How DC's unique status let Trump take control of police, deploy National Guard
The capital's unique status as a federal city, rather than part of a state, grants the federal government unique power to manage it directly. But the president is unlikely to be able to take control of the entire DC government because that would require a change in federal law, which would be difficult to get through the Senate.
Trump also has special authority to deploy the National Guard in DC, in contrast to governors traditionally overseeing mobilizations in their states. But the military is typically blocked from participating directly in law enforcement, which is why California filed a federal lawsuit against Trump's recent deployment of thousands of troops in Los Angeles.
'DC as a federal enclave is fundamentally different than a state or a local government,' Anthony Michael Kreis, a law professor at Georgia State University, told USA TODAY.
Here's what to know about Trump's authority to bolster law enforcement in states and cities − and the limitations on that power:
Trump becomes first to take over DC police under 1973 Home Rule Act
The Constitution, ratified in 1787, provided for a federal capital district to serve as the seat of government controlled by Congress, and DC was founded a few years later. In 1973, Congress approved the Home Rule Act that gave the city a mayor and city council.
But Congress kept control over the city's spending and the ability to overturn DC laws, as happened in 2023 when the council tried to reduce penalties for some crimes. A provision in DC law allows the president to take control of the Metropolitan Police Department temporarily during an emergency.
'I think Washington, DC, is the only city where the president can do that,' Tom Manger, the former chief of Capitol police and departments in the DC suburbs of Montgomery County in Maryland and Fairfax County in Virginia, told USA TODAY.
Trump invoked the provision for the first time Aug. 11, aiming to rid the city of what he called 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' He said the city was overrun with "violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals," despite a declining crime rate.
Trump had to notify the leaders of congressional committees overseeing DC in order for him to keep control of the police for 30 days. A longer extension would require authorization by lawmakers.
Trump told reporters on Aug. 13 that he would ask Congress for 'long-term extensions' for him to remain in control of the DC police, which he expected to be approved 'pretty much unanimously.' But he said he could call a national emergency if needed.
'We're going to be essentially crime-free,' Trump said. 'This is going to be a beacon.'
Trump declared the initial emergency despite DC reporting a 35% drop in violent crime from 2023 to 2024, and a 26% drop in crime so far in 2025. Kreis said 'a lot of people would contest' the declaration of an emergency, but the challenge would be difficult to litigate.
'You almost by default have to defer to the president's judgment on this, no matter who the president is,' Kreis said.
Taking away DC home rule would require change in federal law
Trump is unlikely to be able to take control of the entire DC government because that would require a change in federal law. The legislation could be blocked by a filibuster in the Senate, which requires 60 votes to overcome in a chamber with 53 of Trump's fellow Republicans and 47 members of the Democratic caucus.
Trump threatened to expand the deployment of the National Guard to help fight crime in other states and cities. He specifically cited New York, Chicago and other cities as targets for more troops.
"We're not going to lose our cities over this. This will go further. We're starting very strongly with DC," Trump said.
"We're going to take back our capital," Trump added. "And then we'll look at other cities also."
But other cities and states aren't part of the federal government, so experts say he could not directly take over their police or local governments.'The federal government does not have the authority to commandeer state and local officials against their will to do (its) bidding,' Kreis said. 'He just fundamentally cannot do that as a federalism matter.'
DC Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, called Trump's takeover of the police force 'unsettling and unprecedented' but didn't challenge it in court.
'It's times like these when America needs to know that DC should be the 51st state,' Bowser said in a social media post on Aug. 12.
Trump leads DC National Guard as commander in chief
Trump didn't need any additional authority on Aug. 11 to assign 800 National Guard troops to bolster crime fighting in DC because, as commander in chief, he oversees the Guard in the federal city.
Joseph Nunn, national security counsel at New York University's Brennan Center for Justice, said presidents can deploy the National Guard where they want, but the troops are prevented from directly participating in law enforcement, such as making arrests under a law called the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act.
This is why California National Guard troops in Los Angeles were described as protecting federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and buildings rather than helping arrest undocumented immigrants.
'He can put those troops wherever he wants to put them, but they will be constrained by the Posse Comitatus Act,' Nunn told USA TODAY.
National Guard deployments have been routine
Before Trump's latest directives, National Guard deployments were routine in DC and elsewhere for purposes other than law enforcement.
For example, after the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021, Congress gave Manger the authority to request reinforcements from the National Guard on his own as chief of Capitol police, as opposed to having requests come from a three-member board. Manger said he appreciated the extra staffing to protect the Capitol or help with traffic during protests, such as when he set up dozens of traffic posts to keep vehicles moving during a protest by truckers against COVID-19 mandates.
'The National Guard is terrific,' Manger said.
Local authorities also often coordinate with federal law enforcement, such as the FBI, to fight organized crime or the Drug Enforcement Administration to combat drug trafficking.
'There's a symbiotic relationship between federal and local police across the country,' Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum think tank, told USA TODAY. 'What happened in Washington is distinctly different from what happens in pretty much any city in the country.'
Wexler added that the National Guard has a role to play, but troops are traditionally used 'sparingly.'
The military "will never be a replacement for local police,' Wexler said. 'No police chief I know would ever put the National Guard in a position where they're making an arrest or their dealing directly with a volatile crowd. They have to be used strategically.'
But Manger was uncertain how Trump would move homeless people out of the capital.
'I'm not aware of any other cities or towns around the country that are clamoring for homeless," Manger said. "Where is he going to put them?"
Richard Stengel, a former undersecretary of state during the Obama administration, warned against the use of the military to bolster law enforcement at a time when violent crime in DC is at a 30-year low.
'Throughout history, autocrats use a false pretext to impose government control over local law enforcement as a prelude to a more national takeover,' Stengel said in a social media post on Aug. 11. 'That's far more dangerous than the situation he says he is fixing.'
Trump bolsters immigration enforcement with National Guard
The Pentagon announced on July 25 that 1,700 National Guard personnel – 1,200 already deployed plus 500 additional troops – from cooperating states with Republican governors will work on "case management, transportation and logistical support, and clerical support for the in- and out-processing" of ICE arrests. The troops were sent to more than a dozen cities.
The duties of some will also include taking DNA swabs, photographs and fingerprints of people held at ICE facilities, according to a defense official speaking on condition of anonymity.
California fights Trump's use of National Guard for law enforcement
A landmark federal trial began on Aug. 11 in San Francisco, challenging Trump's deployment of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 active-duty Marines to support deportations and quell immigration protests in Los Angeles.
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will determine if the government violated the Posse Comitatus Act.
California sued the Trump administration by arguing the deployment violated federal law and state sovereignty. But a federal appeals court allowed Trump to retain control of California's National Guard during the legal fight.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom seeks a ruling that would return its National Guard troops to state control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal.
What is the Insurrection Act?
One option for Trump to get around the prohibition on troops conducting law enforcement would be to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act, which aimed to suppress armed rebellion or insurrection.
Despite the harsh terms, presidents have invoked the law throughout the country's history. Former President George H.W. Bush was the last to invoke the law in 1992, when he deployed the National Guard in Los Angeles in response to rioting after the acquittal of four white police officers charged with beating a Black motorist, Rodney King.
Trump threatened repeatedly after Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 to invoke the Insurrection Act but hasn't done so recently.
Legal experts said any challenge to Trump invoking that law would turn on similar semantics, defining whether the emergency or rebellion justified taking over the DC police or deploying National Guard troops in other cities.
'I think it would be naïve to suggest that the president would not try or could not try to stretch the definitions of insurrection or rebellion beyond their common political usage to suit his political needs,' Kreis said. 'The law might say one thing, but its ability to be stretched and molded into a political weapon for the president's benefit is not really purely speculative.'
Contributing: Cybele Mayes-Osterman and Reuters
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why Trump could take over DC police and deploy National Guard
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Study: Not One State Adequately Supports Immigrant Students
Not a single state in the union adequately supports newcomer students, according to an analysis by The Century Foundation, a progressive think tank focused on educational equity. In a report released today, the foundation and its offshoot, Next 100, scored state education departments on whether and how they define immigrant students, collect and report data on their educational progress and fund programs that support them. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter They assigned grades to all 50 states and Washington, D.C., based upon their findings: None won a mark above a C+. Forty-two states scored between C- and D- and five — Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Montana and West Virginia — earned an F. The results come as the Trump administration continues to zero in on this vulnerable student population as part of its multibillion-dollar immigration crackdown: Young people have been arrested, detained — in the case of one Los Angeles teen this month, at gunpoint — and deported. The federal government also recently rescinded rules directing schools to accommodate English learners. Immigrant advocates are pleading with state lawmakers to push back by showing their support for these students and better preparing teachers to meet their needs. 'We are witnessing a sinister daily attack on our immigrant neighbors from a federal government bent on stripping immigrants' access to work, health care, educational opportunities, and even their sense of safety,' said report co-author Alejandra Vázquez Baur, a foundation fellow who heads its National Newcomer Network. 'All students show up with a twinkle in their eye, excited to learn — newcomers included — and states need to do more to support them.' Related The Century Foundation, founded as the Co-operative League in 1919, recommends states develop specific and consistent definitions for this population, which includes refugees, asylum seekers, unaccompanied minors and migratory children. In an effort to better serve this diverse and largely growing student body — there are more than 1 million immigrant students inside the nation's K-12 public schools — agencies must also collect and publish data on key indicators about their educational experiences, including years in the United States, English proficiency, home language, prior schooling and academic outcomes. Such data points might include school engagement, participation in clubs and sports and any behavioral issues that could arise in school, the foundation concludes. State education agencies should use the data to inform funding formulas, the report recommends, and to create a newcomer-specific funding structure that supplements federal money. This additional aid should provide support for students in their first few critical years in the public schools system, 'with transparent reporting on its use and impact.' The report highlights the scattershot nature of data collection across the country: 17 states collect no discernable data on immigrant students at all. Twenty-two compile such information to determine eligibility and maintain compliance with federal Title III funds earmarked for English learners. Eight states collect data that might include newcomers, but it isn't differentiated or used to determine how supports are allocated. Only four have clear definitions of the term 'newcomer' and consistently collect robust data about these children. Oregon requires all districts to submit what it calls Recent Arrivers data and uses the information for federal reporting and to allocate Title III funds, according to the analysis. Kentucky collects disaggregated immigrant student data annually and later divides it by subgroup, while Washington state, according to the researchers, requires districts to track all eligible English learners in their student information systems and report key data points like birth country and U.S. school enrollment date. But North Dakota outdoes them all, the study shows: It publicly reports disaggregated English learner data by year, including counts and percentages of immigrant, refugee and migrant students, among other groups, and breaks down this data by district, home language and ethnicity. The state, population 779,094, had less than 28,000 immigrant residents in 2023. Nearly 84% were of working age. 'This is exemplary,' the report notes of North Dakota's approach, adding it allows for a clearer understanding of the diverse needs within this student population and supports targeted interventions for many children, including those with limited or interrupted formal education. The report cites the unevenness of young immigrants' educational experience, as they sometimes move between districts striving for stable housing. 'When these programs differ across district lines within a state, this group of often highly mobile marginalized students may not qualify for comparable services when they move, and their new schools may not receive the resources they need to properly serve them,' the report reads. 'State education agencies have the unique opportunity to address these inconsistencies to best support all students, including newcomers.' English learners nationally had a 71% high school graduation rate, as of the 2019-20 school year, compared to the 86% national average. At a moment when anti-immigrant fervor was beginning to build in this country, The 74 last year tested the enrollment practices of more than 600 high schools, attempting to register a 19-year-old newcomer who spoke little English and whose education had been interrupted. More than 300 schools refused to register him — including 204 denials in the 35 states and the District of Columbia where high school attendance goes up to at least age 20. Related Vázquez Baur said newcomer students are here to stay and their presence predates the laws guaranteeing them educational access, including the 1982 Supreme Court case, Plyler v. Doe. The quality of their education, she said, will determine not only their opportunity but the health and well-being of their communities. 'Newcomers students are in our classrooms regardless of what our president says,' she said. 'They are valuable neighbors and students. They become valuable leaders in their communities. Especially at this moment, it is the states that are on the front line against the federal government.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Executive director of Regional University System of Oklahoma departing after one year
The Regional University System of Oklahoma will be looking for another leader, as its executive director, Brandon Tatum, has announced his departure. Tatum said he will begin working as the executive vice president at America Achieves, a New York-based nonprofit that has launched the Good Jobs Economy initiative, an effort designed to help local communities integrate and advance strategies for marrying economic growth and economic mobility. Tatum said he will continue living in Oklahoma. Tatum began serving in the RUSO role in August 2024. RUSO is the state's largest four-year university system, serving more than 40,000 students through six institutions: East Central University in Ada, Northeastern State University in Tahlequah, Northwestern Oklahoma State University in Alva, Southeastern Oklahoma State University in Durant, Southwestern Oklahoma State University in Weatherford and the University of Central Oklahoma in Edmond. The executive director serves as the chief executive officer of the RUSO Board of Regents and as a liaison between the regents and the university presidents. 'The RUSO system plays such a key workforce role in the state of Oklahoma,' Tatum said. 'As a system, we serve the most undergraduate students in the state and produce the most nurses and teachers in Oklahoma,' Tatum said. 'It has been a privilege to work with the RUSO Regents and all six of our university presidents to expand opportunity and impact.' Before starting with RUSO, Tatum served as Gov. Kevin Stitt's chief of staff, starting in November 2022. He has held previous roles in both K-12 and higher education, including serving for a time as executive vice president for Oklahoma Christian University in Oklahoma City. While with RUSO, Tatum championed an 'Affordability and Transparency Framework' for the system, which required each of RUSO's universities to develop a three-year strategic plan, detailing how they will address both rising tuition costs and ensuring affordable access to higher education for Oklahomans. 'Dr. Tatum has made a significant impact on RUSO during his time with us,' said Jane McDermott, the chair of the RUSO regents' board. 'We have made significant strides as a system under his leadership and wish him the very best as he takes on this exciting national role.' McDermott said RUSO will accept applications for its executive director's role through Sept. 19. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Executive director of Oklahoma's regional university system is leaving Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Texas House OK'd GOP-favored redistricting. California intends to counter with map of its own
The national redistricting battle enters its next phase Thursday as California Democrats are scheduled to pass a new congressional map that creates five winnable seats for their party, a direct counter to the Texas House's approval of a new map to create more conservative-leaning seats in that state. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has engineered the high-risk strategy in response to President Donald Trump's own brinkmanship. Trump pushed Texas Republicans to reopen the legislative maps they passed in 2021 to squeeze out up to five new GOP seats to help the party stave off a midterm defeat. Unlike in Texas, where passage by the Republican-controlled state Senate and signature by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott are now all that's needed to make the maps official, California faces a more uncertain route. Democrats must use their legislative supermajority to pass the map by a two-third margin. Then they must schedule a special election in November for voters to approve the map that Newsom must sign by Friday to meet ballot deadlines. The added complexity is because California has a voter-approved independent commission that Newsom himself backed before Trump's latest redistricting maneuver. Only the state's voters can override the map that commission approved in 2021. But Newsom said extraordinary steps are required to counter Texas and other Republican-led states that Trump is pushing to revise maps. 'This is a new Democratic Party, this is a new day, this is new energy out there all across this country,' Newsom said Wednesday on a call with reporters. 'And we're going to fight fire with fire.' Texas Democratic lawmakers, vastly outnumbered in that state's legislature, delayed approval of the new map by 15 days by fleeing Texas earlier this month in protest. They were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring upon their return to ensure they attended Wednesday's session. That session ended with an 88-52 party-line vote approving the map after more than eight hours of debate. Democrats have also vowed to challenge the new Texas map in court and complained that Republicans made the political power move before passing legislation responding to deadly floods that swept the state last month. A battle for the US House control waged via redistricting In a sign of Democrats' stiffening redistricting resolve, former President Barack Obama on Tuesday night backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterm election, and the GOP currently controls the House of Representatives by a mere three votes. Trump is going beyond Texas in his push to remake the map. He's pushed Republican leaders in conservative states like Indiana and Missouri to also try to create new Republican seats. Ohio Republicans were already revising their map before Texas moved. Democrats, meanwhile, are mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps as well. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. The struggle for — and against — Texas redistricting Texas Republicans openly said they were acting in their party's interest. State Rep. Todd Hunter, who wrote the legislation formally creating the new map, noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed politicians to redraw districts for nakedly partisan purposes. There was little that outnumbered Democrats could do other than fume and threaten a lawsuit to block the map. Because the Supreme Court has blessed purely partisan gerrymandering, the only way opponents can stop the new Texas map would be by arguing it violates the Voting Rights Act requirement to keep minority communities together so they can select representatives of their choice. House Republicans' frustration at the Democrats' flight and ability to delay the vote was palpable during the Wednesday vote. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced as debate started that doors to the chamber were locked and any member leaving was required to have a permission slip. The doors were only unlocked after final passage more than eight hours later. Republicans issued civil arrest warrants to bring the Democrats back after they left the state Aug. 3, and Abbott asked the state Supreme Court to oust several Democrats from office. The lawmakers also face a fine of $500 for every day they were absent. ___ Riccardi reported from Denver. John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas, and Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, contributed to this report.
