
Protest Letters from Former Israeli Soldiers Lay Bare Profound Rifts over Gaza War
When nearly 1,000 Israeli Air Force veterans signed an open letter last week calling for an end to the war in Gaza, the military responded immediately, saying it would dismiss any active reservist who signed the document.
But in the days since, thousands of retired and reservist soldiers across the military have signed similar letters of support.
The growing campaign, which accuses the government of perpetuating the war for political reasons and failing to bring home the remaining hostages, has laid bare the deep division and disillusionment over Israel's fighting in Gaza.
By spilling over into the military, it has threatened national unity and raised questions about the army's ability to continue fighting at full force. It also resembles the bitter divisions that erupted in early 2023 over the government's attempts to overhaul Israel's legal system, which many say weakened the country and encouraged Hamas' attack later that year that triggered the war.
'It's crystal clear that the renewal of the war is for political reasons and not for security reasons,' Guy Poran, a retired pilot who was one of the initiators of the air force letter, told The Associated Press.
A return to war
The catalyst for the letters was Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision on March 18 to return to war instead of sticking to a ceasefire that had facilitated the release of some hostages.
Netanyahu says the military pressure is needed to force Hamas to release the remaining hostages. Critics, including many families of the hostages, fear that it will get them killed.
One month after Netanyahu resumed the war, none of the 59 hostages held by Hamas have been freed or rescued, of whom 24 are believed to still be alive.
In their letters, the protesters have stopped short of refusing to serve. And the vast majority of the 10,000 soldiers who have signed are retired in any case.
Nonetheless, Poran said their decision to identify themselves as ex-pilots was deliberate — given the respect among Israel's Jewish majority for the military, and especially for fighter pilots and other prestigious units. Tens of thousands of academics, doctors, former ambassadors, students and high-tech workers have signed similar letters of solidarity in recent days, also demanding an end to the war.
'We are aware of the relative importance and the weight of the brand of Israeli Air Force pilots and felt that it is exactly the kind of case where we should use this title in order to influence society,' said Poran.
Elusive war goals
The war erupted on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas carried out a surprise cross-border attack, killing about 1,200 people in southern Israel and taking 251 others hostage.
Throughout the war, Netanyahu has set two major goals: destroying Hamas and bringing home the hostages.
Israel's offensive has reduced much of Gaza to rubble and killed more than 51,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health officials, who don't differentiate between civilians and combatants.
While Israel has come under heavy international criticism over the devastation in Gaza, the domestic opposition to the conflict reflects a widespread belief that Netanyahu's war goals are not realistic.
Nearly 70% of Israelis now say bringing home the hostages is the most important goal of the war, up from just over 50% in January 2024, according to a study conducted by the Jerusalem think tank Israel Democracy Institute. Nearly 60% of respondents said Netanyahu's two goals cannot be realized together.
The survey interviewed nearly 750 people and had a margin of error of 3.6 percentage points.
Netanyahu's opponents have also accused him of resuming the war to pander to his hardline coalition partners, who have threatened to topple the government if he ends the fighting.
Steering clear of politics
Many people were surprised by the military's snap decision to dismiss air force reservists who signed the protest letter.
The army, which is mandatory for most Jewish men, has long served as a melting pot and unifying force among Israel's Jewish majority. Many key units rely heavily on reservists, who often serve well into their 40s.
In a statement, the military said it should be 'above all political disputes.'
As the protest movement has grown, a military official said the army is taking the letters 'very seriously.'
He said it joins a list of challenges to calling up reservists and that the army is working to support them. A growing number of reservists have stopped reporting for duty, citing exhaustion, family reasons, and the financial burden of missing work.
'Any civilian can have his opinions. The problems come when people use the army as a tool promoting their opinions, whatever they may be,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity under military guidelines.
The army's dilemma
Eran Duvdevani, who organized a letter signed by 2,500 former paratroopers, told the AP that the army faces a dilemma.
'If it will keep on releasing from service the pilots, what about all the others who signed the letters? Will they be discharged from service as well?' he said.
He said he organized the letter to show 'the pilots are not alone.' Their concern over the war's direction 'is a widespread opinion, and you have to take it into consideration.'
Although only a few hundred of the signatories are still actively serving, the Israeli military has been stretched by 18 months of fighting and isn't in any position to be turning away anyone from reserve duty. Many Israelis are also furious that as reservists repeatedly get called up for action, the government continues to grant military exemptions to Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox governing partners.
The number of Israelis continuing to report for reserve duty has dropped so low that the military has taken to social media to try to recruit people to keep serving.
Protest letters illuminate widespread divisions
Eran Halperin, an expert in social psychology at Jerusalem's Hebrew University, called the letters 'the most important indication of the erosion of the ethos in this particular war.'
Though the war enjoyed widespread support at the outset, doubts have grown as so many hostages continue to languish in captivity and the Israeli death toll mounts. Nearly 850 soldiers have been killed since the war started.
'It's very, very difficult to maintain and manage a war in such violent conflict when there are such deep disagreements about the main questions pertaining to the war,' Halperin said.
In recent days, Netanyahu's office has published a flurry of messages touting meetings with families of the hostages, stressing he is doing everything he can to hasten their return.
On Tuesday, he and his defense minister toured northern Gaza, where Netanyahu praised the 'amazing reservists' doing 'marvelous work.'
Netanyahu's office released videos of him marching through the sandy dunes surrounded by dozens of soldiers.
'We are fighting for our existence,' he said. 'We are fighting for our future.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Settling for half a victory in the Iran–Israel war
This war had been brewing for two decades – long anticipated but repeatedly avoided. Both the Iranian and Israeli sides had succeeded in avoiding direct confrontation, limiting themselves to proxy wars, until the October 7, 2023, attack happened. At that point, the Israelis decided to eliminate the sources of threat and shift their strategy from 'mowing the lawn' – targeting the proxy threats as they grow – to destroying the entire octopus. They started with Hamas, then dismantled Hezbollah's capabilities, exposed the al-Assad regime in Syria, and now, the war has reached Iran. There, Iran is developing its nuclear and missile capabilities, which have rendered Israel's deterrence doctrine obsolete – making war necessary to restore the balance of power in Israel's favor and reinforce deterrence. When it comes to the Israeli concept of deterrence, Ben-Gurion said: 'A long war is not an option for us; deterrence is our true weapon.' Moshe Dayan explained it further: 'We must scare them from even thinking of waging war, not just win it.' Deterrence remains a cornerstone of Israel's military policy, and that's why it seeks – at least in theory – to strip Iran of its threatening capabilities. But fighting between two heavily armed and destruction-ready forces is an extremely dangerous affair. We have seen in recent history how wars have spun out of control. Hassan Nasrallah never imagined that he and his group would be wiped out when he launched a few rockets. Bashar al-Assad never thought he would end up an isolated refugee in a suburb of Moscow. And Sinwar never envisioned the horrific destruction of Gaza when he planned the October 7 attack. It's only been a few days of fighting, yet the losses are significant. The Iranians have lost top-tier commanders, and their nuclear and missile facilities have sustained major damage. The Israelis are bleeding too – Jaffa, Israel's third-largest city, has suffered massive destruction not seen since the 1948 war, due to Iranian missile attacks. The Iron Dome did not offer full protection for a small country in both population and land. This confrontation differs from previous wars in terms of how victory and defeat are defined. The Israelis are now prepared to tolerate heavy human losses. In the past, governments would fall if as few as five people were killed. So far, Israel has lost over 400 soldiers in the Gaza war, and it hasn't stopped. That's what makes this different – both Israelis and Iranians are willing to bear the cost, and each side sees it as an existential war. Each party accuses the other of crossing red lines by targeting civilians – seemingly laying the groundwork to justify expanding the war, just as happened in the Iran-Iraq war, when most missiles were deliberately aimed at cities. Israel's defense minister warned: 'Tehran will burn if Iranian attacks on cities continue.' This in turn will lead to targeting political leaders – who were considered off-limits at the start of the war. Can the war be stopped in its first week? Israeli sources say they have achieved an immediate success by dismantling Iran's defenses – systems, missiles, and command centers – but strategic Iranian capabilities remain, as not all facilities have been destroyed. Will both sides settle for half a victory to halt the war and return to nuclear negotiations? Perhaps Tehran is willing, to stop the ongoing destruction, while the Israelis don't seem satisfied yet with the results – they want to 'complete the mission' to ensure Iran won't threaten them for the next twenty years. There are other players too – particularly US President Donald Trump – who is likely inclined to stop the war. Will he act in the second week before things spiral out of control? How could it spiral? The Russia-Ukraine war began with two countries; today, it includes North Korean troops, Iranian drones, and Western European experts.


Asharq Al-Awsat
2 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Damascus Stands at Equal Distance in Hostility to Both Tel Aviv and Tehran
Damascus remains a wary onlooker as conflict escalates between Israel and Iran, a confrontation threatening to engulf the broader Middle East. Syria's state media has given top billing to the tit-for-tat strikes, with the country's main news channel devoting extended airtime to live coverage and in-depth analysis of the fast-moving developments. Despite widespread Arab and regional condemnation of Israel's actions, Syria has yet to issue an official statement or comment on the matter. In a notable statement, Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, who accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government of dragging the region and the world toward catastrophe, advised Syria to steer clear of the conflict. Erdogan described Israel's actions as 'reckless, aggressive and illegal,' calling them a clear provocation and blatant violation of international law. During a phone call with Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa on Saturday, Erdogan urged Damascus to avoid being drawn into the regional confrontation. The two leaders discussed the rapidly intensifying Israeli-Iranian standoff and other regional and international issues of mutual concern, according to a statement from the Turkish presidency. Syria has no intention of becoming involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran, according to sources close to the government in Damascus, who say the war-ravaged country remains equally distrustful of both sides. 'The Syrian state is too fragile, and its priority is rebuilding and stabilization. It cannot afford to take ill-considered positions in a conflict involving two parties that have both contributed to Syria's destruction,' a senior source told Asharq Al-Awsat. The source said Damascus is exercising 'extreme caution' as regional tensions mount and is working to shield itself from any potential spillover. Since returning to the regional fold, Syria has placed how it deals with Israel issue firmly on the Arab and international agenda, advocating negotiations and the implementation of the 1974 disengagement agreement without ruling out the possibility of a future peace deal. Despite repeated Israeli airstrikes on Syrian territory, including hits on military sites, Damascus has stuck to its position, seeking diplomatic solutions while avoiding direct confrontation. As for Iran, even after its withdrawal from Syria, Damascus still views Tehran as a rival, accusing it of continued interference and attempts to undermine Syria's security and stability. Sources close to the Syrian government said Damascus fears the broader implications of Israel's aggressive posture, warning that unchecked escalation could destabilize the entire region. 'There will be no official position from Damascus against either side, unless Syria itself is directly targeted,' one source said, noting that the government remains focused on protecting its own fragile recovery and avoiding entanglement in a wider regional conflict.


Asharq Al-Awsat
4 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Prominent Israeli Figures Say War with Iran Must Stop
While most Israelis, including Jewish opposition parties, have been supporting the government of Benjamin Netanyahu in its war on Iran, other senior figures have warned against the continued fighting and demanded to end the battle instead of asking the United States to join. One of these prominent figures is former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who held several important official positions, including Defense Minister, Interior Minister and Foreign Minister, in addition to the Israeli Army's Chief of Staff. In an opinion published in Haaretz newspaper, Barak said, 'If the hope that the Israeli strikes will return the Iranians to the negotiating table is realized, great. But if not, the only way for even the United States to keep Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons will be to declare war against the regime itself until it is brought down. Israel cannot do that alone. And I do not believe that Trump will join such a campaign'. He wrote that if the US joins the war, 'We may even accelerate the process: Iran could decide on a breakout, arguing that the aggression of Israel constitutes an existential threat and leaves it with no option but to produce enough weapons-grade highly enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon'. Barak described as 'euphoric' the atmosphere in the street, in news broadcasts and in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's declaration that the Iranian nuclear threat has been lifted. He said the assumption is premature and far from reality. He then praised the Israeli army's Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, who rightly remarked that the Israelis 'must maintain humility and a calibrated connection to reality.' 'We indeed face a long, grave and painful test that we must all be willing to bear. But we must demand from our leaders prudence and responsibility in managing it,' the former PM wrote. He said that when in 2018, Trump withdrew from the nuclear agreement, at Israel's urging, Iran was about 18 months away from a nuclear weapon. 'We struck the physical facilities of its nuclear program and will strike additional facilities and capabilities. But we did not and will not delay, by more than a few weeks, its ability to obtain nuclear weapons: They already have fissile material for about 10 bombs and the knowledge to build them,' Barak said. He also noted that the next generation of facilities has already been built, 800 meters underground. Meanwhile, in its editorial, Haaretz warned on Sunday that Israel must avoid an all-out, destructive war of attrition with Iran. 'Israel must decide what constitutes a sufficient diplomatic achievement. For now, the strategic objective is not the overthrow of the Iranian regime, but the safeguarding of Israel's security,' the newspaper wrote. It added that, 'It's important to remember that, in the background, the painful war in Gaza continues, hostages rot in Hamas' captivity and the humanitarian crisis grows more severe.' According to the newspaper, 'Operational successes aren't a goal in themselves.' It wrote, 'They must be translated into a diplomatic move that would find a solution to the Iranian nuclear threat while avoiding a slide into an all-out, destructive and prolonged war.' The newspaper also noted that Iran still possesses military capacities and can expand the conflict into a regional escalation. On Saturday night, family members of Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza have expressed fears after Israel launched airstrikes against Iran early Friday, which led to the shifting of public attention from the war in Gaza. Around 1,000 family members joined a Zoom rally on Saturday night, which was held instead of the usual rallies held for the hostages across the country on Saturday night because gatherings were not permitted due to the security situation.