logo
Los Angeles ICE raids fuel controversy over masked agents, World News

Los Angeles ICE raids fuel controversy over masked agents, World News

AsiaOnea day ago

WASHINGTON — Images of federal immigration agents wearing masks and balaclavas as they conduct raids in Los Angeles and other US cities have ignited a politically charged debate over whether they are protecting their identities or engaging in intimidation tactics.
Violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement in Los Angeles during the weekend were triggered by masked US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers rounding up alleged immigration offenders.
Democratic lawmakers and civil rights groups say masks are an attempt by ICE agents to escape accountability for their actions and are aimed at frightening immigrants as they carry out Republican President Donald Trump's directive to crack down on illegal immigration.
Republicans and ICE officials assert the face coverings are necessary to protect agents and their families from being targeted by "doxxing", in which their home addresses and personal information are posted online.
"People are out there taking photos of the names, their faces, and posting them online with death threats to their family and themselves," Todd Lyons, the acting ICE chief, said last week.
There are no federal rules or laws forbidding mask-wearing by law enforcement personnel, although historically they have been used to protect the identities of agents during undercover operations, said Jerry Robinette, a former ICE special agent in charge.
Armed masked ICE agents have also been seen arresting people in cities besides Los Angeles, often in plain clothes that sometimes lack clear identifying markings.
One of the most notable arrests by ICE officials came in March when Turkish student Rumeysa Ozturk was confronted by several masked, plain-clothed agents on a street in a Boston suburb. Her arrest and terrified reaction were captured in a video that went viral.
Ozturk, arrested after co-writing an opinion piece criticising her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza, was released from ICE detention in May after a judge's order.
Masked ICE agents have been filmed arresting workers at a restaurant in San Diego and a gardener at a house in Massachusetts. ICE officers were prominently seen wearing masks during arrests at courthouses across the US last month. Increased mask use in Trump's second term
Scott Shuchart, a top ICE policy official under former Democratic President Joe Biden, said it appeared ICE officers had increased the use of face coverings and tactical gear since Trump took office.
Shuchart said an officer concealing their identity goes against typical American law enforcement practices.
"In general, law enforcement personnel need to have name patches, badge numbers, or other indicia that the public can see and use to file complaints and ensure accountability and oversight," Shuchart said.
Three former US officials dealing with immigration enforcement, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said they did not recall ICE officers routinely using face masks while Biden was in office from 2021-2025.
Mask-wearing by law enforcement agents is more common in countries such as Mexico and Russia with high levels of organised crime or political unrest, or during counter-terrorism operations in countries including France.
Boston's Democratic Mayor Michelle Wu was criticised by the Trump administration last week when she compared masked ICE agents to the "secret police" and a neo-Nazi group.
Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, the parent agency of ICE, called Wu's rhetoric dangerous.
"Make no mistake, this type of rhetoric is contributing to the surge in assaults of ICE officers through their repeated vilification and demonization of ICE," McLaughlin said. Doxxing
Trump's border czar Tom Homan, speaking to Reuters in May, defended ICE officers using face coverings.
"They've been doxxed repeatedly," Homan said. "I should know because I've been doxxed a thousand times myself."
Homan cited an April protest outside his home in upstate New York after ICE arrested a mother and her three children on a dairy farm.
The debate over ICE masks has also erupted on Capitol Hill.
Last week the Democrats' House of Representatives leader, Hakeem Jeffries, denounced the practice, saying ICE agents were trying to conceal their identities from the American people.
Jeffries and others believe unidentifiable law enforcement officials are difficult to hold accountable when misconduct is alleged. He vowed that the masked ICE agents would be identified "no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes."
His comments were decried by his Republican counterpart, House Speaker Mike Johnson.
"They need to back off of ICE and respect our agents and stop protesting against them," Johnson told Fox News.
[[nid:718855]]

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump can abolish national monuments, US Justice Department says
Trump can abolish national monuments, US Justice Department says

Straits Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Trump can abolish national monuments, US Justice Department says

FILE PHOTO: A vehicle rides on a highway past a pair of buttes known as the Bears Ears in Bears Ears National Monument outside Blanding, Utah, U.S., October 22, 2023. REUTERS/Jim Urquhart/File Photo President Donald Trump has the power to abolish two national monuments in California established by his Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, as well as any others created by past presidents, according to a newly released legal opinion from a key adviser within the U.S. Department of Justice. The May 27 document, which was released on Tuesday, reversed a 1938 legal opinion and sets the stage for the Republican president to eliminate federal protections for potentially millions of acres of land previously designated as national monuments. National monuments are created by presidents in recognition of a site's cultural, historical or scientific importance, while national parks are created by Congress largely to protect outstanding scenic features or natural phenomena. Lanora Pettit, who heads the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, was asked by the White House to provide a new opinion as Trump considered whether to reverse Biden's decision in January in his final days in office to designate two California sites that hold significance to Native American tribes as national monuments. The Chuckwalla National Monument preserves more than 624,000 acres just south of Joshua Tree National Park. The Sattitla Highlands National Monument protects 224,000 acres where the dormant Medicine Lake volcano carved craters and lava tubes. Biden had relied on the Antiquities Act of 1906, a law that has been invoked by numerous presidents to designate over 100 national monuments. A 1938 opinion by Attorney General Homer Cummings, who served under Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt, has been long cited as constraining the ability of presidents to undo past designations. But in a 50-page legal opinion, Pettit concluded that the Antiquities Act gives presidents not only the power to establish national monuments on federal lands but also to determine that they never were or no longer are deserving of those protections. The White House has also asked Pettit to consider whether the Justice Department should disavow Cummings' prior opinion. She said it should, writing that the law's silence about whether a president could revoke a predecessor's designation of a monument should be understood as meaning he has such authority. "Thus, for the Antiquities Act, the power to declare carries with it the power to revoke," Pettit wrote. The legal opinion did note that since the earliest days of the Antiquities Act, presidents have 'from time to time diminished' the land set aside to protect monuments. Trump, in his first term, had reduced the size of the Bears Ears National Monument by 85% and the Grand Staircase-Escalante monument by half, both in Utah. Biden restored both monuments to their former size. But no president has abolished a national monument. It was unclear if and when Trump would revoke the monument status for the two California sites or any other monuments. Asked about the new legal opinion, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields in a statement cited the need to "liberate our federal lands and waters to oil, gas, coal, geothermal, and mineral leasing." REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Chancellor Merz's remaking of Germany
Chancellor Merz's remaking of Germany

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Chancellor Merz's remaking of Germany

The relationship between the Germans and US President Donald Trump has long been characterised by antipathy, says the writer. PHOTO: REUTERS All foreign leaders coming to Washington must now pass an ordeal: sitting in the White House's Oval Office next to Mr Donald Trump and facing a gaggle of shouting American journalists. Anything can happen. Sometimes, the US President is content to discuss domestic American matters; in this case, the visiting foreign leader suffers no harm and is left to admire the garish gold decorations Mr Trump has now stuck all over the Oval Office. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Trump is provoking LA to fire up his base
Trump is provoking LA to fire up his base

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Trump is provoking LA to fire up his base

Protestes waving Mexican and US flags face off with police during a protest in downtown Los Angeles, on June 9. PHOTO: AFP History sometimes needs a push. In sending his immigration police to disrupt Los Angeles, US President Donald Trump recognises this. He can now use the predictable backlash to seize more power. Mr Trump's administration already stands out historically for aggregating powers to itself that the US Constitution explicitly vests in Congress. The Constitution does empower the president to deploy the army domestically, but only if he declares the nation to be in a state of insurrection, as Abraham Lincoln did in the 1860s. The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked without a state governor's consent was by Lyndon Johnson in 1965 to protect civil rights marchers in Alabama. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store