logo
Push for defence spend spike after NATO vote

Push for defence spend spike after NATO vote

Perth Now5 hours ago

The opposition is renewing its call on Labor to boost the defence budget after NATO countries agreed to dramatically hike military spending.
All 32 NATO members agreed overnight to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP at a summit in the Netherlands.
The decision is a major win for Donald Trump, who has threatened to drop US military support for Europe if it did not splash more cash.
Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles was at the summit representing Australia as a member of the Indo Pacific Four (IP4).
He told reporters in The Hague that 'obviously a very significant decision has been made here in relation to European defence spending', but noted it was 'fundamentally a matter for NATO'. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles says Labor is funding Australia's defence needs. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
'We've gone through our own process of assessing our strategic landscape, assessing the threats that exist there, and the kind of defence force we need to build in order to meet those threats, to meet the strategic moment, and then to resource that,' he said.
'And what that has seen is the biggest peacetime increase in Australian defence spending that we have seen in our history.'
Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor took a different view.
He welcomed NATO's commitment, saying on Thursday 'we do need to see countries around the world upping their defence spend', including Australia.
'Authoritarian regimes are flexing their muscles,' Mr Taylor told Sky News.
'We're seeing it … with Iran, we've seen it with Russia, and of course, we're seeing it in the Indo Pacific as well.
'And all of that means that we do need to see democratic countries from the West making sure that they're spending what is necessary to make sure we can defend ourselves in these uncertain times.
'The Prime Minister himself has said, these are the most uncertain times since the Second World War, and I think that is absolutely right.
'But you've got to fund your plans. Labor hasn't been funding their plan.' Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor is calling on Labor to hike defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
Pressed on what he thought Labor should be spending, Mr Taylor said 3 per cent of GDP would be sufficient.
'It's incredibly important that we fund the plan necessary for our sovereignty … but for us also to be a good ally of our allies around the world,' he said.
'We're not doing this because Trump is asking for it – in fact, our position was well ahead of that.
'We're doing it because it's the right thing to do in a highly uncertain world where authoritarian regimes are flexing their muscles.'
The Coalition's proposed 3 per cent increase is still well-short of what Washington has asked for.
During a meeting with Mr Marles earlier this month, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called on the Albanese government to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.
It ignited a major debate in Canberra and fuelled criticisms that Australia is ill-prepared to defend itself against an increasingly aggressive China.
While the Albanese government has committed record cash for the defence budget, much of it would not kick in until after 2029.
With the Australia itself predicting a major global conflict by 2034 and some analysts warning of a US-China conflict before 2030, critics have argued the money is not flowing fast enough and instead tied up in longer-term projects at the cost of combat-readiness.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chalmers sues China-linked companies over crucial military minerals
Chalmers sues China-linked companies over crucial military minerals

The Age

time26 minutes ago

  • The Age

Chalmers sues China-linked companies over crucial military minerals

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched an unprecedented lawsuit against China-linked interests to force them to sell their stake in an Australian rare earths miner, whose products are crucial to warplanes, missiles and submarines. The lawsuit, filed in the Federal Court on Thursday against foreign investors in Northern Minerals, is also seeking financial penalties for allegedly refusing to obey Chalmers' direction to sell out of the company last year. The Australian-listed company is developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in remote northern Western Australia, which could be one of the first non-Chinese sources of the minerals used in military guidance systems, wind turbines and electric vehicles. Chalmers' court action against an entity called Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd and a former associate follows his order last year for five Chinese-linked groups to sell their shares in Northern Minerals to unconnected buyers by September. 'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law,' Chalmers said in a statement. 'We are doing what is necessary to protect the national interest and the integrity of our foreign investment framework.' China's control of rare earths and critical products is an escalating cause of concern to the United States and countries like Australia, after Donald Trump's trade war prompted Beijing to restrict shipments of the materials. It has made similar moves before, including against Japan in 2010 during a territorial dispute. China controls nearly all of the world's heavy rare earth production and Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior fellow Ian Satchwell said the global superpower's interests were seeking to exert influence over Northern Minerals. 'Australia, with like-minded partner nations, is seeking to build alternative supply chains for rare earths and other critical minerals, and the Northern Minerals shenanigans are a very obvious example of China-linked bad faith investing to allegedly seek to disrupt those efforts,' Satchwell said. 'In Australia's case those rare earths are used for things such as F35 fighters, missiles attached to them and in the future, nuclear-powered submarines.'

Chalmers sues China-linked companies over crucial military minerals
Chalmers sues China-linked companies over crucial military minerals

Sydney Morning Herald

time26 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Chalmers sues China-linked companies over crucial military minerals

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched an unprecedented lawsuit against China-linked interests to force them to sell their stake in an Australian rare earths miner, whose products are crucial to warplanes, missiles and submarines. The lawsuit, filed in the Federal Court on Thursday against foreign investors in Northern Minerals, is also seeking financial penalties for allegedly refusing to obey Chalmers' direction to sell out of the company last year. The Australian-listed company is developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in remote northern Western Australia, which could be one of the first non-Chinese sources of the minerals used in military guidance systems, wind turbines and electric vehicles. Chalmers' court action against an entity called Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd and a former associate follows his order last year for five Chinese-linked groups to sell their shares in Northern Minerals to unconnected buyers by September. 'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law,' Chalmers said in a statement. 'We are doing what is necessary to protect the national interest and the integrity of our foreign investment framework.' China's control of rare earths and critical products is an escalating cause of concern to the United States and countries like Australia, after Donald Trump's trade war prompted Beijing to restrict shipments of the materials. It has made similar moves before, including against Japan in 2010 during a territorial dispute. China controls nearly all of the world's heavy rare earth production and Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior fellow Ian Satchwell said the global superpower's interests were seeking to exert influence over Northern Minerals. 'Australia, with like-minded partner nations, is seeking to build alternative supply chains for rare earths and other critical minerals, and the Northern Minerals shenanigans are a very obvious example of China-linked bad faith investing to allegedly seek to disrupt those efforts,' Satchwell said. 'In Australia's case those rare earths are used for things such as F35 fighters, missiles attached to them and in the future, nuclear-powered submarines.'

AI could create more jobs: Minister pushes light-touch regulation
AI could create more jobs: Minister pushes light-touch regulation

AU Financial Review

time33 minutes ago

  • AU Financial Review

AI could create more jobs: Minister pushes light-touch regulation

The Labor minister tasked with fixing Australia's flagging productivity has played down fears artificial intelligence will kill off swaths of white-collar jobs and called for light-touch regulation of the disruptive technology. Assistant Minister for Productivity Andrew Leigh cited recent studies which suggested companies adopting AI experienced productivity gains of up to 40 per cent, with the biggest benefit accruing to less skilled workers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store