A New Study Finds That Walking 14 More Steps Per Minute Can Support Healthy Aging
According to study author Daniel Ruben, who was interviewed by CNN, this 6-minute walk test improvement represents an advancement in mobility, function or endurance.
To see who else can benefit from walking and how, we reached out to personal trainers to learn about the health benefits of walking and how we can take getting our steps in to the next level.
Is walking exercise?
Yes, walking is exercise, and experts across physical and mental health disciplines agree. Sergii Putsov, a certified personal trainer with a PhD in sports science, says, "Walking for just 30 minutes every day can lower your risk of severe cardiovascular disease and dementia." April Crowe, a licensed clinical social worker at Paramount Wellness Retreat, adds that "walking in natural environments also boosts cognitive function and creativity, thereby providing a unique kind of therapy."
Does walking do more than build your heart's strength? As it turns out, yes. The Mayo Clinic has identified additional health benefits of walking. According to the medical center, walking can improve muscle endurance, boost energy, lower blood pressure, strengthen bones and support the immune system. You can see benefits both outdoors and on a treadmill.
Walking alone can also change the shape of your body. In 2017, the Journal of Physical Activity and Health did a meta-analysis of 22 clinical trials related to walking and health. The results revealed that brisk walking reduced waist circumference, fat mass and body fat percentage to a "clinically significant" degree in men and women under age 50 living with obesity. It can also lead to overall weight loss. So, that "hot girl walk" you take could cause noticeable changes to your body if you stick to it.
Is walking enough exercise on its own?
Walking can certainly be combined with other activities as part of a circuit. You can also walk as a warm-up for jogging or cycling. Walking on its own can deliver results and may have fewer negative impacts on your body than other high-impact sports.
Gregor Parella, also a CPT, says of walking for walking's sake: "It is much better than jogging because jogging can put undue pressure on your ankles, especially if you're heavily built. On the other hand, brisk walking is one of the best exercises because it tones up your leg and calf muscles without the same pressure on joints.
Even walking at a slow pace is better than being stationary at home, but a faster pace will also hasten the health benefits. A 2019 study in Atherosclerosis found that "walking pace was inversely associated with the risk of death and development of cardiovascular disease" in male physicians with an average age of 67.8. In other words, the faster you walk, the lower your risk of death and cardiovascular disease.
Regarding how long you should walk, the US Department of Health and Human Services recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity each week, or 30 minutes a day for five days, for substantial health benefits. This can include walking briskly at 2.5 mph to 4 mph. Walking at a slow or leisurely pace (2 mph or less) is considered a light-intensity activity, which is likely to produce some health benefits compared to sedentary behavior, but not as many benefits as walking briskly.The health benefits of walking
There are many health benefits to walking. Not only can the activity lower cortisol levels, like all forms of exercise, and give you some fresh air, but you may see various tangible improvements in the following health indicators:
Better sleep. Low-impact physical activity can lead to more fitful sleep. One small 2020 study published in Sleep Health found that increasing daily steps led to better quality sleep, especially among women.
Low-impact physical activity can lead to more fitful sleep. One small 2020 study published in Sleep Health found that increasing daily steps led to better quality sleep, especially among women. Lower risk of type 2 diabetes. According to the American Diabetes Association, walking at least 30 minutes per day could help you stave off type 2 diabetes. Increasing your daily step count may keep your glucose levels in check.
According to the American Diabetes Association, walking at least 30 minutes per day could help you stave off type 2 diabetes. Increasing your daily step count may keep your glucose levels in check. Lower blood pressure. A 2022 study from the American Family Physician reported that a regular walking schedule with moderate intensity can lower systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate.
A 2022 study from the American Family Physician reported that a regular walking schedule with moderate intensity can lower systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate. Improved balance. Remaining steady on your feet is increasingly important for your health as you age. Harvard Health Publishing states that walking builds lower body strength, which improves balance.
Remaining steady on your feet is increasingly important for your health as you age. Harvard Health Publishing states that walking builds lower body strength, which improves balance. Lower risk of cancer. Walking may even reduce your risk of some cancers. A 2013 study out of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention found that postmenopausal women who walked at least seven hours per week had a 14% lower risk of getting breast cancer than women who walked three hours or less every week.
Ways to take your walking to the next level
If you hit a plateau with your walking routine, you can add some intensity to your walk without having to jog or switch activities. Making your walk more rigorous could increase the number of calories burned by giving your body a new challenge. Ways to up the ante on your daily walk include:
Increase the time of your walk. If you're currently walking 30 minutes a day, add more time in 10- or 15-minute intervals. Putsov recommends walking at least 45 minutes a day if your goal is weight loss.
If you're currently walking 30 minutes a day, add more time in 10- or 15-minute intervals. Putsov recommends walking at least 45 minutes a day if your goal is weight loss. Increase your speed. You can also add more intensity by picking up speed. Free fitness workout apps with GPS enabled, including Nike Run Club, can help you track distance and time to calculate your pace.
You can also add more intensity by picking up speed. Free fitness workout apps with GPS enabled, including Nike Run Club, can help you track distance and time to calculate your pace. Wear wrist or ankle weights. Tying on weights like Bala Bangles
Tying on weights like Alternate your pace. Both CPTs we spoke to recommended walking intervals to make walking more challenging. Try walking for five minutes at a regular pace, then five minutes of speed walking, and so on.
Both CPTs we spoke to recommended walking intervals to make walking more challenging. Try walking for five minutes at a regular pace, then five minutes of speed walking, and so on. Add an incline to your route. Are you walking on a flat surface for most of your route? Find a hill to increase the difficulty of your trek. You may also want to add retro-walking (walking backward) up an incline.
Getty Images
How to stay motivated while walking
It's easy to get excited about a new workout routine initially, and it's just as natural to get bored or frustrated when you stop seeing major results. You may find music and podcasts helpful because they make time appear to pass more quickly. Just make sure that these sounds are background noise so that you can still be aware of your environment and those around you.
Crowe also recommends setting clear, achievable goals. She says it can help to remind yourself about how far you've come, explaining, "Recording all achievements made during walks, whether through mobile apps or personal journals, will act as a reminder," which can push you harder next time.
If going it alone is making it harder to stay on track, try walking with a partner or seeing if there is a walking club in your area. Parella says a walking buddy can increase your sense of accountability and make the experience more fun. You may also try new scenery to stay motivated during a walk. Getting some sun will increase your vitamin D intake, which may improve your mood.
Walking safety tips
Before you hit the sidewalk on your daily walk or hot girl walk, be sure you're well-equipped for the task. While a neighborhood or lakeside stroll may seem harmless, you still want to set yourself up for a safe return.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
3 minutes ago
- CBS News
Perseids meteor shower will peak this week. But will the moon ruin it for viewers?
The Perseids meteor shower — considered one of the best shows in the sky — is set to peak this week. But the peak for fireballs shooting through the night sky coincides this year with a bright moon that is expected to negatively impact visibility for eager viewers. The Perseids peak in 2025 is Aug. 12-13, specifically early Wednesday for those in North America. At that time, the moon will be 84% full, according to the American Meteor Society. "In 2025, the waning gibbous moon will severely compromise this shower at the time of maximum activity," the organization says. "Such conditions will reduce activity by at least 75 percent as only the brighter meteors will be visible." Viewers this year can expect to see between 10-20 Perseids each hour, as opposed to 50 Perseids per hour under darker conditions, it says. "The strength of each Perseid display varies year to year, mainly due to lunar conditions," writes Robert Lunsford with the American Meteor Society. "If a bright moon is above the horizon during the night of maximum activity, then the display will be reduced. Most of the Perseid meteors are faint and bright moonlight will make it difficult to view." The Perseids meteor shower has been ongoing for several weeks. It started in mid-July and will continue until Aug. 23. A planetarium program coordinator at a museum in St. Paul, Minnesota, is advising people to instead go out a week or so past the peak when the moon isn't so bright. The Perseids "are an incredible meteor shower," Thaddeus LaCoursiere, of the Bell Museum, told The Associated Press. NASA says the best time to view the Perseids is early in the morning, before the sun comes up, in the Northern Hemisphere. However, meteors sometimes can be seen as early as 10 p.m. When looking at the Perseids, they appear to come from the constellation Perseus, which is why this meteor shower has its name. But the meteors don't originate from the constellation; they are space debris left by a comet. That debris interacts with Earth's atmosphere, disintegrating and resulting in colorful lines in the sky, according to NASA and the American Meteor Society. "The pieces of space debris that interact with our atmosphere to create the Perseids originate from comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle," which last visited the inner solar system in 1992, NASA says. During peak, Tuesday night and Wednesday morning, the Earth will pass closest to the core orbit of comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle, Lunsford writes. "To view the Perseids successfully, it is suggested you watch from a safe rural area that is as dark as possible," he says. "The more stars you can see, the more meteors will also be visible."
Medscape
32 minutes ago
- Medscape
Psoriasiform Dermatitis Risk in Children on TNFi Reviewed
TOPLINE: Older age at TNF alpha inhibitors initiation, a diagnosis of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), and concomitant immunomodulator use were associated with delayed onset of paradoxical psoriasiform dermatitis (PD) in children treated with TNFi, in a retrospective chart review. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective chart review of 3418 patients receiving TNFi therapy for various conditions (including Crohn's disease, JIA, and ulcerative colitis) at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, from January 2018 to January 2023. Overall, 70 patients (2%) developed PD skin eruptions (52.9% women; 91.4% White; 5.7% Black; median age at TNFi initiation, 11.7 years; median age at PD onset, 13.6 years); 21.4% of patients were given concomitant immunomodulators; 94% of patients had PD at multiple sites. The median time from starting a TNFi to the onset of PD was 16.9 months. Treatments for PD included topical steroids (85.7%), systemic medications (15.4%), and nonsteroid topicals including tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and calcipotriene (24.3%). PD outcomes and factors associated with its severity were evaluated. TAKEAWAY: PD rashes resolved in 32 patients (45.7%); the median time to resolution was 15.5 months. Most (71.4%) of those with PD had Crohn's disease, and infliximab (52.7%) and adalimumab (44.6%) were the most frequently used TNFi. The initial TNFi was discontinued in 40 patients (57.1%) because of PD in 23 (57.5) of those patients. Of these 40 patients, 12 (30%) switched to another TNFi with a 33% recurrence rate, while 25 (62.5%) switched to a different medication class with PD persisting in 36%. Girls were more likely to receive high-potency topical steroids, possibly indicating a difference in prescribing practices or worse disease. Onset of PD occurred later in patients with JIA (coefficient estimate [CE], 22.6 months; P = .02), those on concomitant immunomodulators (CE, 11.0; P = .04), or those who were older when the TNFi was started (CE, 2.4; P < .01). IN PRACTICE: 'Our study found that the diagnosis of JIA, older age at TNFi initiation, and concomitant immunomodulation are potential predictors of later PD onset,' the authors of the study concluded. 'Female sex may influence PD severity,' they added, 'but conflicting results and the retrospective design of this study call for additional research to better understand the factors contributing to PD severity in pediatrics.' SOURCE: This study was led by Muayad M. Shahin, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, and was published online on July 31, 2025, in Pediatric Dermatology. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective study design limited the availability of detailed morphologic descriptions. Additionally, multiple definitions of severe PD restricted analysis of risk factors across different outcome measures. DISCLOSURES: This research was funded by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Core Center and the University of Cincinnati Office of Research medical student summer research award, funded by the Stella and Carey Wamsley Charitable Trust. One author disclosed serving as a consultant for LEO Pharma. The other authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Medscape
32 minutes ago
- Medscape
Rural Parents See More Care Gaps and Delays After Pregnancy
TOPLINE: Parents in the year following birth residing in rural areas experienced more healthcare barriers, including reduced access to obstetric care and increased emergency department visits, than their urban counterparts. While infant care was similar between rural and urban areas, postpartum parents reported delays in medical care compared with their infants in both settings. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Health Interview Survey to examine rural-urban differences in healthcare access in postpartum parents and infants. They included nonpregnant women aged 18-49 years who had infants aged 1 year or younger. A total of 2019 postpartum parents (mean age, 27.1 years) and 2191 infants residing in rural areas, and 12,112 postpartum parents (mean age, 29.2 years) and 13,088 infants residing in urban areas were included in the study. Self-rated health was assessed on a five-point scale ranging from excellent to poor for both postpartum parents and infants. Healthcare utilization was evaluated based on the location where the care was received, the number of office or emergency department visits in the prior year, visits to specific clinicians, and the number of hospitalizations. Barriers to care were categorized into insurance coverage issues (such as gaps in coverage, losing coverage after pregnancy, or changes in care location) and reasons for delayed medical care. TAKEAWAY: Parents residing in rural areas were less likely to see an obstetrician-gynecologist (P = .002), visited the emergency department more frequently (P = .030), and had more hospitalizations (P = .041) than those residing in urban areas. Parents residing in rural areas experienced more disruptions in medical care, gaps in insurance coverage, and loss of Medicaid coverage after pregnancy than their urban counterparts. Delays in medical care were also more prevalent among parents residing in rural vs urban areas (20.3% vs 15.8%; P = .009); this pattern was not observed among infants. Among both rural and urban parent-infant dyads, adults were more likely to experience uninsurance and delayed medical care than their infants. Cost was a more common reason for delayed care among postpartum parents than among infants in the same household, regardless of where they lived. IN PRACTICE: 'Investments in rural health care infrastructure may support rural families,' the authors wrote. 'Integrating and incentivizing care for postpartum parents alongside their infants may address differential use and access to care in this critical period.' SOURCE: The study was led by Sara C. Handley, MD, MSCE, of the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. It was published online on August 3, 2025, in The Journal of Rural Health. LIMITATIONS: The analysis did not include specific weighting to represent the US population of parent-infant dyads. The cross-sectional design did not specify the age of the infant, which could have affected the reported number of visits and limited comments on completeness of the care. DISCLOSURES: The study received support through grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the University of Minnesota Foundation Rural Health Research Center Fund, and the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
