logo
‘Told not to speak': MP's bombshell claim

‘Told not to speak': MP's bombshell claim

Perth Nowa day ago
A NSW Labor MP claims he was told he 'would not be allowed to speak' by a senior official during a debate about Palestine at a party conference late last year.
Labor MLC Anthony D'Adam told the Legislative Council during a late-afternoon address on Thursday that the official said he could not be sure that Mr D'Adam's comments would not 'harm the Labor Party'.
'It is often argued that we should keep our debates inside party forums, but what option are we given if even in the forums where debates are supposed to occur, dissenting voices are not allowed to be heard,' he said. Tens of thousands of people attended the pro-Palestine march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge. Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr D'Adam claimed he was 'howled down, abused' and urged to resign following a meeting of the Labor caucus earlier this week when, he said, he sought to 'make pointed criticisms of the Premier in respect to the issues of Palestine' and the Sydney Harbour Bridge protest.
Members of the NSW Labor Party broke ranks over the weekend to join members of the Greens and crossbench who rallied with more than 100,000 pro-Palestine protesters across the bridge after the Supreme Court shot down a bid by police to stop the march. Labor MLC Anthony D'Adam said he was well known for his 'dissenting views' on Palestine. Twitter Credit: Supplied
Premier Chris Minns had been vehemently opposed to the march, repeatedly stating that a pro-Palestine protest across the bridge should never be allowed to occur.
In his speech, Mr D'Adams claims a motion was moved to 'gag' him from speaking and his critique of the Premier was 'political' and not personal.
'During the caucus debate, I could see the fear in the faces and hear it in the voices of my colleagues,' Mr D'Adams said. Premier Chris Minns had been vehemently opposed to the march. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia
'They were concerned that this type of conflict could cost them their seats or their ministries.
'It is this fear that is driving a risk-averse culture in our party, but the challenges that we face as a society require bold government.'
Mr D'Adam said issues such as war and 'climate catastrophe' would not be solved by 'whispered conversations in quiet corners of government'.
He admitted his 'dissenting views' on Palestine were well known and 'put him at odds with the current leadership of the party' at both state and federal level.
'I believe there is room in the Labor Party for those who hold opinions like mine,' Mr D'Adam said. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was among the protesters. Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia
'I fear, however, there is a growing intolerance in the Labor Party for dissent that is stultifying the party's internal culture, and it is producing a stale groupthink.
'If we do not accommodate dissent, then it finds home elsewhere, and Labor becomes a narrow party devoid of debate, the kind of debate that is essential to the party.'
State and federal Labor members attended Sunday's march, including NSW Environment Minister Penny Sharpe and Emergency Services Minister Jihad Dib.
Former federal minister Ed Husic was also in attendance.
Mr Minns' office and the NSW Labor Party were contacted for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gay student's discrimination claim rejected
Gay student's discrimination claim rejected

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Gay student's discrimination claim rejected

A gay student has lost his battle against Macquarie University after claiming he was discriminated against after being sent on placement to a Catholic school. Simon Margan had claimed the university discriminated against him on the basis of his homosexuality by assigning him to a three-week placement at a Catholic school from 10 to 28 October 2022, despite allegedly knowing that such an environment could be 'dangerous' for an LGBT+ person. He cited what he called the 'notorious fact' of religious schools' opposition to LGBT+ rights. The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal refused to grant permission for Mr Margan's complaints of homosexual discrimination and victimisation against Macquarie University to proceed to a full hearing. Mr Margan also complained that the University retained him in the placement, did not reassign him, and initiated a 'fitness to practice' process after he requested to be removed. He further alleged victimisation by the University after he reported discrimination and harassment by staff at the Catholic school. Mr Margan claimed the University refused to let him withdraw from the course without penalty, mishandled his complaint, and informed the school of his grievance while he was still there, causing 'additional detriment.' Mr Margan's discrimination case against Macquarie University has been dismissed by a tribunal. Credit: News Corp Australia In a decision published on Friday Deputy President of NCAT, Acting Judge Nancy Hennessy said: 'The conduct which Mr Margan has identified as being detrimental to him as a homosexual person or which he perceives as being unfair, dangerous or done in retribution for complaining, is lacking in substance. 'Contrary to Mr Margan's submission, there is no duty of care under the Anti-Discrimination Act for the University to take 'every reasonable precaution to prevent the reasonably foreseeable harm' of being placed in a Catholic school'.' According to the published decision, Mr Margan initially said his only preference on a school for his mandatory placement was that it be accessible by public transport. He was later told it would be at a Catholic school. Mr Margan, the published decision said, was 'never asked if he objected to being placed in a religious school'. It added: 'He says it would be incongruous for the University to be able to focus on the emails about preferences as a blanket exemption from scrutiny.'He asserts that he has made numerous representations about his homosexuality and his objections to a placement in a religious school. 'As he was only told about the placement five days before it started, he had no practical opportunity to object and the University made no attempt to establish whether a Catholic school was a problem for him as a homosexual man.' Simon Margan alleged Macquarie University discriminated against him by placing him at a Catholic school despite risks to LGBTQ+ students. Credit: News Corp Australia Homosexuality is becoming increasingly accepted by ordinary members of the Catholic Church, according to the American LGBTQ advocacy group Human Rights Campaign. It added: 'The Catechism of the Catholic Church, a text which contains dogmas and teachings of the Church, names 'homosexual acts' as 'intrinsically immoral and contrary to the natural law,' and names 'homosexual tendencies' as 'objectively disordered.' 'While the Catholic Church does not consider 'homosexual orientation' sinful in and of itself, it does have a very negative attitude toward it.' The Tribunal rejected Mr Margan's claim the University had a duty of care to prevent 'reasonably foreseeable harm' from the Catholic school placement. The Tribunal found it 'highly unlikely' Mr Margan could prove that the placement conditions disproportionately affected homosexual people or that he could not comply. 'The conduct which Mr Margan has identified as being detrimental to him as a homosexual person or which he perceives as being unfair, dangerous or done in retribution for complaining, is lacking in substance,' Ms Hennessy said. She added: 'There is nothing about being a homosexual person that affects their ability to communicate preferences.' The Tribunal concluded both complaints 'lacked substance' and refused leave for the complaints to proceed. Macquarie University had investigated Mr Margan's concerns and found no evidence of harassment or discrimination related to the placement. However, it acknowledged that Mr Margan was not given enough opportunity to withdraw from his study once he became aware that he had been placed in a Catholic school, and did not receive 'adequate feedback' while on placement. As a result, he was allowed to withdraw from the placement unit without penalty.

What we know, and don't know, about Israel's plan to take over Gaza City
What we know, and don't know, about Israel's plan to take over Gaza City

SBS Australia

time2 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

What we know, and don't know, about Israel's plan to take over Gaza City

Israel has announced its plan to seize control of Gaza City — a move that has raised questions about the fate of Gaza and its people. Following the proposal that outlines principles for "concluding the war", the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the army will "prepare" to take over Gaza City. Here is what we know, and don't know, about Israel's new plan. What exactly has the security cabinet approved? Under the newly approved plan to "defeat" Hamas, the Israeli army "will prepare to take control of Gaza City while distributing humanitarian assistance to the civilian population outside combat zones", Netanyahu's office said in a statement on Friday. The statement outlined five "principles" to end the war : Disarming Hamas The return of all hostages, both living and dead Demilitarisation of the Gaza Strip Israeli security control over the Gaza Strip The establishment of an alternative civil administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority The plan triggered swift criticism from across the globe, with Australia, China, Turkey, Britain and numerous Arab governments issuing statements of concern. Hamas, the militant group responsible for the deadly attack on Israel in 2023 that sparked the war, labelled Israel's intentions to seize Gaza City as a "new war crime", accusing the Israeli government of "ethnic cleansing". Out of 251 hostages captured during Hamas's 2023 attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the military says are dead. Why Gaza City? Previously, Netanyahu said Israel planned to take control of all of Gaza, but the new plan only specified control of Gaza City. There was no official explanation for why the focus had changed to Gaza City. Holding full control of the territory would reverse Israel's 2005 decision to withdraw its citizens and soldiers from Gaza, while still keeping authority over the borders, airspace, and utilities. Local media have reported that IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir and other military officials had raised concerns about the full occupation of Gaza. Israel's Channel 12 reported Zamir saying this would "drag Israel into a black hole" during a closed-door meeting. Zamir reportedly suggested alternatives like encircling specific areas where Hamas militants are believed to be located. Most of the 2 million Palestinians currently seeking shelter are in Gaza City, Deir al-Balah, and the displacement camps in the Muwasi area along the coast. Source: SBS News Before the war, Gaza City was the most populous city in Gaza, with a population exceeding 700,000. With evacuations ongoing since the start of the conflict, there are no official details about its current population, but Israeli media estimates the population to be about 900,000. What do we know about the planned operation? During the potential operation in Gaza City, the civilian population would be further displaced to the southern Strip, according to a report by the Times of Israel. Amir Avivi, a retired Israeli brigadier general, has called Gaza City "the heart of Gaza," saying its fall "is pretty much the fall of Hamas". There are no details about when and how the Israeli military will implement the plan in Gaza City, but multiple local media, including the Kan public broadcaster, have previously reported that the plan will last four to five months in several stages. CNN reported that the first phase will include the evacuation of Gaza City, and it is expected to end on 7 October, the second anniversary of the Hamas attack on Israel, which killed more than 1,200 people. Who will run Gaza? The fifth principle Israel's security cabinet announced is "establishment of an alternative civil administration that is neither Hamas nor the Palestinian Authority". The militant group Hamas has been in power in Gaza since 2007, while the Palestinian Authority, which is recognised by some countries, has governed parts of the occupied West Bank since the mid 90s. The Israeli government did not provide any further details about who should replace these two. Netanyahu has previously said that Israel has no intention to "govern" Gaza, and they "don't want to keep it". "We want to have a security perimeter ... We want to hand it over to Arab forces that will govern it properly without threatening us and giving Gazans a good life," he told Fox News on Friday. He did not offer any additional details about which "Arab forces" might govern Gaza, and so far, none of the Arab countries have agreed to take the lead. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan have all denounced Israel's new plan. In July, France and Saudi Arabia outlined steps toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which involved Hamas handing over its arms to the Palestinian Authority. The decision was endorsed by Qatar and Egypt, but Hamas has said it won't disarm unless an "independent, fully sovereign Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital" is established. Israel has bombarded Gaza since Hamas' October 7 attack in 2023, in which more than 1,200 people, including an estimated 30 children, were killed and over 200 hostages taken, according to the Israeli government. More than 60,430 people have been killed in Gaza since October 7, according to the health ministry in Gaza. The October 7 attack was a significant escalation in the long-standing conflict between Israel and Hamas. Israel has denied that the population in Gaza is facing, or succumbing to, starvation.

Premier's big call as state parliament hangs in balance
Premier's big call as state parliament hangs in balance

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Premier's big call as state parliament hangs in balance

Tasmania's freshly reinstalled Liberal premier has appointed an independent MP to lead the state parliament's upper house. But fellow politicians have accused the minority government of attempting to "neutralise" the crossbench through the appointment. Jeremy Rockliff appointed the independent member for McIntyre Tania Rattray the leader for the government in the state's upper house, days after he was reinstalled as premier. "While we serve in different Houses, I have always admired Tania's collaborative approach, common sense and commitment to her community," Mr Rockliff said in a post on social media platform X. "I look forward to working with Tania and all Members of Parliament together, to deliver for Tasmania." Ms Rattray, who has held her seat since 2004, said she agreed to take on the role "in the spirit of co-operation" and looks forward to the opportunity while remaining an independent member. "It is clear to me Tasmanians are looking to their elected representatives to show leadership and work collaboratively," she said in a Facebook post. "That's exactly what I'm committed to." Ms Rattray's new role has been celebrated by the state's crossbenchers but has also raised suspicions Mr Rockliff might have an ulterior motive. "This appointment is, however, an effective way for the beleaguered Liberals to neutralise - to a significant extent - an independent vote in the Legislative Council," Greens member for Hobart Cassy O'Connor said. Mr Rockliff was reinstalled as premier on Wednesday after the governor granted his request to form a minority government. Ms Rattray's appointment could be short-lived, with a planned motion expressing no confidence in the Liberals and confidence in Labor set to be moved when state parliament returns on August 19. Neither the Liberals with 14 seats nor Labor with 10 won the 18 required to control the lower house in their own right after a snap poll produced a hung parliament. Mr Rockliff and Labor's Dean Winter have no formal agreements of support with the 11 minor party MPs and independents.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store