrol.
