logo
Diamer-Basha dam now a top priority

Diamer-Basha dam now a top priority

Express Tribune10-05-2025

The government on Friday decided to proceed with its plan to present a full fiscal year 2025-26 budget amid a suggestion to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to unveil a short-term budget and also get provincial contributions to meet increased defense expenses.
The participants of a budget preparation meeting on Friday also urged the government to allocate substantial funds for national defense and expedite the completion of the Diamer-Basha dam, citing India's move to hold the Indus Waters Treaty in abeyance.
During the meeting, the prime minister also asked the Federal Board of Revenue to tax the income of Islamabad Club, which is the recreational venue for the country's bureaucrats, foreign diplomats and richest persons of society.
The premier chaired the meeting of his cabinet ministers and top-ranking business leaders of the country to discuss the 2025-26 budget, to be unveiled in the first week of June.
There was a suggestion in the meeting that due to the prevailing tensions with India, the government should provide maximum possible money for the defence and also consider the option of giving a shorter than one-year budget, according to multiple participants of the meeting.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif did not immediately share his mind on the proposal. The Constitution provides a room for giving a four-month budget. But a finance ministry official said that the government's plan to present the entire fiscal year 2025-26 budget remained intact.
The Ministry of Finance has assured full provision of the resources to deal with the India-created conflict situation and has proposed at least 18% increase in the allocation for the next fiscal year over this year's spending.
There was also a proposal in the meeting that the government should freeze next fiscal year's development budget at this year's actual spending, which may not cross Rs600 billion due to low spending so far.
The sources said that some cabinet members also suggested giving maximum money for the completion of the Diamer-Basha dam so that the reservoir is completed at the earliest to store water.
The participants urged to build sufficient foreign exchange reserves for meeting any unexpected import needs during the tension times.
One of Pakistan's richest persons suggested the premier to reduce the bloated size of the government. The private sector participants also asked the PM to reduce taxes on textile exports and also suspend the Export Development Surcharge being collected from exporters.
One of the participants urged the government to ban economic transactions by non-filers, including banning trading of grains by them.
An official press statement underlined that the Prime Minister said that providing relief to the common man in the upcoming budget was the government's priority, and all-out resources will be utilized to reduce the financial difficulties of the poor and middle class.
The prime minister directed that the upcoming budget should be prepared with a focus on sustainable export-driven growth and considering the projects to promote industries and increase production. The budget should also focus extensively on the creation of jobs, agriculture, information technology, small and medium enterprises, and the housing sector, said Sharif.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Retail sector: CAP voices concerns over lack of ‘meaningful' tax reforms
Retail sector: CAP voices concerns over lack of ‘meaningful' tax reforms

Business Recorder

time15 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Retail sector: CAP voices concerns over lack of ‘meaningful' tax reforms

LAHORE: The Chainstore Association of Pakistan (CAP) has raised significant concerns over the lack of meaningful tax reforms for the retail sector in the proposed Finance Bill 2025–26. The CAP has also warned that targeting domestic e-commerce could inadvertently harm the formal retail sector and jeopardize the growth of Pakistan's digital economy if not revised. The CAP acknowledged the government's efforts to broaden the tax base and formalize the economy. However, the association argues that inconsistent and short-sighted policies have placed disproportionate burdens on tax-compliant retailers integrated with the Federal Board of Revenue's Point of Sale (FBR-POS) system. The absence of a clear, long-term taxation roadmap, developed in consultation with stakeholders, has further deepened uncertainty within the sector. 'This year, the retail ecosystem anticipated a strategic, long-term approach in the Finance Bill,' said CAP Chairman Asfandyar Farrukh. 'Instead, we see a continuation of past practices, with our proposals to foster formal retail growth and encourage broader documentation largely overlooked.' Organized retail currently accounts for only 10% of Pakistan's retail and wholesale trade, significantly lower than the 15–20% share observed in comparable economies. Informal competition, increasing compliance burdens, and uneven enforcement continue to hinder growth, investment, and job creation in the formal retail sector. CAP Patron-in-Chief Tariq Mehboob highlighted the detrimental impact of last year's decision to eliminate the GST concession for customers of tax-compliant retailers, which has further tilted the competitive landscape in favor of informal players. 'Schemes like Tajir Dost failed due to inadequate planning and lack of stakeholder engagement,' Mehboob stated. 'There is still an opportunity to revise the Finance Bill before its finalization. Without prompt action, we risk losing another year without meaningful reform.' To encourage digital payments and economic documentation, the CAP has proposed reduced GST rates for consumers who transact digitally with retailers of any size. These rates, coupled with simplified compliance measures and built on the success of provincial incentives, would lower costs, promote formalization, and reduce reliance on cash transactions. Additionally, the CAP has recommended a fixed quarterly advance income tax regime for small retailers, payable through branchless banking and adjustable against annual filings. The association also advocates for a stable, three-to-five-year tax framework, complemented by incentives such as cashback programmes and service benefits at NADRA and passport offices, to build trust and encourage small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to register. Pakistan's e-commerce sector has experienced remarkable growth, expanding by over 35% annually and empowering more than 100,000 micro and small sellers while generating jobs in technology and logistics. According to the State Bank of Pakistan, the sector facilitated over PKR 538 billion in digital payments in 2024. The CAP supports positive measures in the Finance Bill, such as the 5% digital presence levy on imported goods sold through foreign platforms like Temu and the introduction of e-commerce transaction reporting to enhance documentation. However, the CAP has expressed concern over several proposed tax compliance measures that could undermine these gains. Key concerns include blanket sales tax withholding on already documented businesses without input adjustment, mandatory sales tax registration for micro-sellers—particularly impacting youth and women entrepreneurs—and complex, multi-rate income tax withholding for platforms, payment providers, and courier services. These policies risk creating operational bottlenecks, complicating payment recovery, and increasing compliance costs across the e-commerce value chain. The CAP has called on the Ministry of Finance, the Federal Board of Revenue, and the Ministry of Commerce to suspend the implementation of these measures and engage in urgent consultations with stakeholders, including online sellers, platforms, and service providers. The association has put forward several recommendations to address these issues: limiting the 2% sales tax withholding to non-Active Taxpayer List (ATL) sellers, accepting income tax registration as sufficient for small, home-based online sellers, implementing a simplified single-rate income tax withholding of 0.25%, restructuring penalties to encourage rather than punish compliance, rationalizing provincial taxes on essential digital services, and providing a transition period of at least two to three months for e-commerce businesses to adapt. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

'No' US role in ceasefire with Pakistan
'No' US role in ceasefire with Pakistan

Express Tribune

time15 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

'No' US role in ceasefire with Pakistan

PM Carney invites Modi to G7 as guest; first Canada visit in 10 years seen as diplomatic test for the new leader. PHOTO: REUTERS India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi told US President Donald Trump late on Tuesday that a ceasefire between India and Pakistan after a four-day conflict in May was achieved through talks between the two militaries and not US mediation, according to India's senior-most diplomat. The Indian prime minister also told the US president that New Delhi will never accept third-party mediation with Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir, the India's senior-most diplomat said. Foreign secretary Vikram Misri said that Modi "strongly" conveyed India's long-held stand to Trump during a phone call between the two leaders on Tuesday. Trump has repeatedly offered to mediate between India and Pakistan to solve the "Kashmir issue" since a four-day conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbours in May. The White House has not commented on India's statement. Analysts say Trump's very public statements on offers of mediation over Kashmir have tested Delhi's red lines on the issue. Delhi has always encouraged its Western partners not to treat India and Pakistan as equals. It also discourages western leaders from undertaking visits to India and Pakistan at the same time. "PM Modi told President Trump clearly that during this period, there was no talk at any stage on subjects like India-US trade deal or US mediation between India and Pakistan," Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri said in a press statement. "Talks for ceasing military action happened directly between India and Pakistan through existing military channels, and on the insistence of Pakistan. Prime Minister Modi emphasised that India has not accepted mediation in the past and will never do," he said. However, Modi's claim that the decision to de-escalate was made on the call of Pakistan's military has raised questions about the rationale behind the offensive in the first place with the assertion appearing to potentially undercut New Delhi's own stance. Misri said the two leaders were due to meet on the sidelines of G7 summit but Trump left a day early due to the situation in the Middle East. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the Modi-Trump call. Pakistan has previously said that the ceasefire happened after its military returned a call the Indian military had initiated. He said that Trump expressed his support for India's fight against terrorism and that Modi told him India's Operation Sindoor under which it launched the cross-border strikes was still on. Trump also asked Modi if he could stop by the US on his return from Canada, Misri said, but the Indian leader expressed his inability to do so due to a pre-decided schedule. He invited Trump to visit India later this year for the summit of the leaders of the Quad grouping, which Trump accepted, Misri said.

Timeline has to be set by court when constitutional timeline is not met: PTI counsel
Timeline has to be set by court when constitutional timeline is not met: PTI counsel

Business Recorder

time16 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Timeline has to be set by court when constitutional timeline is not met: PTI counsel

ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf(PTI)'s counsel told the Constitutional Bench that the majority judgment in reserved seats has not violated the Constitution by extending time for 41 independents to join the PTI. Salman Akram Raja, representing the PTI, said that eight judges of the Supreme Court have dealt with the coercive measure adopted by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) the PTI candidates had opted to contest elections as independent. An 11-member Constitutional Bench, headed by Justice Aminuddin Khan, heard the review petitions of Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan Peoples' Party (PPP) and the ECP. The proceeding was live-streamed on SC's You Tube channel. Raja argued that the timeline has to be set by the Court when constitutional timeline is not met. The eight judges considering all the facts and the precedents gave relief to the PTI. Justice Amin inquired when the Court hearing an appeal filed against the Peshawar High Court (PHC) under Article 185 of the Constitution then can use Article 187. Raja, citing cases of NRO and extension to the Chief of Army Staff, argued that deviation had taken place in the past as well, but the Supreme Court cured them. He said judgment of Justice Mandokhail and Justice Qazi Faez also recognised the deviation and cured it by declaring that 39 independents are PTI candidates and entitled to reserved seats. Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail said to extent of 39 independents they had done that on the basis of undisputed facts. Raja contended that the majority judgment had also looked at all the facts and the precedents and came up with two different sets of relief, adding the factual finding cannot be undone. Justice Amin said till date, none of the 80 independents has disputed that he or she has not joined the SIC independently. Justice Mandokhail noted that the elections process starts by filing nomination papers, adding the candidates who have mentioned in their nomination papers independent then why not they accept those nomination papers? At the onset of the proceedings, Raja explained why the PTI candidates contested general elections 2024 as independents. He submitted that after the Supreme Court's judgment on the PTI's intra-party elections, the ECP disallowed party symbol to them, and also derecognised the PTI, adding the ECP in its 9th February order declared all the PTI candidates as independents, including those who had contested on PTI tickets and won the elections. He told that there was great confusion at time as they were told that all the PTI candidates would be treated as independents, 'therefore our returned candidates had joined the SIC, as we had the precedent of Balochistan Awami Party (BAP) before us that a party which had not contested elections and won any seats, but was distributed reserved seats.' 'We had the understanding that ultimately the will of the people would prevail.' Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail stated that the BAP had contested the election and secured seats, adding it had some members in the Balochistan provincial assembly and five in the Senate, if not in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Raja replied that they had assumption that the BAP party had no seats in the National Assembly and the provincial assemblies. Justice Mandokhail said despite various difficulties some of the PTI members contested on the PTI tickets and became MNAs. He questioned when PTI was in the National Assembly then why 80 independent returned candidates joined the Sunni Ittehad Council (SIC). He asked whether those six MNAs had claimed reserved seats on their strength? Raja replied that till 11th February 2024, the ECP treated them (the six MNAs) also as independents. 'If six lawmakers had been recognised as PTI then the independent candidates could have joined the PTI instead of the SIC.' Justice Mandokhail then asked Raja that you filed a writ petition before the Lahore High Court (LHC),praying that you should be declared as PTI candidate instead of independent. Raja informed that his petition was disposed of by a divisional bench of LHC, which included Justice Ali Baqar Najafi, without any order and the matter was remanded to the ECP. 'I came to the Supreme Court against that order I have challenged the vires of Explanation of Rule 94 of The Election Rules, but the SC office returned my petition on 2nd February, 2024 by raising objections.' Justice Mandokhail then asked him whether you or any of the PTI leaders till date has challenged that order? Raja responded: 'We came to the Supreme Court not once, but twice, but our application was returned by the Registrar's Office, and we were told that the Supreme Court will not entertain any election related application.' Upon that, Justice Mandokhail questioned why not any of the PTI leaders filed any chamber appeal. The case was adjourned until today (Thursday). Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store