It's time to speak up: what the Prime Minister should be saying on anti-Semitism
I speak to you today on a matter I now consider to be a national emergency.
It is said that the greatest test of a democracy is not the experience of the majority but the way in which it protects the rights and wellbeing of the minority.
In the UK today, there are under 300,000 Jews. Jewish people make up just 0.5 per cent of our population. They are a tiny group who contribute a great deal to public life and communities across the nation.
I must tell you today that Britain is failing its Jewish community.
I also tell you that I am drawing a line in the sand. The Jew-hate we are seeing in our country must end now – and as the Prime Minister I am personally going to lead the fight against anti-Semitism.
For those who would like to pretend that racial hatred of Jews is not a very serious problem in our society today, let me put you straight.
We are seeing it on the streets of Britain on a weekly basis. Just last weekend, large numbers of protestors in London chanted 'F--- your Jewish State'. Note the language here. Not opposition to the war Israel is fighting but a direct attack on Jews. An open display of racism.
The war between Israel and Hamas has divided opinion. I know that. But it should never be an excuse for the Jew-hate that is creeping its way into the fabric of our society and our national institutions.
Take schools. More than half of Jewish teachers have reported anti-Semitic abuse since the war in Gaza began. They are finding swastika graffiti in the classroom and facing chants of 'F--- the Jews'. Some teachers are even fearful of disclosing their religion at work. This is entirely unacceptable. It should shame us all.
Then there's the NHS. Jewish patients have been abused and left in fear, Jewish doctors and nurses have faced discrimination. In one case a nurse was confronted with the anti-Semitic trope of Jews 'drinking blood'. It is hard to believe this is happening in our caring professions. Institutional blindness to anti-Semitism must end now.
The question we must all ask ourselves is: how do we stop this hate in its tracks? It requires leadership, courage and conviction and I am prepared to show it.
Today I announce a National Inquiry on Anti-Semitism. It will be tasked with collecting evidence and providing recommendations for urgent national change. It will build on the excellent work led by Lord Mann and Penny Mordaunt for the Board of Deputies of British Jews. I am not prepared to wait long for this. It must report back to me directly in six months.
In the meantime, I am tasking ministers and civil servants across the land to make a difference right now. I will be asking them: what have you done this week to tackle anti-Semitism?
I will make sure that there is zero tolerance of Jew-hate in our education system, whether the perpetrators are teachers or students. Any university lecturer or schoolteacher proven to have displayed anti-Semitism should be fired. Any student or pupil should face the strongest of disciplinary processes. Holocaust education is already part of the national curriculum. I announce here that compulsory education on anti-Semitism will join it.
In our health system, I will ensure that Jewish people can feel as confident in the care they receive as every other citizen of our nation. Again, those proven to have been racist against Jews or provided an inferior service based on race should lose their jobs. They should have no place representing our nation through our public services. Wes Streeting has shown leadership by pledging decisive change in the NHS on anti-Semitism. I support his ambition and will monitor results closely.
Discrimination in the arts must end now too. The cancellation of Jewish artists and performers and the silent boycotting of their work will not be permissible. I call on local councils to withdraw the licences of any venues that discriminate against Jews. I will also ensure that any publicly-funded arts institution guilty of permitting anti-Semitism will no longer receive government money.
I want the nation to know that I am making a personal commitment to fighting Jew-hate in our society, just as I did in rooting out anti-Semitism from the Labour Party. I am not prepared for the legacy of this Government to be a failure to stamp out this poisonous racism.
It is not who we in Britain are. We are better than that. Our values are better than that. Our democracy is better than that.
The change starts now.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Hamas refuses to disarm until Palestinian state established
Hamas has reaffirmed that it will not agree to disarm unless a sovereign Palestinian state is established, in response to one of Israel's key demands in talks about a ceasefire in Palestinian armed group said it was responding to remarks it attributed to US President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff that Hamas had "expressed its willingness" to lay down its considers the disarmament of Hamas one of several key conditions for any deal to end the negotiations between Israel and Hamas to secure a ceasefire and the release of hostages stalled last week. In the past few days, Arab governments have urged Hamas to disarm and surrender control of Gaza, after a number of Western countries - including France and Canada - announced plans to recognise a state of Palestine. The UK said it would if Israel did not meet certain conditions by in its statement, Hamas said it could not yield its right to "resistance and its weapons" unless an "independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital" was Defense Forces (IDF)'s Lt Gen Eyal Zamir warned on Friday that there would be no respite in fighting in Gaza if negotiations failed to quickly secure the release of hostages being held by on Saturday, the family of hostage Evyatar David issued a statement after Hamas released a video showing him shirtless and emaciated in a dimly-lit tunnel. They accused Hamas of starving him as part of a propaganda campaign and appealed to the Israeli government and the United States to do everything possible to save him. Witkoff has been visiting Israel as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government faces mounting pressure over the deteriorating humanitarian conditions in agencies have warned there is man-made, mass starvation in Gaza, and have blamed Israel, which controls the entry of all supplies to the territory. Israel has insisted there are no restrictions on aid deliveries and that there is "no starvation".Earlier on Saturday, Witkoff met in Tel Aviv with families of Israeli hostages who are still in Gaza. Footage posted online showed the Washington negotiator being greeted with applause and pleas for help by supporters of the hostages' families as he arrived in a square that has become known for protests. Witkoff said peace efforts should focus on ending the conflict and bringing home all the hostages, instead of what he called a partial part of Witkoff's trip, he met Netanyahu on Thursday and on Friday he inspected a widely-criticised aid site in southern figures from the United Nations say at least 1,373 Palestinians have been killed seeking food since late May. The majority have been killed by the Israeli military near Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution sites, the UN has accused Hamas of instigating chaos near the sites and says its troops do not intentionally open fire on civilians. The Israeli military launched a campaign in Gaza in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken than 60,000 people have since been killed in Gaza, and 169 people, including 93 children, have died from malnutrition, according to the territory's Hamas-run health ministry.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after small boat terror claims
The Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after he said terror suspects had arrived in Britain on small boats. In an article for The Telegraph last year, Mr Jenrick, the former immigration minister, claimed that individuals linked to Islamic State had 'waltzed right in' to Britain across the Channel. It can now be revealed that a fortnight later, the Home Office's most senior civil servant reprimanded him over the disclosure. Sir Matthew Rycroft, the department's then permanent secretary, wrote to Mr Jenrick to tell him the information 'should not have been made public' and warned him against 'any further disclosure' of sensitive information from his time in government. On Saturday, critics said the move showed that the Government was trying to 'suppress' concerns about the security implications of mass migration. During his spell as immigration minister between October 2022 and December 2023, Mr Jenrick would have had access to sensitive information and security briefings, including about migrants crossing the Channel. The Home Office has neither confirmed nor denied the veracity of Mr Jenrick's claims and is understood to have had concerns that they could undermine national security. In his letter, Sir Matthew argued that the former immigration minister was bound by rules that prohibit the disclosure of sensitive information, including the ministerial code and the Official Secrets Act. Sir Matthew is also understood to have confirmed that Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, was personally aware that he was issuing the reprimand. The revelation comes amid wider concerns about the Government's attitude towards free speech, especially on contentious topics such as migration. This week it emerged that a secretive Whitehall 'spy' unit has been used to target social media posts criticising migrant hotels and 'two-tier policing'. That prompted the White House to say it was monitoring the situation surrounding freedom of expression in the UK 'closely and with great concern'. Allies of Mr Jenrick expressed concern that the Home Office was trying to deter him from speaking out on security concerns around migration. Bradley Thomas, the Tory MP for Bromsgrove, said: 'Any attempt by the Home Office to suppress news of such significant national security importance is a disgrace. 'Robert Jenrick resigned from the Home Office on a point of principle and he has been clear that mass migration has not been good for our country. 'Robert's principled stance has seen him consistently challenge the failings of the immigration system to keep our country secure and prosperous.' He said that Ms Cooper's 'implicit awareness' that the reprimand was being issued was 'a dereliction of her duty to the British people'. Lewis Cocking, the Tory MP for Broxbourne, said that the warning to Mr Jenrick represented 'political overreach from the Civil Service'. 'They shouldn't be telling an elected Member of Parliament what they should or shouldn't be saying about illegal immigration,' he said. 'It's just another example of why we need a total overhaul of the Civil Service, to get them back working in the interests of ordinary British people. 'Labour Ministers have failed to give me clear answers on how many small boat arrivals fail criminality checks, and this suggests they are working with civil servants to keep the reality of the situation hidden from the public.' Ministerial code Former ministers continue to be bound by the ministerial code, which sets out the standards for their conduct, after they have left office. Mr Jenrick is also on the Privy Council, which advises the sovereign on matters of state, and whose members are subject to extra confidentiality obligations. It is understood that it is not unusual for officials to remind both current and former ministers of their responsibilities under those rules. Mr Jenrick declined to comment. The news comes as Labour is under growing pressure over its handling of the small boats crisis, with the number of crossings this year having already topped 25,000. Officials were forced to send migrants to a controversial overflow hotel in Canary Wharf on Saturday after almost 900 arrived on Wednesday.
Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
Yvette Cooper's fast-track asylum plan revealed as protests erupt again
The home secretary is set to introduce a new fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog so that decisions can be made in weeks rather than years. As the pressure to cut the number of people waiting in hotels for asylum decisions grows, Yvette Cooper is expected to introduce a new law this autumn to overhaul the appeal system. It comes as the first 60 migrants were moved into the four-star Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf, east London, on Friday night under cover of darkness. There was a small anti-migrant protest outside the Britannia on Saturday afternoon, while much bigger groups of both anti-migrant and anti-fascist protesters congregated outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in central London, which also houses asylum seekers, and in the centre of Manchester where hundreds of people marched as part of a protest organised by Britain First, a far-right group. Anti-immigrant protesters in Manchester JAMES SPEAKMAN FOR THE SUNDAY TIMES Home Office figures show that more than 25,000 migrants have attempted to cross the Channel to the UK in small boats this year — the earliest the figure has been reached. Cooper will also tighten the rules surrounding the interpretation of 'exceptional circumstances' in immigration cases and the use of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to family and private life. In an interview with The Sunday Times, Cooper said: 'We need a major overhaul of the appeal [process] and that's what we are going to do in the autumn … if we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control.' A source familiar with the plans said the aim would be to compress the process so that decisions and returns could be 'made within weeks'. It is understood the system would look similar to a scheme Labour operated while last in government, which was abandoned after judges ruled it was 'structurally unfair' after about 99 per cent of claims were refused. Asylum seekers who are refused sanctuary in Britain are seeing their appeals take an average of 54 weeks to be heard. There were 50,976 outstanding appeals as of March, which is almost double the number compared with 2024 and seven times higher than in 2023, figures show. It is the highest the backlog has ever been and comes on top of the almost 79,000 asylum claims awaiting an initial decision. Residents at the Thistle City Barbican hotel in central London watch from their windows… LUCY NORTH/PA … as anti-immigration protesters gather outside. PA While they wait, many asylum seekers receive state support in the form of accommodation such as hotels — with a bill of £2.1 billion for the taxpayer in the year to March — and a weekly allowance of between £8.86 and £49.18 per person depending on other support. Those who register appeals are entitled to legal aid, at about £820 a case. Of those who received an initial asylum decision in the year to March, just under half (49 per cent) were granted asylum. In the year to March 2024, it was 61 per cent. The proposed changes will cap a series of announcements this summer aimed at restoring order and control in the system. This weekend, Cooper has announced plans to outlaw social media adverts promoting journeys on small boats to asylum seekers or jobs in the black market aimed at luring migrants to the UK. Offenders could receive up to five years in prison and a hefty fine. Home Office analysis shows that approximately 80 per cent of migrants arriving via small boats told officials that they used social media during their illegal journey to the UK, including to locate or communicate with an agent or facilitator associated with an organised crime group. Under an amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill going through parliament, a new UK-wide offence will be introduced to criminalise the creation of material for publication online which promotes or offers services facilitating a breach of UK immigration law. This could include small boat crossings, the creation of fake travel documents like passports or visas or explicitly promising illegal working opportunities in the UK. Cooper said: 'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the UK and a life in this country — whether on or offline — simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral. 'These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media. We are determined to do everything we can to stop them — wherever they operate. 'We have to stay one step ahead of the ever-evolving tactics of people-smuggling gangs and this move, part of our Plan for Change to boost border security, will empower law enforcement to disable these tactics faster and more effectively, ensuring people face proper penalties.' The government's 'one in one out' deal with France is also expected to begin in the coming weeks, with people arriving in the UK via small boats being returned to France in exchange for the UK accepting an asylum seeker from France who can demonstrate a genuine family connection to Britain. According to The Times, the pilot scheme is expected to see only up to 50 asylum seekers a week being returned to France, with the same number coming in exchange to the UK. However, Cooper disputed the figure and said: 'We are not fixing numbers. We're very clear we want to operate this as extensively as possible.' • 'One in, one out' migrant deal: what are the key plans? Introducing a fast-track scheme to process asylum decisions is expected to require an injection of cash from the Ministry of Justice to increase the number of judges and court sitting days. Spelling out her ambition to the home affairs select committee in June, Cooper said: 'One of the things I have always been keen to do is to have a system for fast-track decisions and appeals. 'If people arrive from predominantly safe countries, they should not be sitting in the asylum system for a long time. We should be able to take those decisions really quickly, and make sure that those people go through the appeals system really quickly and are returned really quickly as well. That would mean a fast-track system alongside the main asylum system, and it would be really important in making sure that the system is fair. It will require legislation in order to be able to do that, as well as new system design … I think there should be faster tracks for those cases so that we can get them through the system really quickly.' Last week, as he arrived for a visit to Scotland, President Trump said the 'invasion' of migrants is 'killing' Europe and told politicians to 'get their act together'. Responding to his claims, Cooper blamed the previous Conservative government. 'We inherited a broken immigration system and a broken asylum system,' she said. 'And what we're doing is putting in place the foundations to restore order and control to both systems.'
