[Editorial] Keep up cooperation
The top diplomats from South Korea, China and Japan met in Tokyo on Saturday.
Their meeting came a year and four months after their last gathering in Busan, South Korea, in November 2023.
It is noteworthy that they met a day after top Russian security official Sergei Shoigu visited Pyongyang, demonstrating the cozy relationship between Russia and North Korea.
South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul said in a joint press conference after the meeting that South Korea, China and Japan affirmed that maintaining peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula serves the common interests of the three countries.
He said that Russia and North Korea should stop their military cooperation immediately and that North Korea should not be rewarded for actions such as dispatching its troops to Ukraine to fight for Russia. There are concerns that Russia may provide advanced military technology to North Korea in return.
It is worrisome that Pyongyang-Moscow ties, buttressed by their treaty on a comprehensive strategic partnership signed in June last year, have deepened to the level of troop deployments. Under the treaty, should either nation find itself in a state of war due to an armed invasion, the other must provide military assistance without delay.
In Pyongyang, Shoigu reportedly presented an 'important signed letter' from Russian President Vladimir Putin to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. The former Russian defense minister is said to have exchanged views on issues related to defending the security interests of the two countries.
As North Korea-Russia relations get closer, South Korea's diplomacy with China grows in importance.
However, South Korea and Japan, traditionally aligned with Washington, are in a similar position on security and North Korea issues, while there are subtle differences between them and China.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi stressed a political solution to Korean Peninsula problems but without mentioning North Korea. Seoul should ask Beijing to play a role in containing its ally North Korea.
To mitigate the negative impacts of North Korea's closer ties with Russia, it would be helpful to strengthen cooperation with China and Japan in addition to cooperating with the US and Japan.
But balanced diplomacy is required because an excessive inclination toward Beijing will invite backlash from Washington.
South Korea and Japan differ from Beijing on North Korea issues, and they are also cautious about Beijing's push for regional economic integration. In this situation, it is desirable to focus first on cultural exchanges to advance trilateral cooperation.
Fortunately, Cho and Wang agreed to work harder to improve the mutual understanding between the two nations, raising expectations for Beijing to lift its ban on the import of Korean culture such as K-music and K-drama.
Though China has not acknowledged the ban officially, it has effectively been in force for nearly 10 years. It was imposed in protest against the deployment of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, a US anti-missile system, to South Korea in 2016.
The meeting of foreign ministers from South Korea, China and Japan is an important diplomatic platform. However, sustaining their cooperation is not easy because their interests are entangled. South Korea should keep up the trilateral cooperation through the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit, which it will host in Gyeongju, North Gyeongsang Province, in October.
However, Seoul needs to be wary of Beijing's expansionist moves. China unilaterally erected a large unauthorized steel structure within the South Korea-China Provisional Measures Zone in the Yellow Sea off the west coast of South Korea. Seoul suspects that Beijing might claim later an area around the structure as its territorial waters, infringing on South Korea's legitimate maritime interests. Of course, China's basic perceptions of its ally North Korea are little changed.
South Korea-US-Japan cooperation is always important. Seoul's cooperation with Beijing is important, too, but there must be a stern response on security and territorial issues. South Korea-China-Japan cooperation should be strengthened on this premise.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
29 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Westinghouse deal tensions loom over Korea-US summit
Controversial KHNP agreement faces backlash at home as leaders prepare to discuss nuclear energy cooperation Escalating tensions over a deal between South Korea's state-run energy firms and US company Westinghouse are complicating the agenda for the upcoming Korea-US summit, where nuclear energy cooperation is expected to take center stage. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in Washington next Monday for their summit, with officials saying nuclear partnership will be high on the agenda. According to a local media report on Wednesday, state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power and Westinghouse, the two companies at the heart of the controversy, are preparing to form a joint venture to enter the US nuclear reactor market on the occasion of the upcoming summit. The report explained that since KHNP cannot independently access the US market, it plans to enter through a partnership with the American firm while handling most of the construction work. Nuclear energy's inclusion on the summit agenda was widely expected, given that the sector was part of South Korea's $200 billion investment pledge in the US under the tariff deal announced last month. President Trump has vowed to expand US nuclear energy capacity from 97 gigawatts to 400 gigawatts by 2050. Achieving this target would require constructing approximately 300 new 1,000-megawatt reactors. Industry observers view the US as eyeing Korean companies' technological expertise and construction capabilities to meet this goal. The plan comes amid controversy over a separate agreement that KHNP and Korea Electric Power Corp. struck with Westinghouse in January, sparking worries about potential summit implications. The settlement resolved Westinghouse's claims that KHNP had violated its intellectual property rights by using licensed Westinghouse technology in the development of its APR 1000 and 1400 nuclear reactor designs. The deal cleared the way for a KHNP-led consortium to sign an estimated 26 trillion won ($18.58 billion) contract in June to build two nuclear reactors in the Czech Republic. But after details of the settlement came to light on Monday following another local media report, the state-run company came under fire for agreeing to lopsided conditions to reach a swift deal, while burdening itself with hefty financial commitments. According to the agreement, KHNP agreed to sign contracts for goods and services worth $650 million with Westinghouse for each export of a single nuclear reactor, and to pay an additional $175 million per reactor in technology licensing fees. The 50-year deal also contains a provision requiring Westinghouse to verify the technical independence of Korean companies before they can bid on overseas nuclear reactor projects, including small modular reactors. It also restricted KHNP to pursuing nuclear projects in only 12 designated countries -- including the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Egypt, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan, Turkey, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa -- while barring it from new deals in North America, Britain, Japan, Ukraine and the EU, except for the Czech Republic. Lawmakers blamed KHNP for bowing to US pressure to secure the Czech deal. 'It has been confirmed that the Yoon Suk Yeol government signed an unfair contract with Westinghouse to break the deadlock in the Czech project,' said Rep. Han Jeong-ae of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea at the National Assembly on Tuesday. Amid the controversy, KHNP CEO Whang Joo-ho on Tuesday said the deal terms remain within acceptable limits, but he declined to provide detailed answers, citing confidentiality obligations. 'While I cannot say (Westinghouse's demands) are justified, they are something tolerable enough for us to endure and still generate profit,' Whang said at the National Assembly. Meanwhile, opposition People Power Party lawmakers also stressed that just before the Korea-US summit, it may not serve the national interest for the parliament to directly confront the Westinghouse issue. 'Westinghouse may hold the original technology, but it lacks the construction capacity to independently build reactors, which means Korean companies are likely to handle the construction,' said an industry insider on condition of anonymity. 'Even if the deal is viewed as unfavorable, I believe it was inevitable if Korean companies are going to expand their overseas nuclear businesses.' Amid growing backlash, South Korea's presidential office has ordered the Industry Ministry to investigate the deal to verify that the negotiations and contract process were carried out based on laws and regulations and in accordance with principles and procedures.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
Kim Jong-un issues inter-Korean policy rejecting Seoul's olive branch
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on Tuesday conveyed his inter-Korean policy plan through his sister Kim Yo-jong, who handed it down during a meeting with key Foreign Ministry officials while denouncing Seoul's olive-branch offer as 'deceptive,' state media reported Wednesday. Seoul swiftly rejected the charge. The presidential office said, "It is regrettable that a North Korean official distorts and misrepresents our sincere efforts." President Lee Jae Myung's office also pledged to "move beyond an era of hostility and confrontation, restore mutual trust, and open a new era of peaceful coexistence and joint growth on the Korean Peninsula." North Korea's latest statement was part of a series of high-level pronouncements that zeroed in on what it labeled a "contradiction" in the Lee administration's conciliatory inter-Korean policy — pointing to the ongoing Ulchi Freedom Shield exercise between South Korea and the US. Kim Yo-jong, vice department director of the Party Central Committee, 'conveyed and assigned the head of state's foreign policy plan at a consultative meeting with director generals of the Foreign Ministry,' state-run Korean Central News Agency reported Wednesday in a Korean-language dispatch. At the same time, Kim 'sharply criticized the essence of the Republic of Korea government's deceptive 'appeasement offensive' and its two-faced nature,' KCNA added, referring to South Korea by its official name. 'Clarifying once again on this occasion, the ROK cannot become our state's diplomatic counterpart,' Kim was quoted as saying in the KCNA report. 'The DPRK Foreign Ministry must properly seek accurate countermeasures regarding relations with the most hostile state and with the states that listen to its agitation, based on the conclusion of our head of state, who pointed out the true nature of the ROK," Kim said. DPRK stands for North Korea's official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. KCNA reported that Kim Yo-jong "analyzed Seoul's behavior of pretending as if the ROK's policy toward the DPRK is making a 'rapid U-turn'" during the meeting. Kim specifically dismissed President Lee's Aug. 15 National Liberation Day speech, in which Lee pledged to respect the North Korean system, not to pursue unification by absorption and clarified South Korea's intent not to conduct any hostile acts. Then, Kim denounced the Lee administration for 'parroting' its predecessors' rhetoric by describing the annual combined military exercises between South Korea and the United States as defensive in nature. 'This is a passage that vividly reflects the double-faced character of the Seoul authorities, whose inside and outside are different," Kim was quoted as saying in the KCNA report. "Whoever in the ROK it may be, one must not forget the fact that they are America's top-class running dog.' Mounting pressure before Lee-Trump summit Lim Eul-chul, a professor at Kyungnam University's Institute for Far Eastern Studies in Seoul, assessed that 'Kim Yo-jong's core message is essentially a propaganda line.' 'The point is that as long as the South Korean government remains subordinate to the US, it cannot create a new history of sustainable and peaceful inter-Korean relations," Lim said. 'North Korea is seeking to push the Lee Jae Myung administration into making a more drastic shift from its hostile policy toward the North — including the suspension of ROK-US military exercises — by exerting maximum pressure on the administration.' The latest remarks followed Kim Jong-un's order — issued Monday, the first day of the Ulchi Freedom Shield regular exercises between South Korea and the US — calling for a rapid nuclear buildup and denouncing the combined drills. On Aug. 14, Kim Yo-jong had similarly criticized the exercises, claiming that the Lee administration's policy toward North Korea 'has not changed in the least and cannot change.' The string of denunciatory statements comes ahead of the first summit between President Lee and US President Donald Trump on Aug. 25 in Washington. Lim further explained that the outcomes of the Lee-Trump summit 'are expected to have a significant impact on inter-Korean relations.' 'The key question is whether the results will show weakened dependence on the US and greater diplomatic autonomy vis-a-vis the US,' Lim said. 'However, North Korea is likely well aware of the structural constraints and dilemmas the Lee administration faces.'
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump eyes air support for Ukraine, no US ground troops
WASHINGTON/LONDON/KYIV (Reuters) -- President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine, but said the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia's war in the country. A day after Trump pledged security guarantees to help end the war at an extraordinary White House summit, the path to peace remained uncertain as the US and allies prepared to work out what military support for Ukraine might include. "When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably ... by air," Trump said in an interview with the Fox News "Fox & Friends" program. Trump did not elaborate. Later, in an interview with radio host Mark Levin, Trump characterized his negotiating style in trying to end the war as "probably instinct more than process." Following Monday's meeting, Russia launched its biggest air assault in more than a month on Ukraine, with 270 drones and 10 missiles launched, the Ukrainian air force said. The energy ministry said the strikes caused big fires at energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery. Trump conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal after all, saying, "We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks." The nature of US military aid for Ukraine under a peace deal was unclear. Air support could take many forms, such as missile defense systems or fighter jets enforcing a no-fly zone. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that US air support was "an option and a possibility," but, like Trump, she did not provide any details. "The president has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies," she said at a news briefing. Analysts say more than 1 million people have been killed or wounded in the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hailed the White House talks as a "major step forward" toward ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and setting up a trilateral meeting with Putin and Trump. Zelenskyy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous Oval Office meeting in February. Trump discussed Budapest as a venue for a summit involving Zelenskyy and Putin with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Tuesday, a White House official said. Istanbul, where delegations for the two countries have met previously, has also been mentioned, a senior administration official said. Hungary is one of the few European places that Putin could visit without fear of arrest on International Criminal Court charges as Orban maintains close ties with the Russian leader. It was unclear whether Ukraine would accept Hungary as a venue. Neutral Switzerland also said it would be ready to host Putin for any peace talks. "They are in the process of setting it up," Trump told radio host Levin about a Putin/ Zelenskyy meeting. But Trump cast doubt on whether he would attend. "Now I think it would be better if they met without me. ... If necessary, I'll go," he said. Trump, asked by Levin how he balanced the interests of all the parties involved, said, "Well, it's probably instinct more than process. I have instincts." Ukraine's allies held talks in the so-called Coalition of the Willing format on Tuesday, discussing additional sanctions to crank up the pressure on Russia. The grouping has also agreed that planning teams will meet US counterparts in the coming days to develop security guarantees for Ukraine. NATO military leaders were expected to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, with US General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expected to attend virtually, officials told Reuters. Putin has said Russia will not tolerate troops from the NATO alliance in Ukraine. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his summit with Trump on Friday in Alaska. Neil Melvin, a director at the International Security at the Royal United Services Institute think-tank, said Russia could drag out the war while trying to deflect US pressure with a protracted peace negotiation. Melvin said both Ukraine and its European allies on one side and Russia on the other were striving "not to present themselves to Trump as the obstacle to his peace process." "They're all tiptoeing around Trump" to avoid any blame, he said, adding that Trump's statements on security guarantees were "so vague it's very hard to take it seriously."
