
I've seen men watch porn in my workplaces. I reported it and was called ‘a prude'
Last week it was revealed that more than 28 per cent of women in the UK have been shown pornography at work by a manager, colleague or customer. The union
Unite
, which surveyed 300,000 women in 19 different sectors, said that construction, aviation, transport, food and drink, farming, trucking, warehousing and logistics all suffered from significant rates of harassment.
We're not immune from this behaviour in Ireland and it's not limited to certain sectors either. Over the last 20 years a banking chief executive was dismissed for viewing escort services at work. Also, two media employees were dismissed by their employers for having child sexual abuse imagery in their possession.
Personally, I've witnessed several men watching porn in my workplaces – with the knowledge of senior management – as well as experiencing this on a plane and the Dart. When I reported it to a senior manager at work he laughed and said: 'Don't be such a prude.'
READ MORE
Sadly, such attitudes persist. A quick scan of Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) decisions involving pornography shows similar managerial reactions in some cases and the dismissal of employees and managers who viewed, disseminated or condoned the viewing of pornographic images in others. Complainants were awarded damages of up to €40,000.
The daily commute is another hotspot for public porn, with passengers unwillingly subjected to it on buses, trains and planes. According to news reports from all over the State, some male passengers watch porn on their mobiles or computers, often without headphones, so anyone nearby is either forced to confront them or witness it too. Not the best way to start or end your work day.
What is the impact of this behaviour on women and men in the workplace and how can employers address it? What should you and your employer do if a colleague is watching pornography at work?
Employers have an obligation to provide a safe environment for their workers and this includes freedom from sexual harassment, intimidation and bullying. A workplace that allows, or chooses to ignore, these behaviours is putting itself at great risk legally, culturally, financially and reputationally.
[
Men who watch pornography have poorer wellbeing, ESRI study finds
Opens in new window
]
Openly viewing pornography at work may be considered sexual harassment and a form of discrimination, making it illegal in the workplace under the Employment Equality Acts 1998 and 2004. Additionally, the
Harassment, Harmful Communications and Related Offences Act 2020
strengthens the laws against harassment, including sexual harassment, both online and offline.
Sexual harassment is any form of unwanted words or physical actions of a sexual nature which deliberately or unintentionally violate your dignity, make you feel degraded and create an intimidating, hostile, humiliating or offensive environment for you. The unwanted actions may either deliberately aim to violate your dignity or unintentionally have that effect.
David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city
Listen |
36:51
Employers may be held legally responsible for workplace harassment, even though they did not personally carry it out. This is called 'vicarious liability'. It applies where an employer has some control over what happens at the workplace, even if they do not directly employ the person who harassed you.
Sexual harassment has a corrosive impact on workplace attitudes, behaviours and culture and creates a disconnect between women and men who work together. It's also bad for business.
The workplace is a reflection of society, both positive and negative, and employers need to recognise how current trends impact on their culture. Research in the Journal of Business Ethics by NW Mecham found that pornography has permeated the work environment.
Regular exposure to pornography increases the likelihood of impulsive or risky behaviour, according to the study. 'Consuming pornography causes individuals to be less ethical. We find that this relationship is mediated by increased moral disengagement from and dehumanisation of others due to viewing pornography. Combined, our results suggest that choosing to consume pornography causes individuals to behave less ethically.'
[
What are the new online safety regulations that Big Tech is unhappy about – and will they work?
Opens in new window
]
'Because unethical employee behaviour has been linked to numerous negative organisation outcomes including fraud, collusion and other self-serving behaviours, our results have implications for most societal organisations.'
Irish and international research has found that mainstream pornography does not just depict consensual sex between adults, it promotes violence.
Facing Reality: Addressing the Role of Pornography in the Pandemic of Violence against Women and Girls
by the Sexual Exploitation Research and Policy (SERP) Institute says 'there is an urgent need to comprehend and address pornography for what it truly is – the sexual violence, torture and degradation of real women and girls on film.'
'Scholars have argued that as pornography has become increasingly normalised and socially conceptualised as 'sexually explicit material', in fact contemporary pornography does not depict 'sex' in itself, but rather sexual violence masquerading as 'sex'.'
'Amongst men, higher pornography consumption has been found to be associated with views and attitudes towards women that amount to 'hostile sexism',' the report continues. 'A detailed review of studies on men's attitudes and behaviours found a significant positive association between the consumption of violent pornography and attitudes supporting violence against women.'
What does all this mean for workplace culture? Businesses cannot afford to ignore the impact of the 'normalisation' and pervasiveness of porn. It is training men and boys to dehumanise half the population and signalling to women and girls that they are less valued than men at work.
Regular pornography viewers tend to think negatively about women – or see them primarily as sex objects – so they're unlikely to want to work on an equal footing with them, or to help support women colleagues or promote them to managerial roles.
Dehumanising co-workers in this way might also lead to sexual harassment or contribute to a hostile work environment, which not only decreases organisational productivity but might spark expensive litigation, according to Mecham's research.
[
Pornography website access could be restricted by passports under new proposals
Opens in new window
]
In addition, these attitudes can impact on customer relationships and retention levels. 'Dehumanisation may adversely impact an organisation's ability to attract, develop and retain talented women employees, especially when people in leadership positions are using pornography and aggressively engaging in dehumanising behaviour.'
It's often said that workplace culture is dictated by the worst behaviour we allow. Businesses and organisations cannot divorce themselves from what's happening in wider society and they are required to take steps to protect workers from harm, no matter what form it takes.
Under Irish law, 'Employers must have comprehensive, accessible, effective polices that focus on prevention, best practice and remedial action. They must also have an accessible complaints procedure,' according to the
Code of Practice on Sexual Harassment and Harassment at Work
from the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission.
Employers are also required to take action if they become aware of an issue even if no complaint is filed. The existence of a policy document is not enough. 'Employers will not be able to rely on an excellent policy document if it is not implemented.'
So, the next time you hear about someone viewing pornography at work or on public transport, don't just laugh it off, report it.
Margaret E Ward is chief executive of Clear Eye, a leadership consultancy. margaret@cleareye.ie

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Family that rejected six housing offers fails in court bid for emergency accommodation
A mother and their children, who turned down six offers of houses by Clare County Council, have failed in their High Court bid to force the council to provide them with emergency accommodation. Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger ruled that Clare County Council had lawfully discharged its statutory duties regarding the provision of emergency accommodation to the family, which includes seven children. The judge said the family members are not entitled to require the council to offer them emergency accommodation from housing stock earmarked for social housing. Martina Sherlock Mongans and her seven children, who are members of the Travelling community, sought to bring proceedings against Clare County Council, the Minister for Housing, the Attorney General and Ireland, claiming they should be allocated emergency accommodation in a three-bedroom unit that is part of the council's social housing stock. READ MORE The family now lives in a single room in a relative's house. 'Undoubtedly, the situation in which they are currently living in one room in a relation's house is appalling,' the judge said. However, she found that the council acted 'reasonably and lawfully' in making six separate offers of emergency accommodation to them. She, therefore, could not find the circumstances required to interfere in how the council exercised its discretion. The family was evicted from a rented council house in Lahinch, Co Clare, in July 2024 and deemed homeless by the local authority. Hotel accommodation was arranged for several weeks from July 31st, 2024. Setting out the background to the case, the judge said that, since August 2024, six different own-door accommodation options have been offered as emergency accommodation. She said each had been refused for various reasons, including concerns about safety, suitability and distance from the children's schools. The judge said it is surprising that this 'entirely unsatisfactory arrangement prevails in preference to the six houses offered to the family'. She said this is perhaps indicative of how strongly the family feels about the conditions and location of each of the houses offered. The judge said the family did not establish any cause of action or grounds for her to permit them to bring their case against the State parties. The judge said the family wanted accommodation in Ennistymon or Lahinch, largely because of one of their children's educational needs. The judge said she was satisfied Clare County Council assessed the particular needs of the family in a manner that was reasonable, rational and lawful when offering them six of the accommodations. The judge said that, in effect, the family asserted a right to emergency accommodation in a house that the council has earmarked for social housing on the basis of exceptional circumstances in which they are currently living. The family's refusal of six separate offers of reasonable own-door accommodation means the family is no longer homeless within the meaning of the Housing Act, the judge found. 'The family are living in extremely difficult circumstances and no one could be anything but sympathetic and concerned at that. However, they do not have rights over and above what is provided for in legislation or any enhanced rights to determine subjectively what is or is not a reasonable accommodation for them,' the judge said.


Irish Times
18 hours ago
- Irish Times
Master brewer who died in Cork house fire remembered as ‘gentle giant with big heart'
A master brewer who died in a house fire in Cork city last week knew the importance of time and 'put more into the life of others than he took out,' his requiem Mass has heard. Peter Lyall, who was remembered as a 'gentle giant with a big heart,' died when a fire broke out at his home in Hollyhill in the early hours of July 21st. The 57-year-old, who worked at the Franciscan Well brewery in Cork for over two decades, was pronounced dead at the scene. His beloved dog Charlie also died. His partner Anna Neville managed to get out of the property and was transferred to hospital. Fr Sean O'Sullivan told mourners at St Mary's on the Hill Church, in Knocknaheeny on Monday that Mr Lyall learned a lot about life from the brewing process which he said involves 'choosing the finest ingredients', blending them in the right proportions and then giving them the time to ferment. READ MORE 'Family, friendship, his passion for work, his love of basketball and coaching, his love of fun and a bit of craic – they were the ingredients of his life he blended them into something that, like his beer, will last long beyond them.' Mr Lyall had also been a coach at Fr Mathew's Basketball club in the city. Shane Long, founder of The Franciscan Well bar and brewery, said Mr Lyall was a modest man. He said Mr Lyall was 'instrumental in producing a beer called Sunbeam' and that he never took any credit for it. 'And when everybody else is gone from here, his beer will still be there, a lasting memory for the amazing man he was.' He also said Mr Lyall met Ms Neville, 'the love of his life', over three decades ago and adored her, their children and grandchildren. Mr Lyall's grandson Paul said he had an infectious laugh which could be 'heard across a room and maybe even through the walls'. Chanice and Kia said he was a 'magical' grandfather who made them feel safe and loved and always told them how proud he was of them. Mr Lyall is survived by his partner Ms Neville, his daughters Sarah and Johann, his five siblings, grandchildren, relatives, neighbours and friends.


The Irish Sun
a day ago
- The Irish Sun
UK-wide emergency alert to OVERRIDE millions of phones & trigger loud siren – exact date you'll be hit
A UK wide emergency alert is set to override millions of phones and trigger a siren on your device. A message that will be sent to phones across the country in a national test of the UK's emergency alert system has been published in advance as the Government seeks to ready the public for the drill. Advertisement 1 A UK-wide emergency alert is set to override millions of phones in September Credit: Alamy Millions of devices will vibrate and make a siren sound for around 10 seconds as they receive the text of fewer than 100 words at around 3pm on September 7. It will assure the public that they "do not need to take any action" and include a message in both English and Welsh. The Government has been carrying out a public awareness campaign to ensure people know when the test is taking place, including those facing domestic abuse who may have hidden phones. On Monday, the Cabinet Office said the text message will include both English and Welsh and be sent to mobile phones on 4G and 5G networks in the UK. Advertisement Read more News It will read: "This is a test of Emergency Alerts, a UK government service that will warn you if there's a life-threatening emergency nearby. "You do not need to take any action. In a real emergency, follow the instructions in the alert to keep yourself and others safe. "Find simple and effective advice on how to prepare for emergencies at . "Visit for more information or to view this message in Welsh. " Advertisement Most read in The Sun Live Blog Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said: "Just like the fire alarm in your house, it's important we test this system so that we know it will work if we need it. New Emergency Alerts system will inform people who are in immediate danger by sending alerts direct to mobile phones "The alerts have the potential to save lives." Since the first national test of the system in April 2023, five alerts have been sent, including during major storms such as Storm Eowyn in January when lives were at risk. Other activations have took place when an unexploded Second World War bomb was discovered in Plymouth, as well as during flash floods in Cumbria and Leicestershire. Advertisement Some MPs have called on ministers to use different modes of communication for the alert in order to ensure it reaches people who do not have access to a phone. Liberal Democrat Cabinet Office spokeswoman Sarah Olney has suggested the Government follows Scandinavian examples where the public have been handed pamphlets about preparing for emergencies.