Maine lawmakers hope to combat rising student homelessness with new housing assistance fund
Legislation to establish a fund to financially help students avoid homelessness passed both chambers of the Maine Legislature this week.
The bill, LD 384, would allocate up to $750 per academic year to the family or guardian of a student at risk of homelessness for housing-related needs, which could include rental assistance, utilities, critical home repairs and transportation. In light of increasing student homelessness, the disruptions to students' learning caused by housing insecurity, in addition to a lack of available assistance to prevent homelessness, the bill was 'perhaps one of the most impactful bills that the Education and Cultural Affairs Committee heard this session,' according to committee co-chair Rep. Kelly Murphy (D-Scarborough).
The Maine Senate passed the bill on Wednesday with 28 members voting in favor and only six opposed. The House of Representatives had a narrower margin, with 81 members voting Thursday in favor of the bill and 62 opposed. The bill will go back to both chambers for final enactment votes.
Sponsor Sen. Joe Rafferty (D-York), who also co-chairs the education committee, explained that the bill builds on a pilot program approved in the 131st Legislature, which succeeded in helping more than 800 students. Several administrators who spoke at the public hearing vouched for the support they were able to provide struggling students in their districts through the pilot program, which LD 384 would make permanent.
'It breaks my heart to know that there are students throughout Maine who are struggling with housing insecurity and don't know where they're going to sleep each night,' Rafferty said during the Senate floor discussion Wednesday. 'The bill before us today would continue with this good work by permanently establishing a program so that our students can grow up and learn without worrying about where they're going to sleep. It is the right thing to do.'
In Maine, the number of unhoused students has increased from 2,317 students in the 2021-22 school year to more than 5,000 in the 2023-24 school year, Murphy said.
Opponents of the bill in both chambers said the intent was noble, but took issue with the $1.5 million fiscal note. Rep. Barbara Bagshaw (R-Windham) also questioned how much the one-time payment would help families avoid homelessness in the long term.
'If a family is already on the brink, this amount is unlikely to provide lasting stability' she said. 'We're offering a temporary fix to a systematic problem without addressing the root causes.'
During the public hearing, Mallory Cook, director of training and early educator engagement for the Maine Education Association, cited a Maine Housing Coalition report from 2020 that said a vast majority of Maine tenants only owed between $1,000 and $1,500 to their landlords, making the $750 per student annual allocation in LD 384 critical in preventing student homelessness.
'It's not a lot of money, but oftentimes when we've reached a crisis situation in these families, $750 does make the difference between being evicted or having your utility shut off,' Murphy said Thursday. 'This is one way to prevent student homelessness and to ensure that all students have the opportunity to succeed.'
Sen. James Libby (R- Cumberland) said given the current budget deficit the bill was not likely to be funded and would likely languish on the appropriations table, where bills not provided for in the budget compete for remaining funds.
Under the federal McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, all students experiencing homelessness are entitled to a free, appropriate public education. But it does not allocate any money to prevent homelessness, Murphy pointed out.
This week the Legislature also passed another bill, LD 747, which directs the Maine Housing Authority to develop a program to provide assistance to homeless students in coordination with the Department of Education and the Department of Health and Human Services.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
American Eagle shares soar nearly 20% after Trump gushes over ‘fantastic' Sydney Sweeney ad
American Eagle's ties to sultry superstar Sydney Sweeney continued to pay massive dividends Monday — as the retailer's stock surging by nearly 20% after President Trump gave a thumb's-up to her 'fantastic' ad. Trump's approval came after the 'Euphoria' and 'White Lotus' actress revealed that she is a registered Republican voter. 'Oh, now I adore her ad… If Sydney Sweeney is registered, I think her ad is fantastic,' Trump said Sunday. Advertisement 5 President Donald Trump praised Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle ads after learning she is a registered Republican, calling them 'fantastic.' Getty Images The American Eagle ad featuring Sweeney decked out in denim sparked a 'woke' uproar from social media users who objected to the 'great jeans' wordplay that some interpret as having racial overtones. But the fury from left-wing activists was met with its own backlash against the woke mob by HBO's Bill Maher and others Trump amplified his support for Sweeney on his Truth Social platform, calling the American Eagle advertisements 'fantastic' and claiming the featured jeans were 'flying off the shelves.' Advertisement The renewed attention sent the retailer's stock skyrocketing 17%, to $12.61 as of noon ET. The clothing company's market capitalization now stands at $2.14 billion, though shares remain well below their 52-week peak of $22.82. The stock has been trading in a range between $9.27 and that high over the past year, with Monday's gains representing a notable reversal after recent losses. Advertisement 5 Sydney Sweeney appears in American Eagle's fall campaign, which plays on the phrase 'great jeans.' American Eagle 5 Critics have attacked the campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney on social media platforms. American Eagle American Eagle's fall denim campaign has sparked intense public discussion since its launch, centering on advertisements that play with the phrase 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Critics have questioned whether the ads cater to what they term the 'male gaze' and whether this conflicts with American Eagle's subsidiary brand Aerie, which has built a reputation for 'body-positive messaging' by using models of varying body types. Advertisement American Eagle responded to the criticism by issuing a public statement defending their creative choices. 5 Trump's endorsement of American Eagle's 'great jeans' campaign helped fuel a nearly 15% spike in the retailer's stock on Monday. AP 'This campaign is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her narrative. We will continue to honor the unique ways everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence,' the company said. 'Great jeans flatter everyone.' The retailer emphasized that its focus remained on fashion rather than any other interpretation of its messaging. 5 Shares of American Eagle Outfitters were trading at around $12.32 as of mid-morning on Monday. Google Finance Sweeney has remained silent throughout the debate. Advertisement Her political registration became a topic of discussion after Trump's comments, though she has not commented on how her voter status relates to the advertising controversy. The Post has sought comment from Sweeney and American Eagle Outfitters.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump vows to ‘substantially' hike India tariff with 25% rate set to take effect Thursday
WASHINGTON — President Trump vowed Monday to 'substantially' jack up the US tariff on imports from India due to New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil as Moscow's invasion of Ukraine grinds on. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits,' Trump warned on Truth Social. 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.' Advertisement 3 Trump vowed Monday to 'substantially' jack up the US tariff on imports from India. Getty Images 3 Trump blamed the move on New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. AFP via Getty Images Last week, Trump announced the US would charge a 25% duty on imports from India effective at 12:01 a.m. Thursday. Advertisement That is one day ahead of the Aug. 8 deadline Trump has given to Russia to pursue peace with Ukraine or face secondary sanctions or tariffs — penalties on countries that continue purchasing oil from Moscow. 3 An oil refinery operated by Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd., in Mumbai, India. Bloomberg via Getty Images India and China are widely seen as the two largest purchasers of Russian oil, which has helped the Kremlin withstand crippling sanctions and finance its war. Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to travel to Russia Wednesday to take another crack at persuading the Kremlin to begin negotiations.


Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
China and Russia Make Military Maneuvers After Trump's Nuclear Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Joint drills are taking place in the Sea of Japan by Russia and China following President Donald Trump's announcement that he had deployed U.S. nuclear submarines in response to threats from Vladimir Putin's ally. The Maritime Interaction 2025 exercises with Beijing had been planned before Trump denounced as "foolish and inflammatory" nuclear threats from former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev. But the drills are the latest sign of deepening military cooperation between the countries as Trump's announcement adds to growing tensions between Moscow and Washington. Retired U.S. Vice Admiral Robert Murrett told Newsweek that Trump's announcement about submarines could reflect a minor shift in the overall posture of U.S. nuclear forces. Fighter jets on China's aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, during a drill at sea on April 24, 2018. Fighter jets on China's aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, during a drill at sea on April 24, 2018. Getty Images Why It Matters Before Putin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia and China signed a "no limits" strategic partnership, and since then, their military and economic ties have increased, although Beijing has claimed neutrality in the war. China and Russia have carried out annual drills for years, but the latest ones come at a sensitive time in which Trump has expressed his growing anger with Putin and responded to Medvedev's nuclear saber rattling. What To Know The navies of Russia and China are conducting joint artillery and anti-submarine drills in the Sea of Japan, near the Russian port of Vladivostok, as part of the "Maritime Interaction-2025" exercise, Russian officials said on Sunday. Russian and Chinese media said the drills involved the joint detachment of Russian and Chinese warships, including a large Russian anti-submarine vessel and two Chinese destroyers. Also taking part were diesel-electric submarines from both countries and a Chinese submarine rescue ship. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, were taking part, according to China's Defense Ministry. The drills, which are scheduled to end on Tuesday, include artillery fire exercises, anti-submarine warfare training, air defense operations, and joint search and rescue missions. They follow Trump's comments on Friday that he had ordered the deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines in response to "highly provocative" statements from Medvedev about the possibility of war between the countries. Medvedev, who was Russian president between 2008 and 2012 and is now deputy chairman of the Federation Council, issued a veiled nuclear threat against the U.S. as referred to the "Dead Hand" system of retaliatory nuclear strikes created during the Soviet era. Trump called the comments "foolish and inflammatory" but did not specify whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines, nor did he reveal the locations, which would be kept secret by the U.S. military. Murrett, the deputy director of the Syracuse University Institute for Security Policy and Law, told Newsweek that what may have happened in response to the untoward remarks by Medvedev pales in comparison to some of the nuclear posturing that took place between the U.S. and Russia throughout the Cold War. "Having said that, any shift in nuclear posture should be carefully calibrated, and act as a deterrent and not a prelude to unchecked increased tensions," Murrett added. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump said of Dmitry Medvedev's post: "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences." Russia's Pacific Fleet, in a statement: "Ships and vessels of the Russian Navy and the Naval Forces of the People's Liberation Army of China entered the Sea of Japan from Vladivostok to conduct the practical part of the joint Russian-Chinese exercise "Maritime Interaction —2025." Retired U.S. Vice Admiral Robert Murrett told Newsweek: "The possible repositioning of USN submarines could reflect a minor shift in the overall posture of U.S. nuclear forces which are constantly assessed." Pavel Podvig, head of the Strategic Nuclear Weapons of Russia project, told Russian outlet RBC: "There is no qualitatively new and more serious threat to Russia here, rather the statement is more of symbolism." What Happens Next Although the drills end on Tuesday, Japan's Ministry of Defense warned that China's military cooperation with Russia poses serious security concerns. Meanwhile, Medvedev has not posted on social media since July 31, and Russian media outlets have largely not reacted to his spat with Trump, which could suggest a truce in the online war of words.