No roof, no rest for over 3 lakh people: Why Delhi still can't house its homeless
Live Events
Life on the pavement
Shelters that empty by morning
Supreme Court steps in
Gaps in policy and politics
What locals see, what they want
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Under Delhi's bridges, on its pavements, and near its markets, thousands sleep in the open every night. They sell balloons and trinkets at crossings by day. By night, they huddle beneath tarpaulin sheets, battling hunger, dust, noise and weather, as reported by TOI.Many arrived in the capital hoping for work. They stay back after dreams collapse, left with no roof over their heads. Some are alone. Others are with families. All try to carve out a life on concrete.Government efforts like the Support for Marginalised Individuals for Livelihood and Enterprise (SMILE) and the National Urban Livelihood Mission 's Shelter for Urban Homeless (SUH) promised change. Yet the numbers sleeping rough say otherwise.A major count conducted in August 2024 revealed that 1,56,369 people were sleeping on the streets between 11pm and 5.30am. The city's estimated homeless population is over 3,00,000, according to Dr Indu Prakash Singh, member of the State Level Shelter Monitoring Committee (SLSMC).'The current shelters are not enough,' said Dr Singh told TOI. 'Delhi has more shelters than many cities in the world. Govt also provides food and medicines at the shelters. But, there are not enough of them, and many people still sleep outside.'Dr Singh noted that despite a decade since the launch of the SUH scheme, shelter provision is still 90% below the requirement set by the Master Plan for Delhi 2021.The city's footpaths double up as kitchens. Boundary grills become clotheslines. The underside of flyovers serve as bedrooms. Entire families survive this way—elderly people, disabled individuals, pregnant women and children alike.'Remove poverty, bring jobs everywhere, and homelessness will disappear,' said Dr Singh. 'The tragedy of this country is that the poor are persecuted and not supported. If poverty schemes truly worked, we wouldn't be here discussing this.'He added, 'Homelessness isn't the issue. The lack of work is. The real problem is a govt deficit — not of money, but of care and commitment.'Despite government funding and court directives, shelters often stand underused or overwhelmed. A senior Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) official explained, 'The court has assigned us responsibility, but the challenge remains. Many homeless people return to the streets despite food and shelter. Some families stay for decades, others never come. We rescue at least 40–50 people daily. They use the night shelters but leave by morning. We urge donors to give to shelters.... We've proposed skill-based programmes for employment.'He said the issue was not just infrastructure. 'The lack of manpower (at the shelters) is a big issue. The key is creating jobs in home states to reduce migration to Delhi.'In February 2025, during a hearing on urban homelessness, the Supreme Court posed a pointed question: should jobs take precedence over handouts?While recognising the urgency of shelter, the court asked for a balance in welfare policies. It challenged whether one-time benefits were sustainable, especially when structural gaps in employment and housing remained.The BJP, ahead of its election promises, had pledged to remove homelessness entirely if it formed the government. Yet realities on the ground suggest long-term plans remain absent.According to Dr Singh, DUSIB—primarily an engineering body—has been burdened with social responsibilities that should fall under welfare departments. 'Govt must come up with a holistic policy on this — at central and state levels,' he said.The Centre for Holistic Development (CHD) also believes that short-term schemes aren't enough.Sunil Kumar Aledia, executive director of CHD, said: 'The cityscape may be important, but addressing the problem of homelessness is also crucial.' He stressed the need for structured efforts: 'Long-term planning, like the five-year plans we had earlier. There were discussions about housing rights for the homeless then.... We need at least five years of dedicated effort, especially for housing policies. Marginalised sections can contribute to the Smart City projects too.'He added, 'Homeless people would have to be brought to the mainstream.'Suchita Kacker Meena, a Delhi resident, offered a citizen's perspective. 'Sustainable solutions to homelessness lie in building more shelters, creating job opportunities and ensuring effective implementation of rehabilitation programmes.'This sentiment is echoed in many neighbourhoods where the homeless have become part of the local landscape—visible but largely ignored.While there are schemes, food vans, medicines, and occasional rescue drives, the core issue remains unaddressed—how does a city care for those it sees every day but rarely notices?With half the required shelters missing and few clear roadmaps ahead, Delhi's homeless continue to survive in fragments—half-visible in crowded streets and half-forgotten in public plans.(With inputs from TOI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Pilibhit Tiger Reserve introduces new method to count tigers by gender
The exercise showed an increase of eight tigers compared to the 71 counted in the National Tiger Conservation Authority's 2022 national estimation. PILIBHIT: The Pilibhit Tiger Reserve (PTR) has carried out a sex-based estimation of tigers in its core forest area, finding 14 males and 53 females. The gender of 12 tigers could not be determined due to unclear stripe patterns in images captured by camera traps, the officials said on Thursday. The internal estimation began in Nov last year, with the 602 sq km core forest divided into 316 grids of 2x2 km each. A total of 632 camera traps were installed in two phases, and the data was downloaded in March by World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) experts. Over four months, the images were analysed and matched to identify individual tigers. The exercise showed an increase of eight tigers compared to the 71 counted in the National Tiger Conservation Authority's 2022 national estimation. As per protocol, the internal survey excluded around 30–40% of PTR's tigers, which often stay in agricultural fields in nearby villages due to the reserve's overpopulation. 'If we include these stray tigers, the total population in Pilibhit could be close to 100,' said divisional forest officer Manish Singh. Singh added that the survey confirmed an ideal male-to-female ratio of 1:3–4. 'The salient finding was that some male tigers travelled over 70–80 km, which is unusual for this reserve,' he said. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Flag hoisting rules: Check these important dos and don'ts before celebrating Independence Day with the Tricolour
Flag Hoisting time and protocol on 15th August Dos for hoisting the Tricolour Hoist the flag briskly and lower it slowly with dignity. Keep the saffron band on top when displayed vertically. Display the flag in a prominent position, not overshadowed by other flags or objects. Ensure the flag is clean, undamaged, and of the correct proportions (3:2). Flags can be made of hand-spun, hand-woven, or machine-made cotton, polyester, wool, or silk khadi bunting. The flag may be flown by individuals, private organisations, and educational institutions on all days, including Sundays and holidays. The flag may be flown at night if it is well-lit and prominently displayed. During ceremonies, the flag may cover a statue or monument being unveiled but should not touch the ground. Damaged or soiled flags should be disposed of privately by burning or in a dignified manner. Don'ts for hoisting the Tricolour Do not dip the flag in salute to any person or object. Do not fly the flag upside down or in a disrespectful manner. Do not allow the flag to touch the ground, floor, or water. Do not use the flag for commercial purposes, such as costumes or decorative items, except as permitted. Do not use the flag as a covering for buildings, vehicles, or platforms, except in state or military funerals. Do not fly the flag alongside or below another flag in a way that reduces its prominence. Do not add writing, printing, or marks on the flag. Do not use the flag's design as clothing or accessories below the waist, though flag pins and emblems may be worn respectfully. Do not intentionally damage, burn, or mutilate the flag in public, as this is an offence under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971. Do not store the flag in a way that may cause damage. Flag Code Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Flag hoisting Independence Day 15th August 2025: India will celebrate its 79th Independence Day on August 15, honouring the sacrifices of freedom fighters and marking the country's liberation from nearly 200 years of British rule in 1947. The day will be observed across the country with the hoisting of the national flag, singing of the national anthem, and cultural to the Flag Code of India , the national flag should traditionally be hoisted at sunrise and lowered at sunset. Since the 2022 amendment, the flag can also be flown at night if it is adequately illuminated. On Independence Day, the flag is 'hoisted' from the bottom to the top of the pole, symbolising India's victory over colonial the 2002 amendment to the Flag Code, private citizens can hoist the national flag at homes, offices, or factories, provided the rules are followed. Any violation of the Flag Code or acts that insult the flag are punishable with up to three years' imprisonment, a fine, or both, under the Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971.
The Print
4 hours ago
- The Print
SC's stray dog order fails Delhi. Courtroom absolutes don't solve bad policy
The problem is real—even if much of the debate refuses to admit it. Many activists, whether driven by deep affection for dogs or simply insulated from the realities of India's streets, often dismiss these concerns outright. But their distance doesn't erase the risk. I still remember being chased by a stray dog on my way to the gym—managing to protect myself only because I happened to be carrying an umbrella. Yes, it's true that in many places, communities do coexist with stray dogs, and some even care for them. Dogs often recognise familiar residents and respond with calmness. But that recognition doesn't always extend to outsiders. I've seen how anyone unfamiliar—a delivery worker, a visitor, a passer-by can suddenly become a target. From a distance, the stray dog issue might appear to be just another matter of urban policy. But for the average Indian, it shapes daily life in far more visceral ways. According to the 2019 Livestock Census, India is home to over 1.5 crore stray dogs—creating one of the most densely entangled human-canine landscapes in the world. The country also accounts for 36 per cent of global rabies deaths. There are multiple cases of small babies being mauled to death by stray dogs in India. In Delhi alone, over 35,000 animal bite incidents were recorded between January and June 2025. These numbers offer only a partial picture. They don't fully convey what it means to navigate a street where safety feels negotiable, or how vulnerable one can feel—especially as a child, an elder, or someone walking alone—in a city that has outsourced its responsibility to coexistence without offering protection. Public response against the Supreme Court's order to relocate Delhi-NCR's stray dogs to shelters has already settled into the familiar shape of division. Most people seem to fall neatly into two camps—those who view the court's order as overdue action against a growing health threat, and those who see it as an attack on the basic dignity of animals. Even Rahul Gandhi has weighed in, calling the move 'a step back from decades of humane policy.' But like most public debates in India, the noise has overtaken the nuance. What's at stake isn't just whether stray dogs belong on the street—it's what kind of country responds to deep, systemic neglect with courtroom absolutes. What's needed now is a policy-based solution. The situation cannot remain suspended between denial and inaction—it has already cost lives. According to the World Health Organization, the true burden of rabies in India is not fully known, but estimates suggest between 18,000 and 20,000 deaths each year. The economic toll runs parallel. The average cost of post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies is over Rs 5,000 per case, a figure that places enormous strain on families and an already overburdened public health system. In some places, the absence of institutional response has led to a dangerous alternative of vigilante violence, with individuals killing stray dogs. And yet, the crisis cuts both ways. India's streets are also home to countless stray animals living in chronic neglect—underfed, injured, and exposed to disease. This is as much an animal welfare emergency as it is a public safety one. What we're left with is a city that fails both its people and its animals. Also read: Dogs matter more to Indian middle class than people Failure of governance Allowing stray dogs to continue living unregulated on India's streets is no longer a viable option—not for public health, and not for the animals themselves. A national approach to stray dog management is urgently needed. On that front, I agree with many animal rights advocates: The voiceless should not be subjected to solutions that amount to cruelty in the name of order. The Supreme Court's directive to relocate all strays within eight weeks is not just unrealistic, it borders on the inhumane. The order also seems to disregard existing law that permits sterilised dogs to be returned to their localities. A plan built around urgency rather than feasibility is unlikely to solve the problem it claims to address. Shelters have a role, but long-term solutions must confront root causes: Irresponsible pet ownership, lack of sterilisation services, and underfunded municipal systems. If this process is to mean anything, it must be implemented not just with resolve, but with timelines grounded in what's possible—not what simply looks decisive. In India, many who call themselves dog lovers often seem more invested in the idea of dogs than in the actual care they require. Behind the declarations of affection, there is often little regard for regulation, training, or responsibility. And it's not uncommon to see pet ownership tied to aspiration—with a preference for imported breeds over adoption from shelters. This disconnect isn't just social— it's built into the legal frameworks too. In India, a dog that bites is typically isolated for ten days to check for rabies. If it survives, it's vaccinated and returned. In the UK, by contrast, a dog that threatens or harms a person can be seized, its owner prosecuted, and in some cases, the animal put down. These are not small differences—they reveal how regulation, when absent or unclear, shifts the burden of danger onto the public, while also failing the animals themselves. In the end, a city that cannot protect either its people or its animals isn't just failing at compassion—it's failing to govern at all. And no courtroom directive can fix that unless it's matched with policy, accountability, and the political will to implement both. Amana Begam Ansari is a columnist, writer, and TV news panellist. She runs a weekly YouTube show called 'India This Week by Amana and Khalid'. She tweets @Amana_Ansari. Views are personal. (Edited by Theres Sudeep)
