Capitol Report: Leaders debate energy legislation, DEI, PURA Commissioner
Plus, the Connecticut Department of Education declines to comply with the Executive Order to end DEI in schools and a walkout occurred during the PURA Commissioner nomination vote.
News 8 political reporter Mike Cerulli shares more on energy legislation.
The panel discusses an apology from Secretary of State Stephanie Thomas over comments regarding the Trump administration and how a Stamford Mayoral candidate is a time traveler from space.
Watch the show in the video above.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Idaho Gov. Brad Little orders budget cuts amid tax breaks, revenue shortfall
Idaho Gov. Brad Little on Friday signed an executive order requiring all state agencies other than public schools to cut spending, he announced in a news release. It was the first time since 2020 such cuts have been ordered, according to the Governor's Office. The order cited the need to cut spending after Idaho lawmakers reduced income and property taxes by over 20%. The Governor's Office said the state must 'make way' for the tax cuts in President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill.' State agencies, including the Idaho State Police, Department of Correction and Department of Health and Welfare — which administers Medicaid — must reduce their general fund spending by 3% for the 2026 fiscal year, which began in July. They can consider consolidating services or agencies, eliminating vacant positions, cutting back on contract costs, and reviewing unused funds that are 'not critical' to operations, according to the order. 'Idaho will right-size government to match the means of Idahoans,' the order read. In the news release about the order, the Governor's Office celebrated Idaho's strong and rapidly growing economy. The Idaho Legislature this year made 'unprecedented' investments in school facilities, teacher pay and literacy, 'demonstrating we can have it all,' Little wrote in the order. 'We can simultaneously cut taxes while meeting the needs of a growing state.' Idaho Democrats pushed back on that framing. Senate Minority Leader Melissa Wintrow, D-Boise, in a Friday news release said 'no amount of spin can hide the truth.' 'If Idaho's fiscal health were truly as strong as Republicans claim, there would be no need to strip funding mid-year,' Wintrow said. 'Ending this wasteful scheme will not close the hundreds of millions of dollars in budget shortfalls created by Republican giveaways.' Idaho Democrats also pointed the finger at the GOP's passage of laws that cost more money, such as allowing public funding for private school tuition. Lauren Necochea, the party's chair, in another news release said the program blew 'a hole in the budget' and called the cuts 'the bill coming due for reckless Republican rule.' 'We were honest with Idahoans about where this budget was headed,' she said. 'Back in the spring, Democrats warned that Statehouse Republicans were budgeting dishonestly while the Trump regime was driving up costs and undermining our economy. The GOP ignored these warnings, and now Idaho families are paying the price.' Though it expressed appreciation for Little's exclusion of public schools from the cuts, the Idaho Education Association in a release called them 'very unfortunate and completely predictable.' 'The Idaho Legislature's massive tax cuts easily foretold this outcome, even as lawmakers dismissed the needs of basic governing and Idaho's most vulnerable residents,' President Layne McInelly wrote. 'Idaho Education Association members believe Gov. Little is right to spare Idaho's public school students and classrooms from even more fiscal austerity while lawmakers write checks to the wealthy.' In recent months, state revenues came in below forecasts set by the Legislature. Little in February told reporters he worried that lawmakers' proposals to cut taxes were beyond what the state could afford. The Legislature cut taxes by $400 million and spent another $50 million on a tax credit for private education. Those bills, which Little signed into law, reduced revenue available for the state budget by about $453 million, the Idaho Capital Sun reported. In his January State of the State address, Little called for a reduction of the fund by $100 million — less than a quarter of the Legislature's amount. 'If I would have thought we could do $450 (million), I would have proposed $450 (million),' Little said of the hundreds of millions more that lawmakers aim to return to taxpayers. On Friday, Democrats called for a special legislative session to repeal the tax credit program, often referred to as school vouchers. 'It is an essential first step toward restoring fiscal responsibility,' Wintrow said in the release. Idaho continues its 'historic' tax cuts. Here's what residents can expect What will Trump administration cuts mean for Idaho? Gov. Little predicts 'economic shock' Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Want to fix the nation's broken higher-ed system? Look to the South
Universities in the American South are becoming models for fixing higher education. After the COVID lockdowns and amid antisemitic violence and the anti-American and DEI-infused agendas that have taken hold over the past two decades, Southern colleges are now displacing the broken universities in the Northeast that were once benchmarks for elite education. The number of Northeastern high-school students going to Southern colleges has nearly doubled in the last 20 years, thanks largely to lower costs and less-ideologically driven campus cultures. College-admissions experts note that the rise in these schools' popularity has allowed them to become more selective, boosting their prestige even further among high-school students. From 2014 to 2024, the last full year for available admissions data, Auburn University's freshman-class acceptance rate decreased from 85% to 46%; Clemson University's dropped from 52% to 38%. The trend line holds even for the South's most selective colleges: Rice University's acceptance rate dipped from 14% to 8%; Emory University's, from 26% to 15%. By contrast, elite Northeastern universities have only been able to maintain their enrollments by taking in more foreign students. Why are young people are flocking to Southern universities? Because, on the whole, they're run better. They take a pragmatic approach to education that's attractive to students who want to learn without the far-left craziness that prevails at so many schools. As an adjunct professor at the University of Kentucky, I'm immersed in a common-sense-oriented culture that's absent at elite Northeastern schools, one that lets administrators run the institution more sensibly based on what works best and not the optics of a vocal minority's radical ideology. This summer, the University of Kentucky swiftly fired a professor who launched an online petition calling for international warfare against Jews. About the same time, Columbia University was agreeing to a $221 million settlement with the Trump administration over its multi-year failures to police protesters who caused millions of dollars in damage and harassed peers in the name of far-left ideology pushed by their professors. The contrast could not be starker. Common-sense governance in higher education inspires leaders to be pragmatic and take action to keep students safe and the campus running normally. Pragmatism translates into rational decision-making and logical solutions across all areas of university life. The Universities of Florida and North Carolina systems, for example, have among the strongest track records of enforcing DEI bans and fortifying campus safety against wanton protesters. These policies transcend collegiate bureaucracies and change campus cultures for the better. At the University of North Carolina, students shut down their peers' anti-American protest by raising the American flag in front of them. At the University of Florida, Jewish students felt reassured after Oct. 7 because then-President Ben Sasse immediately issued a zero-tolerance statement for campus antisemitism. Southern universities' resolve to defy far-left craziness resonates with prospective college students because the results give young people positive visions of what they can experience on campus, achieve as students and accomplish after graduation. When learning devolves into activism, education loses its purpose as a tool for practical future success. Seminar discussions and quad gatherings simply won't translate into good jobs after graduation. Students fleeing the Northeast are reacting to that disconnect between college as a stagnant, unserious experience versus a real vehicle for future success. Southern universities are more disposed to traditional approaches to education, which prioritizes civics education and reinforces the campus as a place for cultivating intellectual and spiritual growth. Public institutions like the University of South Carolina and North Carolina State University have recently invested millions on civic-engagement curriculum. Texas, Florida and Tennessee have also allocated millions to beef up civics and classical education at their state universities. And Southern schools are more willing to welcome students of faith — a draw for some. The 2023 Christian revival at Asbury University in Kentucky was an expression of students' attraction to traditional education. The 16-day prayer celebration numbered 20,000 participants and inspired thousands more at Baylor, Texas A&M and Auburn to hold similar events that year. Students said their search for truth, connection and self-discovery in a society dominated by hyper-politicization motivated them to attend such events. Northeastern colleges thought pursuing radical change through social-justice activism would keep them on top — but that course has only precipitated their decline in reputation and relevance. They could learn much from the South. Zachary Marschall is editor-in-chief of Leadership Institute's Campus Reform and an adjunct assistant professor of arts administration at the University of Kentucky.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump order zeroes in on payments
This story was originally published on Payments Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Payments Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: In an executive order issued last week, President Donald Trump took aim at payments services, among other financial services provided by banks. He demanded that financial institutions not deny consumers access to payments services, and related services, based on their political views. The executive order issued Aug. 7 mandates that federal banking regulators should identify consumers to whom financial institutions may have denied payment processing services by way of a 'politicized or unlawful debanking action.' The order also requires that alleged victims of discrimination be notified and given the opportunity to receive the services they were denied. The order alleged that financial institutions had previously 'engaged in unacceptable practices' to interfere with individuals and businesses seeking to make payments. For instance, people were flagged in the past if they 'made peer-to-peer payments that involved terms like 'Trump' or 'MAGA,' even though there was no specific evidence tying those individuals to criminal conduct,' the order said. Dive Insight: Trump's executive order signals his concerns regarding anti-conservative bias in the U.S. financial system. As a result, banking regulators will spend the coming months combing through alleged incidents of discrimination on the basis of political affiliation and religion. In a CNBC interview days before Trump issued the executive order, the president accused JPMorgan Chase of dropping him as a client and alleged that Bank of America declined to take him on as a customer. Earlier this year, one of the president's sons, Eric Trump, and four other Trump corporate entities filed a lawsuit against credit card giant Capital One regarding the company's takeover of hundreds of Trump bank accounts in June 2021. The lawsuit alleged the financial institution debanked the plaintiffs' accounts because 'Capital One believed that the political tide at the moment favored doing so.' Trump's executive order also requires federal banking regulators to review their current complaint data to find financial firms that have 'engaged in unlawful debanking on the basis of religion' and refer such incidents to the U.S. attorney general for 'appropriate civil action.' 'Bank regulators have used supervisory scrutiny and other influence over regulated banks to direct or otherwise encourage politicized or unlawful debanking activities,' Trump said in the executive order. ''Operation Chokepoint,' for example, was a well-documented and systemic means by which Federal regulators pushed banks to minimize their involvement with individuals and companies engaged in lawful activities and industries disfavored by regulators based on factors other than individualized, objective, risk-based standards.' Recommended Reading Trump Organization lawsuit raises questions about Capital One-Discover deal
