Coloma Township Board votes to sell former US Bank building amid rising costs
Apr. 11—ROCK FALLS — The Coloma Township Board and township residents unanimously voted at their annual township meeting Tuesday to sell the former US Bank building the township bought two years ago.
The board blamed escalating costs to upgrade it for township use and maintenance and accessibility costs as the main reasons for selling the still vacant building at 300-302 First Ave. in Rock Falls. Township residents at the meeting also were allowed to participate in the voice vote on the measure because the vote took place during the annual meeting.
"We're going to be lucky to get what we put into it," said Becky Williamson, who has served as township clerk but was elected to the board as a trustee at the April 1 consolidated election.
The building costs the township about $60,000 annually to own and it would cost about $40,000 to complete the needed renovations to make it compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act and up to code, said Coloma Township Supervisor Kristine Dobbs.
Already, the township's former leadership took out two lines of credit totaling $200,000 to pay for earlier renovations and "they used most of it," leaving about $1,000 available for use, Dobbs said.
Another problem is its size, according to township board members. The two-story building is 15,616 square feet and includes a lobby area, general office area, private offices, teller windows, public restrooms, a bank vault and a break room with a large on-site parking lot.
"It's a very large building for a small township to have," Dobbs said, adding that the township doesn't have the staff needed to fill it.
The initial plan for the US Bank
When the Coloma Township Board purchased the building in February 2023 for $250,000, then-Township Supervisor Sindy Sotelo had hoped to use the building for township offices and expand community services by adding a lending library, a community garden, a thrift store, and an arts and crafts workroom.
In a letter to residents, township board members at the time of the purchase said the property was accessible to people with disabilities but would need about $10,000 to fix the roof and between $25,000 and $50,000 to rewire the electrical system.
Current Coloma Township Board members said other problems came into play soon after the township bought the building, not just the cost to bring it up to code. Another was that the township failed to file the proper paperwork for tax exemption, ended up paying taxes it wouldn't have needed to and was charged more because the taxes were paid after the due date, board members said.
The building was to be exempt from property taxes as a government building. But, in this case, the township failed to submit the required forms before the due date and ended up paying a property tax bill of $7,968.88 in 2024, according to Whiteside County tax bill information.
Sotelo has declined three requests from Shaw Local for an interview. She did provide written statements via text message and a copy of her resignation letter.
"Last year we had to pay a portion of the taxes for the new building, which was a couple thousand when the paperwork must have gotten lost," Sotelo wrote in a text message.
Another problem is the bank building has not been able to open for township use. Once the building purchase was complete, the structure still needed several repairs before the city of Rock Falls could issue a certificate of occupancy.
Rock Falls Building Inspector Mark Searing sent a letter to Sotelo on Jan. 8, 2024, reminding her of that after he was notified that the township "intends or has already begun occupying the building for its general purposes, including holding public meetings at the location."
Those repairs included electrical upgrades, a nonworking elevator and missing ceiling tiles, Searing wrote.
The letter goes on to say, "You must not occupy the building for any purposes ... until an occupancy certificate is issued."
The first building permit was issued Feb. 20, 2024. The permit was for replacing the drop ceiling, erecting a wall and installing two commercial doors, according to a copy of the permit.
Another permit was issued March 26, 2024, also for remodeling. It included adding an interior window and a door, according to the permit.
The next month, permits were issued on April 11 and 29. The first was for electrical upgrades to bring the wiring up to code and the second was for installing exit lights, according to the permits.
Thomas Houck, vice president and architect at Willett Hofmann & Associates, an engineering consultant in Dixon, completed a required code review on Sept. 27, 2024. Included was a letter, addressed to Sotelo, listing several issues with the building that needed to be resolved before an occupancy certificate could be issued. They included the need for the required number of handicap parking spaces, property signage for accessible entrances and changes to the second-floor bathroom to make it accessible.
In the wake of Tuesday night's decision, the township now will get the building appraised before it lists it for sale. State statute mandates the township sell the building for at least 80% of its market value.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Commissioners award almost $100,000 in Community Re-Invest grants
CLARKS SUMMIT — Lackawanna County grant funding will help defray the cost of a crosswalk safety initiative in Clarks Summit, a spay and neuter clinic in Scranton, and other projects and purchases planned by local municipalities and nonprofits. Meeting Wednesday in Clarks Summit, Commissioners Bill Gaughan and Chris Chermak unanimously approved nearly $100,000 in grants through the county's popular Community Re-Invest Program, with 20 projects receiving grants in the first of two program funding rounds this year. The successful applicants, funding amounts and projects include: • Blakely Borough Police Department: $5,000 to defray the $11,143 cost of purchasing a drone. • Shopa-Davey VFW Post 6082, Blakely: $5,000 to defray the $8,900 cost of repairing/replacing the roofs of the post's storage and chicken barbecue buildings. • Blakely Borough Community Ambulance Association: $4,350 to cover the cost of training equipment. • Clarks Summit Borough: $4,958 to cover the cost of a crosswalk safety initiative. • Abington Junior Comets Football Club: $5,000 to cover most of the $5,158 cost of concessions equipment and uniform upgrades. • Covington Twp.: $5,000 to defray the $9,789 cost of painting the exterior of a new police station. • American Legion Post 665, Dickson City: $5,000 to defray the $8,069 cost of a basement water project. • Center for the Living City, Dunmore: $5,000 to defray the $24,000 cost of 'Lighting Up Scranton 2025,' with grant funding supporting equipment, marketing and artist payments. • Elmhurst Twp. Sewer Authority: $5,000 to cover the cost of public restroom facilities accessibility upgrades. • Madison Twp.: $5,000 to defray the $6,400 cost of a disabled ramp covering project at the Township Building. • William Walker Hose Company, Mayfield: $5,000 to cover the cost of firefighting equipment. • Mayfield Borough: $5,000 to cover the cost of municipal meeting room upgrades. • Moscow Borough: $5,000 to cover the cost of a Golden Park fence-extension project. • West Scranton Little League: $5,000 to cover the cost of new grass, lighting and seating at the Little League facilities. • PAWsitively for the Animals, Scranton: $5,000 to cover most of the $5,600 cost of an operational savings and growth project, including the cost of purchasing a computer and other equipment, a pallet jack and holiday costumes for fundraising events. • American Legion Post 568, Scranton: $5,000 to defray the $9,500 cost of a flat roof replacement project. • West Scranton Wrestling Alumni Association: $5,000 to defray the $20,453 cost of installing two Americans with Disabilities Act-compliant lifts. • St. Cats and Dogs of Scranton: $5,000 to defray the $20,000 cost of supplies for a spay/neuter clinic. • United Neighborhood Centers of Northeastern Pennsylvania, Scranton: $5,000 to defray the $9,600 cost of food/clothing pantry improvements. • South Abington Police Department: $5,000 to defray the $25,739 cost of Lexipol law enforcement policy and procedure manuals. County Economic Development Director Kristin Magnotta said the 20 grant recipients were among 28 that applied. Those not awarded funding this round may apply again for funding during the second, she said. Gaughan lauded the grant program. Modest as the individual grants are, the money can be invaluable for organizations trying to close funding gaps and get projects over the finish line, he said.
Business Journals
2 days ago
- Business Journals
Forum discussion: How employers and managers can negotiate a changing workplace
The workplace is changing all the time, but the pace recently seems to have accelerated. Employers are still dealing with a transition to remote work and how that plays out with employees and the office environment. And in recent months, the White House has issued executive orders concerning diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives that many companies have embraced. In addition, there have been changes to laws governing Social Security, 401k plans and other benefits. To sort it out, the Cincinnati Business Courier assembled a panel of legal, human resources, and benefits experts: Jennifer Walwyn Colvin, senior counsel, Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP; Seth Priestle, partner, Pension Corporation of America; Andrea Whalen, senior human resources business strategist, Clark Schaefer Strategic HR. The forum, held May 15 at Union Hall in Over-the-Rhine, was moderated by Cincinnati Business Courier Market President and Publisher Jamie Smith. The panel kicked off with a question about legal compliance today, as laws and regulations appear to be shifting rapidly. Attorney Walwyn Colvin reminded the audience that the big federal employment statutes still exist. Those protect certain classes of workers under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Age Discrimination and Employment Act, and others. 'We should all still work to comply with those, regardless of what's happening with DEI and other actions by the administration,' she said. However, for federal contractors and subcontractors, the landscape has changed. For them, 'There is no longer an affirmative action obligation for anything except veterans as a protected class,' she said. The current administration has abandoned attempts to overturn the injunction that stalled the Federal Trade Commission's 2024 noncompete ban, she said, so at this point, state laws will govern noncompetes. That raised the question of laws governing people who work remotely in different states. 'The rules governing your employees will be based on where that employee is performing work, almost always,' Walwyn Colvin said. Smith then asked what is changing in human resources work. Whalen agreed that federal laws regarding employment still stand, but said, 'It's about respect anyway. It's about how can you create the most respectful environment without the chance of discrimination.' Many companies have instituted DEI policies and procedures in the last few years, which are now under attack. Every company that has a DEI policy should review it, Walwyn Colvin said. 'There is obviously still the opportunity for inclusion and creating diverse teams,' she said. 'What the current administration has prohibited is preferences and quotas.' Whalen said she has seen fear on the part of employers concerning their DEI policies. She advised, 'Let's see how we can work through and make sure that we're doing inclusion in ways that matter most to your team. A lot of it still applies.' Smith then turned to potential changes in corporate retirement plans. Priestle of PCA said SECURE Act 1.0 and 2.0 brought fairly significant changes. Some are still working their way through the system. But one, effective this year concerning catch-up contributions gives people ages 60 to 63 a greater ability to make those. Another coming down the road next year requires high earners to make catch-up contributions through a Roth after-tax basis. Another provision that created substantial tax credits for small businesses starting new retirement plans has resulted in an influx of new plans being created. Smith asked about retirement timing and how that may be affected. Priestle said changes in interest rates actually made it more beneficial for individuals covered by traditional pension plans to retire a year earlier in some cases. And the Social Security Fairness Act passed this year will affect those individuals with a public sector pension. 'It's a unique planning opportunity for teachers, cops, firefighters, and so on to make sure they're aware of it,' he said. Whalen said she sees a lot of people who don't want to retire because they've seen huge fluctuations in their 401k plans and are worried about Social Security benefits changing. She also hears from employees at retirement age, who want to continue working part-time. 'Think about great ways, interesting ways to keep those people who want to stay and be productive,' she advised employers and managers. A new administration has brought some new trends in employment regulations. Walwyn Colvin suggested that HR professionals review the company employee handbook with an eye to recent changes. She also suggested doing an audit of employment authorization forms or Forms I-9. 'With the immigration issues and raids, frankly, and deportations, we found that there are certain industries where, if you have not properly engaged in the I-9 process and ensured that the workers are authorized, it's possible you lose a significant portion of your workforce all at once.' Walwyn Colvin said she is also seeing more employment disputes coming based on reductions in force and misclassification claims. She suggested reviewing job descriptions to make sure that workers are properly classified as employees or independent contractors, and also whether employees are properly classified as exempt or nonexempt from overtime pay. Smith asked how important it is for multi-state corporate HR teams to work locally to make sure everything across the board is equal. 'It's really about consistency,' Whalen said. 'Job descriptions and the duties of what they're doing, and skills required should be pretty consistent.' Walwyn Colvin added that some states have different requirements related to who can be exempt. 'The state tests are often more restrictive than the federal tests under the Fair Labor Standards Act,' she said. The positions she sees misclassified most often include staff accountants, human resources generalists, and administrative assistants. From a legal perspective, it's preferable to have a signed job description that's accurate, Walwyn Colvin said. She also suggested retaining documents or reports that lead to changes in job descriptions. Whalen suggested that when changing a job description, make sure that the manager and the employee or incumbents in that role review the changes and sign off on them. Those new qualifications and job duties then need to be changed in the performance review system. Walwyn Colvin added that with remote workers, job descriptions can include cross-functional collaboration with individuals who are at the office location, and that can be included as an essential job function. 'You can then enforce it in a performance review,' she said. Smith brought up the needs and styles of different generations in the workforce. Whalen said most employers now have five generations in their workforces. 'The difference now is that there are smaller numbers coming in with Gen Z, so it's harder to find people,' she said. 'The different generations are being more vocal and more adamant about wanting a different lifestyle with work,' she said. Understanding generational differences and the talents of each and then adapting the culture will improve hiring and retention, she said. Walwyn Colvin remarked that younger generations generally need more feedback about their performance. 'It's the surprised employee that is more likely to sue,' she said. 'You have to be very clear and communicate about performance that is not satisfactory.' Priestle recommended looking at the entirety of the benefits package to make sure it's relevant to the types of employees you want to attract and retain. Whalen reminded the audience, 'The number one key benefit everyone still wants, no matter your generation, is pay.' But the desire for benefits such as financial counseling, retirement benefits, and time off may differ among generations. Turning to Priestle, Smith asked about retirement planning in this era. He responded saying that although traditional pensions are becoming a thing of the past, the workplace is still the primary means by which people save for retirement. Employers have flexibility to pick and choose different features within their retirement plans and reduce barriers for the type of employee population they have. How to communicate that plan to the workforce is another point to consider. He is also seeing financial planning as a workplace benefit. 'Offering comprehensive financial planning to your employees can be very beneficial in this, and, if done correctly, can run the gamut of your population.' The discussion turned from financial benefits to health and wellness, as Whalen said, she had changed her attitude about its importance during her career. 'It's critical,' she said. 'It's part of what employers should be doing.' That includes mental health too, she said. 'It's not just about providing some tips and wellness benefits,' she said. 'It's more about looking at the overall health of your culture, and the overall health and wellness, including mental health, of your employees.' About 75% of all employees often deal with mental health challenges, she said, citing a recent survey. Walwyn Colvin notes that mental health challenges can affect leave under the Family Medical Leave Act and under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Once an employee has a mental health challenge, the employer needs to consider if there are any functional limitations affecting performance of the job and, correspondingly, if accommodations might be appropriate, she said. She also cautioned employers that if a manager hears something from an employee that indicates a potential health issue, they should be trained to escalate it, 'don't just stay quiet and walk away, because your duty is triggered to engage in the interactive process.' Smith turned again to financial questions, asking Priestle how companies can design retirement plans that are attractive to employees but also financially sustainable for the organizations. Priestle noted that it is very beneficial to have employees who are financially healthy, as employees who are in financial straits will not be productive. 'There is a return on investment to the company from the standpoint of structuring retirement benefits,' he said. He suggested starting with a traditional 401k plan, then considering nonqualified plans that allow for more creativity about who you offer those to. These can be tied to job and company performance. An audience member asked about Generation Z. 'How do you advise trying to change that culture from the bottom up?' Whalen suggested trying to understand, or encouraging the organization to understand, the benefits that Gen Z brings, as well as the reasons behind their preferences. Forming cross-generational teams to do training also helps, she said. 'It boils down to just getting to know the person individually,' she said. 'Each generation has different unique qualities that they bring to the table, but each person has their own unique qualities too.' The conversation then turned to remote work and who is eligible for that as well as rules around the practice. Walwyn Colvin recommended making sure remote work decisions are very intentional and then creating standards around who is allowed to work remotely, and monitoring performance to expectations. 'Look at what standards and expectations can be set, including some that are quantitative, if possible, to make sure that performance can be managed even when an employee is remote' she said. Smith asked the experts for any final thoughts. Priestle said it is imperative that companies have an internal champion for financial wellness. 'They need that person in the organization to truly push the benefits and push the importance of them,' he said. Having that person internally to promote the programs increases their utilization substantially, he said. Whalen agreed, saying providing education about benefits, whether they are financial or concerning time off or mental health, will be helpful to both the employees and their company. Walwyn Colvin suggested that employers review policies to make sure they still serve the company and that they're accurate. Then, managers need to be trained on them. 'Your managers are going to be your first line, enforcing your policies and setting your culture,' she said. She recommended consulting with the company's legal counsel often, even if it's brief. She is seeing an uptick in litigation-demand letters. 'It seems like people are worried and nervous about the economy or other job prospects,' she said. Claims of discrimination and harassment are also up, she said. Walwyn Colvin advised making sure harassment policies are up to date and that they have reporting mechanisms that are useful and effective.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Pritzker's signature next step in Sterling's bid to land millions in Riverfront Reimagined investment
Jun. 5—STERLING — Sterling is one step closer to receiving a designation that could provide up to $50 million in tax incentives for economic development work the city already has started along its riverfront. ExpandAutoplay Image 1 of 5 Sterling is close to a designation that could provide a tax incentive on Riverfront Park. Construction is underway Wednesday, June 4, 2025. (Alex T. Paschal) Sterling Mayor Diana Merdian told Shaw Local that although House Bill 1919, which the city's lobbyist, Matt Hughes of MRH Solutions, advocated for earlier this year, did not pass its third reading in the Illinois Senate, its language has been included as part of the state's omnibus budget package, House Bill 2755. The state's fiscal 2026 budget comprises three components: the state operating budget, a budget implementation bill and the revenue omnibus bill. The Illinois House and Senate on Saturday, May 31, approved all three bills just hours before the midnight deadline for the end of the spring session. The Illinois House approved HB 2755 with a vote of 71-43, followed by the Senate's approval with a vote of 31-25. The bill is now headed to Gov. JB Pritzker for approval. In a news release issued by Pritzker on Sunday, June 1, he indicated that he intends to sign the state budget before the fiscal year begins Tuesday, July 1. Once the state's budget is signed, Sterling officially will receive the River Edge Redevelopment Zone designation. "The passage of the fiscal 2026 balanced budget is a testament to Illinois' fiscal responsibility," Pritzker said. "Even in the face of [President Donald] Trump and congressional Republicans stalling the national economy, our state budget delivers for working families without raising their taxes while protecting the progress we are making for our long-term fiscal health. "I'm grateful to [House] Speaker [Chris] Welch, [Senate] President [Don] Harmon, the budget teams, and all the legislators and stakeholders who collaborated to shape and pass this legislation. I look forward to signing my seventh balanced budget in a row and continuing to build a stronger Illinois." According to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, once a city is designated, certain areas are allocated as a "River Edge Redevelopment Zone." The RERZ program provides investors and municipalities that are eligible with several tax incentives, including property tax abatements and sales tax exemptions. In Sterling's case, it would assist in redevelopment along the Rock River. Merdian said that without the designation and those tax incentives, the city's riverfront redevelopment work would be almost "impossible" to complete. "I have been working to secure this designation for nearly my entire term, and I know a lot of people did not think it would be possible," Merdian said. "It wasn't easy, but one of the things we do here is we work hard to do what's best for this community." Merdian said once Pritzker signs the bill, the city will need to fill out an application with the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity. "That is, we have to have a map, we have to have a public hearing," Merdian said. "We have to have the ordinance, or the information that stays up for so many days, and we have to have everything on the national registry." Hughes lobbied for both HB 1919 and Senate Bill 1309 as part of his strategy to help Sterling secure its designation. Merdian and Hughes recruited help from Rep. Maurice West, D-Rockford, and Sen. Michael Halpin, D-Rock Island, who filed the bills in January. In February, Hughes advised the Sterling City Council that both bills needed to advance out of committee by March 21 and pass both chambers by April 11. The city of Alton was later added to the legislation, following recommendations from West. Merdian told Sterling's Riverfront Reimagined Commission on April 2 that the bill had cleared both subcommittees and was likely to be wrapped into the state's budget package, "where similar bills go." Among the "nay" votes for HB 2755 were state Reps. Brad Fritts, R-Dixon; Tony McCombie, R-Savanna; and Amy Elik, R-Alton — all of whom co-sponsored HB 1919. State Sen. Li Arellano Jr., R-Dixon, who co-sponsored Senate Bill 1309 — Sterling's backup bill should HB 1919 fail — also voted against HB 2755. Shaw Local reached out to each of them for comment. "I was chief co-sponsor on HB 1919 because it directly affected a community in my district, Alton, which was added to the bill as another Redevelopment Zone community," Elik said when responding to Shaw Local's request for comment. "The bill that passed both chambers, which I voted against, HB 2755, eventually included language for Alton and Sterling, but also raised taxes by nearly $1 billion, and I have promised my constituents I would not vote for a tax increase. "In the waning hours of session, we often see omnibus bills that include language from many other bills, and although I support the language in the much smaller and more concise HB 1919, I could not support the massive tax increases in the significantly larger HB 2755, which will hurt communities across my district and the state." Fritts provided Shaw Local with the following response: "It's simple. I voted against HB 2755 because it was not just granting the city of Sterling's River Edge designation, but it was the entire fiscal 2026 revenue package with multiple tax increases. I would have proudly voted yes if this designation was in its own bill, like the originally filed HB 1919. Because of this deceptive tactic utilized by the majority party, I stood united alongside my state senator, Li Arellano, and voted no without hesitation. "Let me be clear: I will not vote in favor of a tax increase on the hardworking men and women of my district, even if that means also voting no on a local project that was shoved into an over 1,000-page bill. The process of putting multiple bills into one has to stop. It's just bad governance, and the people of Illinois deserve better." McCombie, who is House minority leader, agreed with Fritts in her budget vote response. "Speaker Welch said the quiet part out loud: tax-and-spend Democrats are thriving in Illinois ... at the expense of Illinois families," she wrote. "Rather than pursuing meaningful structural reforms to secure our state's future, Democrats chose to prioritize politician pay raises, steal from the rainy-day fund, and funnel money into their own pork projects." Arellano issued his response Sunday. "Illinois Democrats have just rammed through the largest and most reckless budget in our state's history: over $55 billion in spending, passed with zero transparency, minimal debate and no regard for the taxpayers who are footing the bill," he wrote. "This isn't leadership. It's political corruption, plain and simple, snuck in during a midnight vote. "To make matters worse, they're hitting working families with nearly a billion dollars in new taxes. Democrats keep demanding more from you while delivering less. Less public safety. Fewer job opportunities. Less economic growth. "This budget is not just bloated, it's dishonest and irresponsible. It's a slap in the face to the very people who keep this state afloat. I voted no because I refuse to stand by while one-party rule continues to drain our state to prop up its political machine."
